John Howard Society of Sociopaths: Wendy the Malicious McHenry on Notice of Liability

More professional gaslighting by Wendy the Malicious McHenry, morally bankrupt degenerate delinquent.More to come soon!!! :D

How many People war King for the JHS are violating the rights of the accused with malicious intent? Well, We're not entirely sure, We only know that so far it includes John Wyatt, David Little, Wendy McHenry and Conan MacIntyre. Does it sound like these People Honour their mission statement?Another example of a sociopathic narcissist who doesn't know how to respond to a Notice of Liability as the 'services director' for the John Howard Society bail program?Wouldn't You think a service director would know what she and her agents can and can't legally do? Professional gaslighting at its best. Remember, I am only compelled to call Wendy in the first place because she is too much of a child to respond to an email Notice of Liability and gaslighting is all she knows.

Yeah, so We follow up with his belligerence by informing Conan the Malicious MacIntyre why he's on Notice and Liable to Me for criminal harm with INTENT.Did he call back? What do You think? Narcissistic sociopaths NEVER take accountability for their Actions because they believe they are above the Law. He did NOT call Me back and is now in default, tacitly conceding that he's a criminal clown and narcissistic sociopath engaged in fraud with malicious intent to cause undue harm and duress in violation of his Oath.

Yeah, this is the belligerence and criminal contempt of an organization that presents it Self as a 'rights advocate' for those accused of criminal offences in Ottawa.I am going to advise any One listening to this podcast and this episode in particular, that when One encounters an individual like this who is using their position of office to exploit People in violation of their rights, they are breaching the public Trust and civilly and criminally liable.When One believes they have the power to Act with malicious intent in a Trusted position of public office, it is criminal malfeasance causing harm. But when One advises the same Trusted public servant that their Actions are causing undue harm and duress and they persist without legal or lawful excuse, they are not criminally negligent (malfeasance), they are deemed to be Acting with criminal intent (mens rae) because they can no longer plead ignorance of the harm they are doing.This is a narcissistic sociopath exploiting the People he was Trusted to ensure those accused are NOT abused by the system and or deprived of their rights.I hope The John Howard Society of Sociopaths are taking Notes - because they are on Notice. That's a preview for the next episode, so stay tuned!!!

Reporting fraud to the manager of the Virtual Crown Ottawa email address who claims that he enters information onto the Registry under the correct name, but some One in Toronto adds a hyphen to the Registry when it is entered onto the Court Registry.I'm not buying what he's selling, but he's a smooth, courteous criminal...

Jester Justice Julie the Belligerent Bourgeois concedes on Record that she does not have jurisdiction and is NOT a Court of COMPETENT Jurisdiction. She does not even have the authority or jurisdiction to schedule a Matter to hear complaints of Charter violations?No LEGITIMATE Court Will EVER suggest they do not have the Jurisdiction to hear Charter violations because the Charter is the highest law in Canada which means that every Court is subject to it and NONE have the capacity to proceed against any One in violation of their Charter rights without breaching the public Trust and abdicating their Oath to the Court and the Crown in a Common Law Jurisdiction. Legal is not lawful.To the extent that any code, statue or Act violates a Charter right or treaty obligation, it is to the extent of the violation of no force or effect - MOJAG (Paraphrasing from memory.)Precise Wording:"Section 24(1) provides remedies against unconstitutional government action; section 24(2) provides for the exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of the Charter; and section 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 provides that a law that is inconsistent with the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect."

Yes, We call the Chair of the LTB the 'Stool' because Trish the Colluding Carson is a piece of shit colluding with corporate not for profits landlords Multifaith Housing Initiative to railroad and exploit Ottawa's most marginalized tenants and minorities.Michael the Tyrannical Thiele can't stand it that I'm Acting as counsel for My Friend because I Will not let them gaslight constitutionally protected rights or the obligations of the Tribunal. So the only Way they can proceed against My Friend and railroad her as they plan to do, is to have Me removed as counsel.This claim has been before the LTB for over a year and a half and the landlord has not even responded to the original claim!It's very easy to tell that Landlord Tenant Board of Ontario has been completely compromised to serve corporate interests. We Will likely appeal to a Divisional Court, but We Will wait to see what the decision says.I also Wish to point out that one of the reasons the liar posing as lawyer states Wishing to have Me removed as counsel is because I am not competent. I had his legal advice and interview removed from CFRA 580 Radio for saying that landlords could refuse to rent to tenants that are unvaccinated, warning the radio station that he was lying and would be making landlords liable for rights violations if they were to heed his counsel. The interview was removed the next day.Since when does a lawyer Wish to have their opposing counsel removed because they are NOT competent? That would be in his best interest if it were True because then I would be easy to take advantage of. It's precisely the opposite, and fortunately My Friend knows it.

To provide some context for this phonecall to the John Howard Society of Sociopaths where it appears the goal of their not for profit is to see how much harm they can do to those wrongfully accused of a crime by Willfully violating every constitutional right they were Trusted to guarantee are protected in the judicial process, please check the blog post which includes the Notice of Liability they are responding to and Will give the call some context.One of the reasons We know they are engaged in fraud is because no legitimate representative of the Court would ever gaslight a Charter right or treaty obligation once the violation has been expressed on a Court of Record. The loss of a right is a form of harm (tort), and a Court would never compound its own liability by aggravating the harm and ignoring the violation. The longer the violation persists, the more compensation One Will be entitled to for aggravated harm.We're not sure if there are any competent judicial authorities in Canada but We remain cautiously optimistic...How morally bankrupt does a state actor have to be to use their position to exploit others? These are some of the most morally bankrupt sociopaths on the planet, posing as philanthropists and do Gooders. Fucking cunts is what they are.

The rights portion of the Claim for trespass and desecration of a Trust Instrument.

Meet Conan MacIntyre and John Wyatt who believe that when One is charged with a crime, they can cause the accused as much harm as they Wish because they are no longer entitled to the protections guaranteed by their constitution.Right, John Wyatt and Conan MacIntyre?"I represent 'the Bench'". If he means that he's about as useful as a bench or equal in intelligence to a bench, maybe. But 'the Bench'? To suggest that either One of these clowns represents the Court or Canada's Justice system is a dark day for justice if it were true. Thankfully it is not, these are just a couple of misguided narcissists who don't seem to understand the Role God gave them to Play.Fucking cunts is what they are!