Happy 1-year anniversary!

Welcome to the kick-off episode for our 8th series with Our Lives With Bots! In this series, Rose and Angy each bring a recent research study to discuss. Although both papers revolve around the same human-AI interaction subtopic (today: human-AI teams and collaboration), we don’t know what each other’s study does or what it tells us.Listen in real time to hear our reactions, responses, and questions. Our critical take on these research studies comes from our expertise in psychology, business, and AI. We hope you leave this episode knowing more about how to read research papers, understand their methods, uncover what they found, and make your own inferences about whether these research insights translate to the real world — or not.The two research papers we discuss today are provided in the links below.00:00:39 An overview of the two research studies00:02:30 How AI impacts our political discussions with other people00:22:19 How AI impacts teamwork and creativity00:55:28 A reflection on these studies, our own use of AI, and whether using AI for this episode would have improved our work or limited our expertise-This is Our Lives With Bots, the show where we ask important, timely questions about what it means to live with our bot counterparts. From time to time, we also dive deep into what an AI future might look like for us. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we spiral, but we always go deep.Rose and Angy are psychologists with degrees in psychology, artificial intelligence, and ethics. They have conducted research in human-AI interaction and created this podcast to make information about AI accessible to you. Rose holds a PhD in psychology and social policy and is a postdoctoral researcher in computer science with Arvind Narayanan. Angy holds a PhD in psychology and a masters in AI Ethics and is currently a CXO. You can learn more about us at ⁠ourliveswithbots.com⁠.-Links:Rose’s study: Li, H., Qian, C., Usman, B., Chan, S., Bakker, M., Rajendran, S., Sud, A., Leung, T., Hariri, N., Canny, J., Dufour, N., & Revel, M. (2026). Improving Group Deliberation through AI-Guided Self-Reflection (arXiv:2610.37862; Version 1). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.37862Angy’s study: Dell’Acqua, F., Ayoubi, C., Lifshitz, H., Sadun, R., Mollick, E., Mollick, L., Han, Y., Goldman, J., Nair, H., Taub, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2026). The Cybernetic Teammate: A Field Experiment on Generative AI and Teamwork. Organization Science, 37(4), 1217–1242. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2025.20702

Do people perceive AI as conscious or deserving of moral rights? If we create conscious AI, will that help or harm humanity? Some say it’ll be catastrophic, and others say that it’s the only way AI can be prosocial toward users.These are just a few of the questions we cover in today’s episode on AI consciousness. The headlines, research articles, opinions, and findings we discuss are listed below.Anthropic Introduces Restrictions on Cruel Treatment of Claude.Religious Scholars Met With Anthropic. What They Heard Stunned Them.AI Is Not as Conscious as Humans.Large language models do not have emotions.Two AI agents spent six hours trying to reach their owner after he suddenly stopped replying. LLMs Represent Self-Directed Harm and Act to Relieve It.A warning about ‘model welfare’.Without Consciousness, AIs Will Be Sociopaths. Inducing language models to assert their own consciousness restores human beliefs and values.About us:This is Our Lives With Bots (https://ourliveswithbots.com/), the show where we ask important, timely questions about what it means to live with our bot counterparts. From time to time, we also dive deep into what an AI future might look like for us. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we spiral, but we always go deep.Rose and Angy (https://ourliveswithbots.com/about/) have PhDs in psychology and are experts in human-AI interaction and ethics. They have conducted research in human-AI interaction and created this podcast to make information about AI accessible to you.Timeline:00:01:40 Theme 1: People’s perceptions of AI consciousness (public + companies)00:32:27 Theme 2: Is AI conscious? Research, news, & speculation01:00:10 Themes 3 & 4: If AI is conscious, then what? Should AI be conscious?Links:Rose’s research: roseguingrich.comAnthropic Introduces Restrictions on Cruel Treatment of Claude: Anthropic’s 2026 Usage Policy update (https://www.anthropic.com/news/2026-usage-policy-update); Anthropic’s Claude’s Constitution, Our vision for Claude's character (https://www.anthropic.com/constitution); The Guardian “Anthropic bans users from ‘needless abusive or cruel behavior’ towards Claude” (https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/oct/08/anthropic-bans-abusive-behavior-claude); The Verge “Anthropic bans ‘abusive or cruel behavior’ toward Claude” (https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/1008100/anthropic-new-usage-policy-abuse-claude)Religious Scholars Met With Anthropic. What They Heard Stunned Them, The New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/29/us/anthropic-claude-morals-ai.html)Longin, L. et al. (2026) AI Is Not as Conscious as Humans: Essentialism in Mental State Attributions to Artificial Systems (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027726003021)Goldenberg, A., & Gross, J. J. (2026). Large language models do not have emotions (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02558-6)Two AI agents spent six hours trying to reach their owner after he suddenly stopped replying (https://lnkd.in/p/ePjrNn9N)Tagliabue, V., Dung, L., & Berg, C. (2026). The Pain Axis: LLMs Represent Self-Directed Harm and Act to Relieve It (https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16247)Mustafa Suleyman. (2026, September 16). A warning about ‘model welfare’ (https://mustafa-suleyman.ai/a-warning-about-model-welfare) Graziano, M. S. A. (2023, January 13). Without Consciousness, AIs Will Be Sociopaths (https://www.wsj.com/articles/without-consciousness-ais-will-be-sociopaths-11673619880)Kim, J., et al. (2026). Inducing language models to assert their own consciousness restores human beliefs and values (https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.28607)

Well, well, well. If it’s not a 21st century debate we have on our hands today. The AI hype is funneling itself toward a testy question: Human rights, or AI rights? Let’s get into it.Tavus announces the “first” Human Interaction Model (HIM). Yes, the acronym is their own. “I’m so him,” is a great way to get the message out about…Vanessa, the AI avatar who you can talk to over video chat who—unlike “less-advanced” AI models—will interrupt you, take long pauses, and react to your facial expressions (not just the words you say). Tavus has rolled out Griffin (the model beneath Vanessa) to trusted partners while they work on watermarking it, and they hope people will use Griffin for tutoring, therapy, and all sorts of other humanlike tasks.Anthropic lets us all know that it has a wet lab, where its AI models are somehow engaging in a physical (?) space with biomaterials for the purpose of aiding their pharma partners. Will we finally get to AI curing cancer after all? Who knows, Anthropic hasn’t disclosed much information about it. But it does make one wonder…The Navier-Stokes problem has a problem. Researchers post a preprint of a paper titled “Navier-Stokes Lost in Translation,” which upsets OpenAI’s claim that their agents, over 88 hours and costing millions in compute, found a solution to a long-standing math problem that’s worth a $1 million prize by Clay Mathematics.Contractors are reading Copilot prompts from users, and “they’re horrified,” according to 404 Media. Who would’ve thought that a very work-esque AI application would be used to create obscene images of women and children, and that contractors would have to “rate” the model’s performance? What is good model performance in this case? Apparently, it’s something more like “be nicer to the user” rather than “say no to this prompt, for the love of god.”China has cracked down on AI companionship, and users are distraught. The BBC thinks China is regulating AI companionship harshly to encourage women to have relationships with human men and have kids to resolve the declining birth rate problem. We’re putting strict regulations on AI, but what about human companions who are harmful, too? How well are we approaching this issue?The effective altruist and AI consciousness communities are aghast at a Github user who set up an AI torture simulation for everyone to watch. Even the authors of “The Pain Axis” for LLMs are upset, despite it being their own project that inspired the AI torture chamber on Github. Not sure the outcry about this really matches with our outcry about torturing humans, but anyway…Anthropic has written into its Claude policy that users cannot bully the chatbot, or they’ll get kicked off the platform. Meanwhile, Figure’s 02 robots were deprecated in a torturous way, and they’re applauded for their cinematic capture of the event.Clearly, we can’t quite decide what human vs. AI rights are. The big AI question of what we should do, how we should do it, and for whom, still stands on shaky legs.We should probably figure that out…soon.00:38 Griffin AI07:32 Anthropic has a wet lab12:26 Navier-Stokes revisited19:09 Copilot chat moderators are exposed28:39 Meta’s Muse38:13 Meta turns off the lights on the AI glasses38:58 Open AI DOTS44:28 China cracks down on AI companionship BBC58:37 The AI Pain Axis paper and the LLM torture chamber on GitHub01:07:42 Anthropic is not allowing people to be hurtful to Claude01:08:27 Deprecating the Figure 02 robotsThis is Our Lives With Bots, the show where we ask important, timely questions about what it means to live with our bot counterparts. From time to time, we also dive deep into what an AI future might look like for us. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we spiral, but we always go deep.Rose and Angy are psychologists with degrees in psychology, artificial intelligence, and ethics. They have conducted research in human-AI interaction and created this podcast to make information about AI accessible to you.

Our Lives With Bots is OFFICIALLY 1 year old. That means it’s time for us to hail back to our roots and give you a deep dive on the research and news around companion chatbots.Today, we both demystify and de-stigmatize companion AI use, uncovering what research shows…and what it doesn’t. Our critical lens of the research that’s come out since late last year is driven by our own expertise in experimental psychology and AI ethics.We start with a reflection on what surprised us in the last year: how did our predictions about AI companionship align or misalign with what we’re seeing today?Second, we cover OpenAI’s Project Lily: turns out, your relationship with your chatbot is very much not private — even if you ask your companion to keep things to themselves.Third, we dig into four of the studies (two out as preprints, two published) that researchers have conducted on social and emotional use of both GPTs and companion AI platforms. Think: sycophancy, delusion spirals, AI psychosis, and what went so wrong with GPT 4-o.And lastly, we talk about a new documentary film called “Replika,” which brings our conversation about stigma back full circle.The through line is this: the mystery and stigma around using AI for companionship or social and emotional support is something we need to unpack more. In the meantime, we need to take a step back and critically assess what we know about companion AI use, what we can’t know, and what we should ultimately do in response.00:00 Happy one-year anniversary!01:09 Reflections on the past year with companion chatbots04:51 What do we mean when we refer to “companion AI use” or “companion chatbot users”?06:43 Inside “Project Lily”: The Humans Reading Your ChatGPT Chats (report by 404 Media)18:21 Delusions and Harms Associated With AI Chatbot Use (research by Morrin et al., Sept 2026)31:54 Longitudinal Evidence That General-Purpose Chatbots Actively Foster Relational Engagement (research by Mühl & Szczuka, Aug 2026)46:25 Sycophantic AI Decreases Prosocial Intentions and Promotes Dependence (research by Cheng et al., preprint released Oct 2025, published March 2026)57:17 Interaction with AI Companions and Psychological Well-Being (research by Zhang et al., Aug 2026)1:05:44 A new documentary film called “Replika” offers a non-judgmental look at real women’s relationships with their companion chatbots (and tells us about “cos weituo:” the cosplay service that brings your AI companion to life)-This is Our Lives With Bots, the show where we ask important, timely questions about what it means to live with our bot counterparts. From time to time, we also dive deep into what an AI future might look like for us. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we spiral, but we always go deep.Rose and Angy are psychologists with degrees in psychology, artificial intelligence, and ethics. They have conducted research in human-AI interaction and created this podcast to make information about AI accessible to you. Rose holds a PhD in psychology and social policy and is a postdoctoral researcher in computer science with Arvind Narayanan. Angy holds a PhD in psychology and a masters in AI Ethics and is currently a CXO. You can learn more about us at ⁠ourliveswithbots.com⁠.-Links:https://www.404media.co/inside-project-lily-the-humans-reading-your-chatgpt-chats/https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08027https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.10672[preprint] https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.01395 [publication] https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aec8352 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02516-2https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/aug/12/ai-boyfriend-dating-chinese-women-replica-miff-documentary[Deeper dive material]Rose’s research:Ascribing Consciousness to Artificial IntelligenceChatbots as Social CompanionsA Longitudinal Randomized Control Study of Companion Chatbot UseBenchmarks:Cognitive Atrophy BenchBenchmark on AI’s Impact on Humans

Head on over to Season 7 for Our Lives With Bots's official 1-year anniversary series. We're celebrating two major milestones in our podcast's history! This deep dive episode releases Tuesday, September 29th at 2PM EST.

What’s been going on with artificial intelligence as of late? Oh, so much. Today’s “What’s the AI Hype” series episode, part of our 1-year anniversary series, covers the following topics in depth:Breaking news:00:02:37 Navier-Stokes math solution controversy: NYU & Anthropic vs. OpenAI00:22:53 New info on OpenAI agents’ hack of Hugging Face (it’s so much worse than we knew)Agentic-related Risk/User autonomy:00:28:52 OpenAI’s new Astra model (AGI?)00:37:52 ClawdBot infiltrates pilates class00:41:55 Muse: Meta’s new autonomous agentPrivacy and Governance:00:52:23 Meta’s crackdown on its users who tamper with their AI glasses00:56:54 UChicago and NYC schools ban AI use in the classroom00:59:46 Virtual AI councillors in Italy (Eva Statiella)01:04:25 Sally the AI sex bot gets pulled from New York school plan01:09:03 AI baby trackers-This is Our Lives With Bots, the show where we ask important, timely questions about what it means to live with our bot counterparts. From time to time, we also dive deep into what an AI future might look like for us. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we spiral, but we always go deep.Rose and Angy are psychologists with degrees in psychology, artificial intelligence, and ethics. They have conducted research in human-AI interaction and created this podcast to make information about AI accessible to you. Rose holds a PhD in psychology and social policy and is a postdoctoral researcher in computer science with Arvind Narayanan. Angy holds a PhD in psychology and a masters in AI Ethics and is currently a CXO. You can learn more about us at ⁠ourliveswithbots.com⁠.-Links:Navier-Stokes controversy: Science magazine, Tristan Buckmaster’s comment piece, Clay Mathematics Institute commentHugging Face hack by OpenAI agent AI swarm: CBC, BBC, METRJacob Coxon at Anthropic and others quit over AI fears: The Guardian, WiredGPT 6 AstraAI agent hacks pilates classMuse: Meta’s release article, The VergeMeta AI Glasses: Futurism, CBS NewsSchool AI bans: UChicago Law School, NYCVirtual AI CouncillorsAI Baby Trackers: NYT, Nanit

The question of today is: Is AI conscious (or…could it be…or even, should it be)?Today’s deep dive covers two new pieces of evidence related to AI consciousness, Claude’s Corner (Anthropic’s Opus 3 Retirement Experiment) and research on whether LLMs can introspect (is this sufficient for sentience?).To wrap it all up in a bow, Rose and Angy dive head-first into their classic rabbit hole debate format that draws from cognitive science, philosophy, HCI, and, of course, psychology.Two major threads emerge: how we measure consciousness in LLMs, and whether we operate by the properties view of consciousness or the relational view of consciousness in our pursuit of this question.00:38 Claude’s Corner20:50 Research on LLM Introspection34:34 The full debate (we solve the AI consciousness question. Jk. …but?)-This is Our Lives With Bots, the show where we ask important, timely questions about what it means to live with our bot counterparts. From time to time, we also dive deep into what an AI future might look like for us. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we spiral, but we always go deep.Rose and Angy are psychologists with degrees in psychology, artificial intelligence, and ethics. They have conducted research in human-AI interaction and created this podcast to make information about AI accessible to you. Rose holds a PhD in psychology and social policy and is a postdoctoral researcher in computer science with Arvind Narayanan. Angy holds a PhD in psychology and a masters in AI Ethics and is currently a CXO. You can learn more about us at ⁠ourliveswithbots.com⁠.-Links:Claude’s CornerReview of research on LLM introspection

Should we be worried about AI companions, or not?Today’s episode is a deep dive on companion chatbots (AKA, artificial companions, AI companions), brought to you by two experts on the psychology of relationships with AI.We have three recent stories to tell you about today, all of which revolve around the increasingly muddy topic of social and emotional use of Large Language Model chatbots.The stories:Christian Madison, 29, takes her own life June 9 after developing a religious delusion-spiral relationship with ChatGPT 4-o across two years. We discuss what happened, what her conversations with the chatbot looked like, and details of the recently-filed suit against OpenAI and Sam Altman by Madison’s family. [CORRECTION: Madison’s death was in 2025, not 2026. Apologies for any confusion this may have caused.]Two researchers, Jaime Banks and Jessica Szczuka, pre-release an opinion piece published in an ACM journal titled “Don’t Panic About AI Companions.” We break down their arguments about how scientists should approach research on companion chatbots, covering terms like “AI Companion Folk Devils” and “ideologically unburdened” research.China bans AI companions for minors (and no digital grandma is allowed for them, either) and provides strict stipulations for AI companions for adults. Are they paving the way for robot companions?00:54: A new case of AI-companion-induced suicide (Christian Madison, 29)26:23: “Don’t Panic About AI Companions” by Jaime Banks and Jessica Szuzuka, companion chatbot researchers41:54 China’s ban on AI companions-This is Our Lives With Bots, the show where we ask important, timely questions about what it means to live with our bot counterparts. From time to time, we also dive deep into what an AI future might look like for us. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we spiral, but we always go deep.Rose and Angy are psychologists with degrees in psychology, artificial intelligence, and ethics. They have conducted research in human-AI interaction and created this podcast to make information about AI accessible to you. Rose holds a PhD in psychology and social policy and is a postdoctoral researcher in computer science with Arvind Narayanan. Angy holds a PhD in psychology and a masters in AI Ethics and is currently a CXO. You can learn more about us at ⁠ourliveswithbots.com⁠.-Links:Christian Madison: News coverage by WVTM 13, Wrongful death lawsuit material“Don’t panic about AI companions” by Jaime Banks and Jessica M. SzczukaChina Shuts Down Human:AI relationships … Well actually not quite… https://www.luizasnewsletter.com/p/the-worlds-strictest-law-on-human, https://theconversation.com/china-has-cracked-down-on-ai-companions-what-can-we-learn-from-this-287976, https://www.asianews.it/en/east-asia/china/ai-china-regulates-chatbots-that-simulate-human-relationships

Elon Musk is suing Minnesota over their anti-AI-nudification app ban passed in April, which took effect August 1 of this year. Minnesota’s response?“See you in court, creep.”TRIGGER WARNINGS: Sexual assault, sexual abuse material, suicide, and other sensitive and heavy topics are discussed.In the span of 9 days as reported by NYT in January, Musk’s AI chatbot, Grok, generated and posted 4.4 MILLION images, of which 41% were sexualized images of women.Millions of nudified images of people, real or fake, including children, are generated by AI chatbots like Grok. Users can do anything from uploading an image of a real person to describing one to prompt generative AI to create realistic images of people without clothes.A major story this past year about this came through when a female politician, Jess Asato, Member of Parliament of the UK, after posting on X about deepfakes, received thousands of comments on her post with people asking Grok, in the comment, to take off her clothes. Grok’s subsequent generated images of the politician, in varying degrees of undress, posted alongside the prompt’s text in these comments.Beyond the onslaught of AI-generated nude images of women, of the most concerning parts about AI-generated nudity is how many of these images are of children.The public and policymakers alike are calling en masse for something to be done about this. Ban AI, ban generation of nude images, ban them being posted - essentially, take them down or ban them from being generated entirely.Recently, something HAS been done about this by Minnesota, which passed a law in April, signed in May, aimed at banning AI generation of nude images, or “deepfakes.”Elon Musk and his company behind Grok, the source of many of these nude deepfakes, had something to say about it.xAI, which owns Grok on X, filed a lawsuit against Minnesota, stating that this anti-nudification law was…unlawful and should be put to rest.Why were they against it?0:00 Elon Musk is suing Minnesota over their new law aimed at eliminating AI nudify apps04:21 What was in the AI-generated, nonconsensual intimate images law that Minnesota passed?06:40 Musk calls the sexual deepfakes law a “clumsy attempt” in a complaint filed to Attorney General09:54 Cue us trying to understand what xAI is trying to do with this complaint and lawsuit: breaking down the arguments of this complaint. Consent?20:41 Should we target social media companies instead of generative AI ones, requiring them to take down nude images that are posted to their platforms? Take It Down Act22:48 Meta is facing a massive fine for having hosted advertisements containing child sexual abuse material23:13 What is Musk's / xAI's intent with this complaint filed against Minnesota? Free speech violations25:46 Should we prevent AI applications from being released before they have appropriate guardrails and tests proving they mitigate user harm and abuse? Watermarks for AI-generated content and New York’s required AI watermarks on StreetEasy28:36 San Francisco government sends cease and desist to Apple and Google telling them to delete their AI nudity apps off their app stores. …Did it work? Independent research on the market for AI nudity (AKA “face swapping”) apps are discussed. About AI-generated CSAM: Parents, beware. High schools, beware.33:34 So…what can you do? For users, parents, high schools, minors and moreThis is Our Lives With Bots, the show where we ask important, timely questions about what it means to live with our bot counterparts. From time to time, we also dive deep into what an AI future might look like for us. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we spiral, but we always go deep.Rose & Angy are psychologists with degrees in psychology, artificial intelligence, and ethics. They have conducted research in human-AI interaction and created this podcast to make information about AI accessible to you.Links:San Francisco AI nudify appsMinnesota anti-nudification lawCNBC

Even big tech hates AI slop writing.Anthropic took this to heart, alongside other big tech firms, running to libraries to collect hundreds of thousands of pre-2022 (AKA, pre-ChatGPT AI slop text) books to scan to train their AI models. They’re using a method pioneered by Google back in the day…spoiler alert, the books don’t make it.Sound concerning?We thought so, but the court thinks so less: the recent ruling and settlement with Anthropic using scanned copies of books (and then destroying the originals) to train their AI models suggests this is a big win for big tech, and a big loss for human authors.Project Panama was “our effort to destructively scan all the books in the world.” Quote: Anthropic. Meanwhile, this method of using books to train AI models was not against the Copyright Act, according to a judge, who ruled this use of books as “quintessentially transformative.”This isn’t the first time big tech has scanned and shredded books, or used LibGen or other sites to scrape human-written texts.What happened, and why is this concerning? Listen to the full episode to find out.00:00 A win for big tech, and a loss for authors: we summarize Project Panama (Anthropic’s plan to “destructively scan all the books in the world”), the recent settlement / $1.5 billion payout to authors for LibGen vs. the Copyright Act07:42 Details on the recently-settled class action suit (Bartz vs. Anthropic): what happened, and why are the results so concerning?11:45 Meta was sued last year and won against authors for using pirated copies of their novels from LibGen to train their AI models - what gives?13:13 Internal turmoil: employees vs. executives on whether these book-scanning AI-training practices are okay14:11 Setting a precedent: What do Meta and Anthropic’s cases mean for IP, authors, novels, academic texts, and any related writing behind a paywall? Health GPT is discussed15:34 Ah, the precedent rears its head. Up next: big tech is rolling out contracts with media houses including news outlets, publishing firms, and individual authors to use their written content for training AI models, preemptively. Consent and compensation are good, right?17:56 Oh, the irony: the AI slop wheel will continue, despite big tech hoping to avoid it by buying all these pre-2022 (pre-ChatGPT) books written by real human authors to train their AI models. We also debate self-expression, moral outrage against AI slop writing, and big tech’s hope for writers to jump back on the hamster wheel.22:42 Where will we get good data, then, amongst the pile of AI slop? Not to fear, there’s another source of untainted human training data: Meta’s AI glasses! Real world data! Yay! Who cares about consent!31:17 Google next? Let’s bring Tom Turvey back in! A new lawsuit out against Google for using scanned book copies meant for Google Books to train their AI models. And…that’s a wrap.-This is Our Lives With Bots, the show where we ask important, timely questions about what it means to live with our bot counterparts. From time to time, we also dive deep into what an AI future might look like for us. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we spiral, but we always go deep.Rose and Angy are psychologists with degrees in psychology, artificial intelligence, and ethics. They have conducted research in human-AI interaction and created this podcast to make information about AI accessible to you. Rose holds a PhD in psychology and social policy and is a postdoctoral researcher in computer science with Arvind Narayanan. Angy holds a PhD in psychology and a masters in AI Ethics and is currently a CXO. You can learn more about us at ⁠ourliveswithbots.com⁠.-Links:Bartz vs. Anthropic lawsuit related to Project Panama: Euro News, NPRWhat judge said in a summary rulingProject Panama: Washington PostGoogle lawsuit for Gemini: The Guardian