Murder In Moscow: DNA, Cell Data & a Crumbling Defense (2/25/25)

Virginia Giuffre, formerly known as Virginia Roberts, has alleged that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell trafficked her to several prominent individuals for sexual encounters during the early 2000s. In legal depositions and public statements, she has named Prince Andrew, Duke of York; former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson; former U.S. Senator George Mitchell; attorney Alan Dershowitz; financier Glenn Dubin; modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel; and the late MIT scientist Marvin Minsky. All of these individuals have denied Giuffre's allegations, and many have provided statements refuting any wrongdoing or association with her claims. It's important to note that these allegations have not been adjudicated in a court of law, and the named individuals maintain their innocence.In 2024, a federal judge ordered the unsealing of court documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, revealing the identities of over 170 individuals previously concealed under pseudonyms. These documents, part of a lawsuit against Epstein's associate Ghislaine Maxwell, named high-profile figures such as former President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and renowned physicist Stephen Hawking. While the release has reignited public interest and speculation, it's important to note that inclusion in these documents does not necessarily imply involvement in any wrongdoing. Many of the named individuals have denied any misconduct or close association with Epstein.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing over 100 alleged victims in sexual assault lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs, has encountered a significant legal hurdle. The Committee on Grievances for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) recently denied his application for admission to practice in the district, citing his failure to seek proper admission before appearing in cases within its jurisdiction. This decision restricts Buzbee from litigating in the SDNY, which encompasses key areas including New York City's five boroughs.In response, Buzbee has indicated plans to seek "pro hac vice" admission, a legal provision allowing attorneys not licensed in a specific jurisdiction to practice temporarily for particular cases, contingent upon court approval. This process requires him to attach the denial order to each request for admission moving forward. Despite this setback, Buzbee maintains that he is licensed to practice law in New York State and remains committed to his ongoing cases.to contact me:[email protected]:Tony Buzbee, attorney for sexual assault suits against Jay-Z and Diddy, hit with minor roadblockBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In recent developments in the Bryan Kohberger case, Idaho Judge Steven Hippler has denied the defense's motion to exclude key DNA evidence. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022, argued that the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) to link him to the crime scene violated his constitutional rights. However, Judge Hippler ruled that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA found at a crime scene, allowing the prosecution to use this evidence in the upcoming trial. Additionally, the judge upheld the admissibility of digital evidence from Kohberger's online accounts and cellphone data, as well as the legality of trash collection from his parents' home, further strengthening the prosecution's case.In preparation for the trial, which is scheduled to begin in August 2025, Kohberger has added San Francisco attorney Bicka Barlow to his defense team. Barlow, an expert in DNA forensics, has been admitted pro hac vice, allowing her to represent Kohberger in Idaho despite being licensed in California. Her expertise is expected to play a crucial role in challenging the DNA evidence presented by the prosecution. If convicted, Kohberger faces the possibility of the death penalty.to contact me:[email protected]:Bombshell Bryan Kohberger court filing says relative refused to hand over DNA | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The latest hype surrounding the supposed "Jeffrey Epstein client list" is yet another round of recycled speculation with little substantive backing. While reports claim that U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi is reviewing documents that may include names of high-profile individuals, the idea of a singular, definitive "client list" has always been more of a conspiracy-fueled fantasy than a verified reality. Past unsealed documents have revealed connections between Epstein and well-known figures, but nothing has  ever  been  done. The notion that some secret ledger exists, ready to blow open a vast network of elite predators, is more wishful thinking than hard fact. If such a list existed, why hasn't it surfaced in the years of legal battles, document dumps, and investigative reporting?More likely, this "impending release" is another instance of strategic leaks, sensationalism, and political maneuvering meant to stoke public outrage without delivering meaningful justice. Previous Epstein-related releases have been riddled with redactions, context-free name-dropping, and vague associations that fuel more speculation than they resolve. The real issue isn't whether a list exists—it’s whether those with actual influence will ever face real consequences. Until we see ironclad evidence, take any breathless claims about a damning "client list" with the skepticism they deserve.to contact me:[email protected]:AG Pam Bondi vows to release Jeffrey Epstein documentsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Ada County Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defendant, Bryan C. Kohberger, filed a motion requesting a Franks hearing, aiming to challenge the validity of the search warrant affidavits by alleging intentional or reckless false statements or omissions by law enforcement. After thorough consideration, the court denied this motion on February 19, 2025, concluding that the defendant did not meet the necessary burden to warrant such a hearing. Specifically, the court found insufficient evidence to suggest that any false statements or omissions were made intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth in the affidavits supporting the search warrants.Additionally, the defense had submitted multiple motions to suppress evidence obtained through various search warrants, including those related to AT&T, Google, USB, Apple, Amazon, arrest warrants, and searches conducted in Pennsylvania and Idaho. These motions were also denied by the court. In its ruling, the court determined that the search warrants in question were supported by probable cause and that the evidence obtained was lawfully acquired. Consequently, all challenged evidence remains admissible in the ongoing proceedings against Mr. Kohberger.to contact me:[email protected]:021925-Order-Defedants-Moton-Franks-Hearing.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Ada County Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defendant, Bryan C. Kohberger, filed a motion requesting a Franks hearing, aiming to challenge the validity of the search warrant affidavits by alleging intentional or reckless false statements or omissions by law enforcement. After thorough consideration, the court denied this motion on February 19, 2025, concluding that the defendant did not meet the necessary burden to warrant such a hearing. Specifically, the court found insufficient evidence to suggest that any false statements or omissions were made intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth in the affidavits supporting the search warrants.Additionally, the defense had submitted multiple motions to suppress evidence obtained through various search warrants, including those related to AT&T, Google, USB, Apple, Amazon, arrest warrants, and searches conducted in Pennsylvania and Idaho. These motions were also denied by the court. In its ruling, the court determined that the search warrants in question were supported by probable cause and that the evidence obtained was lawfully acquired. Consequently, all challenged evidence remains admissible in the ongoing proceedings against Mr. Kohberger.to contact me:[email protected]:021925-Order-Defedants-Moton-Franks-Hearing.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In January 2025, Rolling Stone published an article by Cheyenne Roundtree and Nancy Dillon titled "As Sean Combs’ ‘Love’ Era Began, New Accusers Say He Was Still a ‘Demon’." The piece examines Sean "Diddy" Combs' public rebranding as a changed man, contrasting it with recent allegations suggesting continued abusive behavior. Despite Combs' claims of personal growth following a 2016 incident where he was recorded assaulting his then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, multiple sources allege that his abusive actions persisted well beyond this purported turning point.The article details accounts from new accusers who describe experiences of manipulation, coercion, and violence at the hands of Combs. These allegations challenge the narrative of redemption that Combs has promoted, painting a picture of ongoing misconduct that contradicts his public persona during his "Love" era. The piece underscores the disparity between Combs' professed transformation and the troubling claims of those who have come forward, suggesting that his abusive behavior did not cease as he has asserted.to contact me:[email protected]:Sean 'Diddy' Combs Was a ‘Demon’ in 'Love' Era, New Accusers SayBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Gabby Petito's family has sued the MOAB police department for 50 million dollars due to their inaction during a traffic stop made outside of Arches National Park. The Petito family contends that the police did not do their job correctly during the stop and their blunder led to Gabby's death. (commercial at 12:31)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/gabby-petito-family-files-50-million-wrongful-death-lawsuit-utah-polic-rcna41980?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_maBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Petito family came face to face with the Laundrie family for only the second time since the murder of Gabby Petito as the two sides face off in court over a lawsuit filed by the Petitos where they claim that the Laundrie family knew that Gabby was dead and still refused to say or do anything about it.More testimony is expected in the coming weeks as both sides prepare to head to trial.(commercial at 8:35)to contact me:[email protected]:Gabby Petito's father issues emotional statement about 'dreading the torment' of hearing Brian Laundrie's mother testify as she and his father are sued for causing 'emotional distress' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Gabby Petito and Brian Laundrie were caught on camera by MOAB police officers a few days before she was murdered by him. The Police officers who responded to the call decided not to arrest Brian Laundrie and instead just to separate the couple for the night. Gabby Petito family is suing the MOAB police department for negligence and with this new witness coming forward, it certainly seems their case has been bolstered. (commercial at 13:21)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.the-sun.com/news/6077506/gabby-petito-fight-witness-brian-laundrie-hit/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.