
False Ideas About Truth - Part 3
0:00
17:10
References:
(1) In Episode 268 we began discussing Frank Turek’s 4 questions that prove Christianity is true. Turek was considering Norman Geisler’s 12 points that shows Christianity is true and reduces Geisler’s argument down to 4 questions leaving out some obvious logical points.
(2) The reason these questions are so VITAL are that they deal with our POSITION in ETERNITY (not to mention a BETTER LIFE here and now on earth). If, in fact, God is real and the NT is reliable, then what the Gospels say about Jesus is that He is who He claimed to be.
(3) John 3:36 says, “He who believes in the Son HAS everlasting life; and he who does not believe the Son shall NOT SEE LIFE, but the WRATH of God abides on him.”
This makes the alternatives in eternity VERY CLEAR. Either (1) BELIEVE and ACCEPT Jesus in order to possess eternal life; or (2) REJECT Jesus and NOT SEE LIFE — instead you will be facing the WRATH of God.
(4) The NT describes the fate of the nonbeliever by referring to this verse: “If anyone not found written in the Book of Life (meaning those receiving life through accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior), he was thrown into the lake of fire” (where Satan, the beast, and the false prophet were thrown (Rev. 20:15).
(5) Of course, truth exists. The mathematical statement 2 + 2 = 4 is true. The sentence: the earth is not flat — is true. The freezing and boiling temperatures for water are true. Historical events are true. John F. Kennedy was assassinated while riding in a presidential motorcade through Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas, on Friday, November 22, 1963. Leviticus 17:11 emphasizes the importance of blood for life, which aligns with modern medical understanding of blood’s role in health. Rom. 8:21 speaks of the idea of decay and disorder in the universe, which relates to the second law of thermodynamics. It’s true that the universe had a beginning a finite time ago by the Big Bang. Isa. 40:22 implies the expansion of the universe, which is supported by modern cosmology.
(6) The atheist claims there is no God, then objective moral values do not exist according to the atheist. But Christians biblical worldview know some moral values do exist. For example, Prov. 6: 16-19 lists 7 things that are an abomination to the Lord including a proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood. Thus, abortion is wrong, and the atheist is wrong by Craig’s Moral argument. If there is no moral truth, everything is permissible as Dostoevsky said. Jesus said, “If you abide in My Word, you are My disciples indeed. And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:31-32).
(7) One of my favorite authors is the late philosopher Francis Schaeffer. He said, “There must be an ABSOLUTE if there are to be MORALS, and there must be an ABSOLUTE if there are to be VALUES. If there is no absolute BEYOND MAN’S IDEAS, then there is NO FINAL APPEAL to judge between individuals and groups whose moral judgments CONFLICT.”
(8) In the trial before the Roman prefect of Judea, Pontius Pilate, who asked Jesus in John 18:33, “Are you the King of the Jews?” Later in 18:37 Pilate asked, “Are you a king then?” Jesus answered, “You say rightly that I am a king. For this cause I was BORN, and for this cause I have COME into the world, that I should BEAR WITNESS to the TRUTH. Everyone who is of the TRUTH hears My voice” (John 18:37).
(9) The irony is DELIBERATE: Pilate had said to Jesus in John 19:10, “Do you not know that I have the power to crucify You, and power to release You?” Pilate is talking to Truth incarnate yet Pilate CANNOT or WILL NOT recognize Him despite the fact that he knows Jesus is innocent.
(10) Pilate was violating what he knew that Jesus was innocent and His wife’s warning where she said, “I dreamed about this man last night. He is a good man, don’t have anything to do with hurting Him” (Matt. 27:19).
(11) The dream serves multiple purposes in the biblical narrative: It is seen as God’s way of confirming Jesus’ innocence to Pilate. Pilate’s wife’s message intensifies Pilate’s moral accountability, showing that even those close to him were aware of the MORAL GRAVITY of condemning Jesus.
This is episode 270.
Fler avsnitt från "Defending and Commending the Faith With Dr. Joe L. Mott, inviting the atheist, agnostic and skeptic to examine for themselves the evidence for the Christian faith"



Missa inte ett avsnitt av “Defending and Commending the Faith With Dr. Joe L. Mott, inviting the atheist, agnostic and skeptic to examine for themselves the evidence for the Christian faith” och prenumerera på det i GetPodcast-appen.








