Diddy Redux: Kohberger Plans To Call DNA Witnesses This Week And Diddy Gets Dropped From A Major Brand

Bryan Kohberger and his "I was out for a gander at the stars" routine isn't sitting well with the Goncalves family and they had no  problem calling it absurd and a delay.In this episode, we hear from the Goncalves family in the wake of the alibi claimed by Bryan Kohberger and what we might expect as the process continues to grind forward.An alibi in a criminal trial is a defense strategy where the accused presents evidence to show that they were somewhere else at the time the crime was committed, thereby making it impossible for them to have committed the crime. It's essentially a form of proof of innocence by demonstrating that the accused couldn't have been at the scene of the crime.Corroborating an alibi using digital evidence involves gathering electronic records or data that can confirm the accused's presence elsewhere. Here's how it can be done:Surveillance footage: If there are surveillance cameras in the area where the accused claims to have been at the time of the crime, the footage can be reviewed to verify their presence.Cell phone records: Mobile phone records can show the location of the accused at the time of the crime, either through cell tower pings or GPS data if enabled. This can be corroborated with witness testimonies or other evidence.Social media or online activity: Posts, check-ins, or messages on social media platforms or other online services can provide a digital footprint of the accused's whereabouts. However, these can sometimes be manipulated, so additional evidence may be needed to corroborate them.Credit card transactions: Credit card transactions or ATM withdrawals can provide evidence of the accused's whereabouts if they made purchases or withdrew money around the time of the crime.Email or electronic communication: Emails, text messages, or other forms of electronic communication can provide timestamps that establish the accused's location or activities at a particular time.Digital photos or videos: If the accused or someone else took photos or videos at the time in question, these can serve as evidence of their presence elsewhere.(commercial at 9:17)to contact me:[email protected]:Family of Idaho murders victim Kaylee Goncalves bite back at Bryan Kohberger's 'moon and stargazing' alibi, saying 'if it had weight, it would have been submitted months ago' | Daily Mail Online

Bryan Kohberger keeps to himself and doesn't talk to anyone in the lock up that he is currently in. According to sources, he is constantly watching the news about the murders in moscow and when he's not doing that, he's sitting down with a pastor exploring his new found faith in god.From the archives: 3-20-23We also get a look at how much money it cost Pennsylvania to fly Bryan Kohberger from Pennsylvania to Idaho after Kohberger was extradited.(commercial at 6:26)to contact me:[email protected]:Bryan Kohberger's Secluded Life Inside Jail: Reports (newsweek.com)source:How much did it cost to fly Bryan Kohberger across the country? | ktvb.com

Bryan Kohberger and his defense team plan on calling two different DNA specialists as witnesses at a hearing scheduled for later on this week in Moscow.   The issue at hand?   The states handling of the IGG information and how they collected that information.   According to the defense, there were many issues with the process and because of those issues, they don't believe it should be introduced at trial.    In our second article, we check in on Diddy's latest problems and this time it's hitting him in the pocket book as his Sean John eyeglass frames have been pulled from stock at Americas Best contacts and eyeglasses.    Let's dive in!(commercial at 8:47)to contact me:[email protected]:DNA experts will testify in Kohberger hearing this week | University-of-idaho-murders | kxly.comsource:Diddy's Sean John Frames Pulled From America's Best Contacts and Eyeglasses (tmz.com)

Plaintiff John Doe, represented by Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, files this complaint against Defendant Sean Combs. The allegations are based on personal knowledge and information. Plaintiff asserts claims against Combs, detailing specific grievances and legal grounds for action. The complaint outlines the nature of the alleged wrongdoing, including factual and legal bases for holding Combs accountable.This lawsuit seeks relief for the harm allegedly caused by Combs, requesting appropriate legal remedies. The complaint establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting evidence, and sets forth claims that Plaintiff intends to prove in court. Through this action, Plaintiff seeks justice and compensation for the alleged misconduct by Defendant.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.637615.1.0.pdf

​Kristina Khorram, who served as Sean "Diddy" Combs' chief of staff, has been implicated in multiple lawsuits alleging her involvement in Combs' purported criminal activities, including sex trafficking and abuse. In these lawsuits, Khorram is accused of facilitating the procurement of sex workers for Combs and managing operations related to alleged illicit activities. One lawsuit notably compared her role to that of Ghislaine Maxwell in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal network, suggesting she played a pivotal part in the alleged misconduct.In response to these allegations, Khorram has categorically denied any involvement in or condonation of such activities. In a statement to Rolling Stone, she expressed profound distress over the accusations, stating: "I have never condoned or aided and abetted the sexual assault of anyone. Nor have I ever drugged anyone." She further emphasized that the notion of her being implicated in such acts is "beyond upsetting, disturbing, and unthinkable," and expressed confidence that the allegations against her would be proven untrue.to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy's chief of staff calls accusations against her "disturbing and unthinkable"

​In case number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan Kohberger has filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained from the search of his white 2015 Hyundai Elantra, VIN: 5NPDH4AE6FH579860, conducted under a Pennsylvania search warrant. The defense contends that the warrant lacked probable cause, asserting that it was based on investigative genetic genealogy (IGG) techniques that they argue violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. They claim that the affidavit supporting the warrant contained misleading information and omitted key details that could have been exculpatory, thereby rendering the search unconstitutional.to contact me:[email protected]:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-White-Hyundai.pdf

