Jay-Z's Reply To Tony Buzbee In Their On Going Battle Over Sanctions (Part 1) (1/31/25)

In the case Doe v. Combs et al., Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-07975-AT, defendant Shawn Carter (professionally known as Jay-Z) has filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion for monetary sanctions and dismissal of the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Carter contends that the plaintiff's counsel, Anthony Buzbee of The Buzbee Law Firm, failed to conduct a reasonable investigation into the factual allegations before filing the complaint, which accuses Carter of serious misconduct. He argues that many of the claims are demonstrably false or highly implausible, suggesting a violation of Rule 11(b), which mandates that attorneys ensure factual contentions have evidentiary support.Carter emphasizes that the allegations have caused significant harm to his reputation and personal life. He asserts that the complaint was filed without proper verification of facts, as evidenced by discrepancies such as incorrect descriptions of events and locations. Carter seeks dismissal of the complaint and requests monetary sanctions against Buzbee and his law firm to deter similar conduct in the future. He underscores the importance of attorneys adhering to ethical standards to maintain the integrity of the judicial process. to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - Rule 11 Reply(15569784.8).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case Doe v. Combs et al., Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-07975-AT, defendant Shawn Carter (professionally known as Jay-Z) has filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion for monetary sanctions and dismissal of the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Carter contends that the plaintiff's counsel, Anthony Buzbee of The Buzbee Law Firm, failed to conduct a reasonable investigation into the factual allegations before filing the complaint, which accuses Carter of serious misconduct. He argues that many of the claims are demonstrably false or highly implausible, suggesting a violation of Rule 11(b), which mandates that attorneys ensure factual contentions have evidentiary support.Carter emphasizes that the allegations have caused significant harm to his reputation and personal life. He asserts that the complaint was filed without proper verification of facts, as evidenced by discrepancies such as incorrect descriptions of events and locations. Carter seeks dismissal of the complaint and requests monetary sanctions against Buzbee and his law firm to deter similar conduct in the future. He underscores the importance of attorneys adhering to ethical standards to maintain the integrity of the judicial process. to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - Rule 11 Reply(15569784.8).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In 2009, Vicente "Mayito" Zambada Niebla, son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, was indicted by the U.S. government on charges of trafficking vast quantities of cocaine and heroin into the United States. As a high-ranking member of the Sinaloa Cartel, he was accused of coordinating drug shipments from Central and South America to Mexico, and subsequently into the U.S., utilizing various methods such as private aircraft, submarines, and speedboats. Following his arrest in Mexico City in March 2009, Zambada was extradited to the U.S. in February 2010 to face these charges.In April 2013, Zambada pleaded guilty to the charges and agreed to cooperate with U.S. authorities. His cooperation included providing testimony against key cartel figures, notably Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán. As part of his plea agreement, Zambada acknowledged his role in coordinating the smuggling of multi-ton quantities of narcotics and agreed to forfeit assets totaling $1.37 billion. In May 2019, he was sentenced to 15 years in prison, with the court considering his substantial assistance to prosecutors. Due to his cooperation, Zambada was released in 2021 after serving part of his sentence.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In 2009, Vicente "Mayito" Zambada Niebla, son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, was indicted by the U.S. government on charges of trafficking vast quantities of cocaine and heroin into the United States. As a high-ranking member of the Sinaloa Cartel, he was accused of coordinating drug shipments from Central and South America to Mexico, and subsequently into the U.S., utilizing various methods such as private aircraft, submarines, and speedboats. Following his arrest in Mexico City in March 2009, Zambada was extradited to the U.S. in February 2010 to face these charges.In April 2013, Zambada pleaded guilty to the charges and agreed to cooperate with U.S. authorities. His cooperation included providing testimony against key cartel figures, notably Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán. As part of his plea agreement, Zambada acknowledged his role in coordinating the smuggling of multi-ton quantities of narcotics and agreed to forfeit assets totaling $1.37 billion. In May 2019, he was sentenced to 15 years in prison, with the court considering his substantial assistance to prosecutors. Due to his cooperation, Zambada was released in 2021 after serving part of his sentence.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In 2009, Vicente "Mayito" Zambada Niebla, son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, was indicted by the U.S. government on charges of trafficking vast quantities of cocaine and heroin into the United States. As a high-ranking member of the Sinaloa Cartel, he was accused of coordinating drug shipments from Central and South America to Mexico, and subsequently into the U.S., utilizing various methods such as private aircraft, submarines, and speedboats. Following his arrest in Mexico City in March 2009, Zambada was extradited to the U.S. in February 2010 to face these charges.In April 2013, Zambada pleaded guilty to the charges and agreed to cooperate with U.S. authorities. His cooperation included providing testimony against key cartel figures, notably Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán. As part of his plea agreement, Zambada acknowledged his role in coordinating the smuggling of multi-ton quantities of narcotics and agreed to forfeit assets totaling $1.37 billion. In May 2019, he was sentenced to 15 years in prison, with the court considering his substantial assistance to prosecutors. Due to his cooperation, Zambada was released in 2021 after serving part of his sentence.