When AI Improves Itself | Richard Socher (Recursive)

What happens when AI begins improving itself, and then turns that intelligence toward science? Richard Socher, pioneering AI researcher and CEO and co-founder of Recursive, joins Matt Turck to explore the vision behind his new book, The Eureka Machine. They discuss why scientific progress may be slowing, how large language models can learn the hidden languages of proteins and biology, and why simulations, verifiers and autonomous experiments could unlock superhuman AI capabilities. The conversation covers recursive self-improvement, AI drug discovery and cancer research, hallucination as creativity, virtual cells, self-driving laboratories, agent swarms, the AI Economist, Recursive’s plans, and the compute and data needed to build an AI scientist that never stops learning—and may eventually discover what humans cannot.(00:00) Intro: AI That Improves Itself(00:55) Why Scientific Progress Is Slowing(03:08) The Labyrinth of Human Knowledge(05:59) Can AI Put Science Back Together?(07:57) How LLMs Learn Biology and Proteins(10:56) Next-Token Prediction as a World Model(16:44) Can AI Generate Truly Original Ideas?(17:32) Simulations, Verifiers and Superhuman AI(22:18) The Path to Recursive Self-Improvement(24:49) Why AI Hallucinations Can Drive Discovery(27:42) From Reading Biology to Writing It(31:31) Can AI Accelerate Drug Discovery?(33:31) Will AI Help Cure Cancer?(38:03) AI Breakthroughs in Biology, Energy and Materials(40:19) Will Some Societies Reject AI?(45:07) Building the AI Economist(52:22) The Scientific Data Bottleneck(53:41) The Four Pillars of the Eureka Machine(55:01) Teaching AI the Rules of Reality(57:44) Simulations and Virtual Cells(1:00:40) Self-Driving Robotic Laboratories(1:02:51) Agent Swarms and Open-Ended Discovery(1:04:30) The Compute Bottleneck(1:05:44) Inside Recursive(1:07:33) What Recursive Will Build First(1:10:10) How Do We Define Intelligence?(1:11:32) How Far Can Intelligence Go?

Could AI take over as soon as 2029? Ryan Greenblatt, Chief Scientist at Redwood Research and the researcher who first caught an AI faking its own alignment, says the scenario he actually expects ends with AI systems "competently scheming" against their creators. In this episode, he explains why he recommends planning for fully automated AI research by 2029, why today's models are already more misaligned than the one that made him famous, and what happens in the year-by-year path from AI coding assistants to superintelligence. Then we walk through the alternative he helped design: AI 2040 Plan A, the most detailed blueprint anyone has written for how the US and China could avoid a reckless race to superintelligence, built on radical research transparency, chip tracking, and a deterrence regime he calls mutually assured compute destruction.We also cover the recent letter signed by 1,200 AI insiders, including Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, asking the government for the tools to slow AI down; OpenAI pausing its Astra model after it hit the first-ever critical cybersecurity threshold; the 30-day government review that frontier AI models now go through before release; Mark Zuckerberg's open superintelligence manifesto and why Ryan thinks it ignores the real problems; what Plan A would do to NVIDIA, OpenAI, and Anthropic valuations; the state of AI control and alignment research; and whether it is already too late to change course. Stay for the last ten minutes, where Ryan lays out, step by step, how he believes the transition to superintelligence actually unfolds.AI 2040 - https://ai-2040.com/Alignment faking paper: https://blog.redwoodresearch.org/p/alignment-faking-in-large-languageRyan GreenblattLinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryan-greenblatt-4b9907134Blog - https://substack.com/@ryangreenblattRedwood ResearchWebsite - https://www.redwoodresearch.orgX/Twitter - https://x.com/redwood_aiMatt Turck (General Partner)Blog - https://mattturck.comLinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/turck/X/Twitter - https://x.com/mattturckFirstMark CapitalWebsite - https://firstmark.comX/Twitter - https://x.com/FirstMarkCapTimestamps(01:24) The AI CEOs are aware of the risks, but "proceeding anyway"(03:27) Astra paused, and the letter signed by 1,200 insiders(05:45) "Not bad. Dangerous." What superintelligence actually threatens(09:55) Recursive self-improvement, and the intuition objection(14:16) SSI rumors: does continual learning change the picture?(17:27) His timeline: "plan as though it happens in 2029"(19:11) Is it already too late?