
Architecture has always been a weapon of war.
As US President Donald Trump continues a presidential blitz through Washington DC’s landmarks—marked by an obsession for cutting down trees—the sudden and complete destruction of the East Wing of the White House a year ago stands out. The administration argued in court that it needed to tear down the historic structure in order to build a six-floor subterranean bunker and an accompanying 90,000-square foot state ballroom above it for the safety of the nation. An August 31st unsigned order from the US Supreme Court overruled skepticism in the lower courts, while this week videos of the construction and reports that it will be even bigger spark viral discourse online.
Given the president’s extensive presence in the Epstein Files and their many references to the occult, speculation as to the sudden need for and secret purpose of the ballroom runs rampant—and is unnecessary. As historians know, this is what dictators do.
Woodcutting as a method of remaking the landscape with extraction and demoralization is as old as empires themselves, and the seven presidential trees cut down on the grounds of the White House will be used by the administration—including as gifts for visitors. The construction of a UFC boxing ring over the summer drew the ire of white Americans who were ashamed of gladiatorial “white trash culture” splayed out on the South Lawn for the nation’s 250th birthday. The structure of the White House itself was built with slave labor, and the relocation of former President Barack Obama’s portrait from the main gallery combined with the administration’s many attacks on Black and African-American communities summon the plantation-era history of the residence. And of course, the soulless classicism of the ballroom exterior revives Nazi architecture.
Given Trump’s incredibly long history as a global showman—from casinos, beauty pageants, reality TV and over a decade of non-stop political rallies, it’s clear he learned what the rich and powerful do to control the public and their perception of state power. His use of the fascist grotesque in particular demonstrates command of physical presence and the somatic compliance of the human body: getting his enemies to feel what he wants them to so they do what he wants them to do. But the interior of the ballroom is where architecture truly becomes choreography.
When French President Emmanuel Macron gave President Trump a private tour of the former palace of the French empire earlier this year, Trump admired that, “Versailles isn’t gold leaf, Versailles is the real deal.” A sitting US President openly admiring with jealousy the work of one history’s greatest villains drew outrage as well as laughter—Versailles makes extensive use of gold leafing. But Trump’s interest in one room in particular, the legendary Hall of Mirrors, is no laughing matter. It’s key to understanding his signature brand of embodied warfare.
In 2005, Trump inaugurated a 20,000-square foot ballroom that was added to his landmarked resort, Mar-a-Lago, with a wedding to his third wife, First Lady Melania. Pictured in the resort’s Instagram account, it’s clear the space was directly inspired by the Hall of Mirrors. This design is the basis for the interior of the new White House ballroom, which will continue the Versailles-style gilding that now adorns much of the Oval Office of the White house. The gigantic ballroom, however, will have some developments that were not available to Louis XIV.
An unprecedented collaboration with military defense contractors will craft six-inch thick, floor-to-ceiling windows designed to withstand missile bombardment. At three stories high, the ceiling swallows an audience of any size. Leaked videos from Trump’s donor parties at Mar-a-Lago show how wealth and decadence will organize hierarchy and consumption in lavish galas while the world watches on social media amidst famine and climate devastation. And reflecting in mirrors around the room will be the watchful eye of Donald Trump, ruling it all behind more military-grade glass from a second floor Presidential Viewing Gallery.
The ballroom will be the beating heart of a new empire. Decades of social engineering by multiple global intelligence agencies and private corporations through defunded education, colonial wars, digital media, tech disruption, manipulated elections, artificial intelligence and a muzzled press reaches its theatrical climax. This is where, like the legendary Hall of Mirrors, Trump assembles his court of billionaires to complete the ritual.
This has all been done before, and dance hides a secret of how this keeps happening. The trick to getting the public’s consent lies in the subtleties of one particular object, carefully adapted across the centuries, that always allows the king to return: the looking glass.
Magic in the Mirror
Completed in 1684 under Louis XIV of France, the Galerie des Glaces (Hall of Mirrors) at Versailles became the ceremonial spine of the palace and a stage where imperial Europe would learn to see its own body.
Designed to replace an open-air terrace, the hall featured seventeen massive arched windows facing the gardens, mirrored by matching arched structures composed of over 350 individual reflective panels. During the day, the mirrors doubled and scattered ample sunlight; at night, hundreds of candles in crystal chandeliers multiplied into thousands of reflections, reinforcing Louis XIV’s persona as the radiant Sun King.
