The Epstein Rewind: Prince Andrew And The Townhouse Belonging To Epstein

Edward Bramson was one of the most outspoken voices on the board at Barclays to call for Jes Staley to be shown the door. In a battle of attrition that lasted over two years, Bramson finally won out when Staley announced he was leaving Barclays over his ties to Epstein. In this episode, we take a look back at how we got here. (Commercial at 11:07)To contact me:[email protected]:https://news.sky.com/story/barclays-activist-renews-attack-on-staley-over-epstein-ties-12078940Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein might as well have been the governor for all of the people who were coming and going to see him while he was in jail. From alleged co-conspirators to lawyers and confidantes, we have the details in this episode.(commercial at 10:21)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/12/jeffrey-epstein-met-in-jail-with-alan-dershowitz-bill-clinton-pal.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this look back episode, we find out that Epstein's brother has reported that Epstein had unexplained injuries to his wrists and shoulder as well as the other already reported injuries. He also says he has NOT been given the findings of the medical examiner despite her proclamation that she did provide all pertinent records. (Commercial at 9:05)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/jeffrey-epstein-unexplained-injuries-wrists-shoulder-brother.ampBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this look back episode...According to explosive documents Prince Andrew was present when Epstein abused "Katlyn Doe" in an assault that was so brutal and graphic that it couldn't be heard in court.Prince Andrew has denied these reports and has continued to refuse to help the investigation.(commercial at 9:11)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11642492/prince-andrew-jeffrey-epsteins-mansion-same-time-abused-sex-slave/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Virginia Giuffre, formerly known as Virginia Roberts, has alleged that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell trafficked her to several prominent individuals for sexual encounters during the early 2000s. In legal depositions and public statements, she has named Prince Andrew, Duke of York; former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson; former U.S. Senator George Mitchell; attorney Alan Dershowitz; financier Glenn Dubin; modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel; and the late MIT scientist Marvin Minsky. All of these individuals have denied Giuffre's allegations, and many have provided statements refuting any wrongdoing or association with her claims. It's important to note that these allegations have not been adjudicated in a court of law, and the named individuals maintain their innocence.In 2024, a federal judge ordered the unsealing of court documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, revealing the identities of over 170 individuals previously concealed under pseudonyms. These documents, part of a lawsuit against Epstein's associate Ghislaine Maxwell, named high-profile figures such as former President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and renowned physicist Stephen Hawking. While the release has reignited public interest and speculation, it's important to note that inclusion in these documents does not necessarily imply involvement in any wrongdoing. Many of the named individuals have denied any misconduct or close association with Epstein.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing over 100 alleged victims in sexual assault lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs, has encountered a significant legal hurdle. The Committee on Grievances for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) recently denied his application for admission to practice in the district, citing his failure to seek proper admission before appearing in cases within its jurisdiction. This decision restricts Buzbee from litigating in the SDNY, which encompasses key areas including New York City's five boroughs.In response, Buzbee has indicated plans to seek "pro hac vice" admission, a legal provision allowing attorneys not licensed in a specific jurisdiction to practice temporarily for particular cases, contingent upon court approval. This process requires him to attach the denial order to each request for admission moving forward. Despite this setback, Buzbee maintains that he is licensed to practice law in New York State and remains committed to his ongoing cases.to contact me:[email protected]:Tony Buzbee, attorney for sexual assault suits against Jay-Z and Diddy, hit with minor roadblockBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In recent developments in the Bryan Kohberger case, Idaho Judge Steven Hippler has denied the defense's motion to exclude key DNA evidence. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022, argued that the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) to link him to the crime scene violated his constitutional rights. However, Judge Hippler ruled that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA found at a crime scene, allowing the prosecution to use this evidence in the upcoming trial. Additionally, the judge upheld the admissibility of digital evidence from Kohberger's online accounts and cellphone data, as well as the legality of trash collection from his parents' home, further strengthening the prosecution's case.In preparation for the trial, which is scheduled to begin in August 2025, Kohberger has added San Francisco attorney Bicka Barlow to his defense team. Barlow, an expert in DNA forensics, has been admitted pro hac vice, allowing her to represent Kohberger in Idaho despite being licensed in California. Her expertise is expected to play a crucial role in challenging the DNA evidence presented by the prosecution. If convicted, Kohberger faces the possibility of the death penalty.to contact me:[email protected]:Bombshell Bryan Kohberger court filing says relative refused to hand over DNA | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The latest hype surrounding the supposed "Jeffrey Epstein client list" is yet another round of recycled speculation with little substantive backing. While reports claim that U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi is reviewing documents that may include names of high-profile individuals, the idea of a singular, definitive "client list" has always been more of a conspiracy-fueled fantasy than a verified reality. Past unsealed documents have revealed connections between Epstein and well-known figures, but nothing has  ever  been  done. The notion that some secret ledger exists, ready to blow open a vast network of elite predators, is more wishful thinking than hard fact. If such a list existed, why hasn't it surfaced in the years of legal battles, document dumps, and investigative reporting?More likely, this "impending release" is another instance of strategic leaks, sensationalism, and political maneuvering meant to stoke public outrage without delivering meaningful justice. Previous Epstein-related releases have been riddled with redactions, context-free name-dropping, and vague associations that fuel more speculation than they resolve. The real issue isn't whether a list exists—it’s whether those with actual influence will ever face real consequences. Until we see ironclad evidence, take any breathless claims about a damning "client list" with the skepticism they deserve.to contact me:[email protected]:AG Pam Bondi vows to release Jeffrey Epstein documentsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Ada County Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defendant, Bryan C. Kohberger, filed a motion requesting a Franks hearing, aiming to challenge the validity of the search warrant affidavits by alleging intentional or reckless false statements or omissions by law enforcement. After thorough consideration, the court denied this motion on February 19, 2025, concluding that the defendant did not meet the necessary burden to warrant such a hearing. Specifically, the court found insufficient evidence to suggest that any false statements or omissions were made intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth in the affidavits supporting the search warrants.Additionally, the defense had submitted multiple motions to suppress evidence obtained through various search warrants, including those related to AT&T, Google, USB, Apple, Amazon, arrest warrants, and searches conducted in Pennsylvania and Idaho. These motions were also denied by the court. In its ruling, the court determined that the search warrants in question were supported by probable cause and that the evidence obtained was lawfully acquired. Consequently, all challenged evidence remains admissible in the ongoing proceedings against Mr. Kohberger.to contact me:[email protected]:021925-Order-Defedants-Moton-Franks-Hearing.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Ada County Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defendant, Bryan C. Kohberger, filed a motion requesting a Franks hearing, aiming to challenge the validity of the search warrant affidavits by alleging intentional or reckless false statements or omissions by law enforcement. After thorough consideration, the court denied this motion on February 19, 2025, concluding that the defendant did not meet the necessary burden to warrant such a hearing. Specifically, the court found insufficient evidence to suggest that any false statements or omissions were made intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth in the affidavits supporting the search warrants.Additionally, the defense had submitted multiple motions to suppress evidence obtained through various search warrants, including those related to AT&T, Google, USB, Apple, Amazon, arrest warrants, and searches conducted in Pennsylvania and Idaho. These motions were also denied by the court. In its ruling, the court determined that the search warrants in question were supported by probable cause and that the evidence obtained was lawfully acquired. Consequently, all challenged evidence remains admissible in the ongoing proceedings against Mr. Kohberger.to contact me:[email protected]:021925-Order-Defedants-Moton-Franks-Hearing.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.