The Gabby Petito Files: Over 46 9-11 Calls Were Made To The Laundrie Residence from Sept. 10-27

In Ada County Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defendant, Bryan C. Kohberger, filed a motion requesting a Franks hearing, aiming to challenge the validity of the search warrant affidavits by alleging intentional or reckless false statements or omissions by law enforcement. After thorough consideration, the court denied this motion on February 19, 2025, concluding that the defendant did not meet the necessary burden to warrant such a hearing. Specifically, the court found insufficient evidence to suggest that any false statements or omissions were made intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth in the affidavits supporting the search warrants.Additionally, the defense had submitted multiple motions to suppress evidence obtained through various search warrants, including those related to AT&T, Google, USB, Apple, Amazon, arrest warrants, and searches conducted in Pennsylvania and Idaho. These motions were also denied by the court. In its ruling, the court determined that the search warrants in question were supported by probable cause and that the evidence obtained was lawfully acquired. Consequently, all challenged evidence remains admissible in the ongoing proceedings against Mr. Kohberger.to contact me:[email protected]:021925-Order-Defedants-Moton-Franks-Hearing.pdf

In Ada County Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defendant, Bryan C. Kohberger, filed a motion requesting a Franks hearing, aiming to challenge the validity of the search warrant affidavits by alleging intentional or reckless false statements or omissions by law enforcement. After thorough consideration, the court denied this motion on February 19, 2025, concluding that the defendant did not meet the necessary burden to warrant such a hearing. Specifically, the court found insufficient evidence to suggest that any false statements or omissions were made intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth in the affidavits supporting the search warrants.Additionally, the defense had submitted multiple motions to suppress evidence obtained through various search warrants, including those related to AT&T, Google, USB, Apple, Amazon, arrest warrants, and searches conducted in Pennsylvania and Idaho. These motions were also denied by the court. In its ruling, the court determined that the search warrants in question were supported by probable cause and that the evidence obtained was lawfully acquired. Consequently, all challenged evidence remains admissible in the ongoing proceedings against Mr. Kohberger.to contact me:[email protected]:021925-Order-Defedants-Moton-Franks-Hearing.pdf

The initial autopsy results came back today and they confirmed what most people have been speculating: Gabby died via homicide. As of now no cause of death has been revealed. to contact me:[email protected]:https://abcnews.go.com/US/body-found-grand-teton-confirmed-gabby-petito-death/story?id=80124838

On top of the first story we heard form Miranda Baker about picking up a hitchhiking Brian Laundrie a second woman has now come forward and said she ALSO gave him a ride. Let's dive in.To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/brian-laundrie-manhunt-woman-in-wyoming-says-she-picked-him-up-hitchhiking/ar-AAOL1QB?ocid=uxbndlbing

In todays episode we update the current status of the manhunt for Brian Laundrie and we hear from a expert criminal profiler and psychotherapist who continues to provide insight on Brian Laundrie's psyche leading up to the eventual murder of Gabby Petito. To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.foxnews.com/us/coward-brian-laundrie-domestic-abuser-criminal-profiler

According to sources who were present at the Merry Piglet and confirmed by restaurant management, Brian Laundrie and Gabby Petito were at the tex mex spot when Brian had a blow up over what they say was an issue with the bill. According to reports Brian was so unhinged that he went in and out of the establishment four times arguing with wait staff. His behavior was so over the top, Gabby had to apolgize for him. As this case continues to evolve we are starting to get a more clear picture of who Brian Laundrie really is. To contact me:[email protected]:https://nypost.com/2021/09/22/brian-laundrie-acted-aggressive-before-gabby-petitos-death-witness/

Fox news has obtained the police records from 46 9/11 calls that were dispatched to the Laundrie residence. Several of those documents contained redacted information. Also...The FBI stopped by the Laundrie's house again today for some more DNA. To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/brian-laundrie-manhunt-fbi-briefly-explores-camper-while-collecting-items-to-use-in-search-attorney-says/ar-AAP0DxFSource:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/brian-laundrie-manhunt-fbi-briefly-explores-camper-while-collecting-items-to-use-in-search-attorney-says/ar-AAP0DxFJoseph Michael Bolduc:https://namus.nij.ojp.gov/case/MP59630

The latest hype surrounding the supposed "Jeffrey Epstein client list" is yet another round of recycled speculation with little substantive backing. While reports claim that U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi is reviewing documents that may include names of high-profile individuals, the idea of a singular, definitive "client list" has always been more of a conspiracy-fueled fantasy than a verified reality. Past unsealed documents have revealed connections between Epstein and well-known figures, but nothing has  ever  been  done. The notion that some secret ledger exists, ready to blow open a vast network of elite predators, is more wishful thinking than hard fact. If such a list existed, why hasn't it surfaced in the years of legal battles, document dumps, and investigative reporting?More likely, this "impending release" is another instance of strategic leaks, sensationalism, and political maneuvering meant to stoke public outrage without delivering meaningful justice. Previous Epstein-related releases have been riddled with redactions, context-free name-dropping, and vague associations that fuel more speculation than they resolve. The real issue isn't whether a list exists—it’s whether those with actual influence will ever face real consequences. Until we see ironclad evidence, take any breathless claims about a damning "client list" with the skepticism they deserve.to contact me:[email protected]:AG Pam Bondi vows to release Jeffrey Epstein documents

In recent developments in the Bryan Kohberger case, Idaho Judge Steven Hippler has denied the defense's motion to exclude key DNA evidence. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022, argued that the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) to link him to the crime scene violated his constitutional rights. However, Judge Hippler ruled that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA found at a crime scene, allowing the prosecution to use this evidence in the upcoming trial. Additionally, the judge upheld the admissibility of digital evidence from Kohberger's online accounts and cellphone data, as well as the legality of trash collection from his parents' home, further strengthening the prosecution's case.In preparation for the trial, which is scheduled to begin in August 2025, Kohberger has added San Francisco attorney Bicka Barlow to his defense team. Barlow, an expert in DNA forensics, has been admitted pro hac vice, allowing her to represent Kohberger in Idaho despite being licensed in California. Her expertise is expected to play a crucial role in challenging the DNA evidence presented by the prosecution. If convicted, Kohberger faces the possibility of the death penalty.to contact me:[email protected]:Bombshell Bryan Kohberger court filing says relative refused to hand over DNA | Daily Mail Online

In Ada County Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defendant, Bryan C. Kohberger, filed a motion requesting a Franks hearing, aiming to challenge the validity of the search warrant affidavits by alleging intentional or reckless false statements or omissions by law enforcement. After thorough consideration, the court denied this motion on February 19, 2025, concluding that the defendant did not meet the necessary burden to warrant such a hearing. Specifically, the court found insufficient evidence to suggest that any false statements or omissions were made intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth in the affidavits supporting the search warrants.Additionally, the defense had submitted multiple motions to suppress evidence obtained through various search warrants, including those related to AT&T, Google, USB, Apple, Amazon, arrest warrants, and searches conducted in Pennsylvania and Idaho. These motions were also denied by the court. In its ruling, the court determined that the search warrants in question were supported by probable cause and that the evidence obtained was lawfully acquired. Consequently, all challenged evidence remains admissible in the ongoing proceedings against Mr. Kohberger.to contact me:[email protected]:021925-Order-Defedants-Moton-Franks-Hearing.pdf