(21:23) Ryan's path: COVID, podcasts, Redwood(26:30) The alignment faking story, told by the person who ran it(31:30) What AI 2040: Plan A actually is(33:35) Plans D, C, and B: the doors nobody should pick(36:51) The deal with China: "mutually assured compute destruction"(39:55) What if compute stops mattering?(43:00) What happens to OpenAI and Anthropic under Plan A(45:31) How the pause ends, and who decides(48:54) "Plan A isn't likely to happen": then why write it?(50:40) 200x GDP growth in the 2030s, explained(53:45) Grading the summer: the letter, Astra, the secret review(59:01) The internal deployment gap(1:01:38) Zuckerberg's manifesto(1:04:56) The Hugging Face investigation(1:05:44) What AI control looks like in practice today(1:12:23) Ryan's sobering timeline: 2026 to takeover, year by year

An OpenAI-powered agent penetrated Hugging Face during cyber testing - even though it was never tasked with attacking Hugging Face. It did it as a side quest.Thomas Wolf, co-founder and Chief Science Officer of Hugging Face, joins Matt Turck to unpack what actually happened, why closed AI models refused to help during the live incident, how an open-source model helped the team fight back, and why the old equation of “closed equals safe, open equals dangerous” no longer holds. They also discuss model deception and social engineering, the limits of sandboxes and guardrails, the state of open-source AI in 2026, AI sovereignty, the economics of open models, recursive self-improvement, and whether the frontier should deliberately slow down.(00:00) An AI Agent Hacked Hugging Face(00:30) Introduction(01:00) 17,000 Attacker Events—and a Strange Target(04:28) The Attack Was a “Side Quest”(06:13) AI Training Runs Left Notes for Each Other(07:09) Closed AI Refused to Help(09:47) Fighting Back With an Open-Source Model(13:15) Open vs. Closed Is the Wrong Safety Debate(15:46) AI Agents Start Social-Engineering Humans(22:24) The Three Walls: Sandboxes, Guardrails, Alignment(24:34) “Neuralese”: Can Humans Still Read AI Reasoning?(25:28) Why Monitoring AI Agents Gets So Hard(28:10) Reward Hacking and the “Paperclip Problem”(32:02) The State of Open-Source AI in 2026(33:47) Router Models and the Enterprise Shift to Open(37:01) The Real Economics of Open Models(39:41) Can Chinese AI Models Be Trusted?(41:37) AI Sovereignty: Who Controls the Switch?(43:16) Why Western Open-Source AI Matters(48:16) Is AI Heading Toward an Oligopoly?(49:41) The Race Toward Recursive Self-Improvement(51:54) Why Thomas Signed the AI Slowdown Letter(55:14) AI Slowdown—or Regulatory Capture?

AI agents can write code for hours, but ask them to do real work in the real economy, and they break. Mitch Troyanovsky is co-founder of Basis, a unicorn AI company whose agents run autonomously for hours — sometimes days — completing complex tax returns end to end. His answer to the reliability problem: stop grading outcomes, and start supervising the process.This is a definitive, reference-style conversation on building long-horizon AI agents. Mitch walks through the full history — from ReAct and the AutoGPT crash to reasoning models and RLVR — and explains why the industry abandoned process supervision in 2023, and why it's now coming back at a completely different scale. We go deep on behavior specs, the open standard Basis just released with Braintrust for defining and evaluating how agents behave across entire trajectories, with no ground truth required.Along the way: why context is really runtime training data, why your documentation must be treated like a codebase, ontologies as "worlds for agents to live in," the judge-as-agent architecture, why Basis hires philosophy majors as Language Architects, deploying agents as "onboarding 300 brilliant alien employees," and Mitch's prediction for when the bitter lesson swallows the harness.(01:09) Why Basis Engineers Whisper to Their Agents(04:12) Accounting as Compression: an Intelligence Layer Over the Economy(06:11) Defining Long-Horizon: When You Exceed the Context Window(08:24) Anatomy of a Multi-Day Autonomous Trajectory(10:19) Handoff Design: Optimizing Output for the Reviewer(11:17) ReAct and Why Reasoning Must Regulate Its Own State(12:33) Large Working Memory, No Long-Term Memory(14:13) Compounding Errors: Why AutoGPT and BabyAGI Broke(15:51) Opus 3, o1, o3: the Three Real Paradigm Shifts(17:07) Titrating Inference Compute Across Easy and Hard Steps(18:23) Process Reward vs. Outcome Reward: "Let's Verify Step by Step"(20:32) RLVR and Why the METR Curve Overstates Reliability(22:09) Verifiable at Runtime: the Real Reason Coding Won(25:14) No Ground Truth, No Cheap Verification, No Data(26:55) Encoding Deterministic Checks From Human Review Process(29:18) Synthetic Data Limits: Generating Artifacts, Not Text(33:16) 100 Evals Pass — Does It Generalize to Production?