500 - Why More Women Are Suggesting Open Relationships

Sponsor Link: Profit Specialist Groupvideo:    • Cash Discount Program Explained  https://www.cashisking.cc/dresses as man outside of school, neighbor sayshttps://nypost.com/2023/02/17/kayla-l...Mystery Link:    • Endocrine Disruptors - Common Chemica...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought Thomas. He didn't give me a topic so I wanted to cover the story of Canada's biggest troll with the biggest size Z gazongas. He or she depending on which day of the week it is gender fluid and changes their identity. At school he looks the way he does on the right and at home he looks the way he does on the left. I shared an article in the description about this male teacher that use to go by the name Kerry but now dresses up in drag as Kayla Lemieux and it basically says that one of Kerries neighbors says he dresses as a man outside of school but only dawns the female look when he goes to school. Apparently there are reports that he was red pilling some of the young boys in his shop class and was worried about losing his job. So he probably thought that dressing up as a female and pretending to be transgender and transitioning would protect him from getting fire. But it's difficult to got fired from a government teaching job in Canada. You really have to do something extreme for the the union to abandon you. So why is this suddenly a big story? The left should leave Kayla or Kerry his male name alone. But this just shows me that the left is starting to get close to figuring out dragmaxxing which is a term I made up recently to describe men that dress up as females to get special privileges. But the problem of course is you don't know which men are just going it because they have gender dysphoria and those that are just doing it for a the social or financial advantage. The leftist made it socially acceptable to change ones gender identity and it's only a matter of time before many more men do it. But getting back to the article about Kerry it raises questions about whether the vulgar costume is just an act. Of course it is. He wears the prosthetic juggs infrequently according to the residents that live in his building and puts them on when teaching or when the cops visit. Cops check on him because he's received death threats. The article says this and I quote: "The teacher — who until a few years ago went by the name Kerry, now Kayla — left Ontario’s Oakville Trafalgar High School this week wearing the gigantic boobs, a blond wig and glasses, but it wasn’t long until the cartoonish clothing came off. After shopping at a department store and pet supplies shop dressed as a woman, Lemieux headed home to get changed and emerged dressed as a man 30 minutes later. Enraged Oakville parent Celina Close told The Post: “I was shocked to learn [Lemieux] appears in public as a male. “The school has been adamant in telling parents this is a transitioning teacher who needs to express themselves as a woman. But “Why does Lemieux choose to appear like he does at school when he dresses as a man in his personal time?” unquote. I think that Kerry should just go with the idea that he's gender fluid because being gender fluid means ones gender could shift over time—during the course of a day, weeks, months, or years. "Whatever form gender fluidity takes, it is important to remember that it is a valid gender identity according to one Dr. Eckler that I read about online. People wondering why Kerry's appearance changes need to be put in their place and if I were him I would use the excuse of being gender fluid for why I was a man in public after school. While I was dressed like a woman in class. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Profit Specialist Group:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sandman Contact Info & Store:Email: [email protected]://teespring.com/stores/sandman-...Mystery Link:    • Central Bank Digital Currency Will CO...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by two donors Adam and Iliyas. Adam said this and I quote: "Hello Sandman, I came across the case of Achraf Hakimi, a Moroccan soccer player who plays for PSG in France. His wife recently filed for divorce and demanded half of his assets, but was surprised to learn that Achraf put his assets into his mother's name and that he owns nothing. This is one of the most genius moves I've seen. What do you think?" Well Adam thanks for the donation as well as Iliyas who asked if other men could do the same? Well other men can do it. I've known men that put many of their assets in their mothers names to protect them from being pillaged by a future ex-wife. I was taught thatthis is the way you do things by my father if you get married. I'll leave it at that. So that you can leave your children something instead of your wife spending the money. Many of you guys say this guy is a hero for thinking like this but I saw this in my life so it's just Tuesday for me. People are hailing Achraf as some sort of hero for putting his 70 million Euro fortune in his mothers hands to protect it from his now ex wife but what many guys aren't seeing or thinking about is how by doing this he is giving his mother power over his life by turning himself into a son husband. He has a weird arrangement with his mother where if he needed something in his life he