The Epstein Rewind: Jeffrey Epstein And His Male Accuser

Jeffrey Epstein's long time lawyer and confidante, Darren Indyke has been sued by two of Jeffrey Epstein's survivors and they hope to turn the lawsuit into the class action variety. Indyke and his legal team say the suit is frivolous and that Indyke is not guilty of any wrong doing.(commercial at 6:28)to contact me:[email protected]:Glen Cove Native Covered up Epstein’s Sex Trafficking, Lawsuit Claims (longislandpress.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein and his money were still in high demand at places like Harvard, even after his first conviction. While other people were doing their best to avoid connections to Epstein, many scientists and researchers did no such thing and just continued accepting bag after bag of cash from him. In this episode, we take a look at some of those donations and some of the people who received them.(commercial at 9:20)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/harvard-science-professors-kept-meeting-donor-jeffrey-epstein-despite-his-n1028536Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Many people who work in Academia have had the stink of Jeffrey Epstein wafting from them throughout the years. Not many of them have brazenly owned the way that a professor from Morgan State University has. Enter Jonathan Farley. Jonathan Farley, according to his email to a jailed Jeffrey Epstein in 2019, had no problem appealing to Jeffrey Epstein for a donation and for that donation the Professor offered to a voice of support for Jeffrey Epstein and to help Jeffrey Epstein refurbish his image. His donation would also garner him a spot at the University as "The Jeffrey Epstein Chair for the Promotion of Women in Mathematics." The University has denied ever taking donations from Epstein and there is no record that it received anything from the now dead convicted sex offender. to contact me:[email protected]:A Math Professor Suggested a Jailed Jeffrey Epstein Give Him Money to Repair His Image in the Black Community (vice.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

While the majority of Jeffrey Epstein's publicly known accusers are female, there have been reports suggesting that male victims may also exist. However, specific allegations from male accusers have not been extensively documented or publicly disclosed. The unsealed court documents and media reports primarily focus on the testimonies and experiences of female survivors.   However one man said that he was abused by Epstein as well.(Commercial at 9:49)To contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The wraparound strategy is a comprehensive approach to combating addiction that reframes it as a treatable disease rather than a crime. At its core, the strategy replaces punitive measures with mandatory treatment programs for nonviolent drug offenders, beginning with a minimum 90-day stay in state-of-the-art facilities. These facilities are designed as multidisciplinary recovery hubs offering medical detoxification, psychological care, vocational training, family therapy, and long-term aftercare support. Judges have the authority to extend treatment up to a year based on individual progress, ensuring that care is tailored to the severity of the addiction. The program emphasizes accountability and structured recovery, aiming to reduce recidivism while addressing the root causes of addiction.In addition to treatment, the strategy incorporates robust prevention efforts focused on education, harm reduction, and community-building. Comprehensive drug education programs, mental health support, and initiatives to address systemic inequities like poverty and housing instability work to reduce the demand for drugs. Coupled with international partnerships to disrupt supply chains, military interventions against cartels, and financial measures to dismantle illicit networks, the wraparound strategy attacks the crisis from every angle. By prioritizing treatment, prevention, and systemic reform, it offers a transformative path to reduce addiction rates, save lives, and restore communities across the nation.With the cartels in Mexico, now being designated as terrorist groups, it's important that we focus on a comprehensive strategy in dealing with not only those who are supplying the drugs, but also with the rampant addiction problem right here at home that continues to drive the market.  In this episode we take a look at what a wrap around strategy might look like.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Sinaloa Cartel, once a unified and dominant force in Mexico's drug trade, is currently embroiled in a violent internal conflict between two primary factions: "Los Chapitos," led by the sons of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, and "La Mayiza," loyal to Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada. This infighting intensified following the July 2024 arrests of Zambada and Joaquín Guzmán López in El Paso, Texas, which created a power vacuum and escalated tensions between the groups. The conflict erupted on September 9, 2024, in Culiacán, Sinaloa, and has since spread to other municipalities, resulting in over 500 deaths and numerous disappearances.The violence has severely impacted daily life in Sinaloa, particularly in Culiacán, where residents face constant threats of abduction and murder. Cartel gunmen have been known to stop individuals, demand access to their cellphones, and execute them if any contact with rival faction members is found. This has led to widespread fear, with businesses closing, economic activity stalling, and families fleeing the area. Despite the deployment of additional military forces, the government's efforts have been insufficient to curb the violence, leaving citizens feeling unprotected and the region in a state of chaos.In the ongoing conflict between factions of Mexico's Sinaloa cartel, a grim tactic has emerged: the desecration of rival families' mausoleums. Notably, the sons of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, known as "Los Chapitos," are suspected of ordering the destruction of elaborate tombs belonging to the family of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a co-founder of the cartel. In early January 2025, a mausoleum near Culiacán, built for one of El Mayo's grandchildren, was ransacked and set ablaze. Days later, assailants returned to inflict further damage and reportedly removed the remains of several Zambada relatives. This act of grave desecration underscores the deepening enmity between cartel factions and represents a stark departure from traditional codes of conduct, where even rival groups typically respected burial sites.to contact me:[email protected]:A grim new tactic in Sinaloa's cartel war: Grave desecration - Los Angeles TimesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Nicholas Tartaglione is a former police officer in New York who was arrested and charged in 2016 for his involvement in a drug-related quadruple homicide. Prosecutors alleged that Tartaglione lured four men to a bar in Orange County, New York, where they were tortured and killed over a drug deal dispute. The case garnered widespread attention due to the brutality of the murders and Tartaglione's prior law enforcement career. While awaiting trial, Tartaglione was held in the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York City, where he briefly shared a cell with Jeffrey Epstein.Tartaglione’s connection to Epstein became significant after Epstein was found injured in his cell in July 2019, weeks before his death. Reports suggested that Tartaglione may have attacked Epstein, though he denied any involvement, claiming he attempted to assist Epstein instead. The incident fueled speculation and conspiracy theories, especially following Epstein’s death by apparent suicide in August 2019. Tartaglione’s presence in Epstein’s cell during a critical period added to public scrutiny of the MCC, highlighting concerns about inmate safety and accountability within the facility.In a recent jailhouse interview, Nicholas Tartaglione, a former police officer convicted of a 2016 quadruple homicide, revealed that federal prosecutors had offered Jeffrey Epstein a plea deal in exchange for incriminating information on then-President Donald Trump. Tartaglione, who shared a cell with Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan weeks before Epstein's death in August 2019, recounted that Epstein discussed the possibility of fabricating information to secure a lighter sentence but ultimately claimed to have no substantial information on Trump. Tartaglione also mentioned that Epstein considered cooperating to protect his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell. These revelations shed new light on the legal strategies considered during Epstein's incarceration and the pressures he faced prior to his death. (commercial at 10:24)to contact me:[email protected]:Feds offered Jeffrey Epstein a deal for dirt on Trump: ex-cellmateBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In United States v. Sean Combs, 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government submitted declarations in response to Judge Subramanian’s January 3, 2025 order (Dkt. No. 123) and to further oppose the defendant’s motion for a hearing and other relief (Dkt. No. 117). These submissions aim to provide additional evidence and arguments supporting the Government’s position that the defendant’s requests for a hearing and related relief are unwarranted. The declarations address key points raised in the defense's motion, reinforcing the Government's stance and compliance with procedural requirements outlined by the court.In United States v. Sean Combs, 24-cr-542 (AS), the defense responded to the government’s request for redactions to their January 14, 2025 letter motion (Dkts. 126, 127). Although the defense refiled the motion with the requested redactions as directed by the Court (Dkt. 128, 129), they opposed the redactions, arguing that they are overly broad and violate the presumption of public access to judicial documents. The defense seeks the Court’s permission to refile the letter motion with narrower redactions to better balance transparency and confidentiality.to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 Combs Letter re Redactions (AS comments) AE (002)gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.131.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the Memorandum of Law in Support of Macy’s Motion to Dismiss in case 1:24-cv-07774-JPO, Macy’s argues that the plaintiff’s claims lack legal merit and should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Macy’s contends that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, asserting that the allegations are either legally insufficient or unsupported by factual evidence. The memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff has not met the necessary pleading standards to establish the essential elements of the claims, including specific instances of wrongdoing or a direct link between Macy’s actions and any alleged harm.Additionally, Macy’s argues that certain claims are barred by law, such as those preempted by federal statutes or time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations. The memorandum also highlights procedural and jurisdictional issues, asserting that the case lacks the factual and legal foundation to proceed. Macy’s requests that the Court dismiss the complaint in its entirety, maintaining that the claims are overly broad, speculative, and fail to establish a plausible basis for relief under the law.to contact me:[email protected]:TO:Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the Memorandum of Law in Support of Macy’s Motion to Dismiss in case 1:24-cv-07774-JPO, Macy’s argues that the plaintiff’s claims lack legal merit and should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Macy’s contends that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, asserting that the allegations are either legally insufficient or unsupported by factual evidence. The memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff has not met the necessary pleading standards to establish the essential elements of the claims, including specific instances of wrongdoing or a direct link between Macy’s actions and any alleged harm.Additionally, Macy’s argues that certain claims are barred by law, such as those preempted by federal statutes or time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations. The memorandum also highlights procedural and jurisdictional issues, asserting that the case lacks the factual and legal foundation to proceed. Macy’s requests that the Court dismiss the complaint in its entirety, maintaining that the claims are overly broad, speculative, and fail to establish a plausible basis for relief under the law.to contact me:[email protected]:TO:Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.