Is The Diddy Verdict A Societal Rejection Of The 'MeToo' Era

Why Kohberger Victim Impact Statements Matter Description: As Bryan Kohberger awaits formal sentencing, one of the most emotionally powerful moments still lies ahead: the victim impact statements. In this episode, defense attorney Bob Motta joins us to talk about why these statements are more than just catharsis—they’re a crucial part of justice. We explore what these statements legally affect, how they influence sentencing (even if subtly), and why giving a voice to the families matters—especially in a case that will never see a jury trial. Motta also shares how defense attorneys prepare for this stage, how defendants typically respond, and why the courtroom atmosphere during impact statements is often one of the most harrowing scenes in a criminal case. And yes—we ask the big question: will Kohberger speak, and what would that even mean? It’s emotional, it’s procedural, and it’s the last real moment where the families get to speak directly to the man who changed their lives forever. #BryanKohberger #VictimImpactStatements #TrueCrimePodcast #BobMotta #KohbergerSentencing #JusticeForTheVictims #HiddenKillers #KohbergerPlea #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrimeBreakdown   Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Is Bryan Kohberger's Mind Worth Studying? Description: In the wake of Bryan Kohberger’s plea deal and life sentences for the brutal murders of four Idaho students, one profound and controversial question emerges: Is his mind worth studying? In this episode, acclaimed psychotherapist Shavaun Scott explores the ethical, scientific, and psychological dimensions of examining Kohberger’s psyche. We debate the potential benefits and dangers of analyzing the mind of a convicted murderer, specifically one educated in criminology who used his academic knowledge to facilitate horrific crimes. Scott carefully evaluates arguments on both sides of this complex ethical dilemma. On one hand, studying Kohberger could offer invaluable insights into criminal behavior, particularly regarding the psychological mechanisms that drive a highly educated individual to commit violent acts. Such knowledge could potentially lead to improved criminal profiling techniques, enhanced detection methods, and better prevention strategies. However, Scott also addresses the serious risks associated with giving attention to murderers like Kohberger. Can studying such individuals inadvertently glorify or encourage copycat crimes, providing exactly the kind of twisted fame some criminals seek? Scott explores historical cases, comparing Kohberger to other infamous offenders, analyzing whether previous studies have effectively contributed to preventing further violence or merely perpetuated a dangerous cycle of notoriety. Throughout the episode, Scott delves deep into Kohberger’s psychological profile, examining his academic background, narcissistic traits, and lack of remorse. We discuss the critical lessons the psychology and criminology communities can learn from Kohberger, debating whether the benefits of understanding his motivations outweigh the potential ethical pitfalls. This insightful episode pushes listeners to reflect deeply on how society deals with violent criminals and how responsible psychological inquiry might contribute positively to preventing future tragedies. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #CriminalMind #EthicalPsychology #TrueCrimePodcast #ForensicPsychology #CriminalProfiling #PsychologicalStudy #CrimePrevention #HiddenKillers #Criminology    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Is The Diddy Verdict A Societal Rejection Of The 'MeToo' Era Description: The verdict in the Diddy trial did more than divide legal analysts—it reignited a cultural debate we thought had already been settled: Are we still in the #MeToo era, or are we witnessing its slow rejection in real time? In this provocative and timely episode, attorney Eric Faddis joins us to ask whether the jury’s refusal to convict Diddy on sex trafficking and racketeering charges reflects something far larger than one trial. Was this a quiet rebuke of #MeToo itself? We dig into how jurors today process trauma testimony, particularly in high-profile cases involving powerful men. Did they not believe the victims—or did they simply believe the behavior, while wrong, wasn’t “criminal enough”? And if so, what does that say about where the public conscience currently sits? Eric brings his dual perspective as both a former prosecutor and defense attorney to tackle key questions: Have jurors developed fatigue toward celebrity abuse cases? Was the bar set during #MeToo too high for a jury now looking for “perfect victims”? How does the absence of physical captivity or force change jurors’ perception of abuse? We also explore whether prosecutors leaned too heavily on cultural cues—assuming jurors would “feel the moment” without hammering home the legal definitions needed for conviction. Eric explains the difference between moral outrage and legal proof, and how one doesn’t always translate to the other in court. Ultimately, this episode asks whether this verdict was less about Diddy—and more about us. If we don’t recognize psychological coercion and exploitation as crimes anymore, what kind of accountability is left? #MeTooVerdict #DiddyTrial #EricFaddis #CulturalBacklash #JusticeFatigue #CelebrityTrials #TrueCrimeCulture #PowerAndAccountability #SexTraffickingTrial #HiddenKillers    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Big Breakdown – FBI & Psychotherapist Dissect The Sandra Birchmore Lies & Cover-Up Sandra Birchmore was 23, pregnant, and dead in her Canton, Massachusetts apartment in 2021. Initially ruled a suicide, her case would unravel into one of the most disturbing cover-ups involving law enforcement in recent memory. This episode investigates how Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell—who first met Sandra when she was just 15—used his badge and position of power to groom her, control her, and ultimately, as federal authorities allege, stage her