The Epstein Rewind: Jeffrey Epstein and The Abuse In The USVI Up Until 2018

In todays episode we dive into the deep end and discuss Eptein's ties to intelligence and what Julie K. Brown discovered as she was working that angle of the case. To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-writer-who-broke-epstein-case-a-rumored-mossad-link-is-worth-digging-into/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein never stopped committing crimes and abusing people, even in the wake of his first arrest. Even when officials knew that he had a high chance to continue his ways.Today, we take a look at this allegation and Jeffrey Epstein's behavior on the Island after his first arrest.(commercial at 8:04)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/jeffrey-epstein-suicide-victims-girls-virgin-islands-lawsuit-trafficking-a9285536.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case identified as 24-cv-03931, the defendants associated with Sean "Diddy" Combs have filed a memorandum of law supporting their motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Their primary argument is that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient legal basis and fail to meet the necessary standards for a viable claim. The defendants contend that the complaint does not provide adequate factual details to substantiate the claims made against them, rendering the lawsuit legally insufficient.Additionally, the defendants argue that certain claims may be barred by statutes of limitations or other legal doctrines, further undermining the plaintiff's case. They assert that the amended complaint includes vague and conclusory statements without specific evidence linking the defendants to the alleged misconduct. Based on these points, the defendants request that the court dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety.(commercial at 8:00)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.621909.33.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Rapper Shyne, born Moses Michael Levi Barrow, has recently spoken out about the 1999 nightclub shooting in New York City, expressing that he was made the "fall guy" for the incident. He contends that while he was defending himself and others during the altercation, he ended up serving a ten-year prison sentence, whereas Sean "Diddy" Combs, who was also present, was acquitted of all charges. Shyne believes that Diddy's actions during the trial contributed to his conviction, stating that Diddy "pretty much sent me to prison."Despite the past grievances, Shyne has indicated that he holds no current animosity toward Diddy. In a recent interview, he mentioned that he has "no problem with Diddy" and appreciates any contributions Diddy has made to help the people of Belize. Shyne, now a politician in Belize, emphasizes that his focus is on his political career and serving his country, rather than dwelling on past events.(commercial at 8:55)to contact me:[email protected]:Ex-Rapper Who Took the Fall for Diddy: ‘He Pretends to Be Sorry’Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Attorney Tony Buzbee, representing over 120 individuals alleging sexual misconduct by Sean "Diddy" Combs, has announced plans to pursue legal action against high-profile individuals who attended Combs' notorious "freak off" parties. Buzbee asserts that these attendees, including celebrities and politicians, are "just as liable" for the alleged abuses, even if they did not directly participate. He emphasizes that witnessing or being aware of misconduct without intervening constitutes complicity.To address this, Buzbee has sent demand letters to several prominent figures, seeking to resolve matters privately. He warns that failure to respond will result in lawsuits. Buzbee's approach underscores his commitment to holding not only the primary perpetrator accountable but also those who enabled or ignored the alleged misconduct. He believes that exposing these enablers is crucial for justice and transparency.Also...Ray J has recently expressed concerns about the involvement of other celebrities in the allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs. He suggested that high-profile individuals are financially compensating alleged victims to keep their names out of Diddy's legal troubles, which include charges of sex trafficking, racketeering, and prostitution. Ray J indicated that these celebrities are engaging in a "catch and kill" scheme to protect their reputations and avoid exposure. He also predicted that more celebrities and people in power might either step down or be exposed as the situation unfolds.(commercial at 9:24)to contact me:[email protected]:Ray J claims celebs told him they are afraid of Diddy affiliation and have paid alleged victims to keep quiet | Daily Mail OnlineDiddy's Celebrity “Freak Off” Guests Facing Legal Action, Accusers' Attorney Claims  - AllHipHopBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

