Courtroom Confidential

Jury selection in Tyler Robinson’s trial over the killing of Charlie Kirk is set for June 21, 2028. Why the long wait, and why has Judge Tony Graf reserved 105 court days? Joining from Utah, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter questions the timeline and examines the competing demands of trial preparation, a capital prosecution and the Kirk family’s wait for justice.At 11:28, Josh examines the denial of Lindsay Clancy’s motion to dismiss, the proposed investigation of the holdout juror and the Commonwealth’s gag-order request. At 20:38, he turns to Matthew Farwell’s jury reporting a deadlock, the judge’s decision to resume deliberations Tuesday and the competing evidence. This episode reflects developments as of November 9, 2026.0:00 Cold Open: Jury Selection Set for June 20281:10 Welcome from Utah2:44 Three-Case Preview3:31 Tyler Robinson: Competing Trial Timelines5:25 Does the Case Justify This Much Time?6:30 Why Reserve 105 Court Days?7:53 Preparation Time and Potential Appeals8:41 The Kirk Family’s Response11:28 Lindsay Clancy: Three Motions Denied12:15 Double Jeopardy and the Mistrial Decision13:37 Could Further Review Delay a Retrial?14:59 Why the Judge Rejected a Juror Investigation17:08 Why the Commonwealth’s Gag-Order Request Was Denied19:04 Upcoming Clancy and Robinson Court Dates19:49 Viewer Thanks20:38 Matthew Farwell: The Jury Reports Deadlock22:03 The Jury’s Notes and the Judge’s Response23:27 Josh Weighs the Competing Evidence26:06 The Prosecution’s Phone-Timeline Argument27:42 Announcements and Schedule ChangesFollow Josh:https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQhttps://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/https://www.joshuaritter.com/https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Follow Courtroom Confidential:https://x.com/CRConfidentialhttps://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=enMerch:https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Support our moderators:https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidentialDISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #MatthewFarwell #SandraBirchmoreSupport the show

Could Matthew Farwell have been better off putting his case before a judge instead of a jury? Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter answers your Sunday Funday Q&A questions about bench trials, who must agree to them, and the federal issue at the heart of the prosecution over Sandra Birchmore’s death.Also in this episode: Naresh Bhatt’s testimony and why admitting conduct does not automatically require a guilty plea; Lindsay Clancy’s custody after a mistrial and the debate over questioning a holdout juror; courtroom evidence handling; and whether defendants must tell their lawyers the truth. Josh also shares footage from his courtroom career and answers questions about survivor privacy and true-crime coverage.0:00 Welcome to Sunday Funday Q&A2:19 Matthew Farwell: Why Not a Bench Trial?9:50 Handling Courtroom Evidence Without Gloves14:43 Mental Health, Juvenile Defendants and Accountability20:47 Police Distrust and Online Conspiracy Theories26:16 Naresh Bhatt: Redirect and Recalling a Witness31:26 Josh’s Courtroom Career and Trial Footage40:38 Viewer Feedback and Community Messages42:00 Does True-Crime Coverage Influence Crime?48:12 Christa Pike: The Rule 409 Question52:48 Lindsay Clancy: Questioning the Holdout Juror59:10 Gifted Memberships Explained1:01:35 Sandra Birchmore: The Absence of a Note1:06:44 Upcoming Trials and Hearings1:12:20 O.J. Simpson: Assessing Accomplice Claims1:21:13 Lindsay Clancy: Custody After a Mistrial1:27:28 When Courtroom Passion Becomes Personal1:33:14 Phil Spector: Appearance and Jury Perception1:38:43 Idaho Four: Survivor Privacy and Online Harassment1:44:49 Viewer Questions and Community Chat1:47:20 Must Defendants Tell Their Lawyers the Truth?1:50:56 Thomas Markle: Charges and Jurisdiction Questions1:55:14 Naresh Bhatt: Why Admit Conduct Without Pleading Guilty?1:59:21 Announcements and This Week’s ScheduleHave a question for a future Sunday Funday? Leave Josh a voice message at https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ before Friday at 11:59 p.m. PT.About Joshua Ritter:Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases.Follow Josh:https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQhttps://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/https://www.joshuaritter.com/https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Follow Courtroom Confidential:https://x.com/CRConfidentialhttps://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=enMerch:https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Support our moderators:https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidentialDISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.#MatthewFarwell #SandraBirchmore #NareshBhatt #CourtroomConfidential #LindsayClancy #Idaho4 #BryanKohbergerSupport the show

Naresh Bhatt admits dismembering and concealing his wife Mamta Kafle Bhatt’s body, but denies killing her. Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter welcomes Paul from Reporting Live From My Sofa to examine Bhatt’s changed account, his explanation for not calling 911 and the cross-examination confronting his earlier lies. What do those admissions establish, and what must prosecutors still prove?At 36:11, Josh breaks down the closing arguments in Matthew Farwell’s federal trial over Sandra Birchmore’s death. He examines the prosecution’s motive argument, the disputed phone timeline, competing interpretations of the scene and the additional issue raised by the federal witness-tampering charge.0:00 Cold Open: Bhatt’s Changed Account1:04 Welcome and Show Preview2:56 Naresh Bhatt: Paul Joins Josh8:31 The Risks of Taking the Stand10:50 Why Didn’t Bhatt Call 911?16:26 What Bhatt Admitted About Concealing Mamta’s Body17:52 Why Emphasize Where the Body Went?21:41 Cross-Examination: Confronting the Lies27:29 Why Listening Matters on Cross-Examination28:16 Confronting Bhatt with Mamta’s Injury Photograph32:26 Redirect and What Comes Next34:01 Paul’s Upcoming Coverage36:11 Matthew Farwell: Closing Arguments38:40 The Prosecution’s Motive Argument41:53 The Phone Timeline and Proof of Homicide44:18 What Counts as Evidence of a Struggle?46:29 The Defense’s Closing Argument49:32 The Federal Witness-Tampering Issue52:35 The Prosecution’s Rebuttal54:31 Deliberations and What Comes Next55:18 Hero of the Week1:01:20 Announcements and Memberships1:03:37 Sunday’s Earlier Start and Monday’s Trial CoverageCheck out Paul from Reporting Live from My Sofa!YT: https://www.youtube.com/@ReportinglivefrommysofaIG: https://www.instagram.com/reportinglivefrommysofa1About Joshua Ritter:Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases.Follow Josh:https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQhttps://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/https://www.joshuaritter.com/https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Follow Courtroom Confidential:https://x.com/CRConfidentialhttps://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=enMerch:https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Support our moderators:https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidentialDISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.Support the show

Matthew Farwell’s defense rested on November 4 without calling the former police detective to testify. Federal prosecutors allege Farwell killed Sandra Birchmore and staged her death. His defense disputes that account. Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter examines the competing expert opinions and what the forensic evidence can tell jurors about how Birchmore died.In Virginia, Naresh Bhatt took the stand in his own defense against the charge that he murdered his wife, Mamta Kafle Bhatt, whose body has never been found. How does his account compare with the evidence prosecutors presented before resting their case?About Joshua Ritter:Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases.Follow Josh:https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQhttps://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/https://www.joshuaritter.com/https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Follow Courtroom Confidential:https://x.com/CRConfidentialhttps://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=enMerch:https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Support our moderators:https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidentialDISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.#MatthewFarwell #SandraBirchmore #NareshBhatt #MamtaKafleBhatt #CourtroomConfidentialSupport the show

Lindsay Clancy’s November 2 hearing ended with major questions still unresolved. Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter welcomes Billy Bush, host of Hot Mics with Billy Bush, to examine the defense’s effort to prevent a retrial, the Commonwealth’s response and the dispute over questioning the holdout juror. They also discuss Kevin Reddington’s courtroom approach, juror privacy and the proposed gag order ahead of the November 16 status hearing.At 26:09, East Idaho News reporter and Courtroom Insider host Nate Eaton joins Josh after attending Lori Vallow Daybell’s Idaho Supreme Court appeal hearing. They examine the removal of attorney Mark Means, the competing arguments over conflicts of interest and why the timing of that decision matters. Nate also discusses other issues raised at the hearing and introduces his podcast, Deceived.0:00 Cold Open: Clancy’s Holdout Juror1:11 Welcome and Show Preview3:03 Lindsay Clancy: Billy Bush Joins Josh4:39 Retrial Timing and Reddington’s Courtroom Approach8:24 Double Jeopardy: The Competing Arguments11:53 Questioning a Holdout Without Pressuring a Verdict14:14 Reddington, the Judge and Juror Privacy17:25 Defense Advocacy and Public Perception22:18 Would a Gag Order Help?23:40 November 16 and the Unresolved Retrial Questions25:20 Viewer Thanks and Transition26:09 Lori Vallow Daybell: The Idaho Appeal27:14 Nate Eaton’s Report from the Hearing28:03 Why Mark Means Was Removed31:33 Actual Conflict or Assumed Conflict?34:51 The State Defends the Disqualification36:16 Nate Eaton on Means’ Role in the Case38:57 Other Appeal Issues and the Death-Penalty Question41:21 Nate Eaton’s New Podcast: Deceived44:20 Viewer Thanks45:13 Announcements and Memberships47:27 Upcoming Shows and Sunday’s Earlier StartFollow Billy Bush!YT: https://www.youtube.com/@HotMicswithBillyBushFB: https://www.facebook.com/hotmicswithbillybushX: https://x.com/hotmicsbillyIG: https://www.instagram.com/hotmicswithbillybush?xtok=MThtYXQzY3ZtbGlraw==Follow Nate Eaton!YT: https://www.youtube.com/@EastidnewsFB: https://www.facebook.com/NateEatonReporterX: https://x.com/NateNewsNow?lang=enIG: https://www.instagram.com/n.eaton/?hl=enFollow Josh:https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQhttps://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/https://www.joshuaritter.com/https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Follow Courtroom Confidential:https://x.com/CRConfidentialhttps://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=enMerch:https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Support our moderators:https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidentialDISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #LoriVallowDaybell #CourtroomConfidentialSupport the show