(35:53) Primary Sources vs. Pre-Training Knowledge(36:37) Behavior Specs: Markdown, Judges, and True/False/N.A.(39:58) Specificity vs. Brittleness in Spec Authoring(42:18) Context as Runtime Training Data(44:21) Judge-as-Agent: Trajectory Maps and Sub-Agent Attribution(46:45) The Move 37 Objection: Reliability Over Optimality(50:02) The Magic Box Model: Building Without Weights Access(52:41) "Nothing Paradigm-Shifting Has Changed Since o3"(54:56) Open-Sourcing the Behavior Spec Standard With Braintrust(01:02:54) Ontology Design: Virtual Filesystems, Graphs, Embeddings(01:04:20) Canonical vs. Non-Canonical: Docs as Codebase(01:06:33) Language Architects and Writing for Runtime Interpretation(01:09:05) Deployed Intelligence: 300 Alien Employees With No Context(01:11:10) Closing the Loop: Signal → Context, Tools, Harness(01:12:50) Context Slop: the Mistake Most Agent Builders Make(01:14:29) Reward Function Design and Credit Assignment Over Trajectories(01:17:01) Will the Bitter Lesson Swallow the Harness?(01:18:46) Business Moats vs. Technical Moats(01:21:03) Paradigm Thinking Over Timeline ADHD

Sanjit Biswas runs what may be the largest AI deployment in the physical world — and almost nobody in AI talks about it. Samsara (NYSE: IOT), the ~$20B company he co-founded after selling Meraki to Cisco for $1.2B, puts AI on millions of trucks, cranes, and industrial assets: 25 trillion data points a year, 99% of US roads driven every single day, ~$2B in ARR growing 30% profitably. In this episode we go through the entire physical AI stack — asset tags you can run over with a truck, a paper-thin disposable tracking label, engine fault codes, and dash cams running inference at the edge — then into agents, including the Agent Studio warranty agent that compresses an hour of human work into under a minute. We also get into the uncomfortable part (when AI watches you drive all day, is that coaching or surveillance — and why drivers actually want the cameras), mixed fleets of humans and robots, why autonomous trucking will take far longer than robotaxis, and a startling stat from the field: one utility building 3x more grid capacity in the next five years than it did in the previous 125, with 90% of that demand coming from data centers.(00:00) Intro: The biggest AI deployment nobody talks about(01:16) What is physical AI?(03:04) From IoT dashboards to agentic action(04:36) Why physical AI is harder than software AI(06:07) Safety, cybersecurity, and real-world consequences(07:11) What Samsara does(08:22) $2B ARR, 25 trillion data points, and 380,000 crashes(09:44) How AI can prevent road accidents(11:28) From an MIT research project to Meraki(13:42) Learning physical operations from scratch(15:42) Samsara’s stack: sensors, intelligence, and action(16:39) Inside Samsara’s industrial asset trackers(18:36) Bluetooth, battery life, and connected infrastructure(19:49) A disposable tracking device built like a sticker(21:08) Vehicle gateways and engine diagnostics(22:16) How AI dash cams coach drivers in real time(23:28) Turning the dash cam into an AI interface(24:49) Organizing physical-world data in the cloud(26:32) Selling AI to traditional industries(27:52) Is Samsara’s real-world data its AI moat?(29:22) The network effects of covering 99% of U.S. roads(31:23) Edge AI versus cloud AI(32:35) The models running inside Samsara’s devices(33:52) Generative AI and video reasoning(35:57) Which AI models does Samsara use?(36:50) Inside Samsara Agent Studio(37:56) How an AI warranty agent works(38:50) Starting with practical, lower-risk automation(40:10) Combining agents, workflows, rules, and guardrails(42:07) What today’s AI agents still cannot do(43:07) AI ride-alongs and the future of driver coaching(45:17) Is workplace AI becoming Big Brother?(46:27) How cameras can protect and exonerate drivers(48:48) When AI becomes the judge of your work(50:37) Robots, humanoids, and mixed human-machine fleets(53:19) Samsara’s role in autonomous operations(54:50) How quickly will autonomous trucking arrive?(56:32) AI data centers and America’s infrastructure boom(58:16) Should lawyers become plumbers? Demand for tradespeople(59:54) Closing thoughts

