The Epstein Rewind: What the Maxwell Charges Mean To Prince Andrew

In October 2023, during a deposition related to a civil lawsuit filed by Gabby Petito's parents, Christopher Laundrie recounted a distressing phone call from his son, Brian Laundrie, on August 29, 2021. In this call, Brian, sounding "very panicked," informed his father that "Gabby's gone" and requested assistance in obtaining a lawyer. Christopher noted that Brian was "very nervous and very scattered" during the conversation. Despite the alarming nature of the call, Christopher claimed he did not understand the implication that Gabby Petito was deceased. Following this conversation, the Laundries contacted their attorney, Steven Bertolino, and sent him $25,000 to retain a Wyoming-based lawyer for Brian. Roberta Laundrie, Brian's mother, mentioned in her deposition that she refrained from asking her son about Gabby's whereabouts, adhering to their attorney's advice. The Laundries did not reach out to Gabby's family or authorities after learning she was "gone," leading to allegations that they withheld critical information during the search for Gabby Petito.to contact me:[email protected]:Gabby Petito lawsuit: Read the parents' depositions here | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In October 2023, during a deposition related to a civil lawsuit filed by Gabby Petito's parents, Christopher Laundrie recounted a distressing phone call from his son, Brian Laundrie, on August 29, 2021. In this call, Brian, sounding "very panicked," informed his father that "Gabby's gone" and requested assistance in obtaining a lawyer. Christopher noted that Brian was "very nervous and very scattered" during the conversation. Despite the alarming nature of the call, Christopher claimed he did not understand the implication that Gabby Petito was deceased. Following this conversation, the Laundries contacted their attorney, Steven Bertolino, and sent him $25,000 to retain a Wyoming-based lawyer for Brian. Roberta Laundrie, Brian's mother, mentioned in her deposition that she refrained from asking her son about Gabby's whereabouts, adhering to their attorney's advice. The Laundries did not reach out to Gabby's family or authorities after learning she was "gone," leading to allegations that they withheld critical information during the search for Gabby Petito.to contact me:[email protected]:Gabby Petito lawsuit: Read the parents' depositions here | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Amanda Thirsk was paid over 355K dollars as a trustee for Andrews Trust. In this look back episode, dive into the payout and then the inevitable fallout. To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8304561/Prince-Andrews-charity-investigated-355k-payments-Dukes-former-private-secretary.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this look back episode, we head back to March of 2021...With the new indictments being dropped in Maxwell's lap and the case against her expanding, it brings the question of Prince Andrew and his involvement back to the center of the stage.(Commercial at 12:30)To contact me:[email protected]:https://m.independent.ie/world-news/north-america/prince-andrew-may-be-dragged-into-trial-over-link-to-epstein-40259635.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this look back episode, I warmed up the Delorean for a trip back to August and November of this year to talk about one of the women caught up in this new investigation.Adriana Ross.A former model, Ross worked for Epstein for years gaining his trust and hos favor. Her jobs included the booking of underaged girls for "massages."As the net begins to tighten, we will be right here to cover it.To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/former-model-accused-helping-jefrrey-20993300Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On today's morning update...Jeffrey Epstein had a long reach. A reach so long in fact, it ensnared many powerful men. One of the most powerful to ever be in Epstein's orbit, however, was Bill Clinton. In this article the authors take us on a journey back to 2016 where we learn at the attempt of Darren Indyke to do some damage control on behalf of the Clintons. Join me as I dive in!(Commercial at 13:15)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10408733/The-bid-whitewash-Bill-Clintons-cosy-links-Jeffrey-Epstein-Hillary-ran-President.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In December 2024, LaTroya Grayson filed a $15 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging that she was drugged and sexually assaulted at one of his parties in New York City in October 2006. According to the complaint, Grayson's half-sibling won a contest through local radio station KJAMZ, which included an all-expenses-paid trip to New York to attend a "Diddy White Party." Upon arrival, the event had been rebranded as a "Black Party." Grayson claims that after consuming less than two premade drinks at the party, she began to feel unwell and attempted to go to the restroom. Her next memory was waking up at Saint Vincent's Medical Center with no recollection of how she arrived there, noticing her shirt was torn, her underwear missing, and her money stolen. She believes she was drugged, assaulted, and robbed. After returning to Oklahoma, Grayson allegedly received a threatening phone call from an anonymous