One More Chance Jane Doe And Her Motion To File Anonymously (11/20/24)

In our first segment...In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), Sean Combs' legal team has formally requested that the court instruct the U.S. Marshals Service to remove his leg shackles before courtroom appearances. They argue that during the October 10, 2024, conference, Combs was unnecessarily shackled, a situation observed by both the press and the public. The defense contends that such restraints are unwarranted and could prejudice public perception.In our second segement...Recent reports suggest that Sean "Diddy" Combs, currently detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering, is receiving notable attention from fellow inmates. Allegations indicate that certain inmates, referred to as "groupies," are vying for his favor, with some reportedly competing to perform tasks such as making his bed. These claims have been highlighted by journalist Toure, who cited an insider's account of Combs' experiences in custody.Additionally, a former inmate of the same facility has corroborated these assertions, describing a 20-man dormitory where inmates are allegedly "jealous" and "fighting" for Combs' attention. These reports provide insight into the dynamics within the detention center, suggesting that Combs' celebrity status may be influencing interactions among inmates.In our third segment..Recent reports indicate that private investigators have approached content creators discussing Sean "Diddy" Combs, aiming to determine if these influencers are being compensated for their coverage. Notably, YouTuber Amala Ekpunobi, with over two million subscribers, claimed that investigators visited her former residence to inquire about potential payments related to her commentary on Diddy. Similarly, TikTok personality "Secret Service Samson" reported a visit from private investigators questioning his Diddy-related content. These incidents suggest a concerted effort to scrutinize the motivations behind online discussions of Combs, particularly in light of his recent legal challenges.(commercial at 10:51)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.73.0_1.pdfsource:Diddy Surrounded By “Groupies” Fighting To Make His Prison Bed, Former MDC Inmate Claims  - AllHipHopsource:Influencers Allegedly Targeted By Private Investigators Over Diddy CoverageBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-07777-LJL, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a motion to proceed anonymously, citing the highly sensitive and personal nature of her allegations against Sean Combs. She expressed concerns about potential retaliatory harm and unwanted media attention if her identity were disclosed. The court granted her motion, allowing her to file the complaint and issue summonses under a pseudonym. However, the court required her to file a renewed motion within 30 days after serving the complaint to continue proceeding anonymously; failure to do so would result in the disclosure of her name.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.629910.15.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this edition of our Mega series, we are taking a look at three articles dealing with Usher and his relationship with Diddy.   The relationship between Usher and Sean "Diddy" Combs has come under scrutiny following Combs' recent arrest on charges of conspiracy and sex trafficking. Usher, who has had a professional relationship with Diddy since his teenage years, quickly made headlines when he deleted all of his posts on X (formerly Twitter) shortly after Combs' arrest. This sparked rumors that the move might be related to the scandal, given their close ties. However, Usher later claimed that his account was hacked and denied any connection between the deletions and Combs' legal troubles..Usher has not been implicated in any crimes, but his past experiences living with Diddy as a young artist have resurfaced in discussions about the mogul's controversial history. He has previously spoken about witnessing wild parties and "curious things" during his time with Diddy in the 1990s, though he has maintained a distance from the current allegations.(commercial at 8:41)to contact me:[email protected]:Usher Says He Saw 'Very Curious Things' When He Lived with Diddy at 13 for a Year (people.com)Segment two:The controversy surrounding the alleged deleted Usher tweets stems from claims that the R&B singer posted a series of controversial messages on social media, which were quickly deleted. While specific details about the content of these alleged tweets vary, the general narrative suggests that they may have been offensive or insensitive in nature, sparking backlash and prompting Usher or his team to remove them.Afterward, rumors and discussions circulated about what was actually posted, leading to debates on social media. Some argued that screenshots of the tweets were fabricated or taken out of context, while others expressed disappointment or criticism of Usher based on the claims.  So the question is, was content hidden or was Usher hacked like he says?   Let's dive in!