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prince Andrew is finding himself pulled right back into the Epstein conversation now that Judge Preska has announced her decision to unmask the rest of the John and Jane Does from the once sealed documents. In this episode, we take a dive into the Joe Exotic of the Windsor family's newest Epstein related problem and what it could mean moving forward.(commercial at 9:11)to contact me:[email protected]:Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prince Andrew's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein has been a source of controversy and scrutiny. Here's a summary of their relationship:Initial Connection: Prince Andrew, Duke of York, first met Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, in the late 1990s through mutual social connections. Their initial introduction was reportedly facilitated by Ghislaine Maxwell, a close associate of Epstein.Social Ties: Over the years, Prince Andrew and Epstein developed a social relationship. They were often seen together at various social events and parties, both in the United States and the United Kingdom. Prince Andrew stayed at Epstein's properties, including his mansion in New York City and his private island in the Caribbean.Controversial Allegations: The friendship between Prince Andrew and Epstein came under intense scrutiny due to Epstein's arrest and subsequent conviction on charges related to sex trafficking of minors. Epstein was accused of sexually exploiting young women and girls, some of whom claimed to have been trafficked while still underage.Denials and Legal Actions: Prince Andrew faced allegations of sexual misconduct with one of Epstein's accusers, Virginia Giuffre (formerly Virginia Roberts), who claimed she was forced to have sexual encounters with Prince Andrew when she was a minor. Prince Andrew vehemently denied these allegations and stated that he had no knowledge of Epstein's illegal activities.Legal Fallout: In August 2019, Prince Andrew faced public backlash and stepped back from his royal duties in the wake of the controversy surrounding his association with Epstein. He expressed a willingness to cooperate with law enforcement in the United States but faced challenges in arranging an interview with investigators.Ongoing Investigation: The legal saga involving Prince Andrew and his ties to Epstein continued beyond the knowledge cutoff date in September 2021. The FBI sought to interview him, and discussions about potential settlements or legal resolutions were ongoing.In this episode we hear from another witness who has some very, very disturbing things to say about the Joe Exotic of the Windsor family and about his alleged behavior while cavorting with his BFF Jeffrey Epstein.(commercial at 9:20)to contact me:[email protected]:Epstein victim: My friend was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew (nypost.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Bill Richardson is a prominent American politician who served in various government positions and is known for his extensive experience in both national and international affairs. Born on November 15, 1947, in Pasadena, California, Richardson has had a long and successful career in public service.Richardson's political journey began in the 1970s when he worked as a staff member for several Democratic politicians.He gained recognition as a skilled strategist and negotiator, leading to his appointment as Deputy Chief of Staff in the White House during the Clinton administration. In this role, he played a crucial role in domestic and international policymaking.Richardson's first major government position was as the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations from 1997 to 1998. During his tenure, he focused on human rights issues and advocated for diplomatic solutions to global conflicts.Richardson made two unsuccessful bids for the Democratic nomination for the U.S. presidency in 2008 and 2012. Despite his energetic campaigns, he was unable to secure the nomination but remained an influential figure within the Democratic Party.In this episode we head back to 2019 and take a look at his attempts to distance himself from Epstein and his sudden onset of dementia whenever Epstein or Zorro ranch is brought up. (commercial at 11:21)to contact me:[email protected]:Richardson recalls a single visit to Epstein ranch - Albuquerque Journal (abqjournal.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Former Epstein guard, Tova Noel, who was charged with forging records in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein's death at the lock up has been sued by a new co-worker who alleges that Noel bullied her and physically abused her after several altercations at work. The woman who brought the complaint against Noel has been fired, while Noel is still currently with the compnay. Noel avoided charges by the federal government after she cut a sweetheart deal with the feds after being accused of shopping and sleeping as well as faking her records while Jeffrey Epstein allegedly killed himself 15 feet away. And in a final bit of irony, the cameras at the medical office where Noel allegedly assaulted her co worker? They weren't working either.(commercial at 7:16)to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein prison guard who was 'snoozing and online shopping' when millionaire pedophile committed suicide in his cell is sued for assault by female colleague at new NYC job | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 24-cv-12647, United States District Judge Judith E. Levy issued an opinion and order granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss the case. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish sufficient grounds for their claims, leading to the dismissal of the case in favor of the defendant. Additionally, the court denied the plaintiff’s motion for permission to file an interlocutory appeal, indicating that the appeal did not meet the criteria for such a request at this stage of the proceedings.The court also addressed the defendant's motion for sanctions, ultimately denying it. While the dismissal of the case resolved the central legal issues, the court determined that sanctions were not warranted under the circumstances. The rulings collectively ended the litigation in favor of the defendant without imposing additional penalties or restrictions on the plaintiff.to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - Cardello-Smith Opinion and Order Final.docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.