
How to Trust a Catholic Influencer: Is That What the Church Teaches? [Ep. 103]
Somebody online says they’re Catholic, then tells you this is a sin, this is the tradition, and this is what the Church has always done. How are you supposed to know if that’s actually true?
We get into the part most Catholic content skips: what the Magisterium actually is, why an encyclical isn’t automatically dogma, and why “the Church teaches” is a much smaller category than your feed makes it.
Using examples like receiving Communion in the hand vs. on the tongue and prayer after Communion, we critique absolutist online claims and highlight how customs, rubrics, intention, and circumstances matter when evaluating whether something is sinful.
We also address AI and impersonation scams, including fake priest accounts and AI-generated content, urging discernment about whether content draws viewers toward Christ or fuels anger and attachment to influencers.
Featuring: Fr. Simon Esshaki, Abbot Ankido Sipo, Fr. Chris Somo, Fr. Tristan Farida
–––
00:00 Who Speaks for the Church 00:27 Coffee and Milk Debate 04:03 What Makes Catholic Content Trustworthy 06:21 Ordinary vs Extraordinary Teaching 08:24 Hand or Tongue for Communion? 10:35 Prayer After Communion Controversy 13:15 "Our Father" Gestures 17:28 Custom Tradition and Innovations 21:52 "Is This a Sin?" Culture 27:13 Church Teaching vs Opinion 31:00 Impersonators and AI Scams 36:48 Discernment for Catholic Media 37:42 Faith in Sports
–––
Fler avsnitt från "Feeding Fathers"



Missa inte ett avsnitt av “Feeding Fathers” och prenumerera på det i GetPodcast-appen.