Sandra Birchmore’s final recorded phone activity came minutes before Matthew Farwell left her apartment building, according to testimony discussed in this episode. What does that timeline establish, and how could the defense challenge its significance? Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter joins attorney Randolph Rice to examine the competing interpretations, William Kilroy’s testimony and the defense’s effort to raise reasonable doubt. Farwell has pleaded not guilty.Then, Josh and Randolph examine Lindsay Clancy’s latest criminal-case filings ahead of the November 2 hearing. They debate the jury notes, whether the judge should have questioned the holdout juror again, the defense’s double-jeopardy argument and the proposed gag order. Jump to 22:44 for the Clancy discussion.0:00 Cold Open: Matthew Farwell’s Defense1:28 Welcome and Show Preview3:37 The Prosecution Rests; Randolph Rice Joins Josh4:43 Was Sandra Birchmore’s Death a Homicide?7:27 The Phone Evidence and Surveillance Timeline10:12 How the Defense Could Interpret the Timeline12:38 Circumstantial Evidence and Reasonable Doubt13:59 Search History and the Defense’s Argument17:34 William Kilroy’s Testimony20:36 Weighing the Evidence and Upcoming Witnesses22:44 Lindsay Clancy: The Fight Over a Retrial24:07 Manifest Necessity and Double Jeopardy30:02 The Jury Notes and the Judge’s Response33:06 Should the Holdout Juror Have Been Questioned Again?38:31 The Defense’s Latest Filing40:57 The Proposed Gag Order44:41 Possible Further Review and Juror Privacy46:50 Guest Wrap-Up47:40 Hero of the Week: Ibro Ahmed51:43 Announcements and Upcoming CoverageFollow Randolph Rice! https://www.youtube.com/@ricelawhttps://ricelawmd.com/attorneys/randolph-rice/https://www.instagram.com/ricelawmd?igsi=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==About Joshua Ritter:Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases.Follow Josh:https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQhttps://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/https://www.joshuaritter.com/https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Follow Courtroom Confidential:https://x.com/CRConfidentialhttps://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=enMerch:https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Support our moderators:https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidentialDISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.#MatthewFarwell #SandraBirchmore #LindsayClancySupport the show

Nearly 15 years after Michelle Parker vanished, what finally changed in the case against her former fiancé? Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter joins investigative reporter and Body Bags podcast co-host Dave Mack to examine the newly unsealed arrest affidavit, the disputed timeline, phone evidence and questions surrounding the original investigation. Dale Smith Jr. has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder. Parker’s body has never been found.Then, Josh examines the latest testimony in Matthew Farwell’s federal trial over Sandra Birchmore’s death, including the medical examiner’s changed finding, William Farwell’s testimony under immunity and a strangulation expert’s interpretation of the physical evidence. What supports the prosecution’s account, and what remains contested? Jump to 31:17 for the Farwell discussion.0:00 Cold Open: An Arrest Nearly 15 Years Later1:24 Welcome and Show Preview3:47 Sponsor: Zocdoc4:51 Michelle Parker: Case Overview6:11 Dave Mack Joins Josh7:33 The People’s Court Connection11:26 The Disputed Timeline and Phone Evidence15:48 Photographed Injuries and Unanswered Questions18:32 Prior Allegations of Domestic Violence24:19 Missing Physical Evidence and the Waterford Text27:28 The Vehicle, Removed Decal and Forensic Technology31:17 Matthew Farwell: Trial Update32:57 The Counselor’s Cross-Examination37:26 Why the Medical Examiner Changed Her Finding42:22 William Farwell’s Testimony47:19 The Strangulation Expert’s Evidence50:56 Josh’s Assessment and What Comes Next53:59 Announcements and Upcoming CoverageJoin Courtroom Confidential for a closer look at what prosecutors allege, what the evidence supports and what remains in dispute.Follow Dave Mack:https://www.youtube.com/@josephscottmorganFollow Josh:https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQhttps://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/https://www.joshuaritter.com/https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Follow Courtroom Confidential:https://x.com/CRConfidentialhttps://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=enMerch:https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Support our moderators:https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidentialDISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.Support the show

True crime, legal analysis, and YOUR questions—LIVE! Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter answers viewer questions on the biggest cases in true crime.Want to ask Josh your true crime legal question for next Sunday Funday? Get your questions in before 11:59pm PT Friday! Click the tab on the right side here: https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Sunday Funday Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLiteA2x_mfo3H6cFS91S0tBu600tjCeFJ&si=Afeir78gpaWnjK8KCourtroom Confidential: Live Trials: https://www.youtube.com/@CCLiveTrialsBecome a CC Crew member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQVmA_wratr69AQdmWtRLAw/joinGive us a follow:https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQhttps://www.tiktok.com/@joshuaritteresqhttps://www.joshuaritter.com/https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the US Copyright Law.#matthewfarwell #sandrabirchmore #d4vd #celesterivashernandez #lauraowens  #truecrime #truecrimecommunity #truecrimepodcast #legalanalysis #criminaldefense #livetrial #courtroomconfidential #evidence #selfdefense #juryselection #murder #manslaughter #faithhedgepethSupport the show

Miguel Salguero-Olivares has been found guilty in the murder of Faith Hedgepeth. After a trial centered on DNA evidence, disputed testimony and questions about the investigation, Joshua Ritter welcomes Scott from Recovery Addict to break down the verdict, assess the defense’s strategy of calling no witnesses, and discuss the questions that remain.Then, Boston criminal defense attorney Elyse Hershon joins Josh to discuss the Matthew Farwell trial, including testimony from the father of Sandra Birchmore’s unborn child, challenges to his credibility, and what the forensic evidence means for the prosecution’s case.About Joshua Ritter:Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true crime cases.Follow Attorney Elyse Hershon! https://www.youtube.com/@elysehershonlawyerup https://www.instagram.com/hershonlawyerup?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==  https://www.facebook.com/p/Elyse-M-Hershon-Esq-61584858806322/Follow Scott from  @RecoveryAddict :  https://www.youtube.com/c/RecoveryAddicthttps://x.com/RecoveryAddict2https://www.tiktok.com/@md_recovery_addictFollow Josh:https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQhttps://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/https://www.joshuaritter.com/https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Follow Courtroom Confidential:https://x.com/CRConfidentialhttps://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=enMerch:https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Support our moderators:https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidentialDISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.#SandraBirchmore #MatthewFarwell #Massachusetts #FaithHedgepeth #NorthCarolinaSupport the show

Taking care of your health just got easier, thanks to my sponsor Zocdoc — start here at: https://zocdoc.com/courtroomconfidential ✅Jump to the Faith Hedgepeth discussion: 26:45.The defense rested without calling a single witness. What can its lawyers still accomplish in closing? Joshua Ritter and Scott of Recovery Addict examine the decision not to present witnesses, the risks of putting the defendant on the stand, and whether prosecutors’ efforts to establish a connection between Miguel Salguero-Olivares and Faith distracted from their strongest evidence.Also, former prosecutor and criminal defense attorney R.J. Dreiling joins Josh to examine Matthew Farwell’s federal trial, including the original investigation into Sandra Birchmore’s death, the dispatcher’s testimony, and the distinction between evidence of motive and proof of murder.0:00 Cold Open: The Defense Calls No Witnesses1:13 Welcome and Show Preview3:24 Sponsor: Zocdoc5:00 Matthew Farwell: Grooming Allegations and Case Overview6:11 R.J. Dreiling: Challenging the Original Investigation10:59 The Dispatcher’s Call and Competing Interpretations13:27 Motive, Other Affairs and Proof of Murder20:28 Mental Health Evidence and Jury Selection26:45 Faith Hedgepeth with Scott of Recovery Addict34:46 The Surprise Decision, Closing Arguments and Reasonable DoubtFollow Scott from  @RecoveryAddict  https://www.youtube.com/c/RecoveryAddicthttps://x.com/RecoveryAddict2 https://www.tiktok.com/@md_recovery_addict About Joshua Ritter:Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases.Follow Josh:https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQhttps://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/https://www.joshuaritter.com/https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Follow Courtroom Confidential:https://x.com/CRConfidentialhttps://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=enMerch:https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/Support our moderators:https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidentialDISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video.FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.#FaithHedgepeth #MatthewFarwell #SandraBirchmore #TrueCrimeSupport the show