Qantas 32

Green | https://www.nytimes.com/1998/09/20/nyregion/jet-crash-raises-question-are-cockpit-crews-large-enough.html | https://web.archive.org/web/20080720061945/http://www.courttv.com/trials/unabomber/chronology/chron_7882.html | https://www.law.cornell.edu/background/unabom/history.html | https://www.tsa.gov/sites/default/files/mission_hall_exhibit_final_508.pdf | https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/11/16/bomb-jolts-jet/f0cb8543-c2ab-44c5-bdd5-203c53efffe1/

You can just walk in and BUY weather balloons | a huge amount of original research and cool stuff on markbarry.com | check out Jon Bois’ video https://youtu.be/E7w_v9J7iOc?si=wzaMx2kvm5B6e3n4

Just gonna hide up here for a lil minute and drink my Coca-Cola

BOTH engines!!! BOTH.

Ten AM on a Thursday

“Favorite” isn’t the right word…

Fight Flight Freeze

Literally just updates and chitchat, brought to you by heat and chaos

If you have anything to add to this story, email [email protected] and keep the research going! Check back here for more corrections: 1) There were two types of runways used on Oct 8, 1970. The Connies, with their wheeled landing gear, would land on an airstrip that was glacial ice. So it was a hard, solid surface. Pilots say it’s not very different than landing on tarmac except for braking. The Hercs, with their skis, used a landing strip made of compacted snow that accumulated over ice. So Peggy’s wheels would have ruined that runway. Also, just for note, the ice airstrip moves annually since it’s on a glacier and the Navy recalibrates it annually but that had not yet been done on 10/8/70 | 2) point of safe return, not point of no return! | 3) NZ isn’t the closest you can get to Antarctica, Southern Chile is! | 4) the nose landing gear hit the ice, not the nose itself

That will be £10, please