King Charles III has reportedly grown increasingly frustrated with his brother, Prince Andrew, due to ongoing controversies and financial dependencies. Following Prince Andrew's association with Jeffrey Epstein and the subsequent fallout, including a disastrous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, King Charles has taken decisive steps to distance the monarchy from further scandal. This includes cutting off Prince Andrew's annual personal allowance, which was previously used to maintain his residence at the Royal Lodge in Windsor Great Park. The King has also urged Prince Andrew to vacate the 30-room mansion and relocate to the smaller Frogmore Cottage, a move that Andrew has resisted.The financial strain on Prince Andrew has been exacerbated by the termination of his allowance and the need to fund the upkeep of the Royal Lodge, which is reportedly in disrepair. Despite these challenges, Prince Andrew has secured a benefactor to cover maintenance costs, raising questions about his finances and the identity of this supporter. Experts suggest that Prince Andrew's reputation is irreparably damaged, and there is little chance of him returning to public duties. They advise that he accept his situation and live a quiet life away from the public eye.(commercial at 8:06)to contact me:[email protected]:King Charles fed up with 'fragile' Prince Andrew amid Epstein scandal: experts | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case identified as 24-cv-03931, the defendants associated with Sean "Diddy" Combs have filed a memorandum of law supporting their motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Their primary argument is that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient legal basis and fail to meet the necessary standards for a viable claim. The defendants contend that the complaint does not provide adequate factual details to substantiate the claims made against them, rendering the lawsuit legally insufficient.Additionally, the defendants argue that certain claims may be barred by statutes of limitations or other legal doctrines, further undermining the plaintiff's case. They assert that the amended complaint includes vague and conclusory statements without specific evidence linking the defendants to the alleged misconduct. Based on these points, the defendants request that the court dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.621909.33.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case identified as 24-cv-03931, the defendants associated with Sean "Diddy" Combs have filed a memorandum of law supporting their motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Their primary argument is that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient legal basis and fail to meet the necessary standards for a viable claim. The defendants contend that the complaint does not provide adequate factual details to substantiate the claims made against them, rendering the lawsuit legally insufficient.Additionally, the defendants argue that certain claims may be barred by statutes of limitations or other legal doctrines, further undermining the plaintiff's case. They assert that the amended complaint includes vague and conclusory statements without specific evidence linking the defendants to the alleged misconduct. Based on these points, the defendants request that the court dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.621909.33.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Mega condenses  the lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs into one powerful, comprehensive episode. From allegations of misconduct to claims of power abuse, this episode brings together the transcripts from Diddy's arraignment in a single, unfiltered narrative. At Sean Combs' recent arraignment in a federal court in Manhattan, he pleaded not guilty to charges of racketeering, sex trafficking, and transporting individuals across state lines for prostitution. These charges stem from a federal indictment that alleges Combs ran a criminal enterprise for over a decade, engaging in various illegal activities including sex trafficking, forced labor, and bribery. The indictment also mentions that Combs orchestrated elaborate sex parties, referred to as "Freak Offs," which involved coercion, threats, and abuse to maintain control over his victims.During the hearing, Combs' legal team requested a $50 million bail package that included home detention and restrictions on his movements. However, the judge denied bail, citing the risk of flight, potential danger to the community, and the possibility that Combs might tamper with witnesses. The court emphasized that Combs used his influence to manipulate and intimidate, which contributed to the decision to keep him in custody while awaiting trial.(commercial at 9:21)to contact me:[email protected]:O9HLComC (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Many survivors have recounted tales of horror that they suffered at Jeffrey Epstein's ranch in Stanley, NM. Even with all of this evidence, the state where Epstein didn't have to register as a sex offender decided that an investigation into his behavior while in the state didn't warrant an investigation. Instead, they decided to punt it to the feds. The question is...why? Why wasn't a parallel investigation launched in New Mexico? Why was Zorro Ranch never raided? Let's take a look!(commercial at 7:11)to contact me:[email protected]:https://nmindepth.com/2019/no-epstein-indictment-here-for-now/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.