Landmark Supreme Court Decision Prohibiting Racial Gerrymandering plus Dems Go w the Nazi Communist in Maine & Out-of-Control DEI Homeless Policies

1. Homeless Services Are Allegedly Prioritized by Identity, Not Need Some cities (especially Portland, Oregon) use a point‑based scoring system to allocate homeless services. Points are allegedly awarded for: LGBTQ+ identification Race/minority status Language background Interest in “culturally specific services” These factors sometimes score equal to or higher than: Senior status (55+) Disability Long‑term homelessness Zero income This is an expression of intersectionality ideology, where identity outweighs material need. 2. Portland as a Case Study of Policy Failure Portland reportedly allocated $1.3 billion to homelessness programs by 2024. The text claims spending reached roughly $200,000 per homeless person. Despite this: Homeless deaths allegedly increased fourfold from 2019 to 2023. Heavy spending paired with ideological frameworks led to worse outcomes, not improvement. 3. DEI Is Framed as Actively Harmful DEI systems are: Bureaucratic Performative Detached from practical outcomes DEI: Creates perverse incentives Encourages people to self‑identify strategically Distracts governments from solving root problems (housing, safety, treatment) 4. BBCE (Broad‑Based Categorical Eligibility) Enables SNAP Abuse A major portion of the text focuses on SNAP program fraud. BBCE allegedly allows individuals to qualify for food stamps if they receive any minor government benefit, such as: Informational pamphlets Hotlines This bypasses traditional income and asset checks. Millionaires, lottery winners, and individuals with large assets can legally receive SNAP benefits. 5. Scale and Types of SNAP Fraud Highlighted EBT card skimming and cloning Benefit trafficking (selling benefits for cash) Improper payments due to verification failures Multi‑state enrollment Use of deceased identities Retail collusion Involvement of international crime networks 6. Luxury Vehicle Ownership as Evidence of Abuse Cites that thousands of SNAP recipients own luxury vehicles (Teslas, Porsches, Lamborghinis, etc.). Uses these examples to argue there has been: No accountability No data transparency Intentional evasion of eligibility rules 7. Trump Administration Portrayed as Corrective Force Credits to the Trump administration for: Removing 4.3 million people from SNAP Increasing audits and enforcement Targeting BBCE reform Democrats are portrayed as opposing reform to maintain voter support. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

How BBCE Works: Federal law requires asset and income checks for SNAP eligibility. Under BBCE, if a person qualifies for any form of state-designated assistance, they are automatically eligible for SNAP. States exploit this by creating minimal “benefits” (e.g., pamphlets, hotlines, informational flyers) that legally trigger SNAP eligibility. Scale of the Issue: Over 40 states use BBCE. Millions of SNAP recipients reportedly exceed federal income or asset limits. Roughly 1 in 5 enrollees allegedly have assets of $100,000 or more (per the source’s claims). Taxpayer cost is described as hundreds of millions to billions of dollars annually. Fraud Characterization: The system is “fraud by design”, not accidental mismanagement. The program no longer focuses on the “truly needy” but instead expands enrollment intentionally. Additional SNAP Abuse Allegations: EBT skimming and theft by organized criminal groups. Trafficking: selling SNAP benefits for cash. Improper payments due to administrative errors (claimed ~12% rate in FY 2024). Multi-state fraud, identity fraud, and use of deceased individuals. Retail fraud, where stores exchange benefits for cash. International criminal involvement in benefit theft. Luxury Vehicle Example: Cites a single state where 14,000 SNAP recipients allegedly owned luxury vehicles, including Ferraris, Bentleys, Lamborghinis, Porsches, Teslas, and others—used to illustrate misuse. Government Response: USDA and law enforcement conducting investigations and theft replacement. Movement toward chip-based EBT cards for security. Claimed removal of 4.3 million people from SNAP rolls due to fraud detection. USDA food and nutrition administration being reorganized and moved closer to states. Political Framing: Blames Democratic-led states and policies for expanding SNAP to increase voter dependency. Claims “blue states” resist data transparency. Frames SNAP reform as a central midterm election issue. Proposed Reforms: Eliminate or restrict BBCE. Reinstate asset tests and stricter income limits. Tighten work requirements. Reduce enrollment to focus on genuinely needy households. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Supreme Court Ruling on Racial Gerrymandering A 6–3 Supreme Court decision invalidated Louisiana’s congressional map because it relied on race-based district drawing, which they describe as unconstitutional. The ruling is a landmark rejection of racial gerrymandering, asserting that race should not be a controlling factor in redistricting, even when justified under the Voting Rights Act. Democrats oppose the ruling because racial districting allegedly benefits their electoral prospects. 2. Maine Democratic Senate Primary Controversy Democratic Governor Janet Mills withdrew from a U.S. Senate race because she could not defeat a more extreme primary challenger. That challenger is a self-identified communist with a Nazi tattoo and a history of inflammatory online statements. This reflects radicalization within the Democratic Party, asserting that extreme ideological views are now tolerated or rewarded in Democratic primaries. 