The Epstein Rewind: How Jeffrey Epstein Ushered In The Fall Of Victoria's Secret

The fallout from the relationship between Les Wexner and Jeffrey Epstein continues to be felt by Victoria's secret, even if they are looking to place the blame elsewhere. Since the revelations about the deep ties between the founder of the company and the convicted sex offender Epstein, the company has been on a downward spiral and the only logical place for it to end up, is in the bargain bins. However, according to the new CEO of Victoria's Secret, it has NOTHING to do with Jeffrey Epstein. I have my doubts.(commercial at 8:59)to contact me:[email protected]:https://nypost.com/2022/08/25/victorias-secret-ceo-insists-jeffrey-epstein-hulu-documentary-was-a-non-event/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Denise George, the Attorney General in the United States Virgin Islands, has been engaged in a battle with the remnants of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise and she has not been shy to use her power to subpoena documents from many of those associated with Epstein. In this episode, we take a look at some of those she is digging into.(Commercial at 9:50)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-31/epstein-records-targeted-in-expanding-probe-by-virgin-islandsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Richard v. Combs, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-6848 (KPF), UMG Recordings, Inc. (“UMGR”) has informed Judge Failla of its intent to file a motion to dismiss the complaint filed by plaintiff Dawn Richard. Represented by legal counsel, UMGR has requested this pre-motion conference in accordance with Section 4.A. of the judge's individual practices. The request signifies UMGR's formal step toward challenging the plaintiff's claims.The motion aims to dismiss the complaint entirely with respect to UMGR, indicating that the company believes the claims brought by Richard lack legal basis or merit. By seeking this pre-motion conference, UMGR hopes to discuss the grounds for its motion and clarify procedural matters before formally filing for dismissal.(commercial at 8:30)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.73.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Tanika Ray, a former backup dancer for Sean "Diddy" Combs, has recently shared insights into her experiences working with him during the 1990s. In a March 2024 Instagram post, Ray revealed that she had a "horrific" personal encounter with Diddy, leading her to consciously avoid him thereafter. She stated, "I just knew to avoid him at all costs," and mentioned that while she danced for him and conducted interviews related to his projects, she maintained her distance.Ray chose not to disclose specific details of the incident, citing the trauma associated with revisiting such experiences. She emphasized the challenges women face in speaking out, noting that sharing their stories can lead to re-victimization. Ray highlighted the importance of healing and moving forward, stating that while she has many stories from her time in Hollywood, she prefers to prioritize her mental health over recounting past traumas.(commercial at 8:37)to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy's former dancer Tanika Ray claims she had 'horrific' incident with rapper and 'knew to avoid him' after it | The US SunBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a recent interview with Michael Franzese, former Death Row Records CEO Suge Knight made several allegations concerning Sean "Diddy" Combs and other figures in the music industry. Knight claimed that Diddy had inappropriate relationships with artists Usher and Justin Bieber, alleging that Diddy engaged in sexual activities with both when they were young. He expressed particular concern for Bieber, stating, "It was the saddest thing in the world what they did to Justin Bieber. They had sex with him. I hate to say that because I really like Justin Bieber. I feel bad for Justin Bieber."Additionally, Knight suggested that Diddy and Snoop Dogg shared an unusually close and "uncomfortable" relationship, implying that their interactions went beyond professional boundaries. He stated, "Snoop and Puffy was so close, closer than close, closer than most. They would do things together, and part[y] together, and do things that it was uncomfortable for two men to be that way."We also hear from Diddy's team who responded to the recent comments made by Shyne.(commercial at 8:59)to contact me:[email protected]:Suge Knight Claims Diddy Groomed Justin Bieber & 'Molested' Usher | HipHopDXBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Rapper Lil Durk, born Durk Devontay Banks, has entered a not-guilty plea to federal charges alleging his involvement in a murder-for-hire plot targeting fellow rapper Quando Rondo. The charges stem from an August 2022 incident in Los Angeles, where Rondo's cousin was fatally shot, purportedly in retaliation for the 2020 killing of King Von, an associate of Lil Durk. If convicted, Lil Durk faces a potential life sentence.In response to these serious allegations, Lil Durk has enlisted the services of prominent defense attorney Drew Findling, known for representing high-profile clients such as Cardi B, Offset, and former President Donald Trump. Findling's extensive experience in high-stakes legal battles is expected to play a crucial role in Lil Durk's defense as the case progresses.