would request it from his mother and then she would purchase it for him. Do you really think that's healthy for a 24 year old man to do? Many of you might not agree with the arrangment he had and I'm sure that the close relationship he had with his mother must have pissed of his ex wife Hiba Abouk as well but I don't care if you don't like my opinions. His ex wife Hiba is 12 years older than him. Clearly a man with a woman that much older than him probably has some mommy issues and I couldn't find out if he was raised by a single mother. But it would make a lot more sense if you do this sort of financial maneuver to protect yourself from a future ex wife is to give your assets to your father because that would make way more sense in my mind. Also if you're an old man you never give control of your assets to your daughters. Read King Lear if you want to know how bad an idea it is to put all of your assets in their hands. One article I read says that Achraf put 80% of his earnings in his mothers hands but where is the other 20%? Is it secretly in crypto or has it already been spent? I don't know. Achraf's divorce came about before he received recent grape allegations. Also where are all the women that say that it's inappropriate for older men to date much younger women? They have that 12 year age gap and women aren't saying anything. But below many of the posts about this guys are saying that she only got together with him to take his money and that may be because she also has two children with him. Hiba is a well known actress and maybe she played on his dream to be with his teenage crush? I'm really glad that guys are waking up and seeing the double standards when it comes to older women preying on younger men whil criticizing men for doing the exact same thing. As if they are the only ones that have the right to do that or something. But what's disappointing is that many guys aren't even mentioning the possibility that he's a son husband. I'll get shit for saying that's a possibility. Just because he's victorious against his ex wife doesn't mean he's going to be victorious against a controlling mother. If that's what she is? I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Me The Sandman:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

- MGTOW's Guide to Retiring on $200K in SE Asia- http://www.mgtowbooks.com- Promo code SANDMAN for 10% offBud Lite Crashes 30%   • Bud Light Crashes 30% After Endorseme...  Mystery Link:    • Dating in 2050  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from the one, the only Miss Fat Cat and here's what she has to say very briefly for a change: "Hello Sandman, My hubby showed me a video called Bud Light Crashes 30% After Endorsement of Dylan Mulvaney on YouTube and I want your take on it in case no one made a topic request for this. The reason I can't stand the female VP of marketing is because she does not understand how statistics work. The reason most sales on pretty much everything is on the decline has the do with the population growing older and not drinking as much as the used to. There is also the issue of the population getting smaller as to why sales are going down. I have not done any research on the topic, but even I know that much. Go woke, go broke does not even cover this. This is an idiot that does not get basic economics. My god, my dad would have my head if I blundered like this." Well Miss Fat Cat thanks for the donation and topic. This beer story where Bud Lite hired Dylan Mulvaney to be their spokeswoman for bud lite has backfired and cost the Anheisser Busch company 30% of it's business and apparently drought beer sales for the company plummeted 50%. They saw an 83% drop in business in Boston as people ordered something else. There was an 58% drop in the New York gay community. I had no idea how crazy the numbers were. The video you sent me which I put in the description gets into that. But you're wrong about the population falling. It's going up in Europe, America and Canada, the primary beer drinking markets. It's just the demographics that are changing. The product is out of date with younger people and 20% of gen z identify as gay or trans. So Bud Lite is doing what companies like Disney are doing. Trying to get young people interested. The video you sent me the guys were completely out of touch. They kept saying that most of gen z is under 21 so they can't even buy beer. But any 16 year old at a party can get it these days. What's more here are some pictures of that VP of marketing drinking at a Frat party. She even goes onto say in one of her interviews that she wants to break up frat boy culture which is a fancy way of saying she wants to destroy male spaces. Her marketing campaign is also a success from the standpoint of ESG or environmental and social governance. Companies increasingly don't measure their success based on profit but by how much they can virtue signal. It was only getting a score of 18 which is low so this is going to bring it up. So the woman in charge of marketing might even get a promotion out of this. But as for business itself her so called successful failure means that there will be opportunities for other beer companies to get a greater piece of the market share. There are tons of great microbreweries out there with good quality products that deserve to make money. Also as the population grows it's being replaced by Mexican's that drink sol beer or maybe even corona. As more Muslims come in they for the most part don't even drink. But traditional beer drinkers are disappearing. 