A Dialogue with Yannis Ioannidis, ACM

Moriba Jah is a Astrodynamicist and Space Environmentalist who discusses accountability in space and the paralel with the Digital world.

Mieke De Ketelaere, Vlerick Business School talks about Sustainable, Ethical and Trustworthy AI and the role of the engineer.

A Dialogue with Melissa Govender, Access Partnerschip on regulating AI.

A Dialogue with Neil Sahota, Author of 'Own the AI Revolution'

A Dialogue with Sharon Lemac-Vincere, Lancaster University on comparison space and digital

Vint Cerf is Chief Evangelist with Google. He is an American Internet pioneer and is recognized as one of “the fathers of the Internet“. The interview was originally done for ‘The Brand Called You‘. I4ADA has permission to reuse the recording.

Anna Ida Hudig is a researcher at the University of Cambridge. In this talk we discuss IoT devices.

Yannis Ioannidis is the President of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). In this podcast we discuss the Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct.

What are your main perspectives of accountability? What notions of accountability to you use? How does it add to improving effectiveness of instruments and achieving goals? How to collect knowledge and resources, and how to engage with stakeholders in an inclusive manner? What's the dynamic dimension to accountability? And what digital aspects and considerations are taken in? These and other key topics are addressed in this Dialogue with Rocio Moreno Lopez, Executive Director Accountable Now

Esther George is an Independent Cybercrime and Cybersecurity Specialist and Former Senior Prosecutor for the Crown (UK). In the I4ADA Dialogue she discusses her view on Cyber Crime. Also see: https://zyberglobal.com. And for more information on the Zyber Global Community, please visit https://www.facebook.com/groups/zyberglobalcommunity While everybody seems to be aware of cybercrime, why are the amount of cybercrime prosecutions relatively modest? What is the problem with statistics? What are the roles of respectively media, victims and reporting? Would segmenting and otherwise nuancing this vast domain be beneficial? Do these fit in the current rule of law scope and definitions? Is there a difference between cybercrime and cyber-enabled crimes? What are the current key threats in cyber? How to address and counter those? How to make the conversation more diverse and inclusive, and get all at the table?