murder to look like a suicide. We examine the forensic red flags: a fractured hyoid bone inconsistent with suicide, a broken necklace, surveillance footage placing Farwell at her apartment that night, and 30,000+ text messages showing years of coercion and manipulation. The FBI stepped in after state officials failed to act, exposing a department-wide culture of complicity and silence. Psychologists weigh in on Sandra’s behavioral patterns, how grooming distorts reality, and why no one stepped in until it was far too late. This is the case that proves a badge doesn’t mean protection—and that justice often begins only when the cover-up falls apart. You’ll hear why the federal indictment of Farwell might be just the beginning of holding an entire system accountable. HASHTAGS: #SandraBirchmore #MatthewFarwell #CantonMassachusetts #GroomingAndAbuse #PoliceCoverUp #FBIInvestigation #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #JusticeForSandra #InstitutionalFailure Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

In this episode, we take you deep inside the strange and secretive life of Barry Morphew between the collapse of the first murder case—and the shocking return of criminal charges in 2025. After prosecutors dropped the original charges in 2022 due to evidence handling failures, Barry Morphew didn't stay in Colorado to rebuild his name. Instead, he disappeared—600 miles away to Cave Creek, Arizona, where he adopted fake names like “Bruce” and “Lee,” lived in a trailer, and kept a low profile. Locals never suspected they were sharing a beer with a man once accused of killing his wife. That all changed when Suzanne Morphew’s remains were accidentally found in 2023—dumped in a remote location known as “the Boneyard.” Forensic testing uncovered a disturbing detail: her bones contained traces of a potent animal tranquilizer cocktail, the same mix Barry was legally allowed to use on wildlife. That bombshell, plus a reexamination of digital forensics, led to a grand jury indictment in 2025. Now, Barry is back in Colorado custody, facing first-degree murder charges—again. His civil lawsuit for $15 million? On pause. His daughters? Still standing by him. But the prosecution isn’t pulling punches this time, armed with stronger forensic evidence and no shortage of questions about why Barry lied about who he was and where he’d been. Was he a wrongfully accused husband trying to start fresh? Or a man biding his time, hoping his past would stay buried? This episode unpacks it all—with forensic details, legal twists, and the uncomfortable truth about what happens when justice delays, but doesn’t forget. #BarryMorphew #TrueCrimePodcast #SuzanneMorphew #ColdCaseUpdate #GrandJuryIndictment #ForensicEvidence #ColoradoCrime #MurderCharges #CrimeAnalysis #JusticeForSuzanne    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Was Bryan Kohberger 'Proud' To Admit His Guilt In Court, Ret FBI Behavior Chief Breaks It Down In one of the most chilling moments in recent courtroom history, Bryan Kohberger stood up and calmly pleaded guilty to the brutal murders that shocked the nation. But was he actually proud to admit what he'd done? Retired FBI Behavioral Chief Robin Dreeke joins us to dissect the disturbing nuances of Kohberger’s courtroom demeanor. Known for his expert analyses on criminal behavior and body language, Dreeke explores subtle signals of arrogance, self-satisfaction, or defiance in Kohberger's admission, shedding light on what may have been occurring inside the convicted killer’s mind during this crucial moment. Dreeke leverages his years of experience decoding the minds of some of the most dangerous criminals in the country, discussing how Kohberger's educational background in criminology and criminal justice may have influenced his attitude toward the plea. Was this calmness indicative of someone believing he was still in control, or a final act of twisted defiance and superiority? Throughout the conversation, we delve into Kohberger’s psychological profile—his narcissism, the need for control, and the unsettling possibility of pride in his horrific actions. Dreeke also provides insights into how this behavior will influence his life behind bars and what this could signal about his mental state moving forward. This detailed breakdown of Kohberger’s courtroom conduct helps us understand not only his disturbing behavior but also offers critical lessons for recognizing signs of dangerous narcissism and arrogance in other offenders. Prepare for a deep dive into criminal psychology with one of the FBI’s most seasoned behavioral analysts. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #CourtroomBehavior #GuiltyPlea #FBIProfiler #BodyLanguageAnalysis #NarcissisticCriminal #PsychologyOfCrime #RetFBIRobinDreeke #TrueCrimeAnalysis #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Would A Jury Have Convicted Bryan Kohberger At Trial? Defense Attorney Bob Motta Breaks It Down Description: Would a jury have convicted Bryan Kohberger if this case went to trial? Or was there just enough uncertainty to risk a not-guilty verdict? In this episode, we get the legal perspective from defense attorney Bob Motta on the evidence, the strategy, and the real risks both sides were weighing. With DNA evidence, cell phone data, the sheath, and witness timelines on the table—Motta walks us through how a trial might have played out. He offers expert-level insight into the prosecution’s strongest cards, and where a defense attorney could have still tried to punch holes. More importantly, we examine what prosecutors feared going into trial. Was it the inexperience of the DA’s office? The risk of a rogue juror? The emotional weight of a four-victim case in a small-town courtroom? If you’ve been questioning why this didn’t go to trial, this episode offers the most grounded legal explanation you’ll hear anywhere. #BryanKohberger #KohbergerTrial #JuryVerdict #TrueCrimePodcast #BobMotta #KohbergerEvidence #KohbergerGuilty #HiddenKillers #LegalStrategy #TrueCrimeAnalysis    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Did Bryan Kohberger Get What He