19.7% of Gen Z identify as LGBT and they are more likely to drink things like mojitos. Even I never liked beer because it tasted mostly like piss water. The only beers I liked were brewed by monks and imported from Germany. People are increasingly drinking higher quality beers from microbreweries that's been more fine crafted than mass produced. The giant beer factories in Toronto that I saw along the waterfront while growing up the size of ten or twenty story buildings are gone. There's still a giant one by the airport but people don't want that anymore I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The MGTOW book collection part 2:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Stoic Indifference: Manual of Basic Mental Disciplinehttps://www.amazon.co.uk/Stoic-Indiff...Mystery Link:    • China’s Slacker Youths: Why They Went...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by the one, the only Miss Fat Cat. She's got quite a bit to say and I'll only read the relevant parts for this video so here goes and I quote: "Hello Sandman, My father inherited my grandfathers business and expanded on it. For as long as I can remember there have been a lot times where I had to suddenly deal with my father business associates. I never had much of a problem with that. After being in a car accident as a kid and waking up from my coma things took a lot of effort. The doctor ask when he would meet the patient and I let him know I was there. He ask how I was even able of walk. I told him I put one foot in front of the other. My mother is more interested in point out how flawed my walking is. Quite an interesting cross between a momma bear and a tiger mom. It was tiring dealing with her so I moved out while young. During one of our coaching chats you made an off handed comment. You were wondering why I've never show aggression towards you. There are more people who have this problem with me. I asked my cousin how her parking issue was going and told her how I solved a similar one. She was surprised and I said I did not understand her surprise. She has seen the people I grew up with. This apple did not fall from the tree. She is a branch of that same tree. Considering the circumstances it's not very likely for you to see me lose my temper. As I said you have no malice or ill intent from me to responded to. I'm am confused about something else you said in the same offhanded manner. You think my behavior is the way it is because I might think you won't tolerate me otherwise? That's so very odd. It's not an accusation or a threat. I'm not sure what it is, just that it makes me sad. At least it explains something. I don't like people and I go so far as antistalking Urban Dictionary: antistalking some of them. It is strange for me to antistalk someone I like. Seems like my subconscious has no interest in putting on an act for you. If those are your expectations you'll have a hard time even getting me on the same continent. Best to be hated for what I am as far as I'm concerned. As for your off handed comments. Do you wonder how a man is able to put up with me, especially as long as my hubby has? It's been over 16 years now. Or do you think I put on an act for him as well? Sounds like an absolutely miserable relationship and sad life if that's the case." Well Miss Fat Cat thanks for the donation and topic. I'll get to it in just a sec but first let me tell everyone about today's sponsor Stoic Indifference:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Moorescarts.comANDROID DEVICES https://play.google.com/store/apps/de...IOS DEVICEShttps://apps.apple.com/us/app/mooreca...Why more women are suggesting open relationshipshttps://www.abc.net.au/everyday/why-m...Mystery Link:    • SINGLE MOM THINKS SHES A 1% WOMAN @wh...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here, This video is brought to you by a donation from Mr. Anonymous and here's what he has to say: "Hey Sandman, I haven't missed a video of yours since 2014. It's been very enlightening following your work - thanks for everything. If you haven't already, please take some time to listen to Peter Zeihan's views on things. He's a geopolitical analyst with his own YouTube channel and has done some interesting interviews that I’d like you to check out. It won't take you long to understand his opinions. Based on what Peter thinks, please give us your own thoughts about the best options for MGTOW monks going forward in relation to what types of countries will suit our interests and lifestyles. Peter has changed my views a bit and I'm thinking I might stay in Australia instead of moving overseas - but I want to hear your thoughts after listening to Peter. If Peter Zeihan and future places for MGTOW monks to live isn’t enough to for a good 10 minute video, check out this article called: Why More Women Are Suggesting Open Relationships and give a general response Thanks again! Well Mr. Anonymous thanks for the support and for following me as YouTube slowly kills the views to my channel. I'll cover Peter Zeihan's views in the first half and later I'll discuss the article you shared. The first time I heard him speak was on