(commercial at 7:31)to contact me:[email protected]:Usher says he was hacked after his Twitter account got wiped out following Diddy arrest: 'Y'all ran with it' | Daily Mail OnlineClosing out the episode in segment three:L.A. Reid's role in Sean "Diddy" Combs' story has become more significant as details about his decisions involving young artists resurface. In the 1990s, Reid sent a teenage Usher to live with Diddy as part of a mentorship program dubbed "Puffy Flavor Camp." Usher has since reflected on his experience, describing it as "wild" and revealing that he witnessed inappropriate activities during his time with Diddy. While Reid admitted in his memoir that sending Usher into Diddy's world was meant to help him develop a more mature, edgy sound, he also expressed uncertainty about whether the decision was wise, considering the environment that Diddy fostered. Usher has since hinted at the discomfort he felt witnessing adult behavior at such a young age and stated he would never subject his children to a similar experience.In addition to Usher, Reid was also connected to another young star who had a relationship with Diddy—Justin Bieber. A resurfaced 2009 video shows a then 15-year-old Bieber spending time with Diddy, who made unsettling remarks about getting girls for the underage singer. Reid, who had worked with Bieber early in his career, played a role in connecting the young artist with influential figures like Diddy. This interaction is now being scrutinized in light of the serious allegations against Diddy, raising concerns about the environments young stars like Usher and Bieber were exposed to under his mentorship​.These revelations have cast Reid’s decisions in a more critical light, as both Usher and Bieber's experiences with Diddy are now being reexamined in the context of the accusations against the music mogul.(commercial at 10:22)to contact me:[email protected]:Revealed: How Usher brought 'beautiful' 14-year-old boy Justin Bieber to music mogul L.A Reid as a 'gift' (and how it paved the way for singer's friendship with Diddy) | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A new report from the New York Post cites a a reformed Jewel Thief who claims to have seen videos of powerful figures engaging in incriminating behavior with Epsteins orbit.We take a look at the credibility of such a claim.(commercial at 8:00)To contact me:[email protected]:https://nypost.com/2020/07/11/ghislaine-maxwell-allegedly-filmed-politicians-with-underage-girls/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

When it comes to Jeffrey Epstein the one question I get more than any other is this: Was Jeffrey Epstein a spy? The Answer? Yes and no. In this episode, we are once again diving into the topic after the question was recently asked by Virginia Roberts on her X account. Let's uncork it!(commercial at 8:49)to contact me:[email protected]:Prince Andrew's Accuser Shares Jeffrey Epstein Spy Theory (newsweek.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein had several key employees who are said to have witnessed the comings and goings of the survivors and the abusers.With Adam Perry Lang coming forward...the question is...will Epstein's pilots follow suit?(Commercial at 16:26)To contact me:[email protected]:https://blog.seattlepi.com/flyinglessons/2019/09/07/should-epsteins-pilots-have-foiled-his-child-sex-trafficking-ring/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein was surrounded by people that helped him keep the enterprise chugging along but hardly anyone was as trusted as Richard Kahn. He was so trusted that he was made an executor of his will and he was trusted to go to Epstein's townhouse after his death and remove items. The question is...what did he remove and why would the authorities allow it?(commercial at 21:37)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7498903/Executor-Epsteins-estate-removed-bag-pedophiles-mansion-day-killed-himself.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein his criminal enterprise is best known for their depraved behavior in the realm of human trafficking and sexual assault, but the lifeblood of his criminality was the laundered and dirty money that pumped directly into the pockets of Epstein and those around him. Today we take a look at how Epstein and his staff manipulated the law and engaged in structuring.(commercial at 10:46)to contact me:[email protected]:https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/brutal-rebuke-of-deutsche-bank-raises-serious-questions-about-one-of-jeffrey-epsteins-lawyers/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In advance of today’s hearing, the defense submits this letter in response to the Government’s November 18, 2024 letter (Dkt. 72). The defense asserts that the Government’s actions represent a severe and intentional breach of attorney-client privilege. The conduct has compromised the confidentiality of the defendant’s communications with counsel, exposing critical trial strategy, including plans for expert testimony, witness approaches, and other privileged matters.The defense argues that the Government’s actions are not only egregious but have caused significant harm to the integrity of the proceedings. By gaining access to the defendant’s privileged information, the Government has undermined the fairness of the trial, leaving the defense at a distinct disadvantage. This breach demands immediate scrutiny and rectification to ensure justice is upheld.(commercial at 12:33)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.75.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case United States v. Sean Combs, No. 24 Cr. 542, the prosecution responded to the defense's letter dated November 18, 2024 (Dkt. No. 70), and the Court's subsequent order (Dkt. No. 71). The defense had requested an evidentiary hearing concerning alleged violations of Combs' rights following a search of his jail cell, during which they claim privileged materials were seized. The prosecution argued that such a hearing is unnecessary, asserting that the search was conducted lawfully and that no privileged materials were improperly obtained or used. They maintained that the defendant's rights remain intact and that the defense's concerns do not warrant the requested relief.(commercial at 11:41)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.72.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.