One More Chance Jane Doe And Her Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy (Part 1) (11/18/24)

In October 2024, a lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York under case number 1:24-cv-07777, titled Doe v. Combs et al. The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, alleges that Sean Combs, also known as "P. Diddy," "Puff Daddy," and other monikers, sexually assaulted her during a party at his residence. The complaint details that Combs forcibly raped the plaintiff in a bathroom, subsequently threatening her to ensure her silence. The lawsuit seeks both compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault.(commercial at 7:19)to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In October 2024, a lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York under case number 1:24-cv-07777, titled Doe v. Combs et al. The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, alleges that Sean Combs, also known as "P. Diddy," "Puff Daddy," and other monikers, sexually assaulted her during a party at his residence. The complaint details that Combs forcibly raped the plaintiff in a bathroom, subsequently threatening her to ensure her silence. The lawsuit seeks both compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault.(commercial at 7:19)to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In October 2024, a lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York under case number 1:24-cv-07777, titled Doe v. Combs et al. The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, alleges that Sean Combs, also known as "P. Diddy," "Puff Daddy," and other monikers, sexually assaulted her during a party at his residence. The complaint details that Combs forcibly raped the plaintiff in a bathroom, subsequently threatening her to ensure her silence. The lawsuit seeks both compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault.(commercial at 7:19)to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

JP Morgan Chase has settled with the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein for a cool 290 million dollars but that is not the last of their problems in Judge Rakoff's courtroom. JP Morgan Chase must still contend with a lawsuit that has been brought against the financial institution by the USVI government and it promises to be a lot messier than what we have seen recently when the bank was dealing with the surivors. So now that JP Morgan has settled with the surivors, what comes next?(commercial at 10:06)to contact me:[email protected]:What's next after JPMorgan's $290M deal with Epstein victims (lawandcrime.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The governor of the USVI has announced that a portion of the money that they recieved from the Epstein estate will go towards helping victims of human trafficking, including the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. As of now however, it's all just talk. There are still hurdles that have to be jumped and roadblocks to be navigated.In this episode, we take a look at the proposal and what it could mean for the Epstein case overall, going forward.(commercial at 8:43)to contact me:[email protected]:Top Officials Say Sale of Epstein Property Will Fund New Human Trafficking Initiative | St. Thomas Source (stthomassource.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

As the back and forth between JP Morgan and The USVI continues to heat up, JP Morgan has launched a new salvo at the USVI, claiming that the past three governors of the territory all had relationships with Epstein and all profited from his criminal enterprise.This comes on the heels of the USVI claiming that JP Morgan, as an entity was aware of Epstein's criminal behavior and chose to profited from it instead of stopping him.Meanwhile, back in reality, we all know that both entities are responsible and that plenty of people should be behind bars.The trial is set to kick off in October.(commercial at 10:06)to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein had 'close ties' to Gov. Albert Bryan: Doc (lawandcrime.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank will both have to answer the allegations against them in court after Judge Jed Rakoff ruled that portions of the lawsuit would move forward while others would not.In this episode, we take a look at the ruling and what it might mean moving forward.(commercial at 9:20)to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein victims can sue JPMorgan and Deutsche (lawandcrime.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Pandora Papers is a massive leak of financial documents that was made public in October 2021. It exposed the hidden wealth and financial dealings of numerous world leaders, politicians, celebrities, and business figures. The leak contained around 11.9 million documents from offshore financial service providers, including emails, contracts, and financial records, and it is one of the largest leaks of its kind.Key points and findings from the Pandora Papers include:Offshore Accounts: The leak revealed how many wealthy individuals and public figures used offshore tax havens to hide their assets and avoid paying taxes in their home countries. These offshore accounts were often created through complex legal structures.Prominent Individuals: The documents implicated a wide range of prominent figures, including politicians, government officials, monarchs, and celebrities. Notable names from various countries were linked to these offshore holdings.Conflict of Interest: Some politicians and public officials were found to have financial interests in companies and industries they were responsible for regulating, which raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest.Secrecy and Anonymity: The Pandora Papers highlighted the use of anonymous shell companies and trusts, making it difficult to trace the true owners of these assets and holdings.Global Impact: The revelations had global implications, as they shed light on how offshore financial systems facilitated corruption, money laundering, and tax evasion on a massive scale, which, in turn, can undermine the financial stability and fairness of nations.Calls for Reform: In response to the Pandora Papers, there were calls for greater transparency in financial systems and increased efforts to combat tax evasion and money laundering. Many countries promised to investigate the individuals and entities named in the leak.In this episode we dive into the President of Ukraine and his appearance in the Pandora papers. to contact me:[email protected]:Revealed: ‘anti-oligarch’ Ukrainian president’s offshore connections | Volodymyr Zelenskiy | The GuardianBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

JP Morgan has been firmly under the microscope when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein and the enabling of his criminal enterprise. However, they are not the only ones who were complicit with Epstein and who helped his machine move and now, JP Morgan is turning the tables on the USVI and calling them out for their part in fostering a safe environment for Epstein to operate within their territory, pointing out that Stacey Plaskett received more than $30,000 dollars from Epstein plus a whole host of other play for pay type of relationships that they allege helped Epstein not only abuse girls, but also to protect him from prying eyes while he did so.(commercial at 15:53)to contact me:[email protected]:JPMorgan Chase calls U.S. Virgin Islands complicit in Jeffrey Epstein crimes (cnbc.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The backyard, bareknuckle brawl between the USVI and JP Morgan continues to rage inside of the courtroom, with both sides dropping bombs on each other with every filing, each looking to paint the other as the bad guy. Judge Rakoff, for his part, has kept things moving at a nice clip and has managed to keep things as orderly as possible. Now, however, he is asking the USVI for specific reasons why JP Morgan shouldn't be able to challenge the lawsuit against the bank. The USVI has yet to reply to the court filing that hit the docket yesterday.(commercial at 8:26)to contact me:[email protected]:Federal Judge Asks for Specific Reasons Why Epstein’s Bank Can’t Challenge V.I.’s Lawsuit | St. Thomas Source (stthomassource.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.