Wanted, Infamy Description: Did Bryan Kohberger commit four gruesome murders in Idaho because he craved fame—even the darkest, most notorious kind? In this provocative and revealing episode, respected psychotherapist Shavaun Scott investigates whether Kohberger’s horrific acts were motivated by a twisted desire for infamy. Unpacking the psychological reasons behind his actions, Scott illuminates the troubling phenomenon of criminals seeking lasting recognition through heinous crimes, explaining how societal fascination with such figures can tragically encourage similar behavior. We explore how Kohberger’s academic career in criminology may have ironically intensified his craving for notoriety, pushing him toward violent acts that ensured public attention. Scott highlights Kohberger’s behaviors—such as his calculated decision to plead guilty in a high-profile plea deal, his demeanor in court, and his apparent obsession with controlling public perception—that suggest infamy was central to his motivation. Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of the psychological profile of individuals who seek validation through destructive actions. We examine Kohberger’s mind through the lens of narcissism, insecurity, and sociopathy, exposing how these combined traits can compel a person to commit violent acts simply to become unforgettable. The episode also addresses the moral responsibility society holds in potentially feeding this dangerous hunger for recognition through media coverage and public fascination. Ultimately, Shavaun Scott questions whether the outcome of this highly publicized case has inadvertently granted Kohberger exactly what he wanted—a permanent, infamous legacy. This thoughtful and challenging discussion forces us to confront the troubling intersection between crime, celebrity culture, and human psychology. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #Infamy #TrueCrimePodcast #CriminalPsychology #Psychotherapy #NotoriousCriminals #FameThroughCrime #CrimeAnalysis #SerialKillerPsychology #HiddenKillers    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Why Did The State Accept Bryan Kohberger’s Plea, Attorney Eric Faddis Explains Bryan Kohberger’s surprise guilty plea sent shockwaves through the public, media, and especially the families of his victims. But why did the prosecution accept this plea instead of pushing forward with a high-profile trial, potentially leading to a death penalty verdict? In this crucial episode, Attorney Eric Faddis joins us to unravel exactly why the state chose this path, clarifying the hidden legal strategies behind accepting Kohberger’s plea. Faddis breaks down the prosecution’s decision-making process step by step, explaining the advantages prosecutors saw in taking the plea—from guaranteed justice and closure to avoiding the trauma of a prolonged and graphic trial. He also examines whether fears of appeal or issues with jury selection could have influenced the state’s choice, and how public pressure and resources play into such critical decisions. Drawing from his rich experience as both prosecutor and defense attorney, Eric Faddis outlines the risks prosecutors weigh when facing the possibility of a jury trial, particularly in cases with enormous media attention and emotional investment. Was the plea a pragmatic choice to ensure a life sentence and guaranteed justice, or did the prosecution compromise too much in their pursuit of closure? Listeners will get an insightful look at plea deals, their strategic uses, and how they affect not only justice outcomes but also victim families who might feel denied their day in court. Through clear and concise explanations, Faddis helps us understand this controversial decision from multiple angles, shedding light on the often misunderstood legal realities behind accepting guilty pleas in infamous criminal cases. Join us for an informative, thought-provoking discussion about legal strategies, emotional stakes, and the true meaning of justice when dealing with unimaginable crimes like Kohberger’s. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #GuiltyPlea #ProsecutionStrategy #LegalAnalysis #AttorneyEricFaddis #JusticeSystem #DeathPenaltyDebate #VictimsFamilies #CourtroomStrategy #TrueCrimePodcast    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Why Was Madison Mogen The Target of Kohberger? Howard Blum Explains Description: Among the most chilling questions in the Bryan Kohberger case is why Madison Mogen — of all the victims — may have been the primary target. In this deeply unsettling episode, investigative journalist Howard Blum joins Hidden Killers to unpack his exclusive theory: that Maddie Mogen didn’t just symbolize something to Kohberger — she represented everything he believed he was denied. Blum explores the alleged fixation Kohberger may have developed on Maddie: her appearance, her joy, her effortless connection to others — all of it, a rebuke to his own social alienation. She was the kind of person he could never be close to. And, in Blum’s words, he believed if he couldn’t exist in her world, she shouldn’t be allowed to either. We retrace the alleged events of that night — Kohberger circling the King Road house not once, but three times, before finally working up the will to approach. Blum details how Kohberger appeared fixated on entering Maddie’s room, passing other sleeping victims on the way — and how everything unraveled when he found not one, but two people inside: Maddie and Kaylee. The attack that followed was violent, unrestrained, and ultimately left behind the knife sheath that became the smoking gun. Joined by Robin Dreeke, we also explore whether this was truly a single-target fantasy turned spree, or whether Kohberger was already walking the path of serial escalation — and what Maddie’s symbolic power in his mind says about the dark psychology behind targeted murder. Hashtags: #MaddieMogen #BryanKohberger #HowardBlum #TrueCrimeToday #IdahoFour #KohbergerTarget #MoscowMurders #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #ForensicPsychology Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872