
Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2025-09-29 at 22:07
9/29/2025
0:00
8:36
HEADLINES
72-hour hostage return in 20-point Gaza plan
Regional backers rally behind Gaza plan
Eleven Israeli soldiers wounded in Hamas incursion
The time is now 6:00 PM in New York, I'm Noa Levi and this is the latest Israel Today: Ongoing War Report.
From six o’clock this evening, here is the hourly update on the Gaza crisis and the broader regional diplomacy surrounding it.
The centerpiece remains the Gaza plan unveiled by the United States and backed by Israel. The plan lays out twenty points aimed at ending the war with Hamas, restoring hostages, and reshaping Gaza’s political and security landscape. The core timeline calls for the return of all hostages living and dead within seventy-two hours of a ceasefire. It envisions a redeveloped Gaza described as a new Gaza, with a governance and security framework intended to prevent a relapse into war and to ensure humanitarian relief reaches civilians. Many details, including the specifics of governance in Gaza, security arrangements, and the role of external forces, are left to negotiators to hash out. The plan underscores conditions for progress that Israel has long cited: the need to address the presence and power of Hamas, the protection of Israeli security, and the avoidance of unilateral steps that could undermine stability. In Israel’s view, the plan advances peace through strength, tying humanitarian relief and hostage releases to verifiable steps on the ground and a credible path away from Hamas influence.
In Washington and Jerusalem, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu affirmed support for the plan, signaling that Israel has the United States’ backing to move forward if Hamas accepts the terms. President Donald Trump has described the framework as a serious effort to end the war, while stressing that if Hamas rejects it, Israel has strong support to proceed with its own security objectives. The two leaders, following discussions at the White House, emphasized that the alliance remains key to shaping a durable outcome in Gaza and a broader regional posture that discourages new rounds of confrontation.
Hamas officials and their mediators say they will study the proposal in good faith and respond in due course. The group has not yet endorsed the plan, and it is clear that acceptance will depend on whether the package is judged to protect Palestinian rights, ensure humanitarian relief, and avoid a future framework that would leave Hamas without a role in Gaza. Complicating the calculus is a perception among some Palestinian factions and regional actors that the plan may not fully resolve questions about sovereignty, governance, and the nature of security guarantees. The Palestinian Authority has indicated it will not take part in day-to-day governance in Gaza under the plan, a position that has informed discussions about a broader vision of peace and the future political map in the West Bank and Gaza.
Reactions across the region were mixed but broadly leaned toward cautious support for engaging with the American proposal. A joint statement from regional capitals that have supported the process—Qatar, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and others—welcomed the United States’ constructive role and expressed readiness to cooperate with Washington and others to finalize and implement the agreement. They underscored the importance of maintaining humanitarian relief, securing the release of hostages, and advancing a comprehensive peace process grounded in security for Israel and a sustainable path for Palestinians. France’s president offered public support, urging Israel to remain faithful to the plan and to pursue the path of negotiations toward an end to the war and the release of all hostages. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan praised the United States’ efforts and described them as a step toward achieving a just and lasting peace, while emphasizing Turkey’s continued engagement in the process.
In Israel, the plan’s reception among lawmakers has been mixed. Some lawmakers praised the effort as a meaningful step toward ending the conflict and securing long-sought objectives, while others warned of the risks that any framework allowing renewed Hamas influence could pose to Israel’s security. A notable point of domestic debate has centered on whether the plan would keep Israel in control of critical security arrangements in Gaza, prevent a resumption of hostilities, and guard against a future Gaza that could shelter and empower militants once again. One public debate focused on the question of Palestinian statehood, with some voices noting that the plan raises questions about the conditions under which a Palestinian entity could emerge and how that would be reconciled with Israel’s security requirements and political boundaries. In parallel, an official in Jerusalem noted that the plan’s language on Palestinian governance does not commit Israel to authentic statehood in the near term, while others argued that the plan could pave the way for a broader two-state framework if fully implemented and supported internationally.
