484 - Indian Men Are Taking White Women From White Men

Sponsor Link: Stoic Indifference: Manual of Basic Mental Disciplinehttps://www.amazon.co.uk/Stoic-Indiff...Mystery Link:    • China’s Slacker Youths: Why They Went...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by the one, the only Miss Fat Cat. She's got quite a bit to say and I'll only read the relevant parts for this video so here goes and I quote: "Hello Sandman, My father inherited my grandfathers business and expanded on it. For as long as I can remember there have been a lot times where I had to suddenly deal with my father business associates. I never had much of a problem with that. After being in a car accident as a kid and waking up from my coma things took a lot of effort. The doctor ask when he would meet the patient and I let him know I was there. He ask how I was even able of walk. I told him I put one foot in front of the other. My mother is more interested in point out how flawed my walking is. Quite an interesting cross between a momma bear and a tiger mom. It was tiring dealing with her so I moved out while young. During one of our coaching chats you made an off handed comment. You were wondering why I've never show aggression towards you. There are more people who have this problem with me. I asked my cousin how her parking issue was going and told her how I solved a similar one. She was surprised and I said I did not understand her surprise. She has seen the people I grew up with. This apple did not fall from the tree. She is a branch of that same tree. Considering the circumstances it's not very likely for you to see me lose my temper. As I said you have no malice or ill intent from me to responded to. I'm am confused about something else you said in the same offhanded manner. You think my behavior is the way it is because I might think you won't tolerate me otherwise? That's so very odd. It's not an accusation or a threat. I'm not sure what it is, just that it makes me sad. At least it explains something. I don't like people and I go so far as antistalking Urban Dictionary: antistalking some of them. It is strange for me to antistalk someone I like. Seems like my subconscious has no interest in putting on an act for you. If those are your expectations you'll have a hard time even getting me on the same continent. Best to be hated for what I am as far as I'm concerned. As for your off handed comments. Do you wonder how a man is able to put up with me, especially as long as my hubby has? It's been over 16 years now. Or do you think I put on an act for him as well? Sounds like an absolutely miserable relationship and sad life if that's the case." Well Miss Fat Cat thanks for the donation and topic. I'll get to it in just a sec but first let me tell everyone about today's sponsor Stoic Indifference:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Moorescarts.comANDROID DEVICES https://play.google.com/store/apps/de...IOS DEVICEShttps://apps.apple.com/us/app/mooreca...Why more women are suggesting open relationshipshttps://www.abc.net.au/everyday/why-m...Mystery Link:    • SINGLE MOM THINKS SHES A 1% WOMAN @wh...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here, This video is brought to you by a donation from Mr. Anonymous and here's what he has to say: "Hey Sandman, I haven't missed a video of yours since 2014. It's been very enlightening following your work - thanks for everything. If you haven't already, please take some time to listen to Peter Zeihan's views on things. He's a geopolitical analyst with his own YouTube channel and has done some interesting interviews that I’d like you to check out. It won't take you long to understand his opinions. Based on what Peter thinks, please give us your own thoughts about the best options for MGTOW monks going forward in relation to what types of countries will suit our interests and lifestyles. Peter has changed my views a bit and I'm thinking I might stay in Australia instead of moving overseas - but I want to hear your thoughts after listening to Peter. If Peter Zeihan and future places for MGTOW monks to live isn’t enough to for a good 10 minute video, check out this article called: Why More Women Are Suggesting Open Relationships and give a general response Thanks again! Well Mr. Anonymous thanks for the support and for following me as YouTube slowly kills the views to my channel. I'll cover Peter Zeihan's views in the first half and later I'll discuss the article you shared. The first time I heard him speak was on the Joe Rogan podcast when he was attacking Bitcoin and everyone on Bitcoin Twitter were losing it on his fundamental misunderstanding of Bitcoin. The reason so many people don't understand it is because it's a religion. If you've never had blind faith in it then it's hard to see. That's why Max Keiser says it comes from god. But anyway besides my thinking he's wrong about Bitcoin he's right about some things like China and Russia's demographic issues as well as how Canada is screwed because of high real estate prices and America dicking us around. With those things his geopolitical analysis is spot on. But I think he's