A Look Back: Jeffrey Epstein And Seth Lloyd

In what can only be called an absurdity, evidence that was collected during the first raid of Jeffrey Epstein's townhouse was left there when officers left the house and then that evidence conveniently got up and walked away. After an investigation it was concluded that Richard Kahn took the evidence from Epstein's townhouse but, it's all good because he returned it when asked.When confronted about this on the stand FBI agent Cathy Mcguire could not confirm if anything on the hard drives or any other documentation had been tampered with. So much for the chain of custody, eh?(commercial at 9:10)to contact me:[email protected]://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2021/12/07/evidence-jeffrey-epsteins-safe-went-missing-fbi-raid-court-hears/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein and his influence reached far and wide and he didn't discriminate when it came to political parties. In this look back episode, we hear from Tara Palmieri, host of the Podcast Broken about how Epstein and his influence transcended political affiliations. (commercial at 10:11)To contact me:[email protected]:https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/517845-epstein-podcast-host-on-why-so-many-elites-affiliated-with-alleged-sexBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein had a long reach. A reach so long in fact, it ensnared many powerful men. One of the most powerful to ever be in Epstein's orbit, however, was Bill Clinton. In this article the authors take us on a journey back to 2016 where we learn at the attempt of Darren Indyke to do some damage control on behalf of the Clintons.Join me as I dive in!(Commercial at 23:13)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10408733/The-bid-whitewash-Bill-Clintons-cosy-links-Jeffrey-Epstein-Hillary-ran-President.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this look back episode we take a trip back to July of 2020...According to a source who spoke with Daily Mail, Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein had a huge stash of tapes that would implicate some of the most powerful men in the world. What ever happened to those tapes and who has them in their possession now?(Commercial at 13:46)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8494411/Ghislaine-Maxwell-secret-stash-Jeffrey-Epsteins-sex-tapes.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

he Office of the Inspector General (OIG) plays a crucial role in holding United States Attorney Offices (USAOs) accountable within the Department of Justice (DOJ). The primary function of the OIG in this context is to conduct independent audits, inspections, investigations, and reviews to ensure that USAOs are operating efficiently, effectively, and in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies.Specifically, the OIG may:Investigate Allegations of Misconduct: The OIG investigates allegations of misconduct, including fraud, waste, abuse, and violations of laws or regulations within USAOs. This includes investigating complaints related to prosecutorial misconduct, unethical behavior, or other violations of DOJ policies.Conduct Audits and Inspections: The OIG conducts audits and inspections of USAOs to evaluate their operations, management practices, and adherence to established policies and procedures. These evaluations help identify areas for improvement and ensure that resources are used efficiently.Review Policies and Procedures: The OIG reviews USAO policies and procedures to assess their effectiveness in achieving the DOJ's goals and objectives. This may involve evaluating how cases are handled, decisions are made, and resources are allocated.Provide Recommendations: Based on its findings, the OIG provides recommendations to USAOs and the DOJ leadership on ways to improve operations, enhance compliance with laws and regulations, and prevent misconduct or inefficiencies.Monitor Compliance: The OIG monitors USAOs' implementation of its recommendations and tracks their progress in addressing identified issues. This ongoing oversight helps ensure accountability and continuous improvement.In this episode we begin our look at the OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein's NPA. (commercial at 7:42)to contact me:[email protected]:dl (justice.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) is a legal arrangement that was made between Jeffrey Epstein, a financier and convicted sex offender, and the United States government in 2007. This agreement essentially granted Epstein immunity from federal prosecution for various sex crimes he allegedly committed, primarily involving minors.Here's a detailed breakdown:Origins: The NPA stems from an investigation into Epstein's alleged sexual exploitation of underage girls, which began in 2005 when the Palm Beach Police Department in Florida started looking into accusations against him.Investigation and Charges: The investigation revealed that Epstein had allegedly engaged in sexual acts with numerous underage girls at his residences in Palm Beach, Florida, and elsewhere. As a result, federal prosecutors in Florida, led by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, began building a case against him.Negotiations: As the case progressed, negotiations between Epstein's legal team and federal prosecutors led to the crafting of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.Terms of the NPA:Immunity: Under the NPA, Epstein and any potential co-conspirators were granted immunity from federal prosecution for the crimes identified in the agreement. This means that Epstein would not face federal charges for the offenses outlined, and neither would any individuals who might have assisted or participated in the alleged criminal activities.State Charges: The agreement did not preclude prosecution at the state level. However, in a controversial move, the NPA effectively halted further investigation and potential prosecution of Epstein at the federal level.Limited Charges: Epstein pleaded guilty to state charges in Florida, including solicitation of prostitution and procurement of minors for prostitution. He served a relatively short jail sentence and was required to register as a sex offender.Controversy and Criticism:Secrecy: One