Why don't men want to oppress women anymore?

The cross-national correlation between gender equality and lower fertility is exceptionally strong (r ≈ 0.81). After the 1960s, a unique mating regime spread across parts of the world—with female emancipation, individual mate choice, and effective birth control—followed by a continuing rise in singlehood and declining fertility. Almost all women still want to reproduce, but many struggle to find a good-enough partner. This article argues from an evolutionary perspective that many men’s utility to “free women” has been so diminished that solving the fertility crisis by increasing pair-bonding rates seems unfeasible. A viable means for aiding the survival of low-fertility nations could be to provide women with the economic and social resources necessary for them to conclude that having children alone makes for a better life than remaining childless. Such policies would likely exacerbate male marginalization, but new technologies are on the horizon that could offer men reproductive equality.

Men are leaving the workforce, and we all need to ask 'what's motivating men to stop taking up the mantle of oppressor?' Wage work was how men established their dominance over women, how men placed women in a position of subservience, how men caged women. Why would men stop doing this? And how do we frame them now as even greater oppressors of women for no longer oppressing women through earning a paycheck?

Welcome to HBR News where we give the badger treatment to the news of the week! This week we will be talking about the newest British Prime Minister Burnham(7th in the past decade), female entitlement, Dua Lipa opens a "banned books" library, and more!

The Voidcat vigil continues. One of the central aspects of the social system of patriarchy is that it teaches men to be insecure. Because patriarchy is at it’s core, a dominance-based hierarchy where everyone has to compete for rank and place in an imaginary pecking order, men in particular, can get sucked into this “game.” Yes....really. Also REPO.

The cross-national correlation between gender equality and lower fertility is exceptionally strong (r ≈ 0.81). After the 1960s, a unique mating regime spread across parts of the world—with female emancipation, individual mate choice, and effective birth control—followed by a continuing rise in singlehood and declining fertility. Almost all women still want to reproduce, but many struggle to find a good-enough partner. This article argues from an evolutionary perspective that many men’s utility to “free women” has been so diminished that solving the fertility crisis by increasing pair-bonding rates seems unfeasible. A viable means for aiding the survival of low-fertility nations could be to provide women with the economic and social resources necessary for them to conclude that having children alone makes for a better life than remaining childless. Such policies would likely exacerbate male marginalization, but new technologies are on the horizon that could offer men reproductive equality.

This is going to be a difficult episode, but we can handle it.

OH NO THE CONSEQUENCES OF MY ACTIONS! Why aren't men putting themselves in a life ruining risk by approaching women at work? What's the worst that can happen?

Welcome to HBR News where we give the badger treatment to the news of the week! This week we will be talking about the passing of multiple prominent figures like Ann Widdencombe, Lindsey Graham, and more!

The Voidcat vigil continues. Women run cover for other women having standards in order to sabotage those women and the men who are looking to pair up. News at 11. Also REPO.

It's official. Leftism is a genocidal cult that destroys civilization, and it starts with hating men.