wrong about the end of globalization. There has always been global trade. Think of Marco Polo and the Dutch East India company. There will probably just be a lot less of it. He's also jumping on the bandwagon when it comes to demographic declines. For example Serbia peaked out at 8 million people. Has now dropped to under seven and by UN estimates it will be down to 3 million in 75 years. Just wait until sexbots and AI girlfriends drop it down lower than that. Probably 1-2 million by 2100. Will we see re-ruralization at that point? Or will farmers keep using tractors so people won't have to work the land and can remain in the cities? That means even lower numbers then we had before the industrial revolution. I think the world is dramatically going to depopulate over the next fifty to one hundred years. If we keep our technological sophistication then I suspect we'll have to implemented AI to rule over species to make sure the human race doesn't go extinct. Looks to me like the Hunger Games was prophetic saying that North America might only have four million people. As for Peter he says America will do well in a world of deglobalization because of the inland water ways and the great lakes which are a freshwater Mediterranean as far as I'm concerned. You can go all the way from the gulf of Mexico up the Mississippi and into the great lakes. In a world with less oil we will return to shipping and America will do well from that standpoint. But he's wrong when it comes to Shale oil. The depletion rates for wells is horrible and we've already reached peak petroleum. He seems to think that somehow America is immune from aging demographics when the fertility rate is now 1.7. Canada is 1.5. Were on the same rollercoaster ride just a few cars behind Europe, Asia and Russia. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Moorescarts:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: - MGTOW's Guide to Retiring on $200K in SE Asia- http://www.mgtowbooks.com- Promo code SANDMAN for 10% offLink To Video:    • The Dark Side Of Feminism's "Liberati...  Mystery Link:    • Shorts  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Ron and here's what he has to say: "Hello Mr. Sandman, hope all is well with you brother. I wanted to change my previous topic request's from your analysis of "Red Pilled Movies" to your analysis of so called "Red Pilled" "women". You mentioned in past videos you wanted to interview ladies of interest. After watching this interview, would this one be considered an interesting human? Please dissect and interject your take on this interview with author Mary Harrington regarding her stage of the "Epiphany Stage". She seems to have the answer moving forward regarding the modern feminism mindset. Take care my brother and keep the Lego channel concept moving forward. Good speed to your future endeavors Sir.!" Well Ron thanks for the donation and topic. The interview you sent me to the Chris Williamson Podcast where he interviews Mary Harrington the author of the book Feminism Against Progress. I'm glad I watched this so that you don't have to. About three minutes in she lets the verbal diarrhea flow from her mouth. She says a lot of stuff we already know that women have always had informal power that was community based. That women had the power of reputation to bring up or destroy people socially as well as control access to information when it comes to her husband and what was going on in the community at large. Mary also says that women have turned themselves into subscription product by going on onlyfans and that the current exploitative situation between the sexes is going to wreck love. I agree because if women start treating men like pay piggies they shouldn't be surprised when men eventually see relationships with whamen as being nothing more than transactional. This hurts women because men would normally do a lot of free stuff for them. But if it becomes pay to play men will do the bare minimum. Mary is a former 2nd and 3rd wave feminist that doesn't believe in progress. She goes down the rabbit hole exploring the relationship between feminism and progress. So far I've brought up some big ideas but I could distil 40 minutes of her words down to 5 minutes. She's like the boring version of Diana Davison. But she does make some valid points that Feminism is a response to material conditions in civilization improving. About 25 mins in it starts to get interesting. That everything changed thanks to contraceptive and 3rd wave digital revolution. I never really looked at feminism was unleashed as technology freed women's time. You have the Suffragettes in the early 20th century once oil and electricity freed up their labor in the home thanks to the 2nd industrial revolution. Which coincides with 1st wave feminism. Then you have the contraceptive revolution which ties into 2nd wave feminism and now 3rd wave feminism with the digital revolution. Now we are about to see feminism's response to the 4th industrial revolution, the internet being the 3rd revolution. In each revolution women have gained power. The first gave them more free time because it freed them from difficult household chores. The second freed them from pregnancy and allowed them to earn money on an equal footing to men and the third one freed them of having to take responsibility for sleeping around in their own social circle. Tinder and dating apps mean they don't have to take accountability for being slutty. Not to mention they got tons of attention from social media they never would have received before. But the 4th revolution is AI and it's going to free men from having to persue women sexually thanks to AI girlfriends and loverbots. That means they will lose much of their attention and sexual exploits they gained from the 3rd revolution. Plus AI is going to take many of their jobs away so that takes them back to the middle of 2nd wave feminism. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The MGTOW Book Collection Part 2:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link:- Red Pill Ring- https://www.redpillring.com/Mystery Link:    • The Price Is Right with Bob Barker: T...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uv Hi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Roger. He didn't give me a topic so I wanted to give everyone my opinion about the whole Trad wife phenomenon that's been happening on Tik Tok. Leftist platforms like Vice are freaking out saying that it's related to the alt right. Feminists have usually been Democrats and Republicans have been into traditional ways of living. But both are gynocentric. Feminism promises women overt control over their lives and others and traditionalism gives women covert control. Women that are putting on fifties and early sixties sun dresses like June cleaver are just going through cope because they can't get a Chad. It's just the female chameleon and it's all about taking the population and putting us through the old divide and conquer. The Vice article follows Estee Williams a busty blonde that looks like she's fallen out of a fifties magazine. She looks like she's channeling Marilyn Monroe. She says she didn't grow up in a traditional family but that's not exactly true. Her mother would go to work and then come home to cook and clean for the family. Estee didn't want to live like that so she quite college and adopted the stay-at-home lifestyle because her electrician husband asked her to. So she decided to document her new trad life on tiktok and it's freaking out leftists. She's probably got a hundred thousand followers on tiktok by now. Vice says that many of the people that follow her hate follow her. That's their way of saying that she's not relevant. But I smell fear. She only started putting out content 9 months ago. What people don't realise is that her building her tiktok and social media is going to become a job. She's even started a YouTube channel and will probably grow it and monetize it. The left is freaking out saying that the tradwife movement is going to take women back 65-70 years ago. Part of the Vice article said this and I quote: "I think it's overreaction to problems that a lot of younger people are seeing in our culture,” says Jordan B. Cooper, an ordained Lutheran pastor and adjunct professor of systematic theology at Cornell University, who posted a YouTube video outlining five problems he had with the trad movement earlier this year. Half of those watching videos tagged #tradwife on TikTok are aged 18-24, according to the app’s internal stats – and videos tagged #tradwife have been seen two million times worldwide in the last week. Not all of those people watching will necessarily be wanting to replicate the olden days: some likely watch tradwife content as part of a fetish, with some pointing out the sexual connotations of a motherly figure comforting you through a smartphone screen." unquote I think that for most young people life is too difficult. It's impossible to get ahead on hard work alone. You have to hustle, scam and have a lot of luck. Vice also thinks that the tradwife movement is filled with followers of Mr. Moustache because they want a return to more old-fashioned architecture. A while back I watched a video discussing how even modern architects living in traditional beautiful buildings while they building buildings for everyone else that are modern and dehumanizing. The left is trying to connect a traditional castle in Germany to places where Hitler held his loot. It's quite the stretch. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The Red Pill Ring:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link Money Line Investmentshttps://www.moneylineinvestments.com/BT & JES- Every Other Way (PureNRG)+ Blade Runner 2049 video remix!    • 🎵  BT & JES- Every Other Way (PureNRG...  