female, warning her against pursuing any action due to Combs' celebrity status. The lawsuit includes supporting documents such as photos from the party and medical records.Combs' legal team has denied the allegations, stating that he "has never sexually assaulted anyone or engaged in sex trafficking." They emphasize that Grayson admits to having no memory of the events, does not know who was involved, and has never spoken to Combs, labeling her claims as "pure fiction." As of February 2025, Combs remains incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, awaiting trial on separate charges related to sex trafficking, racketeering, and prostitution, to which he has pleaded not guilty.to contact me:[email protected]:grayson complaintBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In December 2024, LaTroya Grayson filed a $15 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging that she was drugged and sexually assaulted at one of his parties in New York City in October 2006. According to the complaint, Grayson's half-sibling won a contest through local radio station KJAMZ, which included an all-expenses-paid trip to New York to attend a "Diddy White Party." Upon arrival, the event had been rebranded as a "Black Party." Grayson claims that after consuming less than two premade drinks at the party, she began to feel unwell and attempted to go to the restroom. Her next memory was waking up at Saint Vincent's Medical Center with no recollection of how she arrived there, noticing her shirt was torn, her underwear missing, and her money stolen. She believes she was drugged, assaulted, and robbed. After returning to Oklahoma, Grayson allegedly received a threatening phone call from an anonymous female, warning her against pursuing any action due to Combs' celebrity status. The lawsuit includes supporting documents such as photos from the party and medical records.Combs' legal team has denied the allegations, stating that he "has never sexually assaulted anyone or engaged in sex trafficking." They emphasize that Grayson admits to having no memory of the events, does not know who was involved, and has never spoken to Combs, labeling her claims as "pure fiction." As of February 2025, Combs remains incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, awaiting trial on separate charges related to sex trafficking, racketeering, and prostitution, to which he has pleaded not guilty.to contact me:[email protected]:grayson complaintBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Ada County Case No. CR01-24-31665, Defendant Bryan Kohberger filed motions to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants directed at AT&T, Google, USB devices, Apple, and Amazon. The defense argued that these warrants were invalid, alleging they were based on information gathered through unconstitutional methods, including the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), and that the affidavits supporting the warrants contained intentional or reckless omissions of material facts. They contended that the evidence obtained from these warrants violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights and should therefore be excluded from trial.However, the court denied these suppression motions, ruling that the search warrants were lawfully issued and executed. The judge found that the affidavits provided sufficient probable cause and that the methods employed, including the use of IGG, did not violate constitutional protections. Additionally, the court determined that there was no evidence of intentional or reckless falsehoods or omissions in the affidavits that would warrant a Franks hearing. As a result, the evidence obtained from AT&T, Google, USB devices, Apple, and Amazon remains admissible in the proceedings against Kohbergerto contact me:[email protected]:021925-Order-Defedants-Motions-Suppress-ATT-Google-USB-Apple-Amazon.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Ada County Case No. CR01-24-31665, Defendant Bryan Kohberger filed motions to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants directed at AT&T, Google, USB devices, Apple, and Amazon. The defense argued that these warrants were invalid, alleging they were based on information gathered through unconstitutional methods, including the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), and that the affidavits supporting the warrants contained intentional or reckless omissions of material facts. They contended that the evidence obtained from these warrants violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights and should therefore be excluded from trial.However, the court denied these suppression motions, ruling that the search warrants were lawfully issued and executed. The judge found that the affidavits provided sufficient probable cause and that the methods employed, including the use of IGG, did not violate constitutional protections. Additionally, the court determined that there was no evidence of intentional or reckless falsehoods or omissions in the affidavits that would warrant a Franks hearing. As a result, the evidence obtained from AT&T, Google, USB devices, Apple, and Amazon remains admissible in the proceedings against Kohbergerto contact me:[email protected]:021925-Order-Defedants-Motions-Suppress-ATT-Google-USB-Apple-Amazon.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.