3. DEI-Based Homeless Policy (Portland, Oregon) Homeless services in Portland/Multnomah County, resource allocation is guided by DEI and “intersectionality” scoring systems. Factors such as sexual identity, race, and language status are prioritized over income level or length of homelessness. Despite large public spending per homeless individual, homeless deaths increased sharply, which the speakers attribute to ideological mismanagement rather than effectiveness. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Scope of Fraud The testimony describes large‑scale, systemic fraud within Minnesota’s Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP). Individual childcare centers allegedly billed hundreds of thousands to over $1 million annually, often with no real children present. 2. Organized and Long‑Running Scheme Fraud was not isolated or accidental; it showed characteristics of a loosely organized criminal enterprise operating for years (at least 2014–2019). Some perpetrators reportedly learned about the scheme before arriving in the U.S., indicating cross‑border knowledge of vulnerabilities in the system. 3. Common Fraud Methods Billing for nonexistent children and extended hours (e.g., multiple shifts, 7 days a week). Operating “paper” childcare centers that closed immediately once payments were stopped. Kickback arrangements involving parents, co‑owners, or employees. Reusing addresses and reopening under new business names after enforcement actions. 4. Evidence Gathered by Investigators Physical surveillance showed centers operating without children or staff. Electronic evidence (texts, phones, computers) revealed admissions of fraud and intent to profit. Investigations led to multiple felony convictions, including at least one federal case with prison time and restitution exceeding $1 million. 5. Overwhelming Volume of Fraud Investigators received so many credible tips that they had to prioritize only the highest‑dollar cases. Centers billing less than ~$700,000 often could not be addressed due to limited resources. 6. Internal Resistance and Obstruction According to the whistleblower, senior DHS officials discouraged, undermined, or obstructed investigations once fraud became large and visible. Actions alleged include: Attempts to alter or suppress information sent to the Legislative Auditor Harassment and intimidation of investigators Organizational changes that reduced investigators’ authority Procedural delays that significantly reduced investigative capacity 7. Retaliation Against Whistleblowers Investigators who pushed fraud cases reportedly faced: Threats and bullying Negative performance actions Loss of decision‑making power The whistleblower ultimately resigned, stating he would not be complicit. 8. Failure of Oversight The testimony suggests institutional tolerance of fraud, contrasting sharply with standards enforced in law enforcement agencies. The whistleblower emphasizes that minor theft would not have been tolerated in his prior roles, while millions in losses were allowed to continue at DHS. 9. Federal Intervention Federal agencies (FBI, IRS‑CI, HHS‑OIG) eventually became involved due to the scale and nature of suspected crimes. Raids, indictments, and convictions occurred after years of state‑level warnings. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Scope of Fraud The testimony describes large‑scale, systemic fraud within Minnesota’s Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP). Individual childcare centers allegedly billed hundreds of thousands to over $1 million annually, often with no real children present. 2. Organized and Long‑Running Scheme Fraud was not isolated or accidental; it showed characteristics of a loosely organized criminal enterprise operating for years (at least 2014–2019). Some perpetrators reportedly learned about the scheme before arriving in the U.S., indicating cross‑border knowledge of vulnerabilities in the system. 3. Common Fraud Methods Billing for nonexistent children and extended hours (e.g., multiple shifts, 7 days a week). Operating “paper” childcare centers that closed immediately once payments were stopped. Kickback arrangements involving parents, co‑owners, or employees. Reusing addresses and reopening under new business names after enforcement actions. 4. Evidence Gathered by Investigators Physical surveillance showed centers operating without children or staff. Electronic evidence (texts, phones, computers) revealed admissions of fraud and intent to profit. Investigations led to multiple felony convictions, including at least one federal case with prison time and restitution exceeding $1 million. 5. Overwhelming Volume of Fraud Investigators received so many credible tips that they had to prioritize only the highest‑dollar cases. Centers billing less than ~$700,000 often could not be addressed due to limited resources. 6. Internal Resistance and Obstruction According to the whistleblower, senior DHS officials discouraged, undermined, or obstructed investigations once fraud became large and visible. Actions alleged include: Attempts to alter or suppress information sent to the Legislative Auditor Harassment and intimidation of investigators Organizational changes that reduced investigators’ authority Procedural delays that significantly reduced investigative capacity 7. Retaliation Against Whistleblowers Investigators who pushed fraud cases reportedly faced: Threats and bullying Negative performance actions Loss of decision‑making power The whistleblower ultimately resigned, stating he would not be complicit. 