When is it okay to restrict free speech?

In this week's UK Column banter session between me, Mike Robinson, and Charles Malet, we chat about what is meant by the term 'free speech' and when, if at all, it is acceptable to restrict people from speaking freely.As it happens, there are indeed times when it's okay to restrict speech — in a cinema, for example. Do you want to pay money to watch a movie and, instead, listen to the people next to you chatting about what they had for lunch? I pointed out that I won't allow people to come into my home and swear at my family.Sadly, it seems that some people don't do well with absolute freedom of speech and prefer to be chaotic trolls who ruin it for those around them.

Cynthia Chung is an amazing researcher, writer, and filmmaker, and is currently writing a mammoth series on Substack, The True Origins of China's 'Social Credit System', which will later become a documentary, in which she exposes social credit scores as a Western invention, not a Chinese one, as we are led to believe.This matters a lot because we constantly hear about China leading the way in technocracy and why it's a model for Western countries, but the reality is an inversion of what we think we are told.

HIV/AIDS does not exist.It's a hoax.More specifically, according to biochemist David Rasnick, who has been researching this stuff since the '80s, there is no evidence of any virus causing AIDS. To be clear, AIDS does exist, and it's pretty much a collection of known symptoms such as severe weight loss, chronic diarrhoea, recurring fever, persistent fatigue, swollen lymph nodes, and opportunistic infections like pneumonia and tuberculosis, but all of it is caused by environmental factors.

David Rasnick, a biochemist of many decades, argues that cancer is caused by aneuploidy — an abnormal number or balance of chromosomes — not by individual gene mutations as mainstream medicine claims.David was on my podcast a few days ago, where he discussed his decades' worth of research in both AIDS and cancer. However, it proved too much for an hour, so he's returned to focus solely on cancer.

In this weekly banter between UK Column's Mike Robinson, Charles Malet, and me, we discuss ways to navigate what's true and what isn't in both mainstream and alternative media, noting that just because alternative media often counters mainstream narratives, doesn't automatically make it true. And just because something is said in mainstream media, doesn't automatically make it false.In other words, always do your own research and don't blindly trust any of them.

Today is a public holiday in South Africa. It's called Youth Day and it commemorates the uprising in Soweto on 16 June 1976.In short, the apartheid government made a morally bankrupt decision to teach Black pupils in Afrikaans, which was never going to end well, since it was not their mother tongue. Naturally, there was pushback, which ended in street protests and lethal force by the government — another morally bankrupt decision. After all, why use live ammunition on kids? Well, that's exactly what they did, killing some, and the news went global.But there's another part to the story, often ignored, and that is the significant Soviet and Jewish influence behind the entire event.Simon Roche, spokesman for Die Suidlanders, gave a politically incorrect breakdown of everything, with some extra bits on former South African Prime Minister Hendrik Verwoerd.

Monika Wiesak published a book on how the media destroyed Michael Jackson and was recently on my podcast to discuss it. She's also written two books on JFK, exploring how the media similarly destroyed him — so I invited her back to dig into those. The conversation covers the assassination cover-up, the death of JFK Jr., the media's lies, the CIA, and JFK's policies towards Israel.

James Patrick is a filmmaker whose excellent documentaries during the Covid era, caught my attention. I recommend watching Planet Lockdown. It was (and still is) superb.This conversation is about his new documentary, World War 3.

I've thought for years that Michael Jackson was innocent and that the establishment destroyed him because there were a few individuals with an axe to grind.. Monika Wiesak recently published a book — Michael Jackson: The Man, the Music, the Controversy — in which she exposes the conspiracy to take him down in 1993, and he was never able to fully recover. His lyrics became angrier and more revealing, and nobody listened. He was trying to tell us what was going on. He even pointed to Jews in both his lyrics and reality.I found this conversation with Monika one of the most interesting I've had in a long time.

Alex Michael is a musician known as Conspiracy Music Guru, who makes music about, err, conspiracies.His music is great and his lyrics are funny.He chatted to me about how the frequency most music is tuned to was changed a few decades ago, with help from the Rockefellers. Alex says that 432 Hz is more aligned with our natural comfort zone, but the standard became 440 Hz to keep us perpetually anxious. Imagine listening to a singer who is always flat, but so slightly that you can't quite pin it.