the Joe Rogan podcast when he was attacking Bitcoin and everyone on Bitcoin Twitter were losing it on his fundamental misunderstanding of Bitcoin. The reason so many people don't understand it is because it's a religion. If you've never had blind faith in it then it's hard to see. That's why Max Keiser says it comes from god. But anyway besides my thinking he's wrong about Bitcoin he's right about some things like China and Russia's demographic issues as well as how Canada is screwed because of high real estate prices and America dicking us around. With those things his geopolitical analysis is spot on. But I think he's wrong about the end of globalization. There has always been global trade. Think of Marco Polo and the Dutch East India company. There will probably just be a lot less of it. He's also jumping on the bandwagon when it comes to demographic declines. For example Serbia peaked out at 8 million people. Has now dropped to under seven and by UN estimates it will be down to 3 million in 75 years. Just wait until sexbots and AI girlfriends drop it down lower than that. Probably 1-2 million by 2100. Will we see re-ruralization at that point? Or will farmers keep using tractors so people won't have to work the land and can remain in the cities? That means even lower numbers then we had before the industrial revolution. I think the world is dramatically going to depopulate over the next fifty to one hundred years. If we keep our technological sophistication then I suspect we'll have to implemented AI to rule over species to make sure the human race doesn't go extinct. Looks to me like the Hunger Games was prophetic saying that North America might only have four million people. As for Peter he says America will do well in a world of deglobalization because of the inland water ways and the great lakes which are a freshwater Mediterranean as far as I'm concerned. You can go all the way from the gulf of Mexico up the Mississippi and into the great lakes. In a world with less oil we will return to shipping and America will do well from that standpoint. But he's wrong when it comes to Shale oil. The depletion rates for wells is horrible and we've already reached peak petroleum. He seems to think that somehow America is immune from aging demographics when the fertility rate is now 1.7. Canada is 1.5. Were on the same rollercoaster ride just a few cars behind Europe, Asia and Russia. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Moorescarts:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: - MGTOW's Guide to Retiring on $200K in SE Asia- http://www.mgtowbooks.com- Promo code SANDMAN for 10% offLink To Video:    • The Dark Side Of Feminism's "Liberati...  Mystery Link:    • Shorts  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Ron and here's what he has to say: "Hello Mr. Sandman, hope all is well with you brother. I wanted to change my previous topic request's from your analysis of "Red Pilled Movies" to your analysis of so called "Red Pilled" "women". You mentioned in past videos you wanted to interview ladies of interest. After watching this interview, would this one be considered an interesting human? Please dissect and interject your take on this interview with author Mary Harrington regarding her stage of the "Epiphany Stage". She seems to have the answer moving forward regarding the modern feminism mindset. Take care my brother and keep the Lego channel concept moving forward. Good speed to your future endeavors Sir.!" Well Ron thanks for the donation and topic. The interview you sent me to the Chris Williamson Podcast where he interviews Mary Harrington the author of the book Feminism Against Progress. I'm glad I watched this so that you don't have to. About three minutes in she lets the verbal diarrhea flow from her mouth. She says a lot of stuff we already know that women have always had informal power that was community based. That women had the power of reputation to bring up or destroy people socially as well as control access to information when it comes to her husband and what was going on in the community at large. Mary also says that women have turned themselves into subscription product by going on onlyfans and that the current exploitative situation between the sexes is going to wreck love. I agree because if women start treating men like pay piggies they shouldn't be surprised when men eventually see relationships with whamen as being nothing more than transactional. This hurts women because men would normally do a lot of free stuff for them. But if it becomes pay to play men will do the bare minimum. Mary is a former 2nd and 3rd wave feminist that doesn't believe in progress. She goes down the rabbit hole exploring the relationship between feminism and progress. So far I've brought up some big ideas but I could distil 40 minutes of her words down to 5 minutes. She's like the boring version of Diana Davison. But she does make some valid points that Feminism is a response to material conditions in civilization improving. About 25 mins in it starts to get interesting. That everything changed thanks to contraceptive and 3rd wave digital revolution. I never really looked at feminism was unleashed as technology freed women's time. You have the Suffragettes in the early 20th century once oil and electricity freed up their labor in the home thanks to