The Epstein Rewind: The Gushing Letter Sent To Prosecutors On Jeffrey Epstein's Behalf

In Ada County Case No. CR01-24-31665, Defendant Bryan Kohberger filed motions to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants directed at AT&T, Google, USB devices, Apple, and Amazon. The defense argued that these warrants were invalid, alleging they were based on information gathered through unconstitutional methods, including the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), and that the affidavits supporting the warrants contained intentional or reckless omissions of material facts. They contended that the evidence obtained from these warrants violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights and should therefore be excluded from trial.However, the court denied these suppression motions, ruling that the search warrants were lawfully issued and executed. The judge found that the affidavits provided sufficient probable cause and that the methods employed, including the use of IGG, did not violate constitutional protections. Additionally, the court determined that there was no evidence of intentional or reckless falsehoods or omissions in the affidavits that would warrant a Franks hearing. As a result, the evidence obtained from AT&T, Google, USB devices, Apple, and Amazon remains admissible in the proceedings against Kohbergerto contact me:[email protected]:021925-Order-Defedants-Motions-Suppress-ATT-Google-USB-Apple-Amazon.pdf

Bill Barr is not what most people would call a man who is willing to be transparent. In fact, history tells us a different story when looking at Barr's overall career and in the case of Epstein's death while in prison, nothing much has changed. Let's take a look!(Commercial at 15:39)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/11/26/barr-n26.html

Maxwell, and her team, are quick to claim that her and Epstein had stopped communicating over a decade ago and that Ghislaine Maxwell had no contact with him whatsoever in the years after the alleged split. In this article, we hear a different story from Auther Barry Avrich who claims to have seen the two together in Palm Beach in 2016.(Commercial at 22:00)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8643317/Filmmaker-spotted-Jeffrey-Epstein-Ghislaine-Maxwell-dining-Palm-Beach-late-2016.html

In this episode we take a look back at Jeffrey Epstein's shady financials and the FOIA that showed that the SEC had opened an investigation into Epstein after his death.(Commercial at 12:36)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.ft.com/content/f24a9c39-0e9e-4635-8614-4b9f8971f4b8

Alan Dershowitz made an appearance on News Nation this week where he attempted to defend the associates of Jeffrey Epstein who were about to be unmasked using the same old excuse that...nobody knew. Nobody had a CLUE who or what Jeffrey Epstein was. In this episode we take a look at what Dershowitz had to say in the interview about Jeffrey Epstein and the newly unsealed names and what we might expect as things continue to move forward. (commercial at 7:55)to contact me:[email protected]:Alan Dershowitz: Don't Blame Men on Jeffrey Epstein’s List (mediaite.com)

Jeffrey Epstein had many people who were standing up for his 'character' after his first arrest and they sent glowing letters to the prosecutors and judge. In today's episode, we take a look at some of those letters and some of the people who sent them.(commercial at 9:40)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7690411/Jeffrey-Epsteins-2007-biography-prosecutors-described-man-principles.html

In his book author Michael Wolff claims that Steve Bannon was working with Epstein to prepare him for an interview, that never materialized by the way, with CBS.Join me as I dive in!(commercial at 9:39)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/sep/13/steve-bannon-jeffrey-epstein-cbs-interview-michael-wolff-book

After another day in the Carlton Reserve hunting for Brian Laundrie, the teams have once again come up empty. According to authorities the search will continue.We also discuss what sort of gear Brian might have had available to him and it certainly seems to be much more than a backpack.(commercial at 21:08)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10021335/Brian-Laundrie-equipped-survive-MONTHS-25-000-acre-nature-reserve.htmlPictures of the Gear I was referring to in the episode:https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/16235723/brian-laundries-pinterest-survive-for-months/

In Case No. 1:24-cv-07778-JLR, the Combs defendants have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought against them. The defense argues that the plaintiff's allegations are legally insufficient, lacking the necessary factual specificity to substantiate claims of misconduct. They contend that the complaint relies heavily on conclusory statements and unsubstantiated assertions, failing to meet the required pleading standards. Furthermore, the defendants assert that certain claims are time-barred due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, rendering them ineligible for legal action.Additionally, the memorandum challenges the applicability of specific statutes cited in the complaint, arguing that the plaintiff has misinterpreted or misapplied these laws in an attempt to support their claims. The defense emphasizes that the plaintiff has not demonstrated a direct causal link between the defendants' actions and any alleged harm suffered. They also highlight procedural deficiencies, such as the failure to properly serve all parties involved, which they claim undermines the court's jurisdiction over the matter. In light of these arguments, the Combs defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety, asserting that it fails to establish a viable legal basis for proceeding.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.49.0.pdf

In Case No. 1:24-cv-07778-JLR, the Combs defendants have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought against them. The defense argues that the plaintiff's allegations are legally insufficient, lacking the necessary factual specificity to substantiate claims of misconduct. They contend that the complaint relies heavily on conclusory statements and unsubstantiated assertions, failing to meet the required pleading standards. Furthermore, the defendants assert that certain claims are time-barred due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, rendering them ineligible for legal action.Additionally, the memorandum challenges the applicability of specific statutes cited in the complaint, arguing that the plaintiff has misinterpreted or misapplied these laws in an attempt to support their claims. The defense emphasizes that the plaintiff has not demonstrated a direct causal link between the defendants' actions and any alleged harm suffered. They also highlight procedural deficiencies, such as the failure to properly serve all parties involved, which they claim undermines the court's jurisdiction over the matter. In light of these arguments, the Combs defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety, asserting that it fails to establish a viable legal basis for proceeding.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.49.0.pdf