8. Failure of Oversight The testimony suggests institutional tolerance of fraud, contrasting sharply with standards enforced in law enforcement agencies. The whistleblower emphasizes that minor theft would not have been tolerated in his prior roles, while millions in losses were allowed to continue at DHS. 9. Federal Intervention Federal agencies (FBI, IRS‑CI, HHS‑OIG) eventually became involved due to the scale and nature of suspected crimes. Raids, indictments, and convictions occurred after years of state‑level warnings. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Major Minnesota Daycare Fraud Investigation Federal authorities (FBI, DOJ, DHS, and local law enforcement) executed over 20 search warrants at daycare centers in Minneapolis. The investigation centers on childcare providers allegedly billing the state for services not provided. A focal point is the Quality Learning Center, mocked as the “Quality Leering Center” due to a misspelling on its sign. The operation is uncovering multi‑billion‑dollar social services fraud, described as only the “tip of the iceberg.” 2. Alleged Targeting of Somali-American-Owned Businesses Many of the raided childcare centers are described as Somali-American owned. Fraud was systemic and involved false enrollments, inflated capacity billing, and nonexistent children. Critics previously characterized the investigations as discriminatory; the narrative claims recent developments validate the fraud concerns. 3. Political Accountability and Reversal Minnesota officials, including Governor Tim Walz, are having previously dismissed fraud claims but now publicly supporting enforcement actions. This is a political about-face, accusing state leadership of ignoring fraud while in power. Republican lawmakers and Trump administration officials are credited with pushing investigations forward. 4. Broader Pattern of Government Program Fraud Specific attention is given to SNAP (food stamp) abuse, citing data suggesting recipients driving high-end luxury cars. Blue states resist transparency, while red states that share data expose abuse. 5. Trump Administration’s “War on Fraud” President Trump is launching an aggressive, nationwide strategy to combat waste, fraud, and abuse. Vice President J.D. Vance is described as leading a DOJ task force focused on enforcement. The message emphasizes renewed data sharing, audits, and prosecutions as a central policy goal. 6. Accusations Against Democratic Leaders Several Democratic figures (including Ilhan Omar, Tim Walz, and Keith Ellison) are accused of: Benefiting politically from fraudulent networks Covering up or downplaying financial misconduct 7. James Comey Indictment Coverage Former FBI Director James Comey is reported as being indicted a second time, related to a social media post interpreted as a threat toward President Trump. The phrase “86 47” is alleged to mean “eliminate the 47th president.” We revisit Comey’s role in the Russia investigation, suggesting renewed scrutiny into FBI and intelligence leadership actions starting in 2016. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. FBI Raids on Minnesota Daycares for Large-Scale Fraud Federal authorities conducted court-authorized FBI and DOJ raids on roughly 20–22 daycare and learning centers in Minneapolis, many allegedly tied to Somali‑American operators. The investigation centers on massive social services fraud, particularly misuse of childcare funding, with billing far exceeding licensed capacity or actual attendance. One high-profile target, the Quality Learning Center, gained attention due to a misspelled sign and an alleged $1.9 million in funding despite lack of children present. Authorities describe these cases as part of a much larger fraud ecosystem, potentially involving billions of dollars statewide. The raids follow viral investigative videos and prior scandals such as Feeding Our Future ($250M fraud) and fake autism services schemes. 2. Political and Government Response The Trump administration is pursuing an aggressive “war on fraud”, including freezing funds, ordering audits, and promoting data sharing across agencies. Minnesota officials, including Democratic Governor Tim Walz, are expressing regret for past oversight failures and later supporting coordinated fraud enforcement. 3. Broader Fraud Allegations Nationwide This goes beyond Minnesota, citing alleged welfare and SNAP fraud, including recipients owning luxury vehicles. There is a systemic fraud exists nationwide, not confined to one political party or state. 4. Indictment of Former FBI Director James Comey James Comey was indicted a second time, this time over a social media post (“86 47”) interpreted by prosecutors as a threat against President Trump (the 47th president). He is reportedly facing two felony counts related to threatening the president and interstate transmission of a threat. 5. Renewed Scrutiny of the Russia Investigation Comey’s legal troubles are a broader reopening of investigations into the origins of the 2016 Russia probe (Crossfire Hurricane). DOJ and FBI are now investigating whether Comey and other intelligence officials abused authority, mishandled evidence, or made false statements. Newly declassified materials are framed as reviving debate over whether the Russia investigation was improperly initiated. There is institutional accountability and recent actions are an overdue reckoning. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. King Charles III’s Visit to the U.S. King Charles addresses a joint session of Congress, becoming only the second British monarch to do so (after Queen Elizabeth II in 1991). The visit is symbolic of deep historical and constitutional ties between the U.S. and the U.K., especially as America approaches its 250th anniversary. Shared Anglo-American legal traditions (Magna Carta, English Bill of Rights, John Locke). The irony of honoring a British monarch given America’s revolutionary origins. King Charles is portrayed as: Surprisingly humorous and personable, using dry British wit. Well-received across party lines, including Democrats who previously opposed “monarchy symbolism.” President Trump is quoted praising the King’s speech and leveraging the visit to reinforce themes of heritage, liberty, and national identity. 2. FBI Raids on Alleged Somali Fraud Operations The FBI conducts 22 raids in Minnesota, reportedly targeting childcare centers accused of defrauding federal programs. Allegations include: Billing for childcare services not provided. Large-scale misuse of taxpayer funds. Claims that some funds were diverted abroad (including alleged terrorism links—presented as accusations, not proven facts). Specific political figures (e.g., Ilhan Omar, Governor Tim Walz) are accused by the speakers of: Ignoring, enabling, or benefiting politically from the alleged fraud. Ben and the Senator praise the Department of Justice and Trump administration for aggressive enforcement, framing it as overdue accountability. Welfare recipients owned luxury vehicles (Tesla, Porsche, Lamborghini, Ferrari, etc.). Exploited eligibility loopholes like Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility (BBCE). Weak identity and asset verification enabling fraud. The welfare system is: “Fraud by design,” incentivized to maximize dependency rather than enforce eligibility. Poorly monitored by Democratic-led states. The narrative argues for tighter controls, asset checks, and stricter enforcement. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Teachers’ Unions as Primary Villains Teachers’ unions (notably NEA and AFT) are spending over $1 billion on left‑wing political causes over the past decade. The money: Is diverted away from improving education Forces teachers into ideological conformity via union dues Funds political activism unrelated to education Schools are sites of systematic ideological indoctrination, not neutral education. 2. Education System and Indoctrination Narrative Democrats intentionally pursued a long‑term strategy to: Capture elementary through university education Shape political attitudes from childhood Students are taught: To be ashamed of America That political opponents are evil That violence is a legitimate political response Declining academic performance is attributed to this ideological focus. 3. Political Violence Justification Claims Cites polling 25% of Democrats believe political violence is justified. Uses this statistic to argue: The U.S. is entering a dangerous phase where violence replaces debate Trump assassination attempts are predictable consequences Violence is being encouraged implicitly by rhetoric, media, and political leaders. 4. Media and Cultural Figures Accused of Incitement Late‑night TV hosts (e.g., Jimmy Kimmel) and journalists are accused of: Dehumanizing Trump Joking about assassination Reinforcing radical narratives The concept of “stochastic terrorism” is referenced, but reversed: The speaker argues it is the left engaging in it, not Trump. 5. Use of Montage and Selective Quotes The transcript includes a montage of: Democratic politicians Media personalities Activists 6. Expansion Beyond Trump: Moral Collapse Narrative The commentary broadens into claims of a wider moral decay: Defense of “micro‑looting” Justification of corporate murders Acceptance of crime as resistance These trends are framed as ideological extensions of progressive thinking. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Teachers’ Unions as Political Power Brokers Major teachers’ unions (e.g., NEA, AFT) have contributed over $1 billion to left‑wing political causes over the past decade. This funding overwhelmingly supports Democratic candidates, progressive activism, and ideological causes unrelated to education. Education System as Ideological Indoctrination Unions have shifted from focusing on education (reading, writing, math) to political indoctrination of students. Declining academic performance is linked to this ideological focus rather than educational reform. Coerced Union Participation Teachers are forced to contribute union dues and face professional consequences if they dissent, framing this as coercive or unethical. Link Between Education, Ideology, and Political Violence Left‑leaning control of education has normalized hatred of conservatives, Christians, and Donald Trump. There is a direct causal line between: union political spending, ideological education, polling data suggesting some Democrats justify political violence, and alleged assassination attempts on Donald Trump. Normalization of Political Violence 25% of Democrats believe political violence can be justified. This reflects a broader cultural shift allegedly driven by education and political messaging. Democratic Strategy Framing Democrats deliberately pursued a “long game” by controlling education from elementary school through universities to shape future voters. Education institutions are culture‑shaping tools rather than neutral public services. Call to Parental Action This is a warning to parents for continued and increased involvement in school boards. This activism is a response to loss of trust, lack of accountability, and ideological overreach. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.