
Episode 539: Reviewing The Sample Portfolios And What Each One Is About, Performance Metrics, Risk Parity Chronicles, And Portfolio Reviews As Of September 11, 2026
In this episode we answer two emails from Stephen and one from Melanie. We walk through the eight sample portfolios and talk about what each one represents, discuss how different portfolios are appropriate for different goals and the relevant comparison between two withdrawal rates is the relative difference (e.g., 6.0% versus 4.3% is a 40% difference in annual spending, not a 1.7% difference), and talk about what the performance numbers on the website represent. We also remind the listeners that additional resources in blog form can be found at Risk Parity Chronicles.
And THEN we our go through our weekly portfolio reviews of the eight sample portfolios you can find at Portfolios | Risk Parity Radio.
Links:
HedgeFundie Portfolio: HEDGEFUNDIE's Excellent Adventure (UPRO/TMF) - A Summary
Testfolio Backtest of Aggressive 50/50 Portfolio (also on website): Portfolio Backtester for ETFs and Asset Allocation | testfolio
Risk Parity Chronicles Blog Signup (Free): Risk Parity Chronicles | Justin | Substack
Risk Parity Chronicles YouTube Channel: Risk Parity Chronicles - YouTube
Breathless Unedited AI-Bot Summary:
A portfolio can look “safe” right up until the moment it isn’t, and nowhere is that clearer than with leveraged stock and bond strategies. We start with a deceptively simple listener question about the Aggressive 50-50 sample portfolio: did we backtest it, and what did the results say? That opens the door to a bigger point about risk parity, diversification, and why “sample portfolio” never means “recommendation” on our site. Some models are references, some are practical retirement portfolios, and some are intentionally risky experiments designed to teach us what can break.
Next, we tackle a classic retirement investing debate: should you accept a lower long-run return if it buys you a higher safe withdrawal rate? The answer depends on your goal. If you want to spend more in the early years of retirement, drawdowns and sequence-of-returns risk matter more than spreadsheet projections that assume steady annual returns. We talk through why a 4% versus 6% withdrawal rate is a lifestyle-changing gap, and why a 100% stock portfolio can still fail in worst-case starts even when long-run returns look attractive.
We also clear up a common confusion about performance reporting: when a portfolio is “up X% since inception,” those numbers reflect withdrawals as tracked in Fidelity, and you can reconcile comparisons by adding withdrawals back for a rough no-withdrawal view. We point you to Testfolio for running your own backtests with tickers, start dates, and withdrawal rates, then finish with a quick weekly snapshot across stocks, Treasuries, gold, commodities, managed futures, and our experimental portfolios. If this helps you think more clearly about portfolio allocation and retirement withdrawal planning, subscribe, share the episode, and leave a rating or review.
Więcej odcinków z kanału "Risk Parity Radio"



Nie przegap odcinka z kanału “Risk Parity Radio”! Subskrybuj bezpłatnie w aplikacji GetPodcast.








