Tom Nelson

Tom interviews therapist and author Nicole Sachs about recovering from severe back pain diagnosed at 19 as degenerative spondylolisthesis. After learning surgery wouldn’t guarantee pain relief, she discovered Dr. John Sarno’s TMS model: chronic symptoms can stem from nervous-system dysregulation driven by repressed emotions and trauma. Sachs describes her work helping people worldwide, including Michael Porter Jr. and Steve Kerr, emphasizing three pillars: belief in brain science, doing “JournalSpeak” to make the unconscious conscious, and self-compassion. She explains symptoms as an “alarm,” not the “fire,” urges curiosity over fear, and directs listeners to resources at nicolesachs.com.00:00 Meet Nicole Sachs00:44 Back Pain Diagnosis Shock03:03 Surgery Doubts Spark Curiosity05:01 Discovering Sarno TMS07:15 Recovery Stories Proof09:47 Sarno Visit Trash Can15:17 Growing Reach Younger Fans20:39 Steve Kerr Turnaround23:35 Pain Despair Hope26:54 Mind Body Basics Explained34:50 Fire Alarm Analogy39:12 JournalSpeak Breakthrough46:33 How To Start Today47:19 Closing Curiosity Messagehttps://www.yourbreakawake.com/https://www.youtube.com/@thecureforchronicpain=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Ronan Connolly and Gerry Quinn discuss their new peer-reviewed Journal of Toxicology paper assessing safety concerns around modified mRNA COVID vaccines. They criticize shifting claims about vaccine efficacy, difficulties publishing dissenting views, and argue the technology differs from traditional vaccines because it delivers genetic instructions via lipid nanoparticles with broad body distribution. They discuss potential issues including dosing and duration of spike protein production, microvesicle transport, pseudouridine-related frame shifting and protein misfolding, manufacturing differences between trials and mass rollout, and possible DNA contamination. They also review clinical trial criticisms, seasonality findings, and argue observational claims of lives saved rely on models and confounding.00:00 Guests and COVID Paper Recap01:32 New mRNA Vaccine Focus03:22 New Toxicology Paper and Caveats08:50 Why Discussing Harms Was Taboo10:28 Old Vaccines vs Gene Tech15:27 Testing Gaps and Gene Therapy Roots23:42 Where It Goes and How Long It Lasts28:27 Manufacturing Differences and Contamination36:13 Nobel Prize and Pseudouridine41:15 How Modified Bases Can Misread42:13 Frameshift Proteins Found43:08 Codons Explained Simply44:57 Reductionism Meets Epigenetics47:30 Codon Optimization Changes Folding51:37 Why Spike Protein Matters56:14 Long COVID vs Long Vax58:40 Trial Efficacy Math01:02:02 Whistleblowers and Unblinding01:07:26 Seasonality and Lockdowns01:11:10 Lives Saved Model Critique01:15:26 Observational Study Confounding01:18:37 Adverse Events and Gatekeeping01:23:26 Final Takeaways and ResourcesRonan’s X: https://x.com/1RonanConnollyGerry’s X: https://x.com/jercuinn“Scientists uncover major safety concerns over mRNA vaccine technology”: https://www.ceres-science.com/post/scientists-uncover-major-safety-concerns-over-mrna-vaccine-technology=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Anika Sweetland describes becoming fearful of climate change after a school assignment, obsessively following catastrophic headlines, studying climate science, and suffering severe health issues she links to eco-anxiety. During lockdown and after observing net zero’s economic impacts in England, she began questioning claims, researching data on topics like sea levels, crop yields, and past cooling vs warming scares, and concluded she had been “brainwashed.” She discusses media ethics, impacts on children, and argues climate fears enable centralized control. Sweetland and host Tom discuss her new book, its humor, an upcoming Audible version, and support from physicist Will Happer, who wrote the foreword.00:00 Doomsday Headlines Hook00:57 Lockdown Rabbit Hole01:36 Questioning The Narrative01:56 Meet The Author04:11 All In Research Mindset05:01 Childhood Climate Fear07:25 Skeptic Turn In Zurich09:48 Checking Claims One By One13:44 Old Scares Same Script18:18 Eco Anxiety Health Crash21:50 Are People Waking Up24:10 Cargo Bikes Backlash25:02 Finding Real Climate Data25:53 Net Zero Meets Blackouts26:32 Nuclear For Data Centers28:50 Renewables Reality Check29:29 Wind Turbine True Costs30:35 Humor In The Book31:14 Party Of Doom Story33:01 Reaching True Believers33:30 Sea Level Claims Tested34:55 Climate Fear And Moving36:16 Mind Body Healing37:54 Handling Critics And Online38:51 Audiobook And Happer Forward40:46 Conference Protest Moment41:20 Final Book Plug Thankshttps://x.com/anika_climatehttps://aloadofbollocks.com/=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Geologist James Kamis argues El Niño and La Niña are generated by geological forces near a stationary Pacific Ring of Fire source, not primarily by trade-wind shifts. Citing cone-shaped warming/cooling patterns, helium concentrations as volcanic indicators, burst-like heat “blobs,” sharp temperature boundaries, centuries of recorded events, seafloor volcanoes, hydrothermal vents, trenches, and methane hydrate “ice rocks,” he proposes magma heat melts hydrates to create La Niña cooling and continued heating yields El Niño warming. He compares related phenomena (El Padre/La Madre), points to rapid North Atlantic warming linked to a spreading center, and says volcanic impacts may be underestimated in climate studies. He calls for more seafloor mapping and denser Argo buoy coverage.00:00 Meet the Geologist01:14 Geology Behind ENSO03:09 Why Wind Theory Fails05:16 Volcanic Evidence10:18 Ring of Fire Origins11:05 Ocean Floor Revealed12:20 Undersea Volcanoes14:20 Hydrothermal Heat Engine16:09 Faults and Quakes17:19 Methane Hydrates Model20:01 Source Area Deep Dive21:46 La Niña Mechanics23:33 Analog Events Worldwide27:29 Atlantic Heat Spike29:27 Climate Change Impacts33:25 Wrap Up and Q&AKamis’ website: https://www.plateclimatology.com/=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

David Burton argues recent warming (~1.25°C since 1870) is small and often overstated, while CO2 benefits crops and ecosystems by boosting growth and water efficiency, reducing famine risk alongside fossil-fuel-based nitrogen fertilizer. He says storm and sea-level data show little acceleration, citing linear long-term tide-gauge records like Honolulu and noting local land motion dominates. His paper discusses multiple CO2 “lifetimes”: turnover (3–5 years), bomb-spike radiocarbon (~20 years), and the climate-relevant adjustment time he estimates at ~55±10 years, with a long tail he deems currently unimportant. He criticizes IPCC “cumulative emissions/TCRE” and “carbon budget” concepts as unphysical, analyzes direct waste heat as negligible (~52–58 days), and promotes his sealevel.info tools and archived Climategate emails.00:00 Meet David Burton00:23 How Much Warming Really02:04 Ice Ages And Freezing Thresholds03:06 CO2 Greening And Crop Gains05:28 Famine History And Fertilizer07:48 Storms Tornadoes And Sea Level11:00 Paper Overview CO2 Lifetimes11:55 Turnover Bomb Spike Adjustment14:31 Cumulative Emissions Myth15:38 Heat Pulse Lifetime19:45 Suess Effect Carbon14 Confusion27:03 Why CO2 Rises Negative Feedbacks30:03 Linear Removal Rate And Limits34:14 Why Plant Uptake Stays Linear35:30 CO2 Boosts Crop Yields37:03 Airborne Fraction Myth39:16 Emissions Plateau Math42:14 Long Tail Lifespan Debate43:40 Cumulative Emissions Critique48:49 Carbon Budget Pushback50:50 How Long Heat Lasts55:10 Where to Find More56:39 Sea Level Tools vs NOAA01:01:05 Climategate Archive Access01:02:56 Ocean Chemistry and Carbonate01:08:08 Climate Industry FUD Wraphttps://co2coalition.org/teammember/david-burton/ClimateGate emails on Dave’s site: https://x.com/TomANelson/status/1916076156371058904Watts Up With That article on Dave’s site: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/01/21/new-website-gives-you-the-real-deal-on-sea-level-rise-and-rates/=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Chuck Weiss presents his background in atmospheric science, meteorology, aviation, and inventing the Windicator, then argues Oregon universities and public schools promote a politicized “climate crisis” despite Oregon’s small share of global emissions. He defines the greenhouse effect as a radiation-flux difference and claims water vapor and clouds dominate radiative processes while CO2 mainly cools the troposphere and has negligible warming influence, especially over oceans. He argues convection and the hydrologic cycle negate CO2 effects, climate models fail due to grid-resolution and energy-tracking limits, and key predictions (e.g., tropical mid-troposphere “hotspot”) conflict with balloon/satellite data. He attributes recent warming to declining albedo, alleges temperature-data manipulation, disputes extreme-weather and Arctic-ice claims, and criticizes green-energy policies as costly and ineffective.00:00 Meet Chuck Weiss00:25 Credentials and Forecasting Wins02:34 Aviation Career Highlights03:08 Why He Challenges CO2 Theory04:38 Oregon Climate Politics Critique07:39 Schools and Climate Indoctrination09:19 Defining the Greenhouse Effect12:00 Greenhouse Gases Spectrum Breakdown16:51 Why Greenhouse Gases Cool Air18:49 Water Vapor Drives Convection22:50 Clouds Cancel CO2 Warming24:53 Ocean Absorption Reality Check27:14 How Climate Models Work31:48 Model Predictions vs Observations36:04 Hotspot Failure in Mid Troposphere39:01 Temperature Data Adjustments42:00 Satellite Record Teaser42:17 Satellite Warming Pause43:41 Albedo Drives Warming44:37 Radiative Forcing Critique48:37 Hansen CO2 Claims50:13 Emissions vs CO2 Rise52:14 CO2 Cycle and E-Time55:59 Severe Weather Myth01:01:45 Trenberth Missing Heat01:03:03 Arctic Ice Reality Check01:04:58 Fake Crisis Wrap-Up01:06:56 Why Climate Models Fail01:09:29 AI and Turbulence Talk01:14:46 Flying in Heat and Cold01:17:41 Final Policy TakeawayChuck Wiese’s Critique of the 6th Oregon Climate assessment: https://edberry.com/critique-of-the-6th-oregon-climate-assessment/More at Ed Berry’s site here: https://edberry.com/?s=wiese=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Iain Davis discusses his book The Technocratic Dark State, arguing Silicon Valley oligarchs (e.g., Thiel, Musk, Andreessen, Altman, Ellison) steer policy toward a tokenized “everything” economy, including natural assets, carbon markets, and a vastly expanded paper valuation. He says climate narratives may be rebranded across political demographics to sell the same goal: technocratic digital control via programmable money, digital identity, AI-driven surveillance, and BIS-led cross-border “interoperable” payment standards. Davis warns censorship will shift from speech to “reach,” citing the UK Online Safety Act and arrests for online comments, and describes “everything apps,” biometrics-based payments, and geo-fenced spending as tools for automated compliance and fines. He contends surveillance is already pervasive through devices and apps, and says adoption is ultimately a public choice.00:00 Meet Iain Davis00:11 Silicon Valley and Trump03:10 Tokenizing Everything05:18 Carbon Markets and Nature08:39 Climate Narrative Rebrand10:51 Digital Control Pitch12:51 Free Speech and Shadowbans16:04 Online Safety and Censorship20:31 X as Everything App23:05 Crisis Pressure and Control28:04 Debt and Tokenized Assets32:03 Stablecoins and New Rails33:49 Programmable Money Interop35:51 BIS Controls Standards37:49 Bitcoin as Reserve Asset41:13 Programmable Money Fears42:12 AI Data Lake Control46:31 Robots and Adoption Incentives50:54 Mass Surveillance Reality56:05 Face Pay and Auto Fines58:45 Digital ID Skepticism01:02:07 Agentic State Explained01:06:15 Wrap Up and Choicehttps://iaindavis.com/https://www.ukcolumn.org/writer/iain-davishttps://x.com/_InThisTogether=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Paul Burgess presents his “Oceanic Index” model of climate change, arguing oceans regulate low cloud cover that acts as Earth’s thermostat, explaining satellite-era temperatures (1982–2025) with high accuracy and extending the approach back using proxies. He accepts anthropogenic CO2 and a direct ECS near 1–1.2°C per doubling, estimating about 0.6°C warming from CO2 since 1850, but rejects IPCC feedbacks and says a ~2.4% reduction in low clouds can account for additional warming, consistent with CERES radiation data where ocean changes lead cloud changes and then temperature. He discusses mechanisms from meteorology (marine inversion changes), historical periods (Little Ice Age, Roman/Medieval warmth) as largely natural, critiques temperature records and climate messaging, and briefly comments on Lindzen’s iris effect and energy policy debates.00:00 Cloud Thermostat Intro01:25 Oceanic