Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Moves To Exclude Undisclosed Expert Testimony (Part 1) (3/18/25)

Dawn Richard filed an amended complaint against Sean "Diddy" Combs on March 10, 2025, as part of Case 1:24-cv-06848-KPF in federal court. The amended filing expands on her original September 2024 lawsuit, adding new allegations of financial misconduct, claiming that Combs misappropriated funds owed to her from Danity Kane and other music ventures. It also provides more specific details regarding her claims of sexual misconduct and abuse, including additional dates, locations, and alleged witnesses. Richard further alleges that Combs engaged in intimidation tactics, using threats and coercion to silence her.In response, Combs' legal team denied all allegations, calling them baseless and an attempt to damage his reputation. They have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing that the claims lack merit and fall outside the statute of limitations. The court has scheduled a hearing in April 2025 to address this motion, with the lawsuit continuing to unfold as part of the larger legal battles Combs is facing.to  contact  me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.128.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In State of Idaho v. Bryan Kohberger (Case Number CR01-24-31665), Motion in Limine #2 seeks to exclude vague and undisclosed expert testimony from being used at trial. Kohberger’s defense argues that the prosecution has not properly disclosed the identities, qualifications, or specific opinions of their expert witnesses, violating established discovery rules. The defense contends that admitting broad, undefined, or last-minute expert testimony would place them at a severe disadvantage by preventing effective cross-examination and rebuttal preparation. They emphasize that expert testimony should meet the Daubert standard, ensuring that all scientific or technical evidence presented in court is reliable, relevant, and based on a sound methodology. Without proper disclosure, the defense fears that the prosecution may introduce unvetted or speculative testimony, which could unfairly sway the jury.Additionally, the defense raises concerns about ambiguous or generalized expert conclusions that lack a clear factual foundation. They argue that the court must preclude any expert testimony that was not properly disclosed or that fails to meet the necessary scientific and legal standards. The motion highlights the risk of unverified forensic interpretations or psychological assessments being introduced without proper vetting, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. The defense urges the court to enforce strict evidentiary standards by limiting expert testimony only to properly disclosed, scientifically validated opinions. This motion is a critical part of the defense’s strategy to prevent prejudicial, speculative, or unreliable forensic evidence from influencing the jury in one of the most high-profile cases in Idaho’s history.to contact  me:[email protected]:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-2-RE-Vague-Undisclosed-Expert-Testimony.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In State of Idaho v. Bryan Kohberger (Case Number CR01-24-31665), Motion in Limine #2 seeks to exclude vague and undisclosed expert testimony from being used at trial. Kohberger’s defense argues that the prosecution has not properly disclosed the identities, qualifications, or specific opinions of their expert witnesses, violating established discovery rules. The defense contends that admitting broad, undefined, or last-minute expert testimony would place them at a severe disadvantage by preventing effective cross-examination and rebuttal preparation. They emphasize that expert testimony should meet the Daubert standard, ensuring that all scientific or technical evidence presented in court is reliable, relevant, and based on a sound methodology. Without proper disclosure, the defense fears that the prosecution may introduce unvetted or speculative testimony, which could unfairly sway the jury.Additionally, the defense raises concerns about ambiguous or generalized expert conclusions that lack a clear factual foundation. They argue that the court must preclude any expert testimony that was not properly disclosed or that fails to meet the necessary scientific and legal standards. The motion highlights the risk of unverified forensic interpretations or psychological assessments being introduced without proper vetting, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. The defense urges the court to enforce strict evidentiary standards by limiting expert testimony only to properly disclosed, scientifically validated opinions. This motion is a critical part of the defense’s strategy to prevent prejudicial, speculative, or unreliable forensic evidence from influencing the jury in one of the most high-profile cases in Idaho’s history.to contact  me:[email protected]:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-2-RE-Vague-Undisclosed-Expert-Testimony.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Dawn Richard filed an amended complaint against Sean "Diddy" Combs on March 10, 2025, as part of Case 1:24-cv-06848-KPF in federal court. The amended filing expands on her original September 2024 lawsuit, adding new allegations of financial misconduct, claiming that Combs misappropriated funds owed to her from Danity Kane and other music ventures. It also provides more specific details regarding her claims of sexual misconduct and abuse, including additional dates, locations, and alleged witnesses. Richard further alleges that Combs engaged in intimidation tactics, using threats and coercion to silence her.In response, Combs' legal team denied all allegations, calling them baseless and an attempt to damage his reputation. They have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing that the claims lack merit and fall outside the statute of limitations. The court has scheduled a hearing in April 2025 to address this motion, with the lawsuit continuing to unfold as part of the larger legal battles Combs is facing.to  contact  me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.128.