CTSNet Podcasts podkast

The Beat With Joel Dunning Ep. 148: Six-Year Outcomes After TAVR vs SAVR in Low-Risk Patients

12.03.2026
0:00
46:07
Do tyłu o 15 sekund
Do przodu o 15 sekund

This week on The Beat, CTSNet Editor-in-Chief Joel Dunning spoke with Dr. John Forrest, a cardiologist and Director of both Interventional Cardiology and the Structural Heart Disease Program at Yale Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA, about a paper he authored titled “Six-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis,” published by the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Chapters

00:00 Intro 

02:38 TAVR vs SAVR Context 

03:54 CDC WONDER Data, TAVR SAVR 

05:37 JANS 1, TAVR vs SAVR 5-Year Outcomes 

07:31 JANS 2, Temporary MCS Devices Landscape 

09:17 JANS 3, Pulm Resection Post-CABG 

10:23 JANS 4, PRE-HIIT Randomized Trial 

12:36 Career Center 

13:10 Video 1, Redo MVR After VIV TAVR 

15:37 Video 2, Repair After Acute Intramural Hematoma 

18:01 Video 3, Acute Severe MR Repair 

19:36 Dr. Forrest, 6-Year TAVR vs SAVR 

44:49 Upcoming Events 

45:33 The Lifeline Podcast 

They explored other randomized trials involving high-risk and intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis and examined the specific goals of this low-risk trial. The discussion then delved into the trial’s results, highlighting that there was no significant difference in the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke. However, a noteworthy finding was that the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) arm experienced a higher reintervention rate compared to surgery, primarily due to an increased incidence of aortic regurgitation. They also addressed factors such as valve dilation, stents, and various reasons for surgical valve failure. Additionally, they examined the similarities between this trial and other partner trials and the future for low-risk patients with aortic stenosis.  

Joel also highlights recent JANS articles on the updated five-year outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low- to intermediate-surgical risk, a United States nationwide analysis on the changing landscape of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices in the new heart allocation system, pulmonary resection post-coronary artery bypass grafting, and a randomized controlled trial on the preoperative exercise to improve fitness in patients undergoing complex surgery for cancer of the lung or esophagus (PRE-HIIT). 

In addition, Joel explores redo mitral valve replacement after previous valve-in-valve mitral TAVR, aortic repair after acute intramural hematoma, and repair of acute severe mitral regurgitation due to iatrogenic papillary muscle rupture. Before closing, Joel highlights upcoming events in CT surgery.   

JANS Items Mentioned 

1.) Updated 5-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Low- to Intermediate-Surgical Risk 

2.) The Changing Landscape of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in the New Heart Allocation System—A United States Nationwide Analysis 

3.) Pulmonary Resection Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Feasible, but Right-Sided Procedures Demand Caution 

4.) Preoperative Exercise to Improve Fitness in Patients Undergoing Complex Surgery for Cancer of the Lung or Esophagus (PRE-HIIT): A Randomized Controlled Trial 

CTSNet Content Mentioned 

1.) Redo Mitral Valve Replacement After Previous Valve-in-Valve Mitral TAVR 

2.) Aortic Repair After Acute Intramural Hematoma  

3.) Repair of Acute Severe Mitral Regurgitation Due to Iatrogenic Papillary Muscle Rupture 

Other Items Mentioned 

1.) Six-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis 

2.) The Lifeline: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring in Cardiac Surgical Emergencies 

3.) Instructional Video Competition    

4.) Career Center  

5.) CTSNet Events Calendar 

Disclaimer

The information and views presented on CTSNet.org represent the views of the authors and contributors of the material and not of CTSNet. Please review our full disclaimer page here.

Więcej odcinków z kanału "CTSNet Podcasts"