the 2nd industrial revolution. Which coincides with 1st wave feminism. Then you have the contraceptive revolution which ties into 2nd wave feminism and now 3rd wave feminism with the digital revolution. Now we are about to see feminism's response to the 4th industrial revolution, the internet being the 3rd revolution. In each revolution women have gained power. The first gave them more free time because it freed them from difficult household chores. The second freed them from pregnancy and allowed them to earn money on an equal footing to men and the third one freed them of having to take responsibility for sleeping around in their own social circle. Tinder and dating apps mean they don't have to take accountability for being slutty. Not to mention they got tons of attention from social media they never would have received before. But the 4th revolution is AI and it's going to free men from having to persue women sexually thanks to AI girlfriends and loverbots. That means they will lose much of their attention and sexual exploits they gained from the 3rd revolution. Plus AI is going to take many of their jobs away so that takes them back to the middle of 2nd wave feminism. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The MGTOW Book Collection Part 2:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link:- Red Pill Ring- https://www.redpillring.com/Mystery Link:    • The Price Is Right with Bob Barker: T...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uv Hi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Roger. He didn't give me a topic so I wanted to give everyone my opinion about the whole Trad wife phenomenon that's been happening on Tik Tok. Leftist platforms like Vice are freaking out saying that it's related to the alt right. Feminists have usually been Democrats and Republicans have been into traditional ways of living. But both are gynocentric. Feminism promises women overt control over their lives and others and traditionalism gives women covert control. Women that are putting on fifties and early sixties sun dresses like June cleaver are just going through cope because they can't get a Chad. It's just the female chameleon and it's all about taking the population and putting us through the old divide and conquer. The Vice article follows Estee Williams a busty blonde that looks like she's fallen out of a fifties magazine. She looks like she's channeling Marilyn Monroe. She says she didn't grow up in a traditional family but that's not exactly true. Her mother would go to work and then come home to cook and clean for the family. Estee didn't want to live like that so she quite college and adopted the stay-at-home lifestyle because her electrician husband asked her to. So she decided to document her new trad life on tiktok and it's freaking out leftists. She's probably got a hundred thousand followers on tiktok by now. Vice says that many of the people that follow her hate follow her. That's their way of saying that she's not relevant. But I smell fear. She only started putting out content 9 months ago. What people don't realise is that her building her tiktok and social media is going to become a job. She's even started a YouTube channel and will probably grow it and monetize it. The left is freaking out saying that the tradwife movement is going to take women back 65-70 years ago. Part of the Vice article said this and I quote: "I think it's overreaction to problems that a lot of younger people are seeing in our culture,” says Jordan B. Cooper, an ordained Lutheran pastor and adjunct professor of systematic theology at Cornell University, who posted a YouTube video outlining five problems he had with the trad movement earlier this year. Half of those watching videos tagged #tradwife on TikTok are aged 18-24, according to the app’s internal stats – and videos tagged #tradwife have been seen two million times worldwide in the last week. Not all of those people watching will necessarily be wanting to replicate the olden days: some likely watch tradwife content as part of a fetish, with some pointing out the sexual connotations of a motherly figure comforting you through a smartphone screen." unquote I think that for most young people life is too difficult. It's impossible to get ahead on hard work alone. You have to hustle, scam and have a lot of luck. Vice also thinks that the tradwife movement is filled with followers of Mr. Moustache because they want a return to more old-fashioned architecture. A while back I watched a video discussing how even modern architects living in traditional beautiful buildings while they building buildings for everyone else that are modern and dehumanizing. The left is trying to connect a traditional castle in Germany to places where Hitler held his loot. It's quite the stretch. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The Red Pill Ring:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link Money Line Investmentshttps://www.moneylineinvestments.com/BT & JES- Every Other Way (PureNRG)+ Blade Runner 2049 video remix!    • 🎵  BT & JES- Every Other Way (PureNRG...  