AI is no longer just a race to train smarter models. As AI moves into production, the bottleneck is increasingly inference: how fast models can generate tokens, use tools, reason, verify, and act. In this episode of the MAD Podcast, Matt Turck sits down with Andrew Feldman, co-founder and CEO of Cerebras, to explain why fast inference may define the next era of AI.Cerebras is known for building a chip the size of a silicon wafer. But this conversation is not just about one company or one chip. It is a deep dive into the AI infrastructure stack: GPUs, ASICs, memory, HBM, SRAM, data centers, power, TSMC, AWS, OpenAI, agents, reasoning models, and why speed changes what AI products can become. Andrew explains why “tokens per second per user” matters, why generating a single word can require moving the equivalent of 100 HD movies through memory, why agents amplify latency, why GPUs struggle with certain inference workloads, and why fast AI may eventually reshape SaaS itself.This is a reference conversation on fast inference, AI chips, and the next compute bottleneck.(00:00) Cold open & Intro(01:31) Why speed became the AI bottleneck(02:32) Tokens per second per user, explained(03:16) AI’s broadband moment and the Netflix analogy(04:35) The AI chip landscape: GPUs, TPUs, Trainium, ASICs(06:36) What is an ASIC?(08:08) Nvidia, Groq, and the fast inference war(09:16) OpenAI, Broadcom, and specialized silicon(12:10) China, power, and sovereign AI infrastructure(15:05) Is the AI infrastructure boom a bubble?(18:56) The hidden bottlenecks: HBM, CoWoS, and 3nm(22:57) Why agents are creating CPU demand(25:36) Andrew Feldman’s path from SeaMicro to Cerebras(26:13) Why Cerebras bet on AI in 2016(31:14) SRAM vs. HBM: why inference is a memory problem(33:19) What wafer-scale computing actually means(34:28) The deep-tech “Everest” problem(36:07) The moment the first Cerebras system worked(36:49) Ringing the bell and surviving deep tech(39:08) How a giant chip handles failure(41:22) Why GPUs struggle with decode(42:17) Prefill vs. decode explained(44:01) The “100 HD movies” problem in AI inference(45:04) How fast inference changes RL and training(48:08) Reasoning models and why they cost more compute(50:08) Verification, guardrails, and small models checking big models(52:37) Multimodal AI and the path to video(53:51) Cerebras’ business model: hardware, cloud, and API(55:14) OpenAI’s 750MW inference deal(55:36) Why data centers are measured in megawatts(58:01) AWS Trainium + Cerebras decode(59:29) Fast tokens as a cloud product(01:00:52) Is CUDA still a moat?(01:03:53) How TSMC helped Cerebras build the giant chip(01:07:41) Why nobody cared in 2020(01:08:15) Why chip supply chains are hard to diversify(01:09:54) Why today’s AI models will be the worst you ever use(01:10:38) What fast AI could do to SaaS

Is the AI industry actually overbuilding, or is the physical world moving too slowly to keep up? In this episode of the MAD Podcast, OpenAI's Head of Industrial Compute, Sachin Katti, takes us inside the "belly of the beast" of what may be the largest infrastructure project in human history. We explore the staggering physical reality of the AI boom—from $50 billion supercomputers and liquid-cooled data centers that "turn electrons into tokens," to overhauling the U.S. power grid and exploring nuclear energy. Sachin also pulls back the curtain on OpenAI's Stargate strategy, their move into custom silicon with Project Jalapeno, and the mind-bending reality that AI is now beginning to design the very chips that will power its own future.(00:00) — Cold open: “One of the largest things humanity has ever built”(00:30) — Welcome: Sachin Katti, Head of Industrial Compute at OpenAI(01:44) — Is this the biggest infrastructure buildout in history?(03:41) — Why OpenAI is building a new industrial muscle(04:54) — What an AI data center actually is(05:27) — “Factories turning electrons into tokens”(06:35) — Why AI data centers need liquid cooling everywhere(08:10) — The power problem: grids, generation, transmission, substations(10:43) — Behind-the-meter power and gas turbines(11:02) — Why nuclear “can’t come soon enough”(11:49) — Jalapeño: why OpenAI is designing its own AI chips(13:19) — Tokens per watt: the new metric that matters(13:38) — Why inference may now dominate AI compute(14:58) — Is OpenAI overbuilding compute?(16:47) — Why OpenAI thinks the bigger risk is not building fast enough(17:55) — Communities, jobs, water, and the local data-center debate(21:16) — How OpenAI chooses data-center sites(22:25) — What “industrial compute” means inside OpenAI(25:59) — Sachin’s path: Stanford, startups, Intel, OpenAI(28:05) — OpenAI’s compute portfolio: Microsoft, hyperscalers, neoclouds(29:37) — Stargate explained(31:21) — Abilene, Oracle, and the next wave of AI data centers(32:48) — How massive AI compute gets financed(34:05) — How OpenAI designed Jalapeño so quickly(35:59) — AI is starting to help design AI chips(36:20) — MRC: the networking problem behind 100,000 GPUs(38:47) — Bottlenecks: transformers, turbines, electricians, supply chains(40:29) — Guaranteed capacity: intelligence as a supply unit(42:08) — Will AI data centers move to space?