In State of Idaho v. Bryan Kohberger (Case Number CR01-24-31665), Motion in Limine #2 seeks to exclude vague and undisclosed expert testimony from being used at trial. Kohberger’s defense argues that the prosecution has not properly disclosed the identities, qualifications, or specific opinions of their expert witnesses, violating established discovery rules. The defense contends that admitting broad, undefined, or last-minute expert testimony would place them at a severe disadvantage by preventing effective cross-examination and rebuttal preparation. They emphasize that expert testimony should meet the Daubert standard, ensuring that all scientific or technical evidence presented in court is reliable, relevant, and based on a sound methodology. Without proper disclosure, the defense fears that the prosecution may introduce unvetted or speculative testimony, which could unfairly sway the jury.Additionally, the defense raises concerns about ambiguous or generalized expert conclusions that lack a clear factual foundation. They argue that the court must preclude any expert testimony that was not properly disclosed or that fails to meet the necessary scientific and legal standards. The motion highlights the risk of unverified forensic interpretations or psychological assessments being introduced without proper vetting, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. The defense urges the court to enforce strict evidentiary standards by limiting expert testimony only to properly disclosed, scientifically validated opinions. This motion is a critical part of the defense’s strategy to prevent prejudicial, speculative, or unreliable forensic evidence from influencing the jury in one of the most high-profile cases in Idaho’s history.to contact  me:[email protected]:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-2-RE-Vague-Undisclosed-Expert-Testimony.pdf

In State of Idaho v. Bryan Kohberger (Case Number CR01-24-31665), Motion in Limine #2 seeks to exclude vague and undisclosed expert testimony from being used at trial. Kohberger’s defense argues that the prosecution has not properly disclosed the identities, qualifications, or specific opinions of their expert witnesses, violating established discovery rules. The defense contends that admitting broad, undefined, or last-minute expert testimony would place them at a severe disadvantage by preventing effective cross-examination and rebuttal preparation. They emphasize that expert testimony should meet the Daubert standard, ensuring that all scientific or technical evidence presented in court is reliable, relevant, and based on a sound methodology. Without proper disclosure, the defense fears that the prosecution may introduce unvetted or speculative testimony, which could unfairly sway the jury.Additionally, the defense raises concerns about ambiguous or generalized expert conclusions that lack a clear factual foundation. They argue that the court must preclude any expert testimony that was not properly disclosed or that fails to meet the necessary scientific and legal standards. The motion highlights the risk of unverified forensic interpretations or psychological assessments being introduced without proper vetting, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. The defense urges the court to enforce strict evidentiary standards by limiting expert testimony only to properly disclosed, scientifically validated opinions. This motion is a critical part of the defense’s strategy to prevent prejudicial, speculative, or unreliable forensic evidence from influencing the jury in one of the most high-profile cases in Idaho’s history.to contact  me:[email protected]:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-2-RE-Vague-Undisclosed-Expert-Testimony.pdf

​On the second day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, Rexburg Police Detective Ray Hermosillo provided detailed testimony regarding the investigation into the disappearance of Vallow's children, JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan. Detective Hermosillo recounted the events of June 9, 2020, when law enforcement executed a search warrant at Chad Daybell's residence. During the search, they discovered JJ's body wrapped in black plastic and duct tape in a shallow grave near a tree and pond on the property. Additionally, in a pet cemetery area, they uncovered charred human remains, later identified as Tylee, buried near a fire pit.Detective Hermosillo also described attending the autopsies of both children. He detailed that JJ was found wearing red pajamas, with his head wrapped in a white plastic bag secured by duct tape, and his wrists and ankles bound. Tylee's remains were so severely burned and dismembered that determining the cause of death was challenging. The courtroom was shown graphic photographs of the autopsy, leading to emotional reactions from attendees, including visible distress from JJ's grandfather, Larry Woodcock.to contact me:[email protected]

Lori Vallow’s relationship with her brother, Alex Cox, was notably unusual and deeply intertwined with the events leading up to the murders of her children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, as well as the killing of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow. Described as intensely loyal to Lori, Alex appeared to see himself as her protector, often acting as her enforcer in moments of conflict. He shot and killed Charles Vallow in July 2019, claiming self-defense, despite evidence suggesting premeditation. He was also believed to have played a direct role in the deaths of Tylee and JJ, with cell phone records placing him near the burial sites on Chad Daybell’s property around the time of their disappearances. Additionally, Alex married Zulema Pastenes, a close associate of Lori and Chad, in what many believe was a rushed, suspicious union orchestrated for legal protection. His unwavering commitment to Lori and his apparent willingness to eliminate perceived threats have led many to speculate that he was more than just a devoted brother—he was an active participant in a series of calculated crimes.The official narrative surrounding Alex Cox’s sudden death on December 12, 2019, has been met with significant skepticism. Authorities ruled his death as natural, attributing it to bilateral pulmonary thromboembolism (blood clots in the lungs), but the timing and circumstances raise questions. Alex had been a central figure in the deaths surrounding Lori and Chad, yet he conveniently died just days after Tammy Daybell’s body was exhumed for investigation. His widow, Zulema Pastenes, claimed he made ominous remarks in his final days, hinting that “he knew he was going to die soon.” Additionally, his sudden health decline does not align with any known history of severe medical issues. Given the growing legal scrutiny on Lori and Chad, many speculate whether Alex’s death was truly natural or if he was silenced to protect others involved. Some theorists even suggest poisoning or an assisted overdose—a convenient way to eliminate a key player in an unraveling criminal conspiracy.to contact me:[email protected]