Patrick Clancy Critics Are Despicable!

Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos break down Russell Brand’s conviction on one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault. They examine the pattern of conduct prosecutors presented, Brand’s media interviews and the impact of the BBC documentary, the judge’s role, and whether the intense publicity affected his right to a fair trial. They also discuss Brand’s courtroom appearance — from his unbuttoned shirts to the Bible he carried — and why presentation can matter to a jury. Plus, what Brand’s remand into custody could mean for his sentence Monday, with the judge warning he faces significant prison time. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos break down the controversy surrounding Ilhan Omar’s ex-husband, who is openly gay, and the long-running allegation that he may also be her brother. They examine questions surrounding the marriage, immigration fraud allegations, and why the Justice Department’s scrutiny of the congresswoman is raising major concerns about political retribution. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos debate whether Donald Trump screwed Elon Musk over by distancing himself from the controversy surrounding Starlink and Ukraine. Harvey argues Musk was left “hung out to dry,” while Mark questions whether Elon could have acted on his own. Plus, the guys break down Trump’s attacks on Abdul El-Sayed, his controversial comments about Amy Acton, rumors of a power struggle involving JD Vance, and what the upcoming midterms could mean for Trump and the Republican Party. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Mark Geragos fires back after Jane Doe’s attorney, Thomas Giuffra, dragged him directly into the escalating Cornell 7 legal battle, suggesting Mark has helped push the defense’s narrative through TMZ. Mark responds to the accusations head-on, addressing claims about leaked documents, his connection to the case and Giuffra’s attempt to link him to the defense’s media strategy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos tackle the central question in the Cornell case: was Jane Doe a victim? They examine newly surfaced text messages, her account of what happened that night, and how her recollection appears to change in the days that followed. Harvey and Mark debate both sides, including whether trauma could explain those changes and whether the texts raise questions that could create reasonable doubt Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Harvey Levin and legendary defense attorney Mark Geragos tackle the explosive Cornell fraternity investigation and examine what could happen if the case ultimately ends up before a jury. They break down the strongest arguments from both sides, analyze newly revealed text messages, discuss the controversial "medieval times" comment, the Halloween party fallout, and explain why one of the accused could decide to cooperate if charges are filed. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos break down the fallout from the Lindsay Clancy mistrial as Patrick Clancy finds himself facing a wave of public attacks and conspiracy theories. They discuss Patrick’s 60 Minutes interview, his lawyer’s vow to fight back against those targeting him, and the latest legal moves surrounding the case. Hosts: Harvey Levin, Mark Geragos Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos go head-to-head over the controversy surrounding Macklemore after the rapper was dropped from multiple Ed Sheeran tour dates. The two debate whether Robert Kraft and other NFL owners were exercising their rights as private venue owners or crossing the line into collusion, while tackling free speech, boycotts, anti-Semitism, the Israel-Gaza conflict, Colin Kaepernick, and where the law draws the line. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos dive into the fallout from the Lindsay Clancy mistrial, debating the backlash against the lone holdout juror, whether race has been unfairly injected into the conversation, and what the juror's actions inside deliberations could mean for a potential retrial. They also break down the defense's legal strategy, the possibility of a plea deal, and whether Clancy will ever face another jury. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

On this episode of Two Angry Men, Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos break down the mistrial in Lindsay Clancy’s murder case, what led to the deadlocked jury and why the retrial could ultimately fail. They examine what happens next, the prosecution’s options and whether Clancy could avoid another trial. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices