
Iconoclastic conclusions that arise in altered states of consciousness have always sparked major controversy. Do they reveal the truth about ourselves and the world, or are they simply an expression of the mind malfunctioning?
Can we trust these insights, or is it better to ignore them?
And how do we tell the difference?
And if we can sometimes trust them, how do we know when?
Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/psychedelicflexibility
Find my book "Follow the Call: Therapeutic Experiences in Expanded States of Consciousness" at our Buy Me A Coffee shop.
Check out the HoloMind Institute: https://holomind.org/en
Holotropic Breathwork®: https://www.holotropic.com
Holotropic Poland: https://holotropicpoland.pl
(00:00:20) Psychedelics and Truth Debate
(00:02:26) Dangers of Altered States
(00:03:22) Balancing Conflicting Views
(00:04:55) Life Experiences Comparison
(00:05:52) Perception and Language Impact
(00:08:59) Visual Distortions Insights
(00:10:20) Creativity in Psychedelics
(00:12:02) Breaking Illusions
(00:13:07) Relational Revelations
(00:15:39) MDMA and Emotional Truth
(00:17:41) Simple Archetypal Wisdom
(00:19:22) Grof's COEX: Layers of Memory
(00:33:12) Personal Experience Stories
(00:41:55) Controversial Memories
(00:50:21) Insights and Skepticism
Więcej odcinków z kanału "Psychedelic Flexibility"



Nie przegap odcinka z kanału “Psychedelic Flexibility”! Subskrybuj bezpłatnie w aplikacji GetPodcast.








