Cassie Ventura Accuses Diddy Of Assaulting Her

In November 2023, Cassie Ventura filed a lawsuit against her ex-boyfriend, Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging a decade-long pattern of abuse, violence, and sex trafficking during their relationship. The lawsuit was filed under New York's Adult Survivors Act, which allows victims to pursue legal action beyond the usual statute of limitations. The following day, both parties announced an out-of-court settlement, with terms undisclosed. Combs stated, "We have decided to resolve this matter amicably," and wished Cassie and her family well.Legal experts suggest that Combs could have avoided the public legal battle and subsequent allegations by settling privately before the lawsuit was filed. The public nature of the lawsuit brought renewed scrutiny to Combs' handling of the case, leading to a series of additional lawsuits and federal charges that now threaten his career and freedom.(commercial at 7:16)to contact me:[email protected]:Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs could have settled Cassie Ventura’s suit privately but didn’t | Sean ‘Diddy‘ Combs | The GuardianBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode, we hear from Cassie Ventura as she speaks out for the first time following the release of a shocking 2016 video showing her being physically abused by ex Sean "Diddy" Combs.On Thursday, May 23, Cassie, 37,  shared her story on Instagram, expressing heartfelt gratitude for the overwhelming love and support she has received from family, friends, and strangers alike. She reveals how this outpouring of kindness has provided a sanctuary for her younger self, allowing her to finally feel a sense of safety.Cassie candidly discusses the profound impact of domestic violence on her life, describing it as a force that broke her down into someone she never thought she would become. Despite the immense challenges, she emphasizes that with hard work, she has emerged stronger but acknowledges that the journey of recovery is ongoing.Let's dive in!to contact me:[email protected]:Cassie breaks her silence after video of Sean 'Diddy' Combs beating her up was released - as she urges people to 'believe victims the first time' after she was accused of lying | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sean "Puffy" Combs is no stranger to having run ins with the law and he is certainly no stranger to accusations being leveled against him.In this episode, we hear about the shocking accusations of assault being made against Combs by his ex girlfriend and now we are also hearing that their is a criminal investigation surrounding Puffy as well.So, what are the accusations and who are making them? Let's dive in and find out.(commercial at 7:08)to contact me:[email protected]:Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs accused of rape and abuse in lawsuit filed by former girlfriend Cassie Ventura | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a formal letter addressed to Judge Arun Subramanian, the legal team representing Casandra Ventura opposed a motion filed by various news organizations seeking access to sealed sexually explicit videos that are to be introduced as evidence in the federal sex trafficking trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs. Ventura’s attorneys argued that the request to unseal and publicly disseminate such deeply personal and graphic material is unprecedented in the context of a sex trafficking case. They emphasized that the videos in question allegedly depict coercive sexual acts and should remain sealed to protect Ventura’s privacy, dignity, and emotional well-being, especially given the trauma associated with the alleged abuse.The letter further asserted that the news organizations failed to cite any legal precedent supporting their demand and that permitting reporters to watch and listen to these videos during trial proceedings would only serve to sensationalize Ventura’s victimization. Her counsel urged the court to uphold the integrity of the proceedings by balancing the public’s right to access against the victim’s right to be shielded from unnecessary exploitation and re-traumatization. The motion, they argued, could deter future victims from coming forward if courts begin allowing graphic evidence of their abuse to be broadcast or publicly scrutinized in the name of transparency.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.328.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On May 12, 2025, a coalition of major news organizations—including ABC News, The Associated Press, The New York Times, and NPR—submitted a formal letter to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian. They expressed concern over proposed restrictions on public access to certain audiovisual exhibits in the federal sex trafficking trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs. The government had indicated plans to present sensitive evidence, including sexually explicit videos, in a manner that would be visible and audible only to the jury, court, and parties involved, excluding the public and press. The media coalition argued that such limitations would infringe upon the First Amendment rights of the public and press to access criminal trials, especially given the high-profile nature of the case and the serious allegations involved.The news organizations acknowledged the sensitive content of the exhibits and the privacy interests of the alleged victims. However, they contended that these concerns could be addressed without entirely closing the courtroom. As an alternative, they proposed allowing a limited number of pool reporters to view and hear the exhibits as they are presented to the jury. This approach, they argued, would balance the need for public oversight with the protection of victim privacy. The letter emphasized the significant public interest in the proceedings, noting Combs' prominence in the entertainment industry and the gravity of the charges he faces, which include sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. The court's decision on this matter will set a precedent for how sensitive evidence is handled in high-profile criminal trials.to contact me:[email protected]:https://dwt-my.sharepoint.com/personal/perla_dwt_com/Documents/Documents/Closed Cases & Short-Term Projects/Diddy/Diddy Trial Access 5.12.2025 6.10pmBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

During her testimony in Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, Cassie Ventura detailed a decade-long relationship marked by control, abuse, and coercion. She described how Combs exerted dominance over her personal and professional life, dictating aspects such as her clothing choices and daily interactions. Ventura recounted being subjected to physical violence for minor infractions, including being beaten for making "the wrong face." She also testified about being forced to carry a firearm for Combs, which she believed was intended to intimidate her .Ventura's testimony included accounts of being compelled to participate in "freak-offs," which she described as drug-fueled, multi-day sex parties involving male escorts, orchestrated and filmed by Combs. She alleged that during these events, she was forced into degrading acts, such as being urinated on, and was left to clean up afterward. Ventura expressed feelings of humiliation and worthlessness, stating that she engaged in these acts out of fear and a sense of obligation. She also recounted a 2016 incident, captured on surveillance video, where Combs assaulted her in a hotel hallway. Throughout her testimony, Ventura emphasized the pervasive control and abuse she endured, which she said led her to abandon her music career .to contact me:[email protected]:May 13, 2025 - Day 2 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

During her testimony in Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, Cassie Ventura detailed a decade-long relationship marked by control, abuse, and coercion. She described how Combs exerted dominance over her personal and professional life, dictating aspects such as her clothing choices and daily interactions. Ventura recounted being subjected to physical violence for minor infractions, including being beaten for making "the wrong face." She also testified about being forced to carry a firearm for Combs, which she believed was intended to intimidate her .Ventura's testimony included accounts of being compelled to participate in "freak-offs," which she described as drug-fueled, multi-day sex parties involving male escorts, orchestrated and filmed by Combs. She alleged that during these events, she was forced into degrading acts, such as being urinated on, and was left to clean up afterward. Ventura expressed feelings of humiliation and worthlessness, stating that she engaged in these acts out of fear and a sense of obligation. She also recounted a 2016 incident, captured on surveillance video, where Combs assaulted her in a hotel hallway. Throughout her testimony, Ventura emphasized the pervasive control and abuse she endured, which she said led her to abandon her music career .to contact me:[email protected]:May 13, 2025 - Day 2 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Federal prosecutors have filed a motion to exclude testimony from Dr. Elie Aoun, a forensic psychiatrist and assistant professor at Columbia University, whom Sean "Diddy" Combs' defense team intends to call as an expert witness. The defense aims to have Dr. Aoun testify regarding Combs' mental state during the period of the alleged offenses, suggesting that Combs may have had diminished mental capacity. However, the government argues that Dr. Aoun's proposed testimony is inadmissible under the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2, which govern the introduction of expert testimony related to a defendant's mental condition. Prosecutors contend that Dr. Aoun's opinions lack a reliable scientific basis and appear to be speculative, rendering them unsuitable for presentation to the jury.Additionally, the government asserts that allowing Dr. Aoun's testimony would effectively permit the defense to introduce a mental health defense without adhering to the procedural requirements mandated by law. They argue that the defense has not provided sufficient notice or evidence to support such a defense, and that Dr. Aoun's testimony would serve as a substitute for calling actual witnesses, thereby circumventing the rules of evidence. The prosecution maintains that admitting this testimony could mislead the jury and prejudice the government's case, and therefore, they urge the court to preclude Dr. Aoun from testifying at trial.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.276.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Federal prosecutors have filed a motion to exclude testimony from Dr. Elie Aoun, a forensic psychiatrist and assistant professor at Columbia University, whom Sean "Diddy" Combs' defense team intends to call as an expert witness. The defense aims to have Dr. Aoun testify regarding Combs' mental state during the period of the alleged offenses, suggesting that Combs may have had diminished mental capacity. However, the government argues that Dr. Aoun's proposed testimony is inadmissible under the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2, which govern the introduction of expert testimony related to a defendant's mental condition. Prosecutors contend that Dr. Aoun's opinions lack a reliable scientific basis and appear to be speculative, rendering them unsuitable for presentation to the jury.Additionally, the government asserts that allowing Dr. Aoun's testimony would effectively permit the defense to introduce a mental health defense without adhering to the procedural requirements mandated by law. They argue that the defense has not provided sufficient notice or evidence to support such a defense, and that Dr. Aoun's testimony would serve as a substitute for calling actual witnesses, thereby circumventing the rules of evidence. The prosecution maintains that admitting this testimony could mislead the jury and prejudice the government's case, and therefore, they urge the court to preclude Dr. Aoun from testifying at trial.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.276.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The case of Jones v. Combs (1:24-cv-01457) involves a complex series of allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs and multiple associated parties, including Universal Music Group and Love Records. The opposition to Combs' motion to dismiss centers on serious allegations of misconduct, with the plaintiff, Rodney Jones, asserting claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The request for judicial notice of Combs' federal indictment ties into broader accusations, including sex trafficking and racketeering, which have gained significant attention in a separate federal case.This particular filing challenges Combs’ legal team's attempt to dismiss the case by bringing forward evidence that links the civil case to Combs’ criminal indictment, arguing that the indictment supports the plaintiff's claims of exploitation and manipulation over a prolonged period. The opposition excludes Justin Dior Combs but includes other significant figures and corporations, with the plaintiff seeking to ensure the court acknowledges the federal charges in the ongoing civil proceedings.The case has seen numerous legal maneuvers, including motions for sanctions and attempts to amend complaints, reflecting the high-stakes nature of the litigation and the complexity of the issues at hand​.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.78.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.