The Emptying Planet: The Global Impact of Declining Fertility Rates, A Virtual Roundtablehttps://www.cfr.org/event/emptying-pl...Mystery Link:    • Modern Women vs Traditional Housewife  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Chetan. He didn't give me a topic so I'll read his comments give everyone my take and then move on to the main topic which is the way I see the west ending. Here's what he says: "Hi Sandman, 1. I'm not dating a white girl nor am I interested as they come across super crazy. So don't hate on me for that! 2. don't belive the fertility data or any data given by govt in India as it's all bogus extrapolations. Search adani scam on google. Indian ppl generally are hypocritical & looking to scam just about anything breathing. Noone can Or is to be trusted here. Indias population will not shrink below 1 billion anytime before 2100. Like Muslims most indians too seek to take over the west as they see it's weak. Take a look at sikhs in Canada most I know r also perennial crazy over getting some fair skinned girl to smash be it a white girl or someone from my region in the hills where they are known to notoriously get female foetuses aborted. Well Chetan thanks for the donation. Well you were the one that said you were involved with white sugar babies. You didn't really say you were dating any of them. I hope you're not try to to compensate for something. As for India it's in the same population collapse as the rest of the world. It's just Japan, South Korea in the front, then Europe, then India and then Africa on the demographic collapse roller coaster ride. New Delhi doesn't even have replacement population anymore. The west and just about every country are on the verge of economic collapse as populations peak out gradually. Countries will go bankrupt from unfunded liabilities as they stop having babies. I read a transcript from the Council on Foreign Relations for this video and they say there are 3 strategies to get the birth rates up. Give women financial resources to have kids, which has failed to get any country back above replacement. Immigration which is working for now in places like Canada and Australia but will fail in the end because western countries innovation will be gone because they won't assimilate and those countries will become multi-cultural. Germany has even said that multiculturalism is a failure. Option number 3 is forcefully take women's rights away. This worked in Romania when Abortions and contraception were banned. The birth rate doubled in less than a year. As for the council they see the population peaking out in 2060s and then down. I see it happening sooner with sexbots and ai girlfriends like Joi from Bladerunner 2049 that I put in the description. Less babies mean a smaller future tax base. So infrastructure will be left to crumble. Pension schemes will fail. Less young people means less innovation and people to buy consumer durables. In essence the social safety net and economy crumbles. The health care system crumbles from too much demand. Government and corporate jobs disapear. Well at least on the plus side real estate becomes cheaper. Economic growth ends and with it fiat currency that's based on constant growth in the money supply. The question to ask is what replaces it? Bitcoin, gold, silver? Don't know. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Moneyline Investments:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sandman Contact Info & Store:Email: [email protected]://teespring.com/stores/sandman-...Mystery Link:    • Star Trek Picard Season 3 REVIEW | He...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uv Hi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from the one, the only, Miss Fat Cat and here's what she has to say: "Dearest Sir, I was under the impression you did not want me to speak about my hubby. That said, I think people are more interested in the relationship I have with you then him. Apart from whether I'm real or your alter ego rumor has it that being with you would be earth shattering and the best I'll ever have. So my darling, would that come down to 4 orgasms in an hour? It seems a bit much since women are always going on and on about how unsatisfied they are. Oddly enough you do strike me as the the type that can satisfy a woman without needing to unzip your pants. In any case, physical intimacy with you will never be on the table even if your able to go beyond my expectation. The thing is I'm quite found of you as you are. You are bit different during our coaching chats, but at the core you are the same. There are a few video's where you have explained that you have a tendency to change mentally after physical intimacy with a woman. Sleeping with you would be essentially killing what I like. This won't do for me, besides those needs are being met. There is no reason for me to cheat on hubby. I do however have other wants and needs. There is something specific I would like from you. I'm willing to pay about 20 times the amount I typically pay for chat. The budget has been cleared and set aside. Your physical or digital presence is not needed. There is something I want even more then that, but I'm not sure it will happen in my life time. Thankfully no one knows who I am or I would have to deal with people trying to sell me your photo, name, address and or other none relevant information. As always, thank you for your time. Sincerely, Miss Fat Cat" Well Fat Cat thanks for the donation and topic. Now you have me intrigued. I'm not sure how we would chat if it wasn't digitally or in real life? I'm guessing you want me to send you letters. Perhaps some romantic poetry or something on account of you sending me this donation on around valentines day? As for satisfying whamen I haven't had an issues satisfying women either physically or emotionally. I can talk and listen without zoning out and remember what women say. It's funny when they ask me what they just said and I repeat every word back to them. More often than not they tune me out. But that's fine because I'm really only using most of them as sounding boards for my ideas. Having a conversation with a woman is like having a conversation with a cat. The only reason most guys would want to do it is so they hear their own ideas reflected back at them. As for physically I would usually have an hour of sex every second or third day. Sometimes I'd get super creative with the place or with various household objects and no I'm not talking about cucumbers. That's standard operating procedure for me. I've never had any complaints in that department. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Me The Sandman:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Moorescarts.comANDROID DEVICES https://play.google.com/store/apps/de...IOS DEVICEShttps://apps.apple.com/us/app/mooreca...Mystery Link:    • Criminal Lawyer Reacts to Gwyneth Pal...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Terry. He didn't suggest a topic and left it up to me so I wanted to share something I read on the going your own way dot com forum by someone named Lucky Austrian and I quote: "Feminists propose child tax - now every men should pay child-support. The newest fad in feminist circles in Europe is a "child tax" With birthrates only kept on low levels because of immigration, more and more men (approximately. 25%) saying that the ideal number of kids is zero and at the same time basically most of the families with kids consisting of people that should not have kids ... the feminists come up with a new, tricky idea. Basically it means: Child support and alimony is paid by the state and not by the father. Every male has to pay the tax which will be distributed to women with children and companies that employ women that got pregnant. The selling points include men are not burdened by child support anymore and can "move on" without financial burden to their next "family" as are companies not hurt when one of their female employees gets pregnant. The hidden agenda is Women can now have babies with as many bad boys as they want, not caring about financial fitness to support kids as the state will pay all the costs. As now the state is provider and baby-daddy, men would not have any legal father rights anymore, as they do not support the kid. Feminists consider recent developments in the fathers-rights are (like visitation) horrible unjust. The best thing for women is that all men would have to pay even if women did not even let them get a whiff of pussy throughout their life. The ugliest dudes, the weakest beta, all will pay for the kids of the 20% and support them. Women would get more money than a single man can handle to pay to being a single mum should be way easier and birth-rates should rise as basically being a mom becomes a well paid "job" Paying money to companies ensures that companies still hire females as the losses of her getting pregnant are covered, so they still can have their "career" if they wish to do so." unquote Well Terry thanks for the donation and thanks to the guy that posted this topic. I think that eventually something like this will be tried. This story was verified and there are in fact articles on that going your own way post where feminists discuss petitioning the government so it introduces this. Men will be slaves and won't be able to get away from having 20% of their gross income taken away and that's before all of the other taxes. If that happens guys have options too. They choose to work less, retire or just live a minimalist lifestyle to stick it to the ladies. More than likely female governments will just print money and hand it to women regardless of the inflation rate. Men will eventually get tired of that and leave their countries for ones that are more competent ways start saving money in something other than currency. It's scary to think that one day they might get ten Chuds to support 10 of Chad's kids. One of the feminists says that the idea is to separate the child care from the biological producer. Almost making the child a communal responsibility so that a woman doesn't have to take accountability. This is definitely a possibility as fertility rates start to crash below 1 everywhere once virtual girlfriends and loverbots are introduced. Governments will probably resort to radical measures once immigration policies start to fail and their populations start to fall. But if they try to implement what amounts to a bachelor tax then a lot of guys will simply leave their countries. I'm predicting that women will do it when they become the majority of politicians. They are the ones that benefits from the social safety net. If that starts to fail there's no telling what ways they will try and enslave men. Men can go their own way from women relationship wise but not when it comes to finances. Or so it would seem. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Moorescarts:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: Profit Specialist Groupvideo:    • Cash Discount Program Explained  https://www.cashisking.cc/Mystery Link:    • The Psychological Impact Of Hormonal ...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Don and here's what he has to say: "Hi Sandman, Long time listener. I believe you posted and image of Swedish men wearing shirts stating “The Future is Female” in your meme collection recently and it got my thinking about how or if Socialism contaminates normal male behavior. I wonder if there’s a link between gentrification, social app technology and male domestication with the inverse decline in testosterone, where the repression of the native heterosexual male sexual instinct i.e. war, polyamory / promiscuity leads to a compliant, docile, homosexual and blind allegiance to the gyncentric state. I know you have eluded to this in prior topics but what I’m seeing in Europe and my home country USA, it’s just that. A rise in homosexuality and blind acceptance to the gynocentric state. I surmise there are social pressures coupled with economic considerations i.e. money factors that ultimately force the hand of the male in western civilization to go against his natural instinct to be free and promiscuous and ultimately marry a depreciating asset to placate himself and bargain with western reality of cuckholdry. I live in Colombia so fortunately the same social pressures appear to have been rejected by a male consensus and managed by keeping prostitution legal thus preventing a decline in testosterone is my thesis. Please elaborate on this topic and thank you for all the hard work Sandman. Well Don thanks for the donation and topic. Your timing couldn' be better as I recently watched a video from Chris Williamson that I've linked in the description as today's not so mystery link. His guest mentions that a man holding a gun will increase his testosterone level. So if you're living out in the country and you are armed that automatically elevates your T levels. Tim Pool was also mentioning that voters in the rust belt that do manual labor jobs voted Trump because they know what real work looks like. What if they vote Republican because their testosterone levels are higher because they do hard physical work? We know that working out will increase it. Are you not technically working out when lifting heavy things on a construction site? There are lots of reasons for the decline in men's testosterone. Environmental pollution, plastics in water and food containers. Including some mystery factor X that science has yet to reveal. Also Don just because you haven't seen the effects of it in your adopted country of Columbia doesn't mean it isn't happening there as well. The recent studies I've seen show that since the year 2000 we are seeing a drop of 2.64% per year. You're in a country where the men appear masculine. That's because the men you see around you didn't have their brains and bodies shaped by low testosterone. The young guys today are developing with smaller bodies and their brains are not receiving the proper amount of t when when they are still in the womb as well as when they go through puberty. So is it any wonder that many are so weak and feminized? I'll also discuss what that mystery factor x is in potentially lowering testosterone in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Profit Specialist Group:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Sponsor Link: - MGTOW's Guide to Retiring on $200K in SE Asia- http://www.mgtowbooks.com- Promo code SANDMAN for 10% offMystery Link:    • Grumpy Old Man 1 - Saturday Night Live  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video isn't brought to you by any donations yet again. Looks like I'm getting closer and closer to getting ready to hang up my digital hat so to speak. At least on this channel. I'll discuss more about that at the end of this video. But first I want to discuss artificial intelligence rendered adult content. There's a website which I can't share a link to because I'll probably get a strike on YouTube for but I'm going to flash the letters on screen so you know where to go so you can create all kinds of images that are definitely not safe for work. The stock photos I used in this video are of real women. But before I picked them out I went to the site that's on screen and then the stock page and I knew that the fake women weren't real but I started mixing up the real and fake in my head and I started to see the fake women as being real. The website showed me hundreds of images and they passed the aroused boner test. My chubby custard launcher didn't that they were fake. It still gave them a salute. Someone mentioned that in one of my recent memes of the week videos that ai was generating more than just scantily clad ladies but that it was doing way more so I looked into it. I've reached the conclusion that if I don't care if women are real or not sexually then you know that young guys won't care at all. Imagine what that' going to mean when there are completely nude virtual girls in five to ten years or less having conversations with you and rendered in real time? Real women are screwed. You can tell the virtual woman what you want her to do and she'll do it. Again it's almost over for real women. The male sexual revolution is upon us and they will cry and complain while wailing and gnashing their teeth that no man wants to fondle their teet. They will protest and complain but they can but they won't be able to stop it. Men will fap off until the world fails and stay away from relationships. MGTOW will be the new default setting for men in soyciety. Birth rates will plummet even more and family formation will collapse. All that before we even see those virtual girlfriends downloaded into lover bots. As men were almost in the promised land and for women the attention, resources and emotional tampon services are going to dry up. Even the desperate male feminists will probably go their own way from whamen. I'll discuss more implications of digitally rendered poon in a moment but first let me tell everyone about today's sponsor The MGTOW Book Collection Part 2:Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Haakon The Good   • The Philosophy of Self-Preservation  Mystery Link:    • "Elon And I Agree, This Is A Serious ...  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:cBitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxe...Sandman 2:    / @sandman2317  Twitter:   / sandmanmgtow  SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandmanPaypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.comBitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uvHi Everyone Sandman Here,This video is brought to you by a donation from Mr. Anonymous and here's what he has to say: "Hi, Sandman. I just had a dream that I was caught in a literal zombie apocalypse, a la The Walking Dead and woke up wondering if women would be more excited about such a world than men? The assumption always is that scrappy, gun toting redneck survivalist men are the ones looking forward to this type of future. But what if it's women that would actually enjoy it the most? Sure, the hardship would suck. But think of the drama! The excitement! The constant adrenaline rushes! Think of the panty-dropping opportunity to be part of giga Chad Negan's harem! Think of all the testosterone being thrown around by the strong, surviving men! It's got to be better than our current stale, boring estroginized society. I'm not sure there’s enough here for a video, but I see it as an interesting thought experiment. Also, Funny how you did a video request for me a while back about transwomen being better women than women and, fast forward, transmaxxing has now become a thing."Well Mr. Anonymous thanks for the donation and topic. I'll discuss some recent thoughts on the transmaxxing community towards the end but I think that both sexes want the horror of modern industrial life to end. A lot of guys in our community keep saying that they want to see a collapse and for everything to burn. Your subconscious is creating a dreamscape at night that fulfill that fantasy. But collapse doesn't happen all of a sudden. It's gradual and eventually you're in a different era. Many men want the collapse so that women have to suffer again and have no choice but to return to a traditional way of life as an obedient wife. Women want things to collapse so they can all enjoy the drama because they are addicted to it. On one hand they want comfort and safety but on the other they want chaos. When they are given power they extract whatever value they can to give themselves stability but destabilize everything for everyone else. Then men walk away and the economy crumbles. We are seeing that right now with young men pulling out of the laborforce with the work participation rate at all time lows. In the past women got used to alternating states where their country was somewhat stable and other times when it's in a state of war and the men are fighting and dying. Women want to live in a house that's on fire but they don't want to get burned by the flames. What they want is a paradox. Men want stability and we want sexual access. Many of us are willing to throw civilization if we can't get sex. A relationship, wife and kids for many of us are our purpose and if we don't get them we don't care what happens to the world because we don't have our foreskin in the game so to speak. As for women collapse works for them because they won't be killed off if there are wars. Sure they have to worry about dying during childbirth, lack of contraceptives, plagues and famine but at least they won't get slaughtered by conquering nations. Just taken as war brides. Again let it sink in that women want stability and chaos at the same time. That's why I believe that books like the Hunger Games were so popular with girls. The continent of panem in the film is filled with high tech cities in the Rockies Mountains and subsistence farmers and producers everywhere else.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy