Epstein Rewind: Juror 50 and The Push For A Mistrial By Ghislaine Maxwell

​In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (S2 24 Cr. 542), the government opposes the defendant's motion to exclude evidence of prior sexual assaults under Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 404(b). The prosecution asserts that Combs engaged in a pattern of sexual, physical, and psychological abuse against multiple victims, including those named in the indictment and others not specified therein. This evidence is presented as direct proof of the racketeering conspiracy charge and, alternatively, as admissible under Rules 413 and 404(b) to demonstrate Combs's propensity for sexual assault and to establish motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.The government argues that the probative value of this evidence outweighs any potential prejudicial effect, emphasizing its relevance in illustrating the nature and scope of the alleged criminal enterprise. They contend that such evidence provides critical context for the jury to understand the full extent of Combs's conduct and its impact on the victims. The prosecution also maintains that a preliminary hearing to assess the admissibility of this evidence is unnecessary and inappropriate, asserting that the court can make determinations based on the existing record and legal arguments presented.to contact me:[email protected]

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:[email protected]:Sara cmplt

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:[email protected]:Sara cmplt

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:[email protected]:Sara cmplt

The parents of Ethan Chapin sat down for an interview recently where they discussed how they are honoring Ethan and how things have been going for them since that horrible morning last November. In this episode, we hear how the Chapin's have been navigating their new normal and what their plans are for the upcoming trial of the man that the state of Idaho says killed their son. (commercial at 8:32)to contact me:[email protected]:Parents of Ethan Chapin talk grief, new book honoring his memory | king5.com

Whenever a homicide investigation is undereway, one of the first things they are searching for is a motive. What would make someone do something like murder someone? However, sometimes, they never find out why someone was motivated to kill someone else. So, do you need to know that motive to get a successful conviction?In this episode, we hear from Bobby Chacon, an Ex FBI agent who discusses what motive means to an investigation and how important it is for a conviction.(commercial at 7:32)to contact me:[email protected]:Why Bryan Kohberger's Motive Is Not Important for Conviction—Ex-FBI Agent (newsweek.com)

Bryan Kohberger, the suspect in the Moscow Murders, changed the plates on his vehicle almost directly after the murders occurred. While this, on it's own, is certainly not convincing evidence of his guilt, the bigger picture is certainly starting to emerge and it's not looking good for Bryan Kohberger.(commercial at 6:34)to contact me:[email protected]:Bryan Kohberger Switched License Plates After Idaho Murders (newsweek.com)

From the archives: 12-23-22The family of Xana Kernodle has once again made flyers to distribute around the town of Moscow, pleading with residents who might know something to come forward and provide whatever information they might have. This is the second time that Xana's family has made flyers and passed them out as they continue to search for the person or persons responsible for their daughters murder.(commercial at 8:33)to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:Xana Kernodle's Family Seeks Help Solving Quadruple Homicide (lawandcrime.com)

On this edition of the morning update, we dive right back into the deep end of the pool and continue to discuss the evolving situation concerning juror #50, Scotty David and what these revelations could mean moving forward.(Commercial at 17:22)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/ghislaine-maxwell-jurors-overturn/2022/01/06/4eaa6afc-6f15-11ec-b9fc-b394d592a7a6_story.html

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:[email protected]:Sara cmplt