Bitesize Payments podcast

Identity, Privacy, and Surveillance

0:00
19:49
15 Sekunden vorwärts
15 Sekunden vorwärts

The expanded Substack essay is here https://bitesizepayments.substack.com/p/identity-privacy-and-surveillance


Orwell said privacy would be taken. Huxley said we'd hand it over.

On digital payments, we managed both.

And it's left us arguing about the wrong thing. Total transparency or total anonymity. Surveillance state or crypto shadows. Pick one.

That framing is tidy, and it's false — because it misses why cash worked in the first place. Cash was never a principled privacy design. It was an accident of physics. Paper can't phone home.

The middle ground we're mourning was never engineered. We just inherited it.

Which means if we want one now, we have to build it on purpose. And the tools already exist. Zero-knowledge proofs. Selective disclosure. Tokenisation. Prove you're over eighteen without showing your birth date. Prove the funds are clean without exposing the account. The digital euro's offline design keeps transaction details between payer and payee alone — and Parliament cleared the framework last month.

So the real question was never transparency versus anonymity.

It's whether anyone with power actually wants the middle.

Orwell and Huxley both assumed we'd have no choice. That part they got wrong.

Send us Fan Mail









Payments Industry Insights

History of Payments

Payment System Explained

Corporate Payments Strategy

Payment Regulations Impact

ISO20022 Standard

Digital Payments Evolution

CBDC Advancements

Cryptocurrency in Payments

Financial Technology Education


Weitere Episoden von „Bitesize Payments“