The Epstein Rewind: Jeffrey Epstein And The Infrastructure He Built Around Himself

On tonight's edition of the evening update, we head back over to France to get an update on the death of Jean Luc Brunel. As the questions continue to swirl it's important to try and find as much context as possible so that the picture can be viewed with clarity. (Commercial at 10:10)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.20minutes.fr/justice/3240743-20220223-affaire-epstein-suicide-jean-luc-brunel-fin-volet-francais-enqueteBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein was supposed to answer all of the questions that we, the public, might have had. Instead, it only opened the door to even more questions. In this episode, we take a look at some of the glaring holes in the OIG report and how it fails to ansewr several of the most pressing questions.(commercial at 11:50)to contact me:[email protected]:Justice Department report fails to substantiate the suicide narrative of Jeffrey Epstein’s death in federal custody - World Socialist Web Site (wsws.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 2:24-cv-12647 before Hon. Judith Levy, the defendant, Sean Combs, has filed a motion for sanctions against the plaintiff, alleging misconduct in the litigation process. The motion argues that the plaintiff has engaged in actions that are frivolous, abusive, or otherwise in bad faith, including making baseless allegations and improperly using the legal system to damage the defendant’s reputation. Combs' legal team asserts that such behavior has caused significant harm, including unnecessary legal expenses and damage to his professional and personal standing.The motion requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions to deter further misuse of the judicial process. Potential remedies sought include the dismissal of certain claims, reimbursement of legal fees incurred by the defendant, and other punitive measures deemed fit by the court. Combs' legal team emphasizes the importance of maintaining the integrity of the legal system and argues that allowing such alleged misconduct to continue unaddressed would set a dangerous precedent for future cases.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.mied.380235.70.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 2:24-cv-12647 before Hon. Judith Levy, the defendant, Sean Combs, has filed a motion for sanctions against the plaintiff, alleging misconduct in the litigation process. The motion argues that the plaintiff has engaged in actions that are frivolous, abusive, or otherwise in bad faith, including making baseless allegations and improperly using the legal system to damage the defendant’s reputation. Combs' legal team asserts that such behavior has caused significant harm, including unnecessary legal expenses and damage to his professional and personal standing.The motion requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions to deter further misuse of the judicial process. Potential remedies sought include the dismissal of certain claims, reimbursement of legal fees incurred by the defendant, and other punitive measures deemed fit by the court. Combs' legal team emphasizes the importance of maintaining the integrity of the legal system and argues that allowing such alleged misconduct to continue unaddressed would set a dangerous precedent for future cases.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.mied.380235.70.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On Monday, January 27, 2025, suspected Mexican cartel members engaged in a shootout with U.S. Border Patrol agents near Fronton, Texas. The confrontation occurred as a group of migrants attempted to cross the Rio Grande into the United States. The armed individuals fired upon the agents, who promptly returned fire. The Texas Department of Public Safety provided support during the incident. Footage captured by authorities shows the gunmen attempting to conceal themselves in nearby shrubbery. Fortunately, no injuries were reported among the agents, and the migrants were unsuccessful in their crossing attempt.This incident is part of a broader escalation in violence along the U.S.-Mexico border. In a related event, an American hiker was shot twice and robbed by a suspected cartel member near the San Diego-Mexico border in California's Jacumba Wilderness area. The hiker was part of a group that came under gunfire, resulting in his injuries and theft.to contact me:[email protected]:Gunfight erupts on the border as Mexican drug cartels smuggling migrants across open fire on US Border Patrol agents | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

D. Woods, a former member of the girl group Danity Kane, has recently spoken out about her experiences with the group's founder, Sean "Diddy" Combs. In an interview on "Good Morning America," Woods described the work environment under Combs as verbally abusive and predatory. She recounted instances where Combs would "pick and pry" at the group members, chipping away at their self-esteem before offering praise, creating a manipulative dynamic. Woods emphasized that Combs often treated her and her bandmates as mere sex objects, stating that he was "constantly treating you like a piece of meat" and that some environments were intimidating to be in alone.These revelations come as Combs faces federal charges of sex trafficking and racketeering, with his trial set to begin in May. Woods' decision to share her story aligns with the release of the Investigation Discovery docuseries "The Fall of Diddy," which delves into various allegations against Combs. In the documentary, Woods discusses her time with Danity Kane, highlighting the degrading comments and actions she endured. She also expressed concerns about potential retaliation if Combs is acquitted, acknowledging fears of retribution but emphasizing the importance of speaking out. Combs' legal team has denied all allegations, asserting that the accusations are fabricated and lack context. to contact me:[email protected] Kane's D. Woods breaks silence on Sean 'Diddy' CombsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the prosecution has filed an objection to the defendant's motion to unseal the Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) suppression briefing and related hearing. The prosecution argues that the sealed materials contain sensitive information critical to the integrity of ongoing investigations and the privacy of individuals not directly connected to the case. They assert that unsealing these documents could compromise law enforcement techniques, hinder active investigations, and violate the privacy rights of individuals whose genetic information may be involved.Additionally, the prosecution emphasizes the importance of maintaining confidentiality in cases involving advanced investigative methods like IGG, to protect the broader interests of justice and public safety. They contend that the defendant’s arguments for transparency do not outweigh the potential harm that could result from public access to these materials. The objection requests that the court preserve the sealed status of the briefing and hearing records to ensure that sensitive investigative methods and third-party information remain protected.to contact me:[email protected]:011325-Motion-Unseal-IGG-Suppression-Briefing-Hearing.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defendant has filed a motion to unseal the Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) suppression briefing and hearing. The defendant argues that the sealed materials are critical to ensuring transparency and accountability in the judicial process. They contend that access to these documents is necessary to evaluate the legality of the investigative methods used and to safeguard their constitutional rights, including the right to a fair trial. By unsealing the records, the defendant seeks to expose potential violations in the application of IGG and foster public confidence in the judicial system.The motion emphasizes the principle of open courts and asserts that sealing such records without compelling justification undermines public trust and accountability. The defendant’s legal team argues that the government has not demonstrated sufficient harm that would outweigh the public's right to access these records. They further state that unsealing the briefing and hearing is essential for legal oversight and to set a precedent for the responsible use of advanced investigative technologies in criminal cases.to contact me:[email protected]:011325-Motion-Unseal-IGG-Suppression-Briefing-Hearing.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Attorney Tony Buzbee has revealed that several of Sean "Diddy" Combs' celebrity friends have been quietly settling with victims to avoid being publicly named in the ongoing legal scandal. Buzbee, who represents over 120 accusers, noted that demand letters were sent to these individuals, giving them an opportunity to settle their involvement privately before formal lawsuits are filed. The settlements allegedly relate to their attendance and knowledge of illegal activities at Diddy's infamous parties, which have been the center of accusations involving sexual assault and coercion.Buzbee has emphasized that anyone who participated in or allowed these activities to occur without intervention could face legal consequences. He hinted that more lawsuits will be filed, with the potential to implicate additional high-profile figures in the entertainment industry. Buzbee's strategy includes meticulously vetting each claim and sending demand letters to ensure the legal process is thorough. This approach signals that the legal battle surrounding Diddy and his associates may expand, drawing further scrutiny to those who were complicit..Jonathan Oddi's allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs stem from a resurfaced 2018 interrogation video, where Oddi claimed to have been a "sex slave" for Diddy and singer Cassie Ventura. These claims, which include Oddi's allegations of drug use (such as "liquid cocaine") and sexually abusive behavior, have re-emerged amidst Diddy's ongoing legal troubles, although they were never substantiated, and no legal action was taken based on Oddi's accusations.Oddi, a former adult film star, made these claims following his arrest for a violent incident at the Trump National Doral Golf Club, where he engaged in a gunfight with police. While his accusations have been dismissed by many as delusional, they continue to draw attention, especially given Diddy's recent legal battles, which include other serious allegations involving sexual misconduct and abuse​.(commercial at 7:18)to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy's celebrity accomplices have quietly paid-off victims to avoid being named publicly, lawyer claims | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, originally designed to dismantle organized crime syndicates like the mafia, has evolved into a powerful legal tool used to prosecute a wide range of criminal enterprises, including those involving high-profile figures in the entertainment industry. RICO allows prosecutors to target entire criminal organizations, holding leaders accountable for the actions of their subordinates by linking various crimes—such as fraud, drug trafficking, and sexual misconduct—into a broader criminal enterprise. This statute has been instrumental in cases like those of R. Kelly and Keith Raniere, where both men were convicted for operating criminal networks that exploited vulnerable individuals under the guise of legitimate businesses or celebrity status.Sean Combs now faces RICO charges, as prosecutors allege that he operated a criminal enterprise involving sexual misconduct and other criminal activities, with enablers supporting and facilitating his actions. The RICO charges mark a significant escalation in Combs' legal battle, and the potential for superseding indictments could further expand the scope of the case. As seen in previous high-profile RICO cases, this approach enables prosecutors to systematically dismantle the criminal network around the defendant. The outcome of Combs' case could set a new precedent for how the legal system addresses powerful figures in the entertainment industry, reaffirming that no one is beyond the reach of the law, regardless of their wealth or influence.At Sean "Diddy" Combs' October 10, 2024 hearing, he appeared in Manhattan federal court before Judge Arun Subramanian. The session mainly involved setting deadlines for both the defense and prosecution to file their legal arguments in preparation for the upcoming trial, which is expected to take place in May of 2025.Diddy remains in custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. His defense continues to push for his release on bail, which has been denied multiple times due to concerns about witness tampering and flight risk. His legal team had previously offered a $50 million bail package, which included home detention and electronic monitoring, but it was rejected as the court considered him a potential danger to the community.During Sean "Diddy" Combs' October 10, 2024, hearing, his legal team addressed concerns about potential media leaks related to evidence in his case. His attorneys requested that the court impose a gag order to prevent further leaks from law enforcement, which they claim have already influenced public perception and could affect the fairness of the trial. Diddy's team alleges that government agents leaked sensitive material, including a 2016 surveillance video, to the media, compromising his right to a fair trial. The judge has asked the sides to draw up acceptable language for the order.The charges against Diddy include sex trafficking and racketeering, with allegations dating back to 2008. Prosecutors claim that he ran a criminal enterprise, coercing women with the help of his associates and using violence, blackmail, and other forms of intimidation to silence victims. The court appearance also allowed for both sides to discuss procedural aspects, such as evidence handling, and outline the next steps leading up to the high-profile trial. Diddy has pleaded not guilty to all charges(commercial at 14:00)to contact me:  [email protected]:May trial date set for Diddy to face sex trafficking charges | AP NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.