
False Ideas About Truth - Part 4
0:00
16:07
References:
(1) “What is truth?” was Pilate’s sarcastic response. Pilate turned on his heels and went out to speak with those demanding Jesus’ execution. He did not have time to ponder the question of the ages.
(2) Pilate washed his hands before the multitude, saying “I am innocent of the blood of this JUST PERSON.” As Pilate was sitting on the JUDGMENT SEAT he released Barnabas, and he SCOURGED Jesus and delivered Him to be crucified [Matt. 27:26]. He did this despite the fact that he knew that Jesus was innocent, and despite his wife’s warning saying, “Have nothing to do with this JUST MAN, for I have suffered many things today in a DREAM because of Him” [Matt. 27:19]. So Pilate and his wife both knew Jesus was just.
(3) Some early Christian writers, such as Origen, suggested that Pilate’s wife CONVERTED to Christianity after the resurrection due to the dream. Eastern tradition VENERATE her as a saint, while Western interpretations are ambivalent concerning her.
(4) The Gospel of John invites readers to DECIDE whether they will echo Pilates DISMISSAL and REJECTION or “believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have LIFE in His name” (John 20:31). It’s your CHOICE, but that choice has eternal CONSEQUENCES.
(5) Some Christians, such as Augustine, and historians, such as Eusebius, wrote that Pontius Pilate became a Christian after learning about several MIRACULOUS EVENTS that occurred following Jesus' death.
(6) Ultimately Pontius Pilate remains one of the most COMPLEX and CONTROVERSIAL figures associated with Jesus' crucifixion. Scripture presents him as a man who recognized Jesus' innocence yet he yielded to political pressure and fear of unrest. History outside the Bible offers fragments, accusations, legends, and theories — but no definitive account of Pilate’s final years or his ultimate spiritual condition.
(7) In the book The Comprehensive Guide to Apologetics edited by Joseph M. Holden in chapter 6 in an article Richard G. Howe writes “To ask the question, ‘What is truth?’ is to address the 2 separate issues of THEORIES of truth and TESTS of truth. A test for truth is how one DISCOVERS whether a statement is TRUE. By contrast a THEORY of truth is how one DEFINES the terms TRUE and TRUTH. It is the difference between DISCOVERING truth and DEFINING truth.”
(8) In terms of truth I list 8 self-defeating statements we hear in our secular culture and record the obvious counter questions, 3 come from Frank Turek’s book Stealing From God and 5 from an article called Road Runner and Self-Defeating Arguments by Vance Bradley on the web cite reddoorofsoro.org.
(9) In the book I Don’t Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist the authors Norman Geisler and Frank Turek recommend what they call “the Road Runner Tactic” that takes statements that culture offers, and applies the statement to ITSELF to see if they make sense or are self-defeating.
(10) Self-defeating statements VIOLATE the law of LOGIC called the law of NONCONTRADICTION which says that OPPOSITE ideas cannot be true at the same time and in the same sense. This tactic quickly identifies the FALSE STATEMENTS and FALSE PHILOSOPHIES that permeate our secular culture.
This is episode 271.
Fler avsnitt från "Defending and Commending the Faith With Dr. Joe L. Mott, inviting the atheist, agnostic and skeptic to examine for themselves the evidence for the Christian faith"



Missa inte ett avsnitt av “Defending and Commending the Faith With Dr. Joe L. Mott, inviting the atheist, agnostic and skeptic to examine for themselves the evidence for the Christian faith” och prenumerera på det i GetPodcast-appen.








