Epstein Rewind: The Epstein Survivors And Their Amended Complaint Against The USVI (Part 3)

​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger has filed a reply to the State's objection concerning his Motion in Limine #6, which seeks to exclude specific opinions of forensic analyst Rylene Nowlin and the use of the terms "touch DNA" and "contact DNA" during trial. Kohberger's defense argues that these terms are misleading and could confuse the jury by implying a certainty about the method of DNA transfer that is not scientifically substantiated. They emphasize that Nowlin's own disclosures acknowledge the complexity of DNA transfer mechanisms and the current inability of DNA technology to conclusively determine how or when DNA was deposited on an item. Therefore, the defense contends that allowing such terminology and speculative testimony would prejudice the jury and should be excluded to ensure a fair trial.to contact me:[email protected]:032425-Defendants-Reply-States-Objection-Defendants-MIL6-RE-Nowlin-Touch-Contact-DNA.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger has filed a reply to the State's response regarding his motion to strike the death penalty due to his diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The defense asserts that Kohberger's ASD results in significant impairments in communication, reasoning, social skills, and understanding others' reactions—factors that, according to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Atkins v. Virginia, diminish moral culpability and render the death penalty unconstitutional for individuals with such disabilities. They emphasize that these deficits have been present since early childhood and persist into adulthood, affecting Kohberger's adaptive functioning despite his high intelligence quotient (IQ). The defense references the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), noting that individuals with ASD may exhibit a substantial gap between intellectual abilities and adaptive functioning, leading to challenges in daily living, self-care, socialization, and communication. ​to contact me:[email protected]:Ty ABecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In March 2025, a New York federal judge dismissed a sexual assault lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs. The plaintiff, identified only as "Jane Doe," alleged that Combs assaulted her at a 1995 party. The court had previously granted her until March 20 to refile the complaint under her real name, but she failed to do so, leading to the case's dismissal.Combs' legal team responded by highlighting this dismissal as indicative of a broader pattern of meritless claims brought by anonymous individuals. They emphasized that this is the second such case dismissed in its entirety and expressed confidence that other similar claims would not withstand legal scrutiny.to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy Gets Rare Legal Win As Judge Tosses Out 1995 Rape AllegationsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In January 2022, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe was found dead in the snow outside a fellow officer's home following a night of socializing. His girlfriend, Karen Read, was subsequently charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene of a deadly accident, with prosecutors alleging she struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him in the freezing conditions. The initial trial concluded in July 2024 with a mistrial due to a deadlocked jury.Since then, the case has seen significant developments, including the termination of lead investigator Trooper Michael Proctor for misconduct related to the investigation. Additionally, a juror from the first trial has joined Read's defense team, highlighting concerns about the investigation's integrity. Despite defense efforts to dismiss charges on double jeopardy grounds, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that Read can be retried. Jury selection for the retrial is set to commence on April 1, 2025.to contact me:[email protected]:Karen Read and John O'Keefe: Inside evolution of Boston murder mystery since mistrial | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Eugene Henley Jr., widely known as "Big U," is a prominent figure in the Los Angeles music scene and a reputed leader of the Rollin' 60s Neighborhood Crips. In March 2025, Henley was indicted on 43 federal charges, including racketeering, murder, extortion, fraud, and tax crimes. The indictment alleges that from 2010 to 2025, Henley led a criminal enterprise, referred to as the "Big U Enterprise," which engaged in various illegal activities across Los Angeles.One of the most serious allegations involves the 2021 murder of an aspiring rapper identified as "R.W." According to prosecutors, R.W. was signed to Henley's music label, Uneek Music, and recorded a defamatory song about Henley. In response, Henley allegedly traveled to Las Vegas, confronted R.W., and fatally shot him before leaving his body in a desert ditch off Interstate 15.Henley is also accused of exploiting his anti-gang charity, Developing Options, as a front for fraudulent activities. While presenting the organization as dedicated to providing alternatives to gang involvement for South Los Angeles youth, Henley allegedly embezzled large donations from celebrities and companies, diverting funds into his personal bank account. Notably, Developing Options received significant funding from the City of Los Angeles's Mayor’s Office through the Gang Reduction Youth Development (GRYD) Foundation, which includes federal funds.Beyond these charges, Henley faces accusations of submitting fraudulent applications for COVID-19 relief loans, engaging in extortion and robbery, and participating in human trafficking activities. Prosecutors allege that he used his influence within the Rollin' 60s and other street gangs to intimidate businesses and individuals, expanding his enterprise's power through violence and fear. Additionally, Henley purportedly leveraged social media platforms, documentaries, and interviews to bolster his reputation and instill fear, furthering the reach of his criminal organization.Henley was taken into federal custody on March 19, 2025, and is scheduled for arraignment on April 8. If convicted on all charges, he faces a maximum sentence of life in federal prison.to contact me:[email protected]:gov-uscourts-cacd-962315-1-0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Eugene Henley Jr., widely known as "Big U," is a prominent figure in the Los Angeles music scene and a reputed leader of the Rollin' 60s Neighborhood Crips. In March 2025, Henley was indicted on 43 federal charges, including racketeering, murder, extortion, fraud, and tax crimes. The indictment alleges that from 2010 to 2025, Henley led a criminal enterprise, referred to as the "Big U Enterprise," which