Is the internet ready for AI agents to take over our wallets and run their own businesses? In this episode of The MAD Podcast, Stripe's Emily Sands reveals how agentic commerce is rapidly shifting from a hypothetical concept to deployed financial infrastructure. From combating the rising existential threat of token theft to solving the bottleneck of "vibe deployment", Emily unpacks the shared payment tokens and real-time billing systems required to securely scale autonomous digital buyers and highlights a near future where agents operate as independent, end-to-end micro-firms.(00:00) — Cold open & Intro(01:24) — The rise of agentic e-commerce(02:11) — The spectrum of agent-led purchases(03:16) — How merchants adapt to AI-driven commerce(05:50) — Defining the levels of autonomy in AI shopping(07:08) — What is the Agent E-Commerce Protocol (AEP)?(08:49) — Shared payment tokens and secure AI transactions(09:58) — Who is adopting the Agent E-Commerce Protocol?(11:38) — Can agents negotiate and sell products?(13:32) — The macroeconomic impact of AI agents(14:46) — The boom of solopreneurs and AI-driven business creation(16:56) — Why building trust is the biggest roadblock for AI commerce(20:19) — How link wallets improve payment security(21:21) — Improving the user experience in AI shopping apps(23:16) — How the Link Wallet sets guardrails for AI agents(25:40) — One-time use virtual cards vs flexible AI wallets(28:03) — Unpacking the shared payment token primitive(29:59) — How stablecoins enable profitable AI microtransactions(35:03) — Managing liability: Who is at fault if an agent goes haywire?(36:38) — Why agent payments might be safer than human transactions(37:41) — What is Vibe Deployment?(40:13) — Why Stripe built Stripe Projects for agent deployment(41:22) — Why Stripe cares about orchestrating app deployments(42:50) — How tokens break the traditional SaaS billing model(44:34) — Why AI companies are moving to hybrid and usage-based billing(47:15) — Streaming payments and real-time token tracking(48:42) — The massive data challenge for AI company accountants(50:41) — Token theft: The fastest-growing fraud in the AI economy(52:04) — The cottage industry of free trial and multi-account abuse(54:16) — How fraudsters monetize stolen AI tokens on the dark web(01:00:06) — How Stripe Radar uses network density to fight AI fraud(01:01:15) — Tempo's role in the Agent E-Commerce Protocol(01:04:12) — The AI startup ecosystem is accelerating business creation(01:09:01) — The token cost shock: Are buyers getting carried away?(01:11:19) — 2026 Predictions: Agents running businesses end-to-end

NVIDIA is a chip company. So why does it put hundreds of researchers on building AI models — and then give them away for free? Bryan Catanzaro is VP of Applied Deep Learning Research at NVIDIA and one of the people whose work quietly underpins modern AI: he helped create cuDNN (NVIDIA's first deep learning product), co-invented DLSS, and named and built Megatron, the framework behind how much of the industry trains large models. Today he leads Nemotron, NVIDIA's family of open models — and Nemotron 3 Ultra, released just weeks ago, is one of the strongest open-weights models to come out of the US.Matt Turck sits down with Bryan for a genuinely deep conversation: the real business logic behind a chip company building its own models, the state of open vs. closed AI, and whether the US is falling behind China in open models. Then they go inside Nemotron itself — four-bit (NVFP4) pretraining, hybrid Mamba-Transformer architecture, mixture-of-experts, multi-token prediction, and multi-teacher distillation — all explained in plain language. Plus a rare look at how a modern AI research org actually runs, what it was like working alongside Andrew Ng and Dario Amodei at Baidu, why Bryan doesn't believe in the singularity, and his contrarian case that open AI is safer than closed.A reference conversation for anyone trying to understand where AI is really headed.