Beauty aside, the mirrors would have shocked any visitor. Looking glasses were normally produced in small sizes, limited quantities and at enormous cost. To fill such a large room with so many mirrors required not only state-sponsored industrial espionage and theft from Venice—where mirror-making techniques were highly guarded—but an immense fortune to reproduce them at unprecedented scale. The show of wealth, power and desire would have been absolutely intoxicating for anyone looking to escape the rampant poverty of the peasantry and the brutality of colonized life.
The court was governed by actual dance called “ballet”: a ruthless choreography of proximity and gaze, where everyone’s spatial relation to the king was hyper-visible, ensuring no one could escape notice. It took earlier court culture of Venice and Florence to new heights. Dance scholars reverently return to the antics of Versailles and observe the hall’s purpose:
* To reflect the king infinitely.
* To make his body appear opulent and omnipresent.
* To collapse the distance between image and power.
* To turn divine right into visual fact.
The cleverness of the mirrors was not merely the bedazzlement of a world with a lot less sparkle than what we are accustomed to today. It wasn’t the rare thrill of seeing your whole body reflected, either. The blend of performance, absolute monarchy, optical technology and sacred ritual created something far more insidious: when you looked into the glass, you didn't see yourself—you saw yourself only in relation to the king. Self, surveillance, desire and a show of hereditary divinity entangled and cast a spell that was everywhere in the room. But to be a true weapon of war, this magic would need to find a way to radiate around the world.
As I prepare to send this, I just received a photograph of my landlord—the man who destroyed my home and life—having a lavish wedding in Paris in this very ballroom.
With the help of corrupt city and state officials, my landlord slowly destroyed my rent-stabilized, landmarked apartment building on Gay Street in the Greenwich Village of Manhattan, and with it all the African-American, Romani and LGBTQ+ history there. I’ve been documenting my ongoing legal battle on this timeline project.
Your support through a subscription allows me not only to continue my research, but to meet the financial hardship caused by my resistance to Hall of Mirrors corruption and greed.
If you cannot afford a subscription, refer three friends and you can receive a month free.
If you’d just like to buy me a coffee, my harp case is always out while I’m busking.
Remembering the Reflection
Before the Gallery of Glass wove its spell, Louis XIV’s court ballets were already exercising their political technology.
Choreographers like Pierre Beauchamp and composers like Lully built spectacles that staged the king as the axis of order. The most famous of these was the Ballet Royal de la Nuit (1653), where Louis made his teenaged debut towards the end as “The Sun King”. It was a twelve-hour ritual that incorporated “exotic” elements like foreign feathers, so-called “Amerindian” motifs, and caricatured depictions of African bodies. Most of these had been looted from people France colonized, enslaved or otherwise suppressed.
They didn’t just steal adornments and sacred objects, but cosmologies: practices that honored land, ancestors and future generations—forms of embodied care that sustained whole communities. Under Louis XIV, these became props in a ritual of absolutism. The king consumed the beauty of other people to elevate himself, replacing the tenderness and relational knowledge at the heart of these cultures with a choreography of domination. Grotesque spectacle and colonial violence were two steps in the same dance.
For the empire to succeed in its expansion, however, it would need to replicate this engorging process far beyond Versailles. The costly wars of the Spanish empire showed that coercion, deceit and religious conversion were not enough to colonize local subjects. Indigenous ways and the songs, dances and stories of elders endured. This was perhaps when the first global consumer craze would work its charm; it would convince their enemies to colonize themselves.
As French colonial cities of Algiers, New Orleans, Port-au-Prince and Quebec City grew, so did the import of French tastes, from cuisine to textiles to design to dance entertainments. France was not just invading with its economy and military, it was offering a cosmopolitan way of life as seductive as the rumored glories of Paris and Versailles. Given the alternative of war and possible annihilation, who among the aspirational could resist?
For those who refused, there was another plan. Teaching the world to be fashionable relied upon a mnemonic sleight-of-hand: moving culture from oral tradition to print. The Roma and Sinti brought block-print to southern Germany decades before a banker paid Gutenberg to craft a movable type printing press. After Gutenberg debuted his new bible, the banker would then sue him in order to steal the technology in order to print highly-profitable indulgences for the church. A century later the powerful Venetian courts leveraged this tool in order to proselytize their courtly dancing through “dance manuals”, which contained a new written language designed to teach others how to move and look like the 1%.
In part one of this series on ballet, From Corsets to Six-Pack Abs, we explored how empires, from ancient Rome to today’s corporate tech empires, don’t just map land. They create somatic cartographies designed to seduce the public into a promenade of power that feels irresistible, inevitable and irreversible. By the time Louis XIV created his own private guild of dancing masters in Paris, they were mass-producing maps of movement that were portable mirrors that allowed anyone to pay a dancing master to read one of these manuals and teach them how to join this great game of colonialism. Dancing masters and manuals would spread historical propaganda and the king’s dance while adapting it for local tastes, with the added benefit of co-opting local and itinerant Roma, Sinti, Traveler and maritime dance. And the plan worked perfectly.
From young ladies looking to make their debut at a cotillion to gentlemen looking for suitable partners and trade deals on the dance floor, there was no escaping fluency in the positions of balletic feet, the restriction of the torso and the refinement of flowing aristocratic arms, and all the crinolines, corsets and heels that went with them. In time, the replication of French deportments and fashions was so disruptive that Anglican Bishop George Berkeley asked in his 1735 publication, The Querist, “whether we are not undone by fashions made for other people” when he saw the craze sweeping Ireland. All over the world the spell was working; the longer colonial subjects gazed into their respective looking glasses to craft the right image, the further away they became from their inheritances of culture and generational knowledge.
As the British empire grew, the occult magic of the Italian and French courts and their cultural circulation in print was adapted in profound and devastating new ways through the English language, its laws, capitalist corporations and entertainments. The grotesqueness of the court grew as generations of artists, aristocrats, politicians, corporations and legal professionals grew this machinery to order every facet of life from how streets were built, music was played, children were raised and on and on. They imbued this machinery with meaning that was never there. Proximity to power substituted more and more of the truth.
A backlash did come in “Age of Revolutions” at the turn of the 17th and 18th century, and with it the demise of the Ancien Regime and its extravagance. But the magicians behind the mirror are patient, even when the mirror is hidden. As more of the world lost itself in their looking glasses while listening to songs of freedom, the spell evolved.
When White People Fly
In December 1801, Napoleon Bonaparte sent an army of over 40,000 elite troops led by General Charles Leclerc to Haiti to disarm their independence, remove Toussaint Louverture from power and re-establish slavery. The Haitian revolution began August 21, 1791, and two decades later a Europe in love with Napoleon allowed him to do what he wanted—including tricking Toussaint into negotiations and then kidnapping him. France and other empires were still lost in their mirrors of supposed liberation, right as they decided that freedom for some could actually mean slavery for others.
Haiti would defeat Napoleon’s army, but would be stranded by a global economic embargo. When French warships arrived in 1825, Haiti was coerced into a century of multi-billion-dollar reparations to white slaveholders who lost their “property”. How could French and American whites not in the ascendancy allow slavery after winning revolutions to overthrow tyranny? How could they not see that Napoleon’s desire to restore slavery was part of their own subjugation?
One part of the answer is how many people were not aware that they were lost in a magic show. Ludwig von Beethoven, a master of the Romantic-era concert hall, had dedicated his third symphony, Eroica (Heroic), to Napoleon—only to tear it up when Napoleon declared himself emperor of Europe. Beethoven was part of a culture that was gradually being groomed by the theater to be entertained by the suffering of Black people. The bright light of the mirror and its rapidly replicating blindness taught white people whose skin-tone was good, pure and holy, and whose could be exploited. And the 19th century theater was ready to take this fallacy to new highs and lows.
On 12 March 1832 the first version of La Sylphide premiered at the Salle Le Peletier of the Paris Opéra. With music by Jean-Madeleine Schneitzhoeffer, choreographer Filippo Taglioni would have his daughter Marie dance en pointe—in special shoes with support for dance on the tips of the toes. The shortness of her skirts was deemed the scandal here, and her transformation of toe-walking into a flowing dance was genuinely a surprise for audiences. It was the positioning of the production’s villain, the fortune teller “Madge”, that would be the real crime.
A clear dog whistle for Romani and Sinti people, Madge’s vengeful dark magic and grotesque pantomime were designed to make a community that had already faced slavery and genocide into the ultimate evil of the story. Meanwhile, a white gadjo is portrayed as the victim while a white gadji covers herself in white and pretends to fly about the stage while she damages her feet prancing around on the tips of her toes. The optical illusion was complete; the long memory of Roma and Sinti carrying beautiful, complex dance long before European contact was now transferred to white Europeans, who had little to no memory or record of dance pre-Gypsy contact.
And this juxtaposition of dark evil with high whiteness had reinforcement. A new global popular culture out of the new country of the United States of America was taking the world by storm: blackface minstrelsy. As Du Bois would observe a century later in Phylon in 1940, blackfacing has a long, violent and harmful history. In the 19th century as chattel slavery grew more violent in the USA, the practice of white performers painting their face black and pretending to be Africans—from the wealthy to the enslaved—grew in the shadow of the ever-bigger and more cruel mirror of whiteness.
While an ethereal, fictional standard of white purity soared upward in pale muslin and gaslight, grounded movement traditions and non-Western expressions were stripped of their agency and demonized. Figures like Madge and the minstrel were denied true dance movement and portrayed as wicked, facile or false. Blackface minstrel troupes toured the world alongside ballet’s new form of flying whiteness, and the curses of white supremacy and racism would write the rules of the mirror for the next two centuries.
They extracted rhythms, aesthetics, rituals and meanings while looting African diasporic dances, Romani dances, Indigenous dances, rural improvisation, working-class bodies and embodied knowledge outside the court. The were called “noise”, “vernacular” or “low”. Dances were weaponized against their own communities. According to imperial design, this brittle, dangerous glass coerced bodies with violent social/self-policing, ensuring continued reflection of the light of the sovereign. This decadence was never noble; it was brittle, wasteful and terrified of its own emptiness. It always needed more victims to stare into its mirror.
Others have observed the inherent racism in ballet, and yet it endures. When considering the occult practice behind how we perceive ourselves in the mirror in the dance studio and in the bathroom, there is a moment to ask how to look away or shatter the mirror altogether. But without understanding how it mutates generation to generation, we risk its return even when the king is dead.
This architectural intimidation did not stay locked within the gilded corridors of the French court; it proved to be a scalable blueprint for bodily management and surveillance. This of what we consider worthy of reflection is still very much in motion today, determining who gets what and whose lives matter.
There are people whose entire careers are designed to keep this archive alive and dominant in dance education, research and institutions. Surviving livrets and dance manuals—including those housed in elite collections like the Rothschild holdings at Waddesdon, England—maintain reflections of power that keep recolonizing dance and the moving body in the arts, academia and popular culture. They remain at the heart of “rigorous” scholarship in dance history and who counts in auditions as a “dancer”.
As the world reckons with a new ballroom, the Hall of Mirrors shows it was always there. The entire international order today began its scripting a century ago in the Hall of Mirrors in the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, and colonial expansion today splatters more blood upon a hungry looking glass.
And here is the truth audiences and dancers alike feel instinctively: that first reaction people have to ballet’s rigidity—that sudden, intuitive “what is this?”—is not ignorance. It’s recognition of a spell that tries to make hollowness appear whole, noble and desirable—white paint over where a beating heart should be. It’s a masquerade of power pretending to have soul. Whiteness’s compulsive search for what it can never hold—power—is the real ritual of horror in the Hall of Mirrors.
Dance as a culture and a field study inherited—whether we want it or not—this authority rather than its truth. It has given a confidence to choreographers, dancers and culture makers not rooted in profound human experience, rigorous generational knowledge or greater insight, but in access to old gatekeeping networks that once controlled access to manuscripts, guild knowledge and royal favor. For all our talk of “the body” today, worlds of art and entertainment will not confess that they do not mean your body. They mean the body that the king’s choreographic architects and their progeny wanted you to worship. And this modern Hall of Mirrors working across social media like buttons, grant review panels and standing ovations mistakes reflection for depth and domination as understanding.
The Gypsy Mirror
I was never a very good club kid.
I’ve danced and played the harp for Manfred Thierry Mugler, Suzanne Bartsch, Joey Arias, Rihanna, Mary Wilson and other famous showpeople, but I never was very good at reflecting back more than temporary intrigue. Aeon, on the other hand, was pure magic, carried the wisdom of Vogue/Ballroom House and knew exactly where to make them look—and what to want. I remain in awe, but this was not my mirror.
Before that I was disillusioned with New York City dance classes, which taught me the dance world’s authority: getting the right line, the right illusion and the right version of yourself. It is a strange fate of a dancer to stare at your own body while you’re in the middle of torturing it for hours, months, years. But this is the price of survival in the dance world, from childhood studios to Broadway rehearsal rooms. It all felt so superficial.
I then tried contemporary and somatic dance spaces, where the toxicity of mirror culture is understood. Here I was told to “get rid of all technique” and discover my “authentic movement.” I found in these pajama-clad, sterile studios that what I was asked to leave at the door wasn’t just my shoes, but the pulse of my parents steps and the heartbeat of my ancestors that kept me going through impossible circumstances. All I was left with was a “half-breed” face and white passing body. Meanwhile, all the power and privilege of white gadje dancers and their performances of vulnerability were not only allowed, but rewarded with reviews of profundity and groundbreaking acclaim.
As we ask what to do with the mirror, it’s important to recognize that the task of turning away from the mirror isn’t the same for every dancer. It only feels liberating to those who never needed the mirror to figure out how belong in the first place. White dancers can treat the mirror as optional because the state mirrors them everywhere else; their bodies are already legible and their journeys understood. For non-white dancers, the mirror is not a tool to be easily discarded but a demand. The colonial gaze polices the body whether the glass is present or not. Covering mirrors in a studio does not dismantle the structure; it simply hides it. This is why somatics and embodiment without history is just another soft, kind mirror that evades the realities of colonization and racialized embodiment.
The legacy of the mirror is that in most dance spaces, inter-subjective human connection is severed. You do not look across the room to connect with the humanity or the face of your partner; they becomes a mere prop or obstacle, while your relationship to yourself is flattened into an anxious compliance with an institutional, self-surveilling standard. Rather than reclaiming the living, breathing memory of your own movement, experience collapses into an ancient ghost in the reflection called narcissism. This is where some embodied engineering comes in handy: once the code in the choreography is visible, it’s possible to choreograph the code.
The mid-20th century mass-produced “Gypsy mirrors”, often produced of etched glass that were based on hand-painted mirrors Roma and Sinti often decorated and sold in markets. It is a gentle art to adorn the edges of a mirror with creativity so that it’s there gently holding your face when you look at yourself. Perhaps throwing something back into the mirror breaks the curse.
For me, the truest reflection was never glass. It was my community—shared, uncertain, alive. When the studio mirror tries to define me, my family, my Roma and Sinti elders interrupt it. Whether dancing in kitchens with Irish friends, experiencing the rhythm of the mahala, or posing in the club, belonging creates a mirror, not the other way around. But what about when we’re alone?
There is something in Gypsy Fires that I refer to as timedancing: a technology of remembering who we are in the past, present and future. If you’re looking to find your dance, it is fun to re-imagine your life with tutus and castanets. This space is for that smaller group who have a deeper yearning—who want to remember before the mirror was cast. We do this through bringing awareness to what we’ve always been doing, timespinning old steps and gestures of those that have gone before and using them to craft a choreo-destiny beyond the designs of those who seek to control you. This is what “tradition” can do.
Breaking free from somatic cages that control how we sit, stand, sleep, have sex and child-rear begins the moment we witness without filters the violence and vanity of the glass, shatter the illusion of the archive and remember how to move on our own terms. The looking glass in itself is not the problem, but how it has been deployed by the ritually-fluent and affluent across the centuries documents subtle, tidal shifts in how we view ourselves. And if we are to understand the most common mirror you gaze into—the screen looking back at you right now, the self-inquiry is urgent.
Whether we will ever truly escape the Hall of Mirrors is yet to be revealed, perhaps the best we can do is remember that we’re in it. But breaking the spell will depend on whether the public can remember beyond the mirror. It will depend on how we see ourselves. How we see ourselves in each other. This dancing planet will depend on that.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit newsletter.gypsyfires.com/subscribe
More episodes from "Gypsy Fires"



Don't miss an episode of “Gypsy Fires” and subscribe to it in the GetPodcast app.