engaged in various illegal activities across Los Angeles.One of the most serious allegations involves the 2021 murder of an aspiring rapper identified as "R.W." According to prosecutors, R.W. was signed to Henley's music label, Uneek Music, and recorded a defamatory song about Henley. In response, Henley allegedly traveled to Las Vegas, confronted R.W., and fatally shot him before leaving his body in a desert ditch off Interstate 15.Henley is also accused of exploiting his anti-gang charity, Developing Options, as a front for fraudulent activities. While presenting the organization as dedicated to providing alternatives to gang involvement for South Los Angeles youth, Henley allegedly embezzled large donations from celebrities and companies, diverting funds into his personal bank account. Notably, Developing Options received significant funding from the City of Los Angeles's Mayor’s Office through the Gang Reduction Youth Development (GRYD) Foundation, which includes federal funds.Beyond these charges, Henley faces accusations of submitting fraudulent applications for COVID-19 relief loans, engaging in extortion and robbery, and participating in human trafficking activities. Prosecutors allege that he used his influence within the Rollin' 60s and other street gangs to intimidate businesses and individuals, expanding his enterprise's power through violence and fear. Additionally, Henley purportedly leveraged social media platforms, documentaries, and interviews to bolster his reputation and instill fear, furthering the reach of his criminal organization.Henley was taken into federal custody on March 19, 2025, and is scheduled for arraignment on April 8. If convicted on all charges, he faces a maximum sentence of life in federal prison.to contact me:[email protected]:gov-uscourts-cacd-962315-1-0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Michael Proctor, a former Massachusetts State Police trooper, served as the lead investigator in the case against Karen Read, who is accused of the 2022 death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Proctor's role encompassed overseeing the investigation, gathering evidence, and providing testimony during Read's initial trial. However, his conduct during the investigation came under scrutiny due to the revelation of inappropriate and derogatory text messages he sent about Read to family and colleagues. These messages, which included offensive language and unprofessional remarks, raised concerns about potential bias and compromised the perceived integrity of the investigation.In March 2025, following an internal review, Proctor was terminated from the Massachusetts State Police. The disciplinary board cited unsatisfactory performance and violations related to the mishandling of sensitive information and inappropriate communications during the investigation. This development has significant implications for the upcoming retrial of Karen Read, as Proctor's actions and the subsequent questions about the investigation's integrity are expected to be focal points in the defense's strategyto  contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In response to Karen Read's post-trial motion to dismiss charges following a mistrial, the Commonwealth filed a 15-page opposition disputing claims of "extraordinary governmental misconduct." Prosecutors contended that there were no ethical violations or misconduct that would infringe upon Read's right to a fair trial, asserting that the defense's motion should be denied.Judge Beverly Cannone, after reviewing the arguments, denied Read's motion to dismiss, stating that the alleged violations did not warrant the "draconian sanction" of dismissal and that Read's constitutional rights could be fully protected in the forthcoming retrial.to  contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias that refers to the tendency of individuals with low ability or expertise in a particular domain to overestimate their competence and mistakenly believe they possess above-average skills. At the same time, those who are highly skilled or knowledgeable in a specific area tend to underestimate their abilities and assume others are equally capable.The effect was first identified by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999 through a series of experiments. They found that people who performed poorly on tasks related to humor, grammar, and logic consistently rated their abilities higher than they actually were. Conversely, individuals who performed well on these tasks tended to underestimate their performance relative to others.The Dunning-Kruger effect can be attributed to a lack of metacognitive skills, which refers to one's ability to accurately evaluate their own competence. Incompetent individuals often fail to recognize their own limitations because they lack the necessary expertise to accurately assess their own performance. This leads them to overestimate their abilities and be unaware of their shortcomings.Another contributing factor to the Dunning-Kruger effect is the cognitive bias of illusory superiority.This bias causes individuals to believe they are better than average in various aspects of life, regardless of their actual skill level. This bias is particularly strong among those with limited knowledge or experience in a particular area.Interestingly, as individuals gain more expertise and knowledge in a specific domain, they tend to become more aware of the complexities and nuances involved.This increased awareness leads to a more accurate self-assessment of their abilities and often results in a decrease in overconfidence.The implications of the Dunning-Kruger effect can be far-reaching. Incompetent individuals who overestimate their abilities may take on tasks or responsibilities beyond their capabilities, leading to poor decision-making or ineffective performance. Additionally, the effect can hinder individuals from seeking feedback or further education, as they believe they already possess sufficient expertise.In this episode, we take a look at how this applies to the Jeffrey Epstein case and how the legacy media overall continues to miss the overall picture.to contact me:[email protected]:What you WEREN’T told about Jeffery Epstein - TheBlazeBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The battle over Epstein's estate rages on in the Virgin Islands as lawyers for the estate say they are going broke due to the liens placed on them by the Attorney General.The Attorney General counters that the estate is using the funds for purposes that go against the guidelines and refuses to release more funds without proper receipts and a more accurate accounting system by the estate.(commercial at 15:05)To contact me:[email protected]:https://abcnews.go.com/US/executors-jeffrey-epstein-estate-theyre-running-low-funds/story?id=73585309Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.