Index Basics03:16 What I Accept04:45 Out of Sample Proof06:00 ECS Debate Explained07:32 Ocean Cloud Mechanism09:16 CERES Sunshade Evidence12:59 Small Cloud Drop Big Warming14:26 Back to 169516:34 Holocene Lessons17:40 Oceans Through Minima20:57 Warm Periods Without CO222:03 Mediterranean Cloud Check24:51 Extending Index to 1800s28:02 Connolly Adjustment Fit29:49 El Nino 1870s Peak30:55 El Niño Context31:22 ECS Assumptions31:52 Clouds Fill The Gap33:32 Feedback Claim Rebuttal34:57 Frozen Formula Validation36:02 CERES Versus IPCC38:04 Scorecard Evidence40:12 Cloud Mechanism Explained41:07 Kid Friendly Ocean Cycle44:21 Alarmism And Propaganda50:49 Iris Effect Question52:40 Net Zero Cost Reality55:27 Closing ThoughtsClimate Realism by Paul Burgess: https://www.youtube.com/@ClimateRealismMain paper: https://paulburgess3.substack.com/p/how-the-sun-via-the-oceans-controlsThe paper on comparing the  Mediterranean study: https://paulburgess3.substack.com/p/a-mediterranean-study-of-the-effectThe Paper On The  Holocene as far as LIA: https://paulburgess3.substack.com/p/holocene-to-the-little-ice-age-a=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Ed Hoskins presents slides comparing renewables (onshore/offshore wind, solar PV, plus biomass and hydro) with gas, coal/lignite, and nuclear on productivity, EROEI, CO2 embedded in construction, land use, materials, build time, service life, and costs adjusted for capacity factors. He cites European capacity factors since 2010 (offshore ~32%, onshore ~20s, solar ~11%), a combined renewables average near 15% and declining since 2020, and a 2023 wind lull leaving large multi-day deficits. He argues storage to cover such gaps is infeasible, renewables require backup and expanded grids, wear out faster, and become far costlier once productivity is included; nuclear is most energy-productive. He criticizes Germany’s nuclear shutdown and questions CO2-driven policy.00:00 Renewables Reality Check02:17 Capacity Factors Since 201005:33 Dispatchability And Grid Backup08:42 Wind Drought Case Study11:43 Storage Costs And Scale13:25 Energy Return On Investment16:19 Germany Nuclear Shutdown17:35 Embedded CO2 And Biomass21:38 Land Use And Grid Sprawl25:01 Build Times And Lifespans29:16 Cost Comparisons With Productivity41:00 2025 Installations And Conclusions46:48 CO2 Warming Diminishing Returns49:34 Q&A Grid Reliability And China56:06 Wrap Up And ResourcesAbout Ed: https://edmhdotme.wpcomstaging.com/https://edhoskins.substack.com/CO2 concentration Ed Hoskins 2014: https://edmhdotme.wpcomstaging.com/co2-concentration-ed-hoskins-2014/=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1

Dr. Randall Bock, a primary-care physician and author of Overturning Zika, argues that public-health research and media often fuel panic to secure funding, citing Peter Hotez’s warnings about dengue, chikungunya, Zika, and a “lights out” U.S. yellow fever scenario. Bock says U.S. sanitation and mosquito control limit these risks and that vaccines could be ramped up quickly. He contends the 2015–16 Brazil Zika–microcephaly crisis was driven by inconsistent microcephaly definitions, weak testing, and miscounting, noting Zika later persisted without microcephaly. He criticizes Zika human challenge trials and Fauci-era spending, discusses “science under siege” rhetoric, and briefly shares cautious views on childhood vaccination timing.00:00 Why Non-Scary Viruses01:29 Who Am I03:09 Hotez Warning Yellow Fever05:46 Climate Link Tomatoes Analogy07:37 Yellow Fever Reality Check08:35 COVID Vaccine Warp Speed11:25 Zika Forecasts Fell Flat16:11 Microcephaly Counting Mess20:42 Vaccines and Zika Trials26:37 Science Under Siege Critique30:15 Dark Money and mRNA Push32:56 Mann Lawsuit and Hygiene35:14 Hygiene and Dengue36:01 McNeil and Zika Panic39:53 Microcephaly Metrics42:08 Hotez and Fauci Reboots44:37 Soviet Science Rhetoric47:53 Yellow Fever Scares50:12 Ghost Babies Fallout59:22 Vaccines Parenting Choiceshttps://x.com/@DrRandallBockhttps://dailysceptic.org/2026/09/28/the-experts-are-still-trying-to-scare-us-with-non-scary-viruses/=========Slides, summaries, references, and transcripts of my podcasts: https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-summariesMy Linktree: https://linktr.ee/tomanelson1