On the battlefield, Israeli forces and Hamas remain engaged in a tense security environment. Eleven Israeli soldiers were wounded in a Hamas penetration of a military position, five seriously and six lightly, underscoring the ongoing risk and the high stakes of any ceasefire arrangement. The incident illustrates the challenge of reconciling a ceasefire with the capacity of Hamas to operate and maintain influence within Gaza, even as negotiations proceed. The continued threat underscores why Israeli officials stress the necessity of credible security guarantees, robust monitoring, and a plan that prevents Hamas from reconstituting its military apparatus or returning to power in a way that threatens Israeli towns and settlements.
Among international observers, the conversation circles around what the plan can realistically deliver. The questions focus on whether Hamas will accept disarmament, whether a security framework can prevent cross-border attacks, and whether an international presence can operate effectively in Gaza to deter violence and ensure humanitarian access. Analysts note that the plan’s potential hinge points include the timing of hostage releases, the verification of Hamas’s dismantling of its command-and-control structures, and the emergence of a credible civilian administration in Gaza that can gain legitimacy and prevent violent backsliding.
Looking ahead, observers say the most critical tests are practical: Can Hamas agree to the terms and disarm its wings sufficiently to prevent future attacks? Will the international and regional actors align to enforce and fund a transition that maintains security for Israel while enabling humanitarian relief and political development for Palestinians? How will Washington and Jerusalem translate high-level commitments into on-the-ground steps that convince both Israeli and Palestinian publics that the risk of renewed conflict is decreasing rather than merely shifting?
In a broader sense, the episode highlights a moment when a sustained, credible plan could alter the trajectory of the Gaza conflict and reshape regional diplomacy. For Israel, the priority remains ensuring security for its citizens, preserving its sovereignty, and preventing renewed aggression from Gaza. For the United States and allied partners, the goal is to support a pathway to peace that reduces violence, secures humanitarian relief, and leads to a stable regional architecture. For Hamas and the Palestinian leadership, the challenge is to demonstrate that any agreement can deliver tangible gains in governance and dignity while addressing security concerns.
As of 6:00 PM, the events are in flux. Hamas has not yet endorsed the plan, Israel has signaled cautious acceptance pending final details, and regional and international players are preparing to assess, monitor, and react to the steps that follow. The next days will be decisive in determining whether a fragile ceasefire can be anchored in a durable political framework or whether the region moves into another chapter of tension and confrontation. The public should monitor official briefings for specifics on hostage releases, humanitarian commitments, security arrangements, and the exact mechanisms proposed to prevent a resurgence of violence in Gaza and to maintain the security of communities inside Israel.
Thank you for tuning in to this Israel Today: Ongoing War Report update.
I'm Noa Levi. Stay safe and informed.
Keep in mind that this AI-generated report may contain occasional inaccuracies, so consult multiple sources for a comprehensive view. Find the code and more details in the podcast description.
SOURCES
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-869020
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-869019
https://t.me/Newss0nline/55708
https://www.jpost.com/international/article-869018
https://t.me/newssil/172688
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-869016
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-869017
https://www.al-monitor.com/__%3C%21--%20THEME%20DEBUG%20--%3E_%3C%21--%20THEME%20HOOK%3A%20%27views_view_field%27%20--%3E_%3C%21--%20BEGIN%20OUTPUT%20from%20%27core/themes/stable9/templates/views/views-view-field.html.twig%27%20--%3E_/originals/2025/09/factbox-trump-peace-plan-envisions-new-gaza-and-trump-led-board-peace_%3C%21--%20END%20OUTPUT%20from%20%27core/themes/stable9/templates/views/views-view-field.html.twig%27%20--%3E__
https://www.maariv.co.il/breaking-news/article-1237369
https://t.me/Newss0nline/55707
https://t.me/Newss0nline/55706
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-869015
https://www.jpost.com/international/article-869011
https://t.me/newssil/172687
https://t.me/Newss0nline/55705
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-869014
https://t.me/newssil/172686
https://t.me/newssil/172685
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/benjamin-netanyahu/article-869013
https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/0
72-hour hostage return in 20-point Gaza plan
Regional backers rally behind Gaza plan
Eleven Israeli soldiers wounded in Hamas incursion
The time is now 6:00 PM in New York, I'm Noa Levi and this is the latest Israel Today: Ongoing War Report.
