
Can You Trust the Market? Equal-Weighted S&P 500 vs. Four-Fund Strategy
In this week’s episode, Paul Merriman shares lessons from a lifetime of investing—prompted by conversations with students, longtime collaborator Rich Buck, and questions from new investors about trust and risk.
Paul dives deep into the data behind his favorite long-term strategies, including the equal-weighted S&P 500 and the classic Four-Fund Portfolio, comparing 25-year results across multiple time periods.
He explains why no one can predict short-term returns, but how history can still guide your long-term strategy. Using decades of data, Paul shows how diversification across size and value has rewarded disciplined investors—even when recent performance has lagged.
Referenced Tables & Data:
40-Year Returns (1928–2024): S&P 500 best 12.5% / worst 8.9%
25-Year Periods (1950–1974, 1975–1999, 2000–2025)
Equal-Weighted S&P 500 (VADDX/RSP) vs. Cap-Weighted (VTSAX, S&P 500)
DFA Small Cap Value (DFSVX and DFFVX)vs. Russell 2000 Small Cap Value (IWN)
Four-Fund Portfolio (S&P 500, Large Cap Value, Small Cap Blend, Small Cap Value)
Two-Fund Portfolio (S&P 500 + Small Cap Value)
From 2000–2025, the S&P 500 compounded at 8.3%, while the equal-weighted version earned 9.9%, and small-cap value reached 11.1%. Paul explains why this premium persists and why patience—backed by data—is an investor’s greatest advantage.
Full tables and charts available at PaulMerriman.com
More episodes from "Sound Investing"
Don't miss an episode of “Sound Investing” and subscribe to it in the GetPodcast app.