The Mega Edition: Jay-Z And The Motion To Preserve Evidence (1/3/24)
03/01/2025
0:00
27:15
In the case 1:24-cv-07975-AT, Shawn Carter (Jay-Z) has filed a Memorandum of Law supporting his Emergency Motion for an Order to Show Cause, requesting the court take immediate action. The motion seeks two primary remedies: (1) an order to preserve evidence related to the case to ensure no tampering or destruction occurs, and (2) a motion to strike the plaintiff’s complaint and dismiss Carter from the lawsuit entirely under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Carter’s legal team argues that the allegations in the complaint are not only unfounded but also defamatory, and claim that the lawsuit appears to be a misuse of the legal process aimed at harming Carter’s reputation. They further emphasize the need for strict evidence preservation to maintain the integrity of the proceedings.
The memorandum also underscores procedural grounds for dismissing the case against Carter. His legal team argues that the complaint contains inflammatory and irrelevant material that should be struck from the record under Rule 12(f), which allows courts to remove redundant, immaterial, or scandalous allegations. Additionally, they contend that Carter is improperly named as a defendant and that the complaint lacks sufficient legal basis to implicate him in the action. This filing seeks to demonstrate that the claims against Carter are frivolous and warrant immediate dismissal, ensuring the focus of the proceedings remains on legally substantiated matters.
(commercial at 7:19)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Microsoft Word - Motion for Preservation Order (15471918_13).docx
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The memorandum also underscores procedural grounds for dismissing the case against Carter. His legal team argues that the complaint contains inflammatory and irrelevant material that should be struck from the record under Rule 12(f), which allows courts to remove redundant, immaterial, or scandalous allegations. Additionally, they contend that Carter is improperly named as a defendant and that the complaint lacks sufficient legal basis to implicate him in the action. This filing seeks to demonstrate that the claims against Carter are frivolous and warrant immediate dismissal, ensuring the focus of the proceedings remains on legally substantiated matters.
(commercial at 7:19)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Microsoft Word - Motion for Preservation Order (15471918_13).docx
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
D'autres épisodes de "The Epstein Chronicles"
Ne ratez aucun épisode de “The Epstein Chronicles” et abonnez-vous gratuitement à ce podcast dans l'application GetPodcast.