The Epstein Rewind: An IRS Agents Guide To Taking Down People Like Epstein

This document is a motion to suppress evidence filed by Bryan Kohberger’s defense team regarding a search warrant executed on his AT&T mobile account. The defense argues that the warrant, obtained by law enforcement in December 2023, was unconstitutional and overbroad, violating Kohberger's rights under both the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 17 of the Idaho Constitution. The warrant authorized law enforcement to obtain extensive data from Kohberger’s AT&T account, including subscriber information, call and text records, cell site location data, GPS estimates, cloud storage content, and other highly invasive digital records — far beyond what was stated in the attached exhibit, which only referenced “historical” and “prospective” phone records for a two-day window.The defense claims the supporting affidavit submitted by Cpl. Brett Payne either recklessly or intentionally omitted material facts, failed to establish probable cause, and lacked proper particularization, which made the warrant facially deficient. They further argue that all information used to justify the warrant was derived from the allegedly unconstitutional use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), contaminating the warrant and rendering all derived data inadmissible under the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. Because of these issues, the motion asks the court to suppress all evidence obtained through this AT&T warrant, asserting that the warrant process failed both in legal standard and in execution, compromising Kohberger’s constitutional protections.to contact me:[email protected]:111424-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-ATT-First-Warrant.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Virginia Giuffre, known for her accusations against Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, has recently alleged enduring years of domestic abuse by her estranged husband, Robert Giuffre, a mixed martial arts expert. The couple, married for 22 years with three children, separated in August 2023 and are currently engaged in a contentious custody battle. Virginia claims that in January 2024, Robert physically assaulted her in Dunsborough, Western Australia, resulting in severe injuries, including a cracked sternum and a perforated eye. She asserts that this incident was reported to the police and led to her hospitalization. Despite her allegations, Robert obtained a restraining order against her, which her representatives argue is a misuse of protective measures by the alleged abuser.In March 2024, Virginia was involved in a car accident with a school bus near Perth, after which she posted a hospital photo claiming she had "four days to live" due to kidney failure. However, Western Australian police described the crash as minor, with no reported injuries, leading to public skepticism about her account. Virginia's brother, Sky Roberts, suggested that her severe health issues might stem from prolonged abuse rather than the accident. Amid these events, Virginia faces charges for allegedly breaching the restraining order in February 2024, with a court appearance scheduled for April 9. She remains hospitalized, expressing deep concern for her children and gratitude for public support, while maintaining faith that justice will prevail.to contact me:[email protected]:Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre claims to be victim of domestic violence at hands of her husband: reportBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​On April 4, 2025, the fourth day of Karen Read's retrial jury selection at Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Massachusetts, concluded with ten jurors seated—five men and five women. The day's proceedings were abbreviated, ending earlier than scheduled, as Judge Beverly Cannone dismissed four potential jurors before individual questioning commenced. Notably, one previously selected female juror requested to be excused and was replaced by another woman, maintaining the total at ten jurors.In a parallel development, Read's defense team petitioned the United States Supreme Court to dismiss two of the three charges against her, including second-degree murder, on the grounds of double jeopardy. They argue that jurors from the initial trial had privately acquitted her of these charges. Despite this appeal, jury selection is set to continue into the following week, with six more jurors needed to complete the panel of sixteen, comprising twelve primary jurors and four alternates.to contact me:[email protected]:10 jurors seated in 1st week of selection for Karen Read's 2nd trial | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Parents of children aboard the school bus involved in the collision with Virginia Giuffre have publicly disputed her account of the incident, describing her claims as "sick" and "lies." Emmie-Rose Wright, whose three children were on the bus, stated that they reported only a "small crash" with no injuries or significant damage, contradicting Giuffre's assertions of life-threatening injuries. Wright emphasized that the children were neither worried nor traumatized by the eventSimilarly, Hayley Miller, another parent, expressed being "disgusted" by Giuffre's depiction of the crash, asserting that the injuries Giuffre displayed were not from the bus incident and labeling her narrative as false. Both parents defended the bus driver, Ross Munns, highlighting his responsible conduct and the minor nature of the collision. Munns himself described the incident as a "minor collision," expressing disbelief at Giuffre's severe injury claims.to contact me:[email protected]:My children were on the school bus that Virginia Giuffre claims slammed into her at 110kmh - but they said it was a 'small crash' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode, we delve into the chilling case of Gary Ridgway, infamously known as the Green River Killer. Join us as we unravel the meticulous investigation and compelling evidence that led to Ridgway's capture and eventual confession. From the early days of the Green River Task Force to the groundbreaking DNA advancements, we explore how dedicated detectives and forensic experts pieced together the puzzle of one of America's most notorious serial killers.Key Evidence Highlights:Eyewitness Accounts and Suspect Sketches:Witnesses provided descriptions and sketches of a man seen with several victims, which helped narrow down the suspect pool and led investigators to Ridgway as a potential person of interest.Polygraph Test:Ridgway initially passed a polygraph test, which complicated the investigation and allowed him to evade suspicion temporarily.Forensic Breakthrough - DNA Evidence:In the late 1990s, advancements in DNA technology provided a breakthrough. Semen samples collected from victims in the early 1980s were reanalyzed using new DNA profiling techniques, conclusively linking Ridgway to multiple murders.Paint Evidence:Tiny paint particles found on some victims matched paint used at Ridgway's workplace, reinforcing the connection between him and the crime scenes.Confession and Plea Bargain:In a dramatic turn of events, Ridgway confessed to the murders as part of a plea bargain to avoid the death penalty. His detailed confessions and the corroborating evidence provided a comprehensive account of his heinous crimes.Recovered Personal Items:Items belonging to the victims were found in Ridgway's possession or locations associated with him, further implicating him in the murders.Geographical Profiling:Analysis of the locations where bodies were discovered showed patterns that pointed towards Ridgway's home and workplace, corroborating other evidence against him.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucciprotonmail.comsource:Gary Ridgway 2001 summary of evidence (01-1-10270-9).pdf (westsideseattle.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode, we delve into the chilling case of Gary Ridgway, infamously known as the Green River Killer. Join us as we unravel the meticulous investigation and compelling evidence that led to Ridgway's capture and eventual confession. From the early days of the Green River Task Force to the groundbreaking DNA advancements, we explore how dedicated detectives and forensic experts pieced together the puzzle of one of America's most notorious serial killers.Key Evidence Highlights:Eyewitness Accounts and Suspect Sketches:Witnesses provided descriptions and sketches of a man seen with several victims, which helped narrow down the suspect pool and led investigators to Ridgway as a potential person of interest.Polygraph Test:Ridgway initially passed a polygraph test, which complicated the investigation and allowed him to evade suspicion temporarily.Forensic Breakthrough - DNA Evidence:In the late 1990s, advancements in DNA technology provided a breakthrough. Semen samples collected from victims in the early 1980s were reanalyzed using new DNA profiling techniques, conclusively linking Ridgway to multiple murders.Paint Evidence:Tiny paint particles found on some victims matched paint used at Ridgway's workplace, reinforcing the connection between him and the crime scenes.Confession and Plea Bargain:In a dramatic turn of events, Ridgway confessed to the murders as part of a plea bargain to avoid the death penalty. His detailed confessions and the corroborating evidence provided a comprehensive account of his heinous crimes.Recovered Personal Items:Items belonging to the victims were found in Ridgway's possession or locations associated with him, further implicating him in the murders.Geographical Profiling:Analysis of the locations where bodies were discovered showed patterns that pointed towards Ridgway's home and workplace, corroborating other evidence against him.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucciprotonmail.comsource:Gary Ridgway 2001 summary of evidence (01-1-10270-9).pdf (westsideseattle.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn was deeply intertwined with his personal and financial affairs. Indyke, a long-time attorney for Epstein, served as a key legal representative who managed many of Epstein’s business dealings, trusts, and estate planning. His involvement spanned decades, making him an integral figure in the administration of Epstein's assets. Indyke was also named co-executor of Epstein’s estate after Epstein’s death in 2019, alongside Richard Kahn, raising questions about their roles in safeguarding or facilitating Epstein’s extensive operations. Critics have pointed to Indyke’s close professional ties with Epstein as indicative of potential complicity in maintaining the secrecy and structure of Epstein's financial empire, which allegedly supported his criminal activities.Richard Kahn, an accountant and financial manager, also worked closely with Epstein for years, managing his various business entities and ensuring the flow of funds through his complex network of shell companies and trusts. Like Indyke, Kahn was named co-executor of Epstein’s estate, which has faced scrutiny for its handling of victim compensation and asset liquidation. Both men have denied any knowledge of or involvement in Epstein’s criminal activities, yet their long-standing relationships with him have made them central figures in the ongoing investigations and lawsuits against the estate. The extent of their knowledge and involvement remains a point of contention as legal and public scrutiny over Epstein's network continues.(Commercial: 12:55)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.longislandpress.com/2021/03/01/how-feds-say-2-long-islanders-helped-jeffrey-epstein-run-a-sex-trafficking-ring/show lessBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we hear from an IRS agent about how he would go about pursuing a criminal indictment of people like Epstein and Maxwell and what tools the government has at their disposal when dealing with criminal enterprises such as the one Epstein and Maxwell were running. Keep all of this in mind when looking at the Maxwell trial and ask yourself...where are the RICO charges? (Commercial at 18:43)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.thedailybeast.com/former-irs-agent-heres-how-id-investigate-jeffrey-epsteins-financesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.to  contact me;[email protected]:1090-32.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.Giuffre’s deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell’s direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein’s residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein’s private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell’s London townhouse, and at Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell’s role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell’s 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.to  contact me;[email protected]:1090-32.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.