The Emptying Planet: The Global Impact of Declining Fertility Rates, A Virtual Roundtablehttps://www.cfr.org/event/emptying-pl...Mystery Link:    • Modern Women vs Traditional Housewife  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Chetan. He didn't give me a topic so I'll read his comments give everyone my take and then move on to the main topic which is the way I see the west ending. Here's what he says: "Hi Sandman, 1. I'm not dating a white girl nor am I interested as they come across super crazy. So don't hate on me for that! 2. don't belive the fertility data or any data given by govt in India as it's all bogus extrapolations. Search adani scam on google. Indian ppl generally are hypocritical & looking to scam just about anything breathing. Noone can Or is to be trusted here. Indias population will not shrink below 1 billion anytime before 2100. Like Muslims most indians too seek to take over the west as they see it's weak. Take a look at sikhs in Canada most I know r also perennial crazy over getting some fair skinned girl to smash be it a white girl or someone from my region in the hills where they are known to notoriously get female foetuses aborted. Well Chetan thanks for the donation. Well you were the one that said you were involved with white sugar babies. You didn't really say you were dating any of them. I hope you're not try to to compensate for something. As for India it's in the same population collapse as the rest of the world. It's just Japan, South Korea in the front, then Europe, then India and then Africa on the demographic collapse roller coaster ride. New Delhi doesn't even have replacement population anymore. The west and just about every country are on the verge of economic collapse as populations peak out gradually. Countries will go bankrupt from unfunded liabilities as they stop having babies. I read a transcript from the Council on Foreign Relations for this video and they say there are 3 strategies to get the birth rates up. Give women financial resources to have kids, which has failed to get any country back above replacement. Immigration which is working for now in places like Canada and Australia but will fail in the end because western countries innovation will be gone because they won't assimilate and those countries will become multi-cultural. Germany has even said that multiculturalism is a failure. Option number 3 is forcefully take women's rights away. This worked in Romania when Abortions and contraception were banned. The birth rate doubled in less than a year. As for the council they see the population peaking out in 2060s and then down. I see it happening sooner with sexbots and ai girlfriends like Joi from Bladerunner 2049 that I put in the description. Less babies mean a smaller future tax base. So infrastructure will be left to crumble. Pension schemes will fail. Less young people means less innovation and people to buy consumer durables. In essence the social safety net and economy crumbles. The health care system crumbles from too much demand. Government and corporate jobs disapear. Well at least on the plus side real estate becomes cheaper. Economic growth ends and with it fiat currency that's based on constant growth in the money supply. The question to ask is what replaces it? Bitcoin, gold, silver? Don't know. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Moneyline Investments:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sandman Contact Info & Store:Email: [email protected]://teespring.com/stores/sandman-...Mystery Link:    • Star Trek Picard Season 3 REVIEW | He...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uv Hi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from the one, the only, Miss Fat Cat and here's what she has to say: "Dearest Sir, I was under the impression you did not want me to speak about my hubby. That said, I think people are more interested in the relationship I have with you then him. Apart from whether I'm real or your alter ego rumor has it that being with you would be earth shattering and the best I'll ever have. So my darling, would that come down to 4 orgasms in an hour? It seems a bit much since women are always going on and on about how unsatisfied they are. Oddly enough you do strike me as the the type that can satisfy a woman without needing to unzip your pants. In any case, physical intimacy with you will never be on the table even if your able to go beyond my expectation. The thing is I'm quite found of you as you are. You are bit different during our coaching chats, but at the core you are the same. There are a few video's where you have explained that you have a tendency to change mentally after physical intimacy with a woman. Sleeping with you would be essentially killing what I like. This won't do for me, besides those needs are being met. There is no reason for me to cheat on hubby. I do however have other wants and needs. There is something specific I would like from you. I'm willing to pay about 20 times the amount I typically pay for chat. The budget has been cleared and set aside. Your physical or digital presence is not needed. There is something I want even more then that, but I'm not sure it will happen in my life time. Thankfully no one knows who I am or I would have to deal with people trying to sell me your photo, name, address and or other none relevant information. As always, thank you for your time. Sincerely, Miss Fat Cat" Well Fat Cat thanks for the donation and topic. Now you have me intrigued. I'm not sure how we would chat if it wasn't digitally or in real life? I'm guessing you want me