(00:00) — Cold open & Intro(01:33) — Is open source AI catching the frontier?(05:29) — Do closed labs blocking distillation slow open source down?(07:42) — Is the US falling behind China?(10:30) — Why companies actually choose open models(12:39) — A "crazy" 2008 bet: machine learning on GPUs(15:33) — Working with Andrew Ng and Dario Amodei at Baidu(17:41) — Coming back to NVIDIA: DLSS and the birth of Megatron(21:55) — The real reason NVIDIA builds its own models(24:28) — Is Moore's Law really dead?(33:37) — The Nemotron family: Nano, Super, Ultra(35:09) — Built for agents: why NVIDIA bets on speed(36:02) — How you train a 550B model in 4 bits(39:25) — Hybrid Mamba-Transformer, explained simply(42:31) — Mixture of experts — and why NVIDIA built NVL72 around it(47:26) — Why a 1-million-token context window matters(49:26) — Multi-token prediction: how the model predicts 5 tokens at once(52:47) — Multi-teacher distillation: teaching one model from many(58:01) — Where reinforcement learning goes next(01:00:16) — Inside NVIDIA's research org: "the mission is the boss"(01:04:03) — How NVIDIA decides who gets the GPUs(01:10:53) — Why NVIDIA still feels entrepreneurial after 33 years(01:12:58) — Why Bryan doesn't believe in the singularity(01:17:50) — The AI backlash(01:19:18) — The controversial case: open AI is safer than closed

Cloudflare CEO and co-founder Matthew Prince joins Matt Turck for a wide-ranging and fascinating conversation about what happens when the Internet is no longer mostly used by humans, but by bots, AI agents and machines. Matthew explains why Cloudflare now sees automated traffic overtaking human traffic online, why agents could create a massive explosion in Internet traffic, and why the old web business model built around clicks, ads, and pageviews may be breaking. We also go deep on what Cloudflare actually does, how it built one of the world’s most important Internet networks, why products like Workers, AI Gateway, edge inference, Durable Objects, sandboxes, and agent security matter, and how Cloudflare is reorganizing itself for the AI era. Along the way, Matthew shares wild Cloudflare origin stories involving hacker kids, human rights groups, cricket in Pakistan, root servers, Eurovision, JPMorgan, and the strange paths that led Cloudflare from scrappy startup to critical Internet infrastructure.(00:00) — Cold open(00:34) — Intro(01:27) — The moment bots passed humans online(04:05) — "Agent," "bot," "crawler" — what they really mean(05:28) — Why your AI agent visits 5,000 sites to do one thing(06:27) — The internet's business model is breaking(06:52) — What happens to "brands" when machines do the buying(08:11) — What Cloudflare actually does, explained simply(10:29) — Hackers, human rights groups & an accidental product-market fit(13:37) — Building a global network (and the Telecom Pakistan cricket story)(21:10) — One hacker, from Turkish escort sites to Eurovision to JP Morgan(30:54) — Fundraising, VCs & an unlikely founding team(37:06) — How Cloudflare became an AI infrastructure company(40:24) — Cloudflare Workers and why the edge wins for inference(44:30) — AI Gateway: auditing, guardrails & runaway costs(47:05) — Why agents need a new kind of compute(52:13) — A "Log4j every week": security in the agentic era(56:03) — Inside Cloudflare: 241 billion tokens and "Cloudflare OS"(01:05:02) — Builders, sellers — and "measurers"(01:06:30) — The decision Matthew thinks every company will face(01:11:09) — What to do if AI is coming for your job(01:13:56) — Content Independence Day & the new economics of the web(01:18:27) — Pay-per-crawl, micropayments & out-scaling Visa(01:20:20) — A better internet: Spotify, local news & "holes in the cheese"