(commercial at 7:16)to contact me:[email protected]:Rapper Lil Durk pleads not guilty to murder-for-hire charges during Los Angeles arraignment: ReportBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case Jane Doe v. Sean Combs, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-08054, the plaintiff, proceeding under a pseudonym, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging sexual assault and related misconduct. The complaint details incidents from approximately twenty years ago, asserting that Combs engaged in non-consensual sexual acts and inflicted emotional distress upon the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks a jury trial to address these allegations and obtain appropriate legal remedies.Subsequently, the plaintiff requested permission to proceed under a pseudonym, citing concerns for personal safety and privacy. However, on October 30, 2024, the court denied this motion, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings and the defendants' right to a fair defense. The court ordered the plaintiff to refile the complaint under her legal name by November 13, 2024, to proceed with the case.In this episode, we get a look at the complaint and the name of the accuser.   (commercial at 7:23)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.23.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case Jane Doe v. Sean Combs, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-08054, the plaintiff, proceeding under a pseudonym, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging sexual assault and related misconduct. The complaint details incidents from approximately twenty years ago, asserting that Combs engaged in non-consensual sexual acts and inflicted emotional distress upon the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks a jury trial to address these allegations and obtain appropriate legal remedies.Subsequently, the plaintiff requested permission to proceed under a pseudonym, citing concerns for personal safety and privacy. However, on October 30, 2024, the court denied this motion, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings and the defendants' right to a fair defense. The court ordered the plaintiff to refile the complaint under her legal name by November 13, 2024, to proceed with the case.In this episode, we get a look at the complaint and the name of the accuser.   (commercial at 7:58to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.23.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case Jane Doe v. Sean Combs, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-08054, the plaintiff, proceeding under a pseudonym, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging sexual assault and related misconduct. The complaint details incidents from approximately twenty years ago, asserting that Combs engaged in non-consensual sexual acts and inflicted emotional distress upon the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks a jury trial to address these allegations and obtain appropriate legal remedies.Subsequently, the plaintiff requested permission to proceed under a pseudonym, citing concerns for personal safety and privacy. However, on October 30, 2024, the court denied this motion, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings and the defendants' right to a fair defense. The court ordered the plaintiff to refile the complaint under her legal name by November 13, 2024, to proceed with the case.In this episode, we get a look at the complaint and the name of the accuser.   (commercial at 7:55)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.23.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Mega condenses  the lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs into one powerful, comprehensive episode. From allegations of misconduct to claims of power abuse, this episode brings together the transcripts from Diddy's third bail attempt in a single, unfiltered narrative. Sean "Diddy" Combs is making a third attempt to secure his release on bail after being denied twice by the court. Currently detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn on charges including racketeering, sex trafficking, and obstruction of justice, Diddy's legal team filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.In this latest bid, Diddy has offered a $50 million bail package, which includes significant restrictions to address concerns about witness tampering and flight risk. The conditions proposed include home detention, GPS monitoring, 24/7 supervision, barring female visitors, and selling his private jet. Diddy also agreed to weekly drug tests and to avoid contact with grand jury witnesses. Despite these assurances, federal prosecutors remain concerned that his wealth and resources could allow him to flee or intimidate witnesses if released.The court has not yet ruled on this latest appeal, but the stakes are high as Diddy continues to fight the serious charges against him while being held without bail​.In this episode, we get a look at that attempt in full.(commercial at 12:43)to contact me:[email protected]:sean-combs-bail-appeal-1.pdf (deadline.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.