to send you letters. Perhaps some romantic poetry or something on account of you sending me this donation on around valentines day? As for satisfying whamen I haven't had an issues satisfying women either physically or emotionally. I can talk and listen without zoning out and remember what women say. It's funny when they ask me what they just said and I repeat every word back to them. More often than not they tune me out. But that's fine because I'm really only using most of them as sounding boards for my ideas. Having a conversation with a woman is like having a conversation with a cat. The only reason most guys would want to do it is so they hear their own ideas reflected back at them. As for physically I would usually have an hour of sex every second or third day. Sometimes I'd get super creative with the place or with various household objects and no I'm not talking about cucumbers. That's standard operating procedure for me. I've never had any complaints in that department. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Me The Sandman:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Moorescarts.comANDROID DEVICES https://play.google.com/store/apps/de...IOS DEVICEShttps://apps.apple.com/us/app/mooreca...Mystery Link:    • Criminal Lawyer Reacts to Gwyneth Pal...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Terry. He didn't suggest a topic and left it up to me so I wanted to share something I read on the going your own way dot com forum by someone named Lucky Austrian and I quote: "Feminists propose child tax - now every men should pay child-support. The newest fad in feminist circles in Europe is a "child tax" With birthrates only kept on low levels because of immigration, more and more men (approximately. 25%) saying that the ideal number of kids is zero and at the same time basically most of the families with kids consisting of people that should not have kids ... the feminists come up with a new, tricky idea. Basically it means: Child support and alimony is paid by the state and not by the father. Every male has to pay the tax which will be distributed to women with children and companies that employ women that got pregnant. The selling points include men are not burdened by child support anymore and can "move on" without financial burden to their next "family" as are companies not hurt when one of their female employees gets pregnant. The hidden agenda is Women can now have babies with as many bad boys as they want, not caring about financial fitness to support kids as the state will pay all the costs. As now the state is provider and baby-daddy, men would not have any legal father rights anymore, as they do not support the kid. Feminists consider recent developments in the fathers-rights are (like visitation) horrible unjust. The best thing for women is that all men would have to pay even if women did not even let them get a whiff of pussy throughout their life. The ugliest dudes, the weakest beta, all will pay for the kids of the 20% and support them. Women would get more money than a single man can handle to pay to being a single mum should be way easier and birth-rates should rise as basically being a mom becomes a well paid "job" Paying money to companies ensures that companies still hire females as the losses of her getting pregnant are covered, so they still can have their "career" if they wish to do so." unquote Well Terry thanks for the donation and thanks to the guy that posted this topic. I think that eventually something like this will be tried. This story was verified and there are in fact articles on that going your own way post where feminists discuss petitioning the government so it introduces this. Men will be slaves and won't be able to get away from having 20% of their gross income taken away and that's before all of the other taxes. If that happens guys have options too. They choose to work less, retire or just live a minimalist lifestyle to stick it to the ladies. More than likely female governments will just print money and hand it to women regardless of the inflation rate. Men will eventually get tired of that and leave their countries for ones that are more competent ways start saving money in something other than currency. It's scary to think that one day they might get ten Chuds to support 10 of Chad's kids. One of the feminists says that the idea is to separate the child care from the biological producer. Almost making the child a communal responsibility so that a woman doesn't have to take accountability. This is definitely a possibility as fertility rates start to crash below 1 everywhere once virtual girlfriends and loverbots are introduced. Governments will probably resort to radical measures once immigration policies start to fail and their populations start to fall. But if they try to implement what amounts to a bachelor tax then a lot of guys will simply leave their countries. I'm predicting that women will do it when they become the majority of politicians. They are the ones that benefits from the social safety net. If that starts to fail there's no telling what ways they will try and enslave men. Men can go their own way from women relationship wise but not when it comes to finances. Or so it would seem. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Moorescarts:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy