The Epstein Rewind: Bella Klein And The USVI Subpoena

King Charles III has reportedly grown increasingly frustrated with his brother, Prince Andrew, due to ongoing controversies and financial dependencies. Following Prince Andrew's association with Jeffrey Epstein and the subsequent fallout, including a disastrous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, King Charles has taken decisive steps to distance the monarchy from further scandal. This includes cutting off Prince Andrew's annual personal allowance, which was previously used to maintain his residence at the Royal Lodge in Windsor Great Park. The King has also urged Prince Andrew to vacate the 30-room mansion and relocate to the smaller Frogmore Cottage, a move that Andrew has resisted.The financial strain on Prince Andrew has been exacerbated by the termination of his allowance and the need to fund the upkeep of the Royal Lodge, which is reportedly in disrepair. Despite these challenges, Prince Andrew has secured a benefactor to cover maintenance costs, raising questions about his finances and the identity of this supporter. Experts suggest that Prince Andrew's reputation is irreparably damaged, and there is little chance of him returning to public duties. They advise that he accept his situation and live a quiet life away from the public eye.(commercial at 8:06)to contact me:[email protected]:King Charles fed up with 'fragile' Prince Andrew amid Epstein scandal: experts | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case identified as 24-cv-03931, the defendants associated with Sean "Diddy" Combs have filed a memorandum of law supporting their motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Their primary argument is that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient legal basis and fail to meet the necessary standards for a viable claim. The defendants contend that the complaint does not provide adequate factual details to substantiate the claims made against them, rendering the lawsuit legally insufficient.Additionally, the defendants argue that certain claims may be barred by statutes of limitations or other legal doctrines, further undermining the plaintiff's case. They assert that the amended complaint includes vague and conclusory statements without specific evidence linking the defendants to the alleged misconduct. Based on these points, the defendants request that the court dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.621909.33.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case identified as 24-cv-03931, the defendants associated with Sean "Diddy" Combs have filed a memorandum of law supporting their motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Their primary argument is that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient legal basis and fail to meet the necessary standards for a viable claim. The defendants contend that the complaint does not provide adequate factual details to substantiate the claims made against them, rendering the lawsuit legally insufficient.Additionally, the defendants argue that certain claims may be barred by statutes of limitations or other legal doctrines, further undermining the plaintiff's case. They assert that the amended complaint includes vague and conclusory statements without specific evidence linking the defendants to the alleged misconduct. Based on these points, the defendants request that the court dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.621909.33.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Mega condenses  the lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs into one powerful, comprehensive episode. From allegations of misconduct to claims of power abuse, this episode brings together the transcripts from Diddy's arraignment in a single, unfiltered narrative. At Sean Combs' recent arraignment in a federal court in Manhattan, he pleaded not guilty to charges of racketeering, sex trafficking, and transporting individuals across state lines for prostitution. These charges stem from a federal indictment that alleges Combs ran a criminal enterprise for over a decade, engaging in various illegal activities including sex trafficking, forced labor, and bribery. The indictment also mentions that Combs orchestrated elaborate sex parties, referred to as "Freak Offs," which involved coercion, threats, and abuse to maintain control over his victims.During the hearing, Combs' legal team requested a $50 million bail package that included home detention and restrictions on his movements. However, the judge denied bail, citing the risk of flight, potential danger to the community, and the possibility that Combs might tamper with witnesses. The court emphasized that Combs used his influence to manipulate and intimidate, which contributed to the decision to keep him in custody while awaiting trial.(commercial at 9:21)to contact me:[email protected]:O9HLComC (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Many survivors have recounted tales of horror that they suffered at Jeffrey Epstein's ranch in Stanley, NM. Even with all of this evidence, the state where Epstein didn't have to register as a sex offender decided that an investigation into his behavior while in the state didn't warrant an investigation. Instead, they decided to punt it to the feds. The question is...why? Why wasn't a parallel investigation launched in New Mexico? Why was Zorro Ranch never raided? Let's take a look!(commercial at 7:11)to contact me:[email protected]:https://nmindepth.com/2019/no-epstein-indictment-here-for-now/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

We continue our discussion about Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein and add some context to the news that Black was subpoenaed by the court over his financial ties to the Epstein criminal enterprise.(commercial at 11:33)To contact me :[email protected]:https://www.crainsnewyork.com/finance/epstein-had-door-apollo-his-deep-ties-blackBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein had a collection of friends who were very powerful in the world of science and academia and there was no shortage of men in these industries who were rushing to his defense in the wake of his prosecution. In this episode, we take a look at a few of the characters from Epstein's gallery of scum who also worked in the world of science.(commercial at 8:30)to contact me:[email protected]://www.thenation.com/article/archive/epstein-science-sex-abuse-eugenics/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Our exploration of the Epstein criminal enterprise from the inside out continues in this episode, as we take a look at the subpoena sent by the USVI to Bella Klein.(commercial at 9:21)to contact me:[email protected]:DisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

When Jeffrey Epstein was released from jail, he was forced to register as a sex offender. This should mean that he would have to check in before going overseas. As usual, the rules didn't apply to Jeffrey Epstein. One of the more concerning things we have heard about Epstein's time under the 'watchful' eye of the authorities, was that he was still traveling around, even abroad with young girls. He never reported these movements as he status as a predator demanded, according to the same reports. Why was he not arrested for violating the conditions of his release?(commercial at 8:14)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/sep/11/jeffrey-epstein-underage-girls-2018-investigationBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On November 8, 2024, a federal grand jury in Los Angeles issued a superseding indictment against Chicago rapper Lil Durk, born Durk Banks, adding two felony charges to his existing case. The new charges include:Use of interstate facilities to commit murder-for-hire resulting in deathUsing, carrying, and discharging firearms and a machine gun, and possession of such firearms in furtherance of a crime of violence resulting in death.These charges are connected to the August 2022 shooting near the Beverly Center in Los Angeles, which resulted in the death of Saviay'a Robinson, cousin of rapper Quando Rondo.The indictment alleges that Lil Durk conspired with five associates—Kavon London Grant, Deandre Dontrell Wilson, Keith Jones, David Brian Lindsey, and Asa Houston—to orchestrate the murder of Quando Rondo as retaliation for the 2020 killing of King Von, a close associate of Lil Durk. The co-conspirators reportedly used OTF-related finances to fund their travel and logistics for the plot. Lil Durk was arrested on October 24, 2024, near Miami International Airport after authorities discovered he had booked multiple international flights. He is currently held without bond, awaiting transfer to Los Angeles for arraignment.(commercial at 8:15)to contact me:[email protected]:Lil Durk superseding indictment - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.