of the main points of contention surrounding the NPA was the secrecy of the agreement. The victims were not made aware of the details of the deal until after it was finalized.Leniency: Critics argued that the terms of the agreement were overly lenient given the severity of the alleged crimes. Epstein's relatively light sentence and the fact that the agreement shielded potential co-conspirators from federal prosecution were particularly criticized.Allegations of Misconduct: There were allegations that Epstein's wealth and connections influenced the handling of the case and the negotiation of the NPA. Some accused Acosta, who later became U.S. Secretary of Labor under President Donald Trump, of being too lenient in his dealings with Epstein.Aftermath: The NPA became the subject of renewed scrutiny in later years, particularly after Epstein's arrest in July 2019 on federal charges of sex trafficking minors. Epstein died by suicide in his jail cell a month later, awaiting trial. His death prompted further investigations into his alleged crimes and the circumstances surrounding the NPA.Get those barf bags ready, because we are about to take an unredacted look at the notorious Jeffrey Epstein Non Prosecution Agreement.   (commercial at 10:26)to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Karen Read trial has been going on for a week now and so far, it seems as if the momentum is on the side of the defense and following the last few days of testimony, that momentum has only been building, especially after hearing about the way the investigators went about collecting evidence from the scene of the crime.In this episode, we take a look at the last few days in the Karen Read trial and get an update on where things currently stand.to contact me:[email protected]:Karen Read murder trial: Jurors shown video from bars (wcvb.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Chad Daybell is a former gravedigger and author of apocalyptic novels. He gained notoriety in 2020 in connection with the deaths of his former wife, Tammy Daybell, and his new wife, Lori Vallow Daybell's two children, Tylee Ryan and Joshua "JJ" Vallow. The case has received significant media attention due to its bizarre and complex nature.Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow were both involved in a doomsday prepper group and shared similar religious beliefs. They married shortly after the deaths of both of their former spouses. The deaths of Tammy Daybell and the two children were initially considered unrelated, but suspicions arose when investigators discovered inconsistencies and strange behavior from Chad and Lori.Tammy Daybell died in October 2019 under suspicious circumstances, initially attributed to natural causes. However, her body was exhumed after law enforcement began investigating the deaths of Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow. Autopsy results have not been publicly released.Tylee Ryan, 17, and JJ Vallow, 7, were reported missing in September 2019. Their disappearance sparked a nationwide search. Months later, their bodies were found buried on Chad Daybell's property in Salem, Idaho. Autopsies revealed that Tylee had been dismembered and burned, while JJ had been wrapped in plastic and duct tape.Chad Daybell was arrested and charged with destruction, alteration, or concealment of evidence after the children's bodies were discovered on his property. Lori Vallow was also arrested and charged with multiple counts, including desertion and nonsupport of dependent children, obstruction, solicitation to commit a crime, and contempt of court.In this episode recap what went down during day number 19 of the Chad Daybell trial.(commercial at 20:20)to contact me:[email protected]:LIVE UPDATES | Alex Cox's fingerprints found on plastic surrounding JJ Vallow's body, forensic scientist testifies - East Idaho NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The trial of Richard Allen, the man accused of the Delphi Murders, has now been delayed until October.  The trial was originally scheduled to get started next week but after a contentious hearing yesterday, things once again took a dramatic swing after the legal team for Richard Allen filed a motion to rescind it's request for a speedy trial.  A motion to rescind a request for a speedy trial is a formal request made by one of the parties involved in a legal proceeding to withdraw their previous request for a speedy trial. When a defendant requests a speedy trial, they are asking for their case to be heard quickly, usually within a certain timeframe as mandated by law. However, there may be instances where circumstances change, and it becomes beneficial for the defendant to have more time to prepare their case or negotiate a plea deal.By filing a motion to rescind the request for a speedy trial, the defendant is essentially asking the court to allow them more time before their trial proceeds. This could be for various reasons, such as needing additional time to gather evidence, secure witnesses, or consult with their legal counsel.The effect of such a motion depends on the decision of the court. If the court grants the motion, it means that the request for a speedy trial is withdrawn, and the trial may be rescheduled to a later date, allowing both parties more time to prepare. However, if the court denies the motion, the trial will proceed as originally scheduled, and the defendant will not have the benefit of additional time.Ultimately, the decision to grant or deny a motion to rescind a request for a speedy trial rests with the judge overseeing the case, and it will be based on the circumstances presented by the parties involved and as we saw with Judge Gull's ruling.   (commercial at 9:14)to contact me:[email protected]:Delphi double murder trial delayed: Richard Allen's defense says trial needs to be longer (fox59.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this look back episode we hear more about Jeffrey Epstein's "secret" girlfriend, Children's author, Shelley Anne Lewis. Her nickname? Chocolate Sauce. Let's see where she fits in.(Commercial at 8:49)To contact me:[email protected]:https://nypost.com/2020/08/02/everything-you-need-to-know-about-jeffrey-epsteins-secret-girlfriend/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.