Murder In Moscow: Prosecutors Allege That Bryan Kohberger DID Purchase A K-Barr Knife On Amazon (3/20/25)

In March 2005, the Palm Beach Police Department initiated an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein following a complaint from a 14-year-old girl's parents, alleging that Epstein had paid her for a massage that led to sexual activity. The investigation uncovered a pattern wherein Epstein used personal assistants to recruit underage girls for massages, which often escalated to sexual encounters. Evidence included testimonies from multiple victims and witnesses, as well as items found during a search of Epstein's residence, such as hidden cameras and photographs of young girls. The police compiled substantial evidence suggesting that Epstein had engaged in unlawful sex acts with minors.Despite the extensive evidence, when the case was presented to the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office, the response was unexpectedly lenient. A grand jury convened in July 2006 returned an indictment for a single count of felony solicitation of prostitution, a charge that did not fully reflect the severity of the allegations. This outcome led the Palm Beach Police Chief to seek assistance from federal authorities, resulting in a broader investigation by the FBI. The initial handling of the case by local prosecutors has since been widely criticized for it​.(commercial at 10:05)to contact me:[email protected]:Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

From the archives: 3-28-23We've heard numerous times now about Bryan Kohberger and his newfound glory in God. Beyond the fact that he had been meeting with a pastor and exploring his faith however, we didn't know much else.In this episode, we are learning more about his visits to the pastor from the man who runs the ministry who is in charge of providing services to the incarcerated in Idaho.(commercial at 7:44)to contact me:[email protected]:Brian Kohberger pastor tells how he prays with the quadruple murderer | Daily Mail Online

Bryan Kohberger is a 29-year-old criminology graduate student from Washington State University who has been accused of the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students: Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. The students were found stabbed to death in their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho.Kohberger was arrested in December 2022 at his family's home in Pennsylvania. Investigators have linked him to the crime scene through DNA evidence and cellphone data, which reportedly shows him near the victims' residence multiple times before the murders and during the night of the incident. His defense, however, claims that Kohberger was out driving and stargazing during the time of the murders, and they plan to use cellphone data to support this alibi​.Kohberger faces four counts of first-degree murder and a potential death penalty if convicted. His legal team is pushing for a change of venue for the trial, citing concerns over finding an impartial jury due to the extensive media coverage of the case. The trial date has not yet been set, and pre-trial hearings continue to address various motions and evidence disputes.In this episode we get more for author Howard Blum and discuss the theory that Madison Mogen was the killers original target. (commercial at 7:38)to contact me:[email protected]:Idaho murder suspect Bryan Kohberger targeted one of his victims, explosive new theory claims (msn.com)

​In March 2025, a professional photographer filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs in the New York State Supreme Court, alleging sexual battery. The plaintiff, identified as John Doe, claims that during a commercial shoot in late 2022 or early 2023, Combs invited him into his trailer under the pretense of discussing career opportunities. Once inside, Combs allegedly pressured Doe to engage in sexual acts, suggesting that compliance would advance his career. The lawsuit details that after Doe refused, Combs threatened him with physical violence and expelled him from the trailer. Doe asserts that he returned to work, grappling with the trauma of the encounter.Combs' legal team has denied the allegations, stating that he has "never sexually assaulted or sex trafficked anyone—man or woman, adult or minor." They assert confidence in the judicial process and anticipate prevailing in court. This lawsuit adds to a series of legal challenges Combs faces, including multiple allegations of sexual misconduct and assault spanning several decades. As of now, Combs remains incarcerated on unrelated charges, with a trial set for May 2025.to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy lawsuit claims he sexually assaulted man with threats to career

​In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense filed a motion seeking permission to present live testimony from two expert witnesses during the pretrial motions hearing scheduled for April 9-10, 2025. The first expert, Sy Ray, specializes in cell tower data analysis and was expected to testify regarding the interpretation of AT&T timing advance records and their relevance to Kohberger's alibi. The second expert, David Howell, is an authority on digital data systems and was slated to discuss the complexities of Amazon's data retention and recommendation algorithms, particularly concerning the admissibility of Kohberger's Amazon purchase history as evidence. The defense argued that live testimony was essential due to the technical nature of these topics, which could not be adequately addressed through written affidavits alone.However, Judge Steven Hippler denied the defense's motion, ruling that written declarations would suffice for the court's consideration during the April hearing. The judge noted that live witness testimony was unlikely to be necessary but allowed that the defense could have the experts available via video streaming during the hearing. Should the court determine that live testimony is required, it may permit such testimony to be presented remotely. This decision underscores the court's preference for efficiency in pretrial proceedings while maintaining the flexibility to accommodate live testimony if deemed essential.to contact me:[email protected]:031725-Defendants-Motion-Leave-Allow-Witness-Testimony-April-9-2025-Hearing.pdf

​In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense has filed an objection to the State's motion in limine concerning the admissibility of AT&T timing advance records. Timing advance records are utilized to estimate the distance between a mobile device and a cell tower, which can be pivotal in establishing a defendant's location at a specific time. The State seeks to introduce these records as evidence to place Kohberger near the crime scene during the time of the offense.The defense's objection challenges the reliability and accuracy of the AT&T timing advance data, arguing that such records are prone to significant errors and may not accurately reflect a device's precise location. They contend that admitting this evidence could mislead the jury and result in unfair prejudice against Kohberger. This objection aligns with broader concerns raised in the case regarding the use of cell phone data mapping, as defense experts have previously highlighted substantial inaccuracies in the FBI's cell data collection methods.to contact me:[email protected]:031725-Defendants-Obj-States-MiL-ATT-Timing-Advance-Records.pdf

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf

​On the twenty-third day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the court delved into the circumstances surrounding the death of Tammy Daybell, Chad Daybell's first wife. Dr. Lily Marsden, Utah's Deputy Chief Medical Examiner, testified about the autopsy performed on Tammy's exhumed body. Dr. Marsden noted the presence of bruises on Tammy's arms and the discovery of pink foam in her airway, both indicative of asphyxia. She concluded that Tammy's death was a homicide resulting from asphyxiation.Additionally, FBI Special Agent Doug Hart presented evidence from Lori Vallow's iCloud account, revealing communications that shed light on the events leading up to the deaths of Tylee Ryan and J.J. Vallow. These messages provided insight into Lori's state of mind and her interactions with key individuals during that period.to contact me:[email protected]