From six o’clock this evening, here is the hourly update on the Gaza crisis and the broader regional diplomacy surrounding it.
The centerpiece remains the Gaza plan unveiled by the United States and backed by Israel. The plan lays out twenty points aimed at ending the war with Hamas, restoring hostages, and reshaping Gaza’s political and security landscape. The core timeline calls for the return of all hostages living and dead within seventy-two hours of a ceasefire. It envisions a redeveloped Gaza described as a new Gaza, with a governance and security framework intended to prevent a relapse into war and to ensure humanitarian relief reaches civilians. Many details, including the specifics of governance in Gaza, security arrangements, and the role of external forces, are left to negotiators to hash out. The plan underscores conditions for progress that Israel has long cited: the need to address the presence and power of Hamas, the protection of Israeli security, and the avoidance of unilateral steps that could undermine stability. In Israel’s view, the plan advances peace through strength, tying humanitarian relief and hostage releases to verifiable steps on the ground and a credible path away from Hamas influence.
In Washington and Jerusalem, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu affirmed support for the plan, signaling that Israel has the United States’ backing to move forward if Hamas accepts the terms. President Donald Trump has described the framework as a serious effort to end the war, while stressing that if Hamas rejects it, Israel has strong support to proceed with its own security objectives. The two leaders, following discussions at the White House, emphasized that the alliance remains key to shaping a durable outcome in Gaza and a broader regional posture that discourages new rounds of confrontation.
Hamas officials and their mediators say they will study the proposal in good faith and respond in due course. The group has not yet endorsed the plan, and it is clear that acceptance will depend on whether the package is judged to protect Palestinian rights, ensure humanitarian relief, and avoid a future framework that would leave Hamas without a role in Gaza. Complicating the calculus is a perception among some Palestinian factions and regional actors that the plan may not fully resolve questions about sovereignty, governance, and the nature of security guarantees. The Palestinian Authority has indicated it will not take part in day-to-day governance in Gaza under the plan, a position that has informed discussions about a broader vision of peace and the future political map in the West Bank and Gaza.
Reactions across the region were mixed but broadly leaned toward cautious support for engaging with the American proposal. A joint statement from regional capitals that have supported the process—Qatar, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and others—welcomed the United States’ constructive role and expressed readiness to cooperate with Washington and others to finalize and implement the agreement. They underscored the importance of maintaining humanitarian relief, securing the release of hostages, and advancing a comprehensive peace process grounded in security for Israel and a sustainable path for Palestinians. France’s president offered public support, urging Israel to remain faithful to the plan and to pursue the path of negotiations toward an end to the war and the release of all hostages. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan praised the United States’ efforts and described them as a step toward achieving a just and lasting peace, while emphasizing Turkey’s continued engagement in the process.
In Israel, the plan’s reception among lawmakers has been mixed. Some lawmakers praised the effort as a meaningful step toward ending the conflict and securing long-sought objectives, while others warned of the risks that any framework allowing renewed Hamas influence could pose to Israel’s security. A notable point of domestic debate has centered on whether the plan would keep Israel in control of critical security arrangements in Gaza, prevent a resumption of hostilities, and guard against a future Gaza that could shelter and empower militants once again. One public debate focused on the question of Palestinian statehood, with some voices noting that the plan raises questions about the conditions under which a Palestinian entity could emerge and how that would be reconciled with Israel’s security requirements and political boundaries. In parallel, an official in Jerusalem noted that the plan’s language on Palestinian governance does not commit Israel to authentic statehood in the near term, while others argued that the plan could pave the way for a broader two-state framework if fully implemented and supported internationally.
On the battlefield, Israeli forces and Hamas remain engaged in a tense security environment. Eleven Israeli soldiers were wounded in a Hamas penetration of a military position, five seriously and six lightly, underscoring the ongoing risk and the high stakes of any ceasefire arrangement. The incident illustrates the challenge of reconciling a ceasefire with the capacity of Hamas to operate and maintain influence within Gaza, even as negotiations proceed. The continued threat underscores why Israeli officials stress the necessity of credible security guarantees, robust monitoring, and a plan that prevents Hamas from reconstituting its military apparatus or returning to power in a way that threatens Israeli towns and settlements.
Among international observers, the conversation circles around what the plan can realistically deliver. The questions focus on whether Hamas will accept disarmament, whether a security framework can prevent cross-border attacks, and whether an international presence can operate effectively in Gaza to deter violence and ensure humanitarian access. Analysts note that the plan’s potential hinge points include the timing of hostage releases, the verification of Hamas’s dismantling of its command-and-control structures, and the emergence of a credible civilian administration in Gaza that can gain legitimacy and prevent violent backsliding.
Looking ahead, observers say the most critical tests are practical: Can Hamas agree to the terms and disarm its wings sufficiently to prevent future attacks? Will the international and regional actors align to enforce and fund a transition that maintains security for Israel while enabling humanitarian relief and political development for Palestinians? How will Washington and Jerusalem translate high-level commitments into on-the-ground steps that convince both Israeli and Palestinian publics that the risk of renewed conflict is decreasing rather than merely shifting?
In a broader sense, the episode highlights a moment when a sustained, credible plan could alter the trajectory of the Gaza conflict and reshape regional diplomacy. For Israel, the priority remains ensuring security for its citizens, preserving its sovereignty, and preventing renewed aggression from Gaza. For the United States and allied partners, the goal is to support a pathway to peace that reduces violence, secures humanitarian relief, and leads to a stable regional architecture. For Hamas and the Palestinian leadership, the challenge is to demonstrate that any agreement can deliver tangible gains in governance and dignity while addressing security concerns.
As of 6:00 PM, the events are in flux. Hamas has not yet endorsed the plan, Israel has signaled cautious acceptance pending final details, and regional and international players are preparing to assess, monitor, and react to the steps that follow. The next days will be decisive in determining whether a fragile ceasefire can be anchored in a durable political framework or whether the region moves into another chapter of tension and confrontation. The public should monitor official briefings for specifics on hostage releases, humanitarian commitments, security arrangements, and the exact mechanisms proposed to prevent a resurgence of violence in Gaza and to maintain the security of communities inside Israel.
Thank you for tuning in to this Israel Today: Ongoing War Report update.
I'm Noa Levi. Stay safe and informed.
Keep in mind that this AI-generated report may contain occasional inaccuracies, so consult multiple sources for a comprehensive view. Find the code and more details in the podcast description.
SOURCES
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-869020
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-869019
https://t.me/Newss0nline/55708
https://www.jpost.com/international/article-869018
https://t.me/newssil/172688
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-869016
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-869017
https://www.al-monitor.com/__%3C%21--%20THEME%20DEBUG%20--%3E_%3C%21--%20THEME%20HOOK%3A%20%27views_view_field%27%20--%3E_%3C%21--%20BEGIN%20OUTPUT%20from%20%27core/themes/stable9/templates/views/views-view-field.html.twig%27%20--%3E_/originals/2025/09/factbox-trump-peace-plan-envisions-new-gaza-and-trump-led-board-peace_%3C%21--%20END%20OUTPUT%20from%20%27core/themes/stable9/templates/views/views-view-field.html.twig%27%20--%3E__
https://www.maariv.co.il/breaking-news/article-1237369
https://t.me/Newss0nline/55707
https://t.me/Newss0nline/55706
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-869015
https://www.jpost.com/international/article-869011
https://t.me/newssil/172687
https://t.me/Newss0nline/55705
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-869014
https://t.me/newssil/172686
https://t.me/newssil/172685
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/benjamin-netanyahu/article-869013
https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/0
More episodes from "Israel Today: Ongoing War Report"
Don't miss an episode of “Israel Today: Ongoing War Report” and subscribe to it in the GetPodcast app.