Murder In Moscow: A Legal Expert Weighs In On Kohberger And Why Idaho Would Seek The Death Penalty

From the archives: 1-19-23There has been a pervasive rumor ever since the affidavit was released that Brian Kohberger might have had an accomplice. However, there has been no evidence of this from any official source.In this episode, we take a look at the conversation around an alleged accomplice and discuss why it is highly unlikely.(commercial at 8:38)to contact me:[email protected]:Speculation that Bryan Kohberger has ‘co-defendant’ in Idaho murders case debunked | The IndependentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

From the archives: 1-19-23As we learn more about what the authorities say happened at the King Road home on November 13th, plenty of experts are giving their opinion about what could have motivated such a brutal and horrendous act.In this episode, we hear from Mary Ellen O'Toole, a retired FBI profiler about what she thinks could have driven Bryan Kohberger, the man the authorities claim is responsible for the murders, to kill four people while they were in their beds.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:[email protected]:Bryan Kohberger was likely motivated by sexual ‘arousal’ and 'hatred': experts | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

From the archives: 1-5-23There was some confusion as to why the Indiana police pulled Bryan Kohberger over in two separate incidents while he was traveling back to Pennsylvania from Washington. We are now learning more about why the traffic stop went down and who was behind the request to make it happen.Let's dive in!(commercial at 7:07)to contact me:[email protected]:FBI asked police to pull Bryan Kohberger over to get images of hands: report (nypost.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

From the archives: 1-25-23Bryan Kohberger is facing four homicide charges in Idaho after Police say he murdered Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin at the home located on King Road in Moscow Idaho. Idaho is a state that has the death penalty on the books so the question is, will the prosecutor attempt to go for it?Let's talk about it.(commercial at 7:47)to contact me:[email protected]:Idaho Murders: Legal Expert Discusses Possibility of Death Penalty (people.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case of State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense filed a "Motion to Compel I.C.R. 16(b)(7) Material and for Sanctions" on December 27, 2024. This motion asserts that the prosecution has failed to provide comprehensive expert reports and opinions as mandated by Idaho Criminal Rule 16(b)(7). Specifically, the defense highlights that, out of the 25 experts the state intends to call, only five have submitted their reports. This lack of disclosure, according to the defense, hampers their ability to prepare adequately, especially with a looming deadline of January 23, 2025, for submitting their own expert disclosures.The defense contends that the prosecution's incomplete disclosures violate discovery rules, thereby prejudicing Kohberger's right to a fair trial. They argue that such omissions impede their capacity to confront and counter the state's expert testimonies effectively. As a remedy, the defense requests the court to either exclude the undisclosed expert testimonies or compel the prosecution to provide the necessary reports promptly. Additionally, they seek an extension of the January 23 deadline to ensure sufficient time for their preparations. This motion underscores the defense's concerns about procedural fairness and the necessity for full compliance with discovery obligations in this capital murder case.to contact me:[email protected]:122724-Motion-Compel-ICT-16b7-Material-Sanctions.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Kanye West, also known as Ye, has been accused of evading legal proceedings in the United States, particularly concerning a lawsuit filed by his former assistant, Lauren Pisciotta. Pisciotta alleges that West drugged and sexually assaulted her during a studio session co-hosted with Sean "Diddy" Combs in 2021. Despite the lawsuit being filed in June 2024 and updated in October 2024, reports suggest that West has been avoiding service of legal documents, complicating the progression of the case.In addition to Pisciotta's lawsuit, there are allegations that West is deliberately staying outside the U.S. to avoid legal entanglements related to Diddy's ongoing legal issues. Some sources claim that West and his partner, Bianca Censori, have been spending extended periods abroad, possibly to distance themselves from the controversies and potential legal actions in the U.S. These developments have led to increased scrutiny of West's international movements and raised questions about his willingness to address serious allegations against him.to contact me:[email protected]:Insiders reveal why 'terrified' Kanye West is partying with wife Bianca Censori abroad and hasn't seen his kids in months | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a recent lawsuit, a woman identified as Jane Doe alleges that Sean "Diddy" Combs sexually assaulted her in 2000 when she was a 16-year-old high school student working as a babysitter. According to the complaint, after completing a babysitting job in Lower Manhattan, Combs offered her a ride home, which she initially declined but later accepted. Instead of taking her home, Combs and his associates allegedly transported her to another location, provided her with a drink that caused grogginess, and then Combs purportedly raped her. Following the assault, she claims she was returned to her apartment building. Combs' legal representatives have denied these allegations, asserting that he has never engaged in any form of sexual assault or sex trafficking.(commercial at 7:42)to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy 'raped teenage babysitter with two other men', bombshell new lawsuit claims | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The upcoming Peacock documentary, "Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy," delves into serious allegations against music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs. One of the most disturbing claims comes from Ashley Parham, who alleges that in 2018, Combs assaulted her with a TV remote control after she suggested his involvement in Tupac Shakur's death. Parham's lawsuit, seeking $50 million in damages, details the assault and subsequent threats to ensure her silence. Combs, currently awaiting trial on related charges, denies these allegations, labeling them as unfounded.The documentary also features testimonies from former associates who describe a pattern of predatory behavior. Allegations include hosting coercive sex parties, engaging in sexual activities with underage girls, and using his influence to exploit women. Former employees recount being coerced into luring women for Combs and witnessing disturbing incidents. Combs' legal team has dismissed these claims as false and defamatory, criticizing the documentary for promoting baseless conspiracy theories.(commercial at 10:34)to contact me:[email protected]:'Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy' doc's biggest claimsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case of English v. Combs et al. (Case No. 1:24-cv-05090), plaintiff Adria English has filed a First Amended Complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit names multiple defendants, including Sean Combs (also known as "P. Diddy"), Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Sean John Clothing LLC, Inc., Combs Global Enterprises, and others. English alleges that she was subjected to sexual assault, harassment, and exploitation by the defendants, detailing incidents that purportedly occurred over a significant period. The complaint includes claims of physical and emotional abuse, asserting that the defendants engaged in a pattern of misconduct that caused her substantial harm.The amended complaint expands upon the original allegations, providing additional details and incorporating new claims against the defendants. English seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief, citing violations of her civil rights and other legal protections. The case has garnered attention due to the high-profile nature of the defendants and the serious nature of the allegations. As the litigation proceeds, both parties are expected to engage in extensive discovery and pretrial motions, with the potential for significant legal and public relations implications.(commercial at 9:14)to contact me:[email protected]:EnglishBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Mark Epstein, brother of Jeffrey Epstein, has consistently expressed skepticism regarding the official account of his brother's death. He has questioned the swift conclusion by authorities that Jeffrey's death was a suicide, pointing to initial death certificates listing the cause as "pending" and highlighting irregularities in the investigation. Mark has referenced observations from forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden, who noted unusual fractures in Jeffrey's neck more consistent with homicidal strangulation than suicide. These concerns have led Mark to believe that the investigation into his brother's death was insufficient and that the possibility of foul play was prematurely dismissed. Additionally, Mark Epstein has criticized statements from officials, such as then-Attorney General William Barr, who labeled the death a suicide shortly after it occurred. He argues that despite acknowledged lapses in prison protocols and the presence of irregularities, attributing the death solely to bureaucratic failures is inadequate. Mark's persistent doubts have been fueled by the lack of comprehensive answers from the Department of Justice and other authorities, leaving him and the public with unresolved questions about the true circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death.to contact me:[email protected]:Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.