NJ Criminal Podcast podkast

Villareal v Texas: The Supreme Court's Take on Attorney-Client Conferral During Testimony

0:00
32:39
Do tyłu o 15 sekund
Do przodu o 15 sekund

This NJCP features Jessica Frisina, a Rutgers Law professor and former public defender, explaining the US Supreme Court's opinion in Villa Real v. Texas.

She joins Meg McCormick Hoerner to outline the implications of the case on attorney ethics, conferral orders, and the balance between effective defense and truthful testimony.key topics

  • Supreme Court's opinion in Villa Real v Texas
  • Conferral orders and Sixth Amendment rights
  • Distinction between total bans and partial restrictions
  • Ethical obligations of defense attorneys
  • Implications for trial practice and court orders

resources

Villa Real v Texas Supreme Court Opinion - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1234_abc.pdf

Geters v United States (1976) - https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/425/148.html

Perry v Leek (1989) - https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/488/272.html

Rutgers Law School - https://law.rutgers.edu

Jessica Frisina's Profile at Rutgers Law - https://law.rutgers.edu/faculty/jessica-frisina

00:00 Introduction to the Case and Guests

02:28 Overview of Villarreal v. Texas

06:43 Precedent Cases and Their Implications

10:33 The Balance of Rights and Ethical Obligations

19:17 Guidance for Attorneys Post-Decision

25:31 Concurrences and Broader Implications

Więcej odcinków z kanału "NJ Criminal Podcast"