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Dawn Richard filed an amended complaint against Sean "Diddy" Combs on March 10, 2025, as part of Case 1:24-cv-06848-KPF in federal court. The amended filing expands on her original September 2024 lawsuit, adding new allegations of financial misconduct, claiming that Combs misappropriated funds owed to her from Danity Kane and other music ventures. It also provides more specific details regarding her claims of sexual misconduct and abuse, including additional dates, locations, and alleged witnesses. Richard further alleges that Combs engaged in intimidation tactics, using threats and coercion to silence her.In response, Combs' legal team denied all allegations, calling them baseless and an attempt to damage his reputation. They have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing that the claims lack merit and fall outside the statute of limitations. The court has scheduled a hearing in April 2025 to address this motion, with the lawsuit continuing to unfold as part of the larger legal battles Combs is facing.to  contact  me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.128.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The powerful and sad testimony of Detective Hermosillo has set the tone for the prosecution and right out of the gate, was devastating to the defense and Lori Vallow. With emotions in the courtroom ranging from crying to blazing hot anger, there was not a single person who wasn't moved by what they saw and heard. That includes the jurors.​On the third day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the prosecution presented further evidence and witness testimonies to build their case against her. Fremont County Lieutenant Joe Powell testified about the investigation into the death of Tammy Daybell, Chad Daybell's first wife, whose demise was initially deemed natural but later considered suspicious. Lt. Powell discussed the decision to exhume Tammy's body for further examination, highlighting that her prior good health raised questions about the circumstances of her death.Additionally, FBI Tactical Specialist Nicole Heideman took the stand to explain the process of phone attribution, which involves determining the primary users of specific phone numbers. She revealed that Chad Daybell had multiple phone numbers during the relevant period, with three being of particular interest to the investigation. Similarly, Lori Vallow and her brother, Alex Cox, each had several phone numbers, with three associated with each being focal points in the case. This testimony aimed to establish communication patterns among the defendants, potentially linking them to the alleged crimes.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​On the second day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, Rexburg Police Detective Ray Hermosillo provided detailed testimony regarding the investigation into the disappearance of Vallow's children, JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan. Detective Hermosillo recounted the events of June 9, 2020, when law enforcement executed a search warrant at Chad Daybell's residence. During the search, they discovered JJ's body wrapped in black plastic and duct tape in a shallow grave near a tree and pond on the property. Additionally, in a pet cemetery area, they uncovered charred human remains, later identified as Tylee, buried near a fire pit.Detective Hermosillo also described attending the autopsies of both children. He detailed that JJ was found wearing red pajamas, with his head wrapped in a white plastic bag secured by duct tape, and his wrists and ankles bound. Tylee's remains were so severely burned and dismembered that determining the cause of death was challenging. The courtroom was shown graphic photographs of the autopsy, leading to emotional reactions from attendees, including visible distress from JJ's grandfather, Larry Woodcock.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this look back episode we hear from Maxwell's lawyers who said they were fearful that juror 50 was going to destroy evidence and we hear how Prince Andrew got the name Randy Andy. to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.newsweek.com/ghislaine-maxwell-retrial-key-juror-may-destroy-critical-evidence-1677593sourcehttps://www.the-sun.com/news/4648982/prince-andrew-randy-andy-girls-dorm/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we take another look at the New York Academy of Art and their ties to Epstein and his criminal organization.(commercial at 17:11)To contact me:[email protected]:https://news.artnet.com/art-world/new-york-academy-art-investigation-epstein-maria-farmer-1890683Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The way that the prosecution conducted itself during the Epstein investigation/trial is one of the most disgusting displays of negligence in quite some time. Yet, nobody was ever punished for it or held accountable for the ridiculous deal that Jeffrey Epstein received. In this episode we take a look at that monstrous deal once again and some of those who participated in handing out a stay out of prison card in the process.(commercial at 18:52)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8953871/How-sloppy-federal-prosecutors-foolish-mistakes-got-Jeffrey-Epstein-15-months-jail.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.