Murder In Moscow: The State Responds To The Motion To Strike The Death Penalty Due to ADS (Part 2) (3/26/25)

There has been much discussion about Bryan Kohberger and his profile in the wake of his arrest. One of the nagging questions has been: If Bryan Kohberger was capable of killing four people in cold blood, is it possible that he had killed before that morning?In this episode, we hear from several experts who discuss it.(commercial at 6:50)to contact me:[email protected]:Expert Backs Up Reported New Probe Into Idaho Murder Suspect With Chilling Argument - Exclusive (grunge.com)

​In 2020, while pursuing a master's degree in criminal justice at DeSales University, Bryan Kohberger authored a 12-page essay titled "Crime-Scene Scenario Final." This academic paper detailed procedures for processing a crime scene, emphasizing methods to prevent contamination, such as the use of fiber-free overalls, gloves, and booties. Kohberger also discussed the importance of collecting DNA evidence and analyzing surveillance footage to identify suspects. The essay centered around a case involving a 35-year-old woman who was stabbed to death in a trailer park, though it remains unclear if this scenario was hypothetical or based on real events.Prosecutors in Kohberger's ongoing trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students have introduced this essay as evidence, arguing that it demonstrates his extensive knowledge of crime scene investigation techniques. They contend that the detailed understanding reflected in his writing suggests a capability to commit the alleged crimes with precision and an awareness of how to avoid leaving incriminating evidence. The trial is scheduled to begin in August 2025, with jury selection commencing on July 30.to contact me:[email protected]

​In 2020, while pursuing a master's degree in criminal justice at DeSales University, Bryan Kohberger authored a 12-page essay titled "Crime-Scene Scenario Final." This academic paper detailed procedures for processing a crime scene, emphasizing methods to prevent contamination, such as the use of fiber-free overalls, gloves, and booties. Kohberger also discussed the importance of collecting DNA evidence and analyzing surveillance footage to identify suspects. The essay centered around a case involving a 35-year-old woman who was stabbed to death in a trailer park, though it remains unclear if this scenario was hypothetical or based on real events.Prosecutors in Kohberger's ongoing trial for the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students have introduced this essay as evidence, arguing that it demonstrates his extensive knowledge of crime scene investigation techniques. They contend that the detailed understanding reflected in his writing suggests a capability to commit the alleged crimes with precision and an awareness of how to avoid leaving incriminating evidence. The trial is scheduled to begin in August 2025, with jury selection commencing on July 30.to contact me:[email protected]

​In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense has submitted a response opposing the State's motion in limine, which seeks to exclude neuropsychological and psychiatric evidence from the trial. The defense intends to present expert testimony indicating that Mr. Kohberger exhibits behaviors consistent with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). They argue that these conditions explain certain behaviors, such as a flat affect, intense gaze, and repetitive speech patterns, which might otherwise be misinterpreted by the jury as indicative of guilt or lack of remorse. Additionally, the defense contends that these behaviors are neurological in nature, supported by neuroimaging evidence, and are crucial for the jury to understand Mr. Kohberger's demeanor and actions accurately.The State, represented by Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson, has moved to prohibit the introduction of this evidence, arguing that it is inadmissible under Idaho rules. The prosecution asserts that the defense has not provided sufficient specific details about Mr. Kohberger's alleged conditions and that such evidence could unfairly prejudice the jury. They also contend that the defense failed to meet disclosure deadlines set by the court. The judge's decision on whether to allow the neuropsychological and psychiatric evidence will significantly impact the strategies employed by both parties in the upcoming trial, scheduled to begin on August 11, 2025.to contact me:[email protected]:Ty A

​In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense has submitted a response opposing the State's motion in limine, which seeks to exclude neuropsychological and psychiatric evidence from the trial. The defense intends to present expert testimony indicating that Mr. Kohberger exhibits behaviors consistent with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). They argue that these conditions explain certain behaviors, such as a flat affect, intense gaze, and repetitive speech patterns, which might otherwise be misinterpreted by the jury as indicative of guilt or lack of remorse. Additionally, the defense contends that these behaviors are neurological in nature, supported by neuroimaging evidence, and are crucial for the jury to understand Mr. Kohberger's demeanor and actions accurately.The State, represented by Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson, has moved to prohibit the introduction of this evidence, arguing that it is inadmissible under Idaho rules. The prosecution asserts that the defense has not provided sufficient specific details about Mr. Kohberger's alleged conditions and that such evidence could unfairly prejudice the jury. They also contend that the defense failed to meet disclosure deadlines set by the court. The judge's decision on whether to allow the neuropsychological and psychiatric evidence will significantly impact the strategies employed by both parties in the upcoming trial, scheduled to begin on August 11, 2025.to contact me:[email protected]:Ty A

​Karen Read is a 44-year-old former financial analyst and adjunct professor from Mansfield, Massachusetts. She was in a relationship with Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. On January 29, 2022, O'Keefe was found unresponsive in the snow outside the Canton home of fellow officer Brian Albert and was later pronounced dead. Authorities allege that Read, after a night of drinking, struck O'Keefe with her SUV during a three-point turn and left the scene. She was subsequently charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence, and leaving the scene of personal injury and death.Read has pleaded not guilty, asserting her innocence and claiming she is the victim of a cover-up involving law enforcement officers. Her defense contends that O'Keefe was beaten inside Albert's home and then left outside, suggesting that the injuries he sustained are inconsistent with being struck by a vehicle. The initial trial began in April 2024 and concluded in July 2024 with a mistrial due to a deadlocked jury. A retrial is scheduled to commence on April 1, 2025.to contact me:[email protected]

Lori Vallow Daybell was found guilty on May 12, 2023, of all charges, including the murders of her two children, Joshua "JJ" Vallow and Tylee Ryan, and conspiracy to commit murder in the death of Chad Daybell’s former wife, Tammy Daybell. The jury deliberated for less than seven hours before reaching a unanimous verdict, rejecting the defense’s argument that Lori was manipulated by Chad Daybell. Prosecutors presented evidence of her deep involvement in the murders, including her belief in doomsday prophecies, text messages plotting the killings, and financial motives such as collecting Social Security benefits after her children's deaths. During sentencing, Lori showed little remorse, leading the judge to impose life in prison without parole, ensuring she would never be released. The verdict closed a case that horrified the nation, exposing a chilling web of religious extremism, deception, and murder.​In November 2023, Lori Vallow Daybell, previously convicted for the murders of her two children in Idaho, was extradited to Arizona to face additional charges. Upon arrival, she was booked into the Maricopa County Jail on two counts of conspiracy to commit murder: one related to the 2019 shooting death of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow, and another concerning the attempted murder of her niece's ex-husband, Brandon Boudreaux. During her initial court appearance, Vallow Daybell inquired about the consolidation of her cases, indicating her active engagement in her defense. As of March 2025, her trial in Arizona is scheduled to commence on March 31, 2025, where she faces these serious conspiracy charges.​In October 2019, Brandon Boudreaux, the ex-husband of Melani Pawlowski (née Boudreaux), who is Lori Vallow Daybell's niece, was targeted in a drive-by shooting outside his home in Gilbert, Arizona. A bullet narrowly missed his head, and the shooter fled the scene. Boudreaux identified the vehicle involved as a Jeep Wrangler registered to Charles Vallow, Lori's deceased fourth husband. Investigations revealed that Alex Cox, Lori's brother, was in the vicinity during the shooting, and cell phone data placed him near Boudreaux's residence at the time of the attack. Authorities believe Cox was the shooter and that Lori conspired with him in the attempted murder, allegedly motivated by financial gain and rooted in their extremist religious beliefsIn February 2022, a Maricopa County grand jury indicted Lori Vallow Daybell on a charge of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder in connection with the attempt on Boudreaux's life. This indictment added to her existing charges, including those related to the deaths of her children, Tylee Ryan and Joshua "JJ" Vallow, and her involvement in the death of Tammy Daybell, Chad Daybell's former wife.Following her conviction in Idaho, Lori was extradited to Arizona in November 2023 to face these additional charges. During her initial court appearance, she pleaded not guilty to the conspiracy charges related to both Charles Vallow's death and the attempted murder of Brandon Boudreaux. As of March 2025, her trial for the Charles Vallow case is scheduled to begin on March 31, 2025, with the trial concerning the Boudreaux case to follow.to  contact me:[email protected]

​During her murder trial, Lori Vallow Daybell's defense team rested their case without calling any witnesses or presenting evidence. This strategy aimed to prevent potential cross-examination pitfalls and to argue that the prosecution had not sufficiently proven her guilt. By not presenting a defense, they sought to minimize risks and maintain focus on the prosecution's burden of proof.Following Lori Vallow's defense resting without presenting evidence, the trial proceeded to closing arguments, after which the jury deliberated and ultimately rendered a verdict. In May 2023, Lori Vallow Daybell was found guilty of all charges, including the murders of her two children and conspiracy to commit murder. She was subsequently sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.to contact me:[email protected]

​On May 11, 2023, during Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, Judge Steven Boyce provided the jury with 39 specific instructions to guide their deliberations. He emphasized the presumption of innocence, stating that Lori was "presumed innocent unless proven guilty." The judge also clarified that the burden of proof rested entirely on the prosecution and that the jury must base their verdict solely on the evidence presented during the trial.Following the instructions, the prosecution delivered its closing arguments, reiterating the theme that the case centered around "money, power, and sex." They detailed a timeline of events, highlighting that Tylee Ryan was killed between September 8-9, 2019; J.J. Vallow between September 22-23, 2019; and Tammy Daybell on October 19, 2019. The prosecution argued that Lori manipulated her brother, Alex Cox, to commit the murders, portraying her as the common link among all three deathsIn response, Lori's defense attorney, Jim Archibald, portrayed her as a loving mother who was misled by Chad Daybell's apocalyptic beliefs. He contended that Lori was a follower, not a leader, and that there was no direct evidence linking her to the murders. Archibald emphasized that Lori's life took a drastic turn after meeting Chad in 2018, suggesting she was influenced by his control.to contact me:[email protected]

Kanye West’s latest social media rant has once again placed him at the center of controversy, this time in a disturbing defense of Sean “Diddy” Combs, who is facing serious criminal allegations including sex trafficking and racketeering. West not only dismissed the allegations against Diddy, but he went further, calling the entire #MeToo movement a "woke agenda" meant to destroy powerful Black men. This rhetoric echoes the same type of deflection and victimhood narrative used by high-profile men accused of sexual misconduct, attempting to cast doubt on survivors rather than addressing the reality of the allegations. Instead of confronting the overwhelming evidence against Diddy—including witness testimonies, financial transactions, and damning surveillance footage—West chose to paint him as a target of some larger conspiracy, making the absurd claim that his downfall was orchestrated rather than the result of his own criminal behavior. In another bizarre move, West even proposed selling Sean John merchandise to raise money for Diddy, essentially treating a man accused of systemic abuse as a martyr rather than a predator.to contact me:[email protected]