
0:00
24:12
Conducting a workplace investigation is about much more than finding someone guilty. To protect your organization, you need a defensible, neutral process that can withstand the scrutiny of a courtroom or an arbitrator.
In this episode, Bob Stenhouse from Veritas Solutions joins me to break down the six essential components of a high-standard workplace investigation. We explore how to handle initiating events (including social media triggers), the nuances of gathering sufficient evidence without a "smoking gun," and the legal standard of the balance of probabilities. Whether you are dealing with a formal complaint or a high-risk harassment allegation, these insights will help you ensure your investigative findings are objective and legally sound.
00:00 The goal of neutral workplace investigations
01:04 Six components of every investigation
04:15 Can the news trigger an investigation?
06:06 Harassment vs. bullying: the legal difference
07:36 Using a risk-informed approach for complaints
11:12 When is your evidence actually sufficient?
14:59 Explaining the balance of probabilities standard
17:32 What makes a solid investigation report?
20:07 Aggravating vs. mitigating factors in discipline
21:42 When to hire an external investigator
Find Bob
Website: https://veritassolutions.net/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bobstenhouse/
Find Andrea (me)
Website: https://thehrhub.ca/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrea-adams1/
More episodes from "The HR Hub"



Don't miss an episode